Peace Journalism

Portada
Hawthorn Press, 2005 - 265 páginas

Peace Journalism explains how most coverage of conflict unwittingly fuels further violence, proposing workable options to give peace a chance. Topical case studies--including the war in Iraq and the "war on terrorism"--are supported by theory, analysis, archive material, and photographs. The book attempts to contrast war journalism and peace journalism; show how the reporting of war, violence, and terror can be made more accurate and useful; and offer practical tools and exercises for analyzing and reporting the most important stories of our time.

Accessible and authoritative, Peace Journalism will prove valuable to those involved directly in journalism and all who wish to better understand the problems and solutions to better coverage of war and conflict.

Dentro del libro

Comentarios de la gente - Escribir un comentario

Crítica de los usuarios - Marcar como inadecuado

As preparation for my upcoming trip to Bradford to study Peace and Conflict Resolution, I picked up a book at the Langara Library called “Peace Journalism”. Exactly my two fields of interest: peace and media. Exactly what I hope to explore with my master’s degree - but I was skeptical before even opening the cover. Why? Although intriguing, the title caused me to immediately put my guard up.
“Journalism” in my mind, should be just that, journalism. Perhaps I’m a purist, but any modification or alteration of a process that I expect to be neutral, unadulterated, unbiased transmission of facts from source to reader, is suspicious to me. Not that I’m naïve enough to believe that news is ever truly objective, but I’m just not used to the bias being advertised! We all agree that “Peace” is desirable, the alternative being hatred, destruction and war, but it seems paradoxical to me to force it, or it’s ideals upon anyone. As soon as we start to use journalism to support any dogma, whether it’s for good, or bad, it becomes propaganda. No? Well, that’s what I thought BEFORE opening the cover to Jake Lynch and Annabel McGoldrick’s book.
I'm happy to report, however, that what is held within its covers is far from a call to turn journalism into left-wing, banner waving peace propaganda. Instead, Lynch and McGoldrick plot out a structure of journalism this is more real. They borrow their core concept from Professor Johan Galtung’s Peace Research to contrast what they call “Peace Journalism”, with the current dominant system of journalism which they call “War Journalism” (Galtung’s model is actually nicely laid out in table form on page 6 – if you read nothing else, read page 6!). But don’t let these titles throw you off. What they’re really getting at is developing guidelines for journalists that ensure that the whole story is reported. Currently, as is so blatantly obvious from reading between the lines of most major publications, a standard of vilification of ‘enemies’ and polarization of conflict has become status quo. If we were ever to turn off our critical minds while reading the paper, we’d believe that the outside world is full of non-human psychopaths! Everyone who isn’t an ally is developing evil nuclear programs aimed at global domination or destruction (ours, of course, are for good, so they’re ok!). Everyone who disagrees with western structures are bent on destroying them – for no good reason. Does this make sense? Of course not, but that’s often the way it’s written, or broadcast. There is ALWAYS a reason. Always several sides. Always history when it comes to conflict. The archenemy, the diabolical plan, and the nemesis are dramatic structures that work really well to tell riveting fairy tales, but should really be kept out of the news.
Lynch and McGoldrick make the excellent point that it’s the way a story is structured and presented that can cause the most damage. Even though we may not believe the negative spin a news story is given, it’s the connotations and the words that slowly seep into our consciousness, and before we know it, we’re all spreading the diseases of stereotyping, prejudice, and worst of all, apathy. The authors explain how there is a “Feedback Loop”, where the media is actually responsible for shaping public opinion and in turn effecting real world actions and reactions. Think about that for a minute. Let’s hope the papers are including ALL of the facts, and are resisting the temptation to sell us exciting fairy tales.
All things considered, this is a good book that you should send to all of your media friends!
 

Contenido

The Peace Journalism Model
1
Conflict Analysis Anchorage for Journalists
33
What do we mean by Peace?
47
Derechos de autor

Otras 15 secciones no mostradas

Otras ediciones - Ver todas

Términos y frases comunes

Acerca del autor (2005)

Jake Lynch and Annabel McGoldrick are experienced international news journalists. They lecture in Peace Journalism at four universities and have led Peace Journalism training workshops for editors and reporters in many countries. They run the Oxford think-tank Reporting the World.

Información bibliográfica