Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court And, at Law, in the Court of Errors and Appeals of the State of New Jersey, Volumen81Soney and Sage, 1912 |
Dentro del libro
Resultados 1-5 de 54
Página 18
... negligence of the defendant was shown ; second , that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory regligence , and third , that the damages were excessive . Before Justices GARRISON , SWAYZE and VOORHEES . For the rule , George Holmes and ...
... negligence of the defendant was shown ; second , that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory regligence , and third , that the damages were excessive . Before Justices GARRISON , SWAYZE and VOORHEES . For the rule , George Holmes and ...
Página 19
... negligent with reference to the work the plaintiff was set to do therein , viz . , to wipe a locomotive that was to be ... contributory negligence , with which the plaintiff's assumption of obvious risk is somewhat con- founded in the ...
... negligent with reference to the work the plaintiff was set to do therein , viz . , to wipe a locomotive that was to be ... contributory negligence , with which the plaintiff's assumption of obvious risk is somewhat con- founded in the ...
Página 20
... contributory negligence to a workman in a trench near to the trolley track because of his failure to look for an approaching car that struck him . " Although , " said Chief Justice Gummere , " he was bound to use reasonable care for his ...
... contributory negligence to a workman in a trench near to the trolley track because of his failure to look for an approaching car that struck him . " Although , " said Chief Justice Gummere , " he was bound to use reasonable care for his ...
Página 39
... contributory negligence , we think that that circumstance affects neither the interpretation of the company's rule nor its legal effect upon the agency of the con- Rogers v . Pennsylvania R. R. Co. 81 N. J. FEBRUARY TERM , 1911 . 39.
... contributory negligence , we think that that circumstance affects neither the interpretation of the company's rule nor its legal effect upon the agency of the con- Rogers v . Pennsylvania R. R. Co. 81 N. J. FEBRUARY TERM , 1911 . 39.
Página 40
... contributory negligence , if determined by the court as a judge , was not justified by legal rules , and if found by the court as a jury was not supported by any testimony . The sole circumstance upon which in either case such find- ing ...
... contributory negligence , if determined by the court as a judge , was not justified by legal rules , and if found by the court as a jury was not supported by any testimony . The sole circumstance upon which in either case such find- ing ...
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Términos y frases comunes
1911-Decided June 44 Vroom 52 Vroom action affirmed alleged amendment amount appears application assessment assigned Atlantic City BERGEN BOGERT bond cause Central Railroad certiorari charge CHIEF JUSTICE claim condition CONGDON construction contract contributory negligence council court was delivered crossing damages declaration defendant in error defendant's demurrer District Court duty election entitled Erie Railroad Co evidence fact feet fendant ground held injury Insurance Jersey City judgment jury land legislative legislature liability March 23 ment MINTURN mortgage Newark nonsuit notice objection opinion ordinance owner Pamph PARKER parties payment Pennsylvania Railroad person plaintiff in error plea present proof prosecutor Public Service Railway question railroad company Railway reason recover refused road statute street Supreme Court SWAYZE testimony thereof tion track TRENCHARD trial court trial judge verdict VOORHEES VREDENBURGH West Jersey writ of error