Democratic Objectivecracy: Do You Want Real Democracy?

Portada
Bernardo De Urquidi - 342 páginas

Do you trust the government? Do you feel represented by the politicians inside the government? Do you trust politicians? Do you vote for “the lesser of two evils”?


The truth is you do not live in a real democracy. Electoral Representative Democracy is not a truly democratic system, it is oppressive, it concentrates power in a few hands, it is inefficient, polarizing, easily corrupted and it tends to generate either stagnation or dictators.


What options do we have?


Stay on this oppressive, polarizing, and inefficient system until it breaks apart or a dictator or violent revolution terrorizes our society.

Implement a more oppressive and totalitarian system to maintain “order” and ramp up “efficiency”. 

Implement one of the truly democratic but inefficient systems that have already been developed and applied like direct democracy or sortition democracy.

Develop new, efficient, just, and real democratic systems and processes like the Democratic Objectivecracy.


What is our best option?

The Democratic Objectivecracy: a new social organization system that is truly democratic, participatory, efficient, hard to corrupt, that distributes power equally among all citizens, it incentivizes collaboration and cooperation to achieve societies common objectives, it protects citizens from oppression and abuses of power and it generates new opportunities and freedoms. The Democratic Objectivecracy maximizes organization and citizens' power while eliminating hierarchy and the concentration of power in a few hands.


Can we really change the system?

Of course! Systems have been changed before and they will continue to change. The real question is not whether or not the system will change but whether it will change peacefully or through violence and whether it will change to be more oppressive or a more just and free system.

Do you want real democracy?

 

Páginas seleccionadas

Contenido

Chapter 4
201
Why choose the objectives of society?
202
Electing the objectives
207
Chapter 5
208
What are the benefits society gets from averaging individuals objectives?
214
Why choose objectives?
220
Why allow the objectives of society to be periodically changed in elections?
222
Chapter 5
223

Personal party and special or powerful group interests
27
Political parties that determine the options among which the citizen can choose
29
Inefficiency
31
If the winning representative is part of a legislative minority they may not have the power to act or legislate in the interests of the people that elected t...
33
Ruling representatives and governed electorate
35
Chapter 3
48
Chapter 1
54
Chapter 2
55
Chapter 3
59
Chapter 4
62
Chapter 5
65
Chapter 6
67
Chapter 7
71
What is the relationship between the circumstances the political system the individual freedoms and the opportunities and possibilities every human b...
76
Chapter 8
83
Chapter 9
86
Chapter 10
89
Chapter 11
92
In a free society the people freely decide the circumstances opportunities possibilities and freedoms that they wish to obtain through the collaboration...
94
In a free society the people freely decide the freedoms options opportunities and possibilities that they had before joining the society and that they li...
95
In a free society the people freely decide the freedoms opportunities and possibilities that arise due to the formation of the society but the people the...
96
In a free society the people freely decide to restrict or eliminate the use of power that a human being has over other human beings in order to protect ...
97
In a free society the people freely decide to carry out certain actions so that in collaboration with the other members of the society they can generate t...
100
Chapter 12
103
Chapter 13
106
Chapter 1
110
The moral tradition and the indoctrination of subjects to obey authority
111
A religious character that was attributed to the kings reign
113
Constitutional monarchy
117
Parliamentary Monarchy
120
Electoral Monarchy
121
Chapter 2
123
The aristocracy of people with the best qualities
125
Chapter 3
128
Chapter 4
134
Chapter 5
139
Technocracy of businessmen
140
Technocratic scientists
142
Technocracy of Lawyers
143
Technocracy in general
144
Chapter 6
146
Chapter 7
153
True democracies
157
Direct Democracy
158
Direct Democracy by Simple Majority
159
Direct Democracy by Consensus
163
Conclusions on direct democracy
167
Sortition Democracy
168
Combination of Different Democratic Systems
176
Objections
178
Chapter 1
184
Chapter 2
186
The system must ensure that the participation of one individual is never oppressive to another individual or the society as a whole The system must e...
187
The new system must allow and celebrate individuality and differences within society but it should find a way to generate social cohesion and union
188
The new system must allow encourage remunerate and celebrate the participation of all citizens
189
The new system must protect individuals and society itself from oppression by powerful individuals and groups
190
The new system has to protect individuals from the system itself and from the possibilities and opportunities to abuse power that the system itself gen...
191
There has to be clear accountability in the new system
192
The new system must allow the undertaking of largescale and highimpact projects
193
The new system should be able to be applied in small communities and in large nations and it should allow democratic interaction among many socie...
194
Chapter 3
197
What does the Objectivecracy intend?
198
What are the societys objectives?
199
Types of Objectivecracy
200
New Social Structure
225
Chapter 6
228
Chapter 7
230
Administrators sign public or collective contracts on behalf of all citizens
237
Chapter 8
239
Collective Contracts
242
Implementation of specific actions and projects
243
Chapter 8
245
Audit of the Auditors
246
Citizen Complaint
247
Trials
248
Trials of a member of the Administrative Assembly for breach or default of a collective contract corruption or defrauding the society
249
Trials of a member of the Assembly of Auditors for breach or default of a collective contract corruption or fraud
250
Trials of a citizen tenderer private entities or members of assemblies for breach or breach of private contracts
251
Chapter 9
252
Minors
256
Chapter 10
258
Why empower citizens to veto the decisions of Assemblies?
259
Why have an assembly of Administrators?
260
Why are all actions done through tenders?
261
How does the division of powers work in this new society?
262
What does the Democratic Objectivecracy and the new social structure achieve?
263
Chapter 11
267
Selection by lottery among all citizens
270
Selection by lottery and social service
271
Percentages of citizens necessary to veto decisions or revoke tenders
276
Nonaveraging and polarizing objectives of society
279
Crisis and stations that need fast responses
281
Oppressive elected objectives or projects
284
Electoral transition and administration cycles
286
Why select the members of the Assemblies by lottery?
291
Chapter 12
294
Chapter 1
299
Freedom of Expression
301
Chapter 2
303
The sense of personal and social responsibility and practice in the use of the democratic system
304
Questioning the status quo
305
Debates
306
Argumentative logic
307
Transparency
308
Chapter 3
310
The citizen guards
312
The response force
314
Social Workers
315
Chapter 4
317
The masses are immoral vicious and cruel and therefore they will choose selfish antisocial unnatural and oppressive objectives
318
Human beings are ignorant and unprepared to be free and to govern themselves
319
The system is very complicated It will not work because it is very complicated
320
Chapter 5
321
Interaction and Debate
322
Take power away from the elected politicians and distribute it among all citizens
323
The Path to Democratic Objectivecracy
326
Neighbors
327
Social organizations activists and volunteers
328
In Families
329
In groups of friends
330
Referendums
331
Workers Unions
332
Members of the 1 and the 10
333
Protests
334
You
335
PD
336
Derechos de autor

