| New York (State) - 1935 - 1272 páginas
...negotiation of a negotiable document of title is not impaired by $°"°r '" the fact that the negotiation was a breach of duty on the part of the person making...or by the fact that the owner of the document was deprived of the possession of the same by loss, theft, fraud, accident, mistake, duress, or conversion,... | |
| Delaware - 1927 - 924 páginas
[ Lo sentimos, el contenido de esta página está restringido. ] | |
| Missouri - 1911 - 504 páginas
[ Lo sentimos, el contenido de esta página está restringido. ] | |
| Nebraska - 1909 - 824 páginas
[ Lo sentimos, el contenido de esta página está restringido. ] | |
| American Bar Association - 1906 - 474 páginas
...Duress.] The validity of the negotiation of a bill is not impaired by the fact that such negotiation was a breach of duty on the part of the person making...negotiation, or by the fact that the owner of the bill was induced by fraud, mistake or duress to entrust the possession or custody of the bill to such... | |
| American Bar Association - 1921 - 1066 páginas
...purchaser is not invalidated by breach of duty of the person entrusted with the document in question ; or by the fact that the owner of the document was...induced by fraud, mistake or duress, to entrust the document to the person from whom the innocent purchaser acquired it. On the other hand, in Sections... | |
| Hawaii - 1929 - 458 páginas
[ Lo sentimos, el contenido de esta página está restringido. ] | |
| 1913 - 632 páginas
...40. That the validity of the negotiation of a bill Is not Impaired by the fact that such negotiation was a breach of duty on the part of the person making...negotiation, or by the fact that the owner of the bill was aejirivfd of the possession of tho same by fraud, accident, mistake, duress or conversion,... | |
| Illinois - 1907 - 644 páginas
...47. The validity of the negotiation of a receipt is not impaired ' by the fact that such negotiation was a breach of duty on the part of the person 'making...negotiation, or by the fact that the owner of the receipt was induced by fraud, mistake or duress to entrust the possession or custody of the receipt... | |
| |