Otras ediciones - Ver todas

Términos y frases comunes

Acerca del autor

Bernardo De Urquidi Gonzalez was born in 1989 in Monterrey Mexico. His parents were the head of a charismatic Catholic movement and raised him to become a priest. When Bernardo was a little boy he daydreamed of going to China to preach and to be martyred at the hands of the communist. He and his brothers slept on top of legos to feel pain and offer it as a sacrifice to god. When Bernardo was 14 years old he entered the seminary of the Legionaries of Christ, where he tried to be the best seminarian possible and strived to be a saint. After starting to question some of the proceedings of the Legion of Christ and the Church, Bernardo was prohibited from reading anything but the bible. He read the Bible from beginning to end and by doing so, lost his faith in god.


Losing his faith in God meant losing his reason to live and his view of what the world and life are. After this Bernardo battled between reentering society, trying to be what he considered a normal teenager should be, and his existential angst. He soon fell into a nihilistic state of mind which he battled with the study of philosophy combined with parties and as much action, adventure, and life as he could handle.


In his efforts to reintegrate into society and to become a normal person, Bernardo started studying engineering, but after two years he finally accepted that he was not going to feel contempt, realized or happy if he continued to decide what to do with his life based on his concept of what a normal person should be. Bernardo left engineering school and, with the idea of becoming an artist and filmmaker he went to Mexico City.


After struggling for a couple of years Bernardo managed to start an independent film production company and to direct and produce his first low budget feature film. The movie was presented in various independent film festivals in Mexico, LATAM, and the USA. To earn a living Bernardo worked in the advertisement industry while developing more projects and films. While doing so he was always reading and writing his own philosophical thoughts and trying to have a positive impact in the world. He worked with a couple of politicians until he realized they were utterly corrupt, and with a couple of NGOs until he realized that they were trying to alleviate the symptoms of the problems we face not the cause of the problems themselves.


After 9 years in the independent film industry, with 3 feature films, many shorts, advertisements, and a web series produced by him, Bernardo still felt something was missing in his life. He attributed this to a lack of financing for his projects, to the moderate success he was having, and to his nihilistic tendency.


In September 2017 Mexico suffered a tremendous earthquake, Bernardo enlisted as a volunteer chauffeur to drive doctors and architects around the small towns near Mexico City that had been hard hit by the earthquake. In one of these towns, they found a couple of houses made form dirt and sticks, not adobe, but regular dirt. The roof of one of these dirt houses was a plastic canvas of a political campaign. Inside this dirt house, you could look up and see the face of a politician and the word “HOPE” printed on the publicity canvas. This was the last straw for Bernardo and after a couple of months of reflection, he closed his production company and decided to dedicate his life to write and to be an activist for social justice, equality, freedom, and ecology.


For the next two years and a half, Bernardo investigated, read, though, analyzed wrote, and traveled. After this time he finished two books, one about politics and one about economics; which contain a critique of the current political and economic systems and a proposal of a new social organization system. Right now Bernardo is working on the Cooperative NGO: We Just Coop where he is developing projects to fight for social justice, freedom, democracy and the protection of the environment. 

Información bibliográfica