Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

space

Pages make certainly a better appearance, but the change in our jodicial system, the oreation of the Cirouit Courts, will demand more space for the future, on account of the additional matter to be pubhished.

The Cirouit Courts will oocupy the same position in our judicial system as the Supreme Courts of New York or the Appellate Courts of Illinois. Its decisions will be of much more importance, and it is to be hoped, value, than the decisions of the District Courts generally have been throughout the state. Reports of the more important of the decisions of these seven courts will be desirable, and will be of value to the Bar. Such reports it is our purpose to publish, and they will take the place of the reports of the District Court decisions heretofore published in the BULLETIN. It is to be presumed that these reports will require considerable additional space, and the form which we have chosen for the combination offers that within a reasonable number of pages. We hope that those subscribers of the JOURNAL, who are not pleased with the style chosen, will at least give us a trial. Vur earnest endeavors to give to the Bar of Ohio e most valuable publication, we think entitle us to that, and we feel satisfied that in time we will gain the approval of all.

All paid up subscriptions for either of the two publications are transferred to the combination, and subscribers to both papers, who should yet have a credit to their account for paid up subscription for both papers, will be credited with a corresponding amount on the subscription for the combination.

All advertisements and cards contracted for in either paper are transferred to the combination at the terms agreed upon.

The Corrections of Errors in the Ohio Reports will be continued all subscribers of the Law JOURNAL to its conclusion, in the same form and style as heretofore, but will be sent out in monthly parts of 16 pages each. The first monthly part of 16 pages for January accompanies the Index and Table of Cases of Vol. 6.

THE CAPITAL PRINTING & PUBLISHING CO. Columbus, O., January 9, 1885.

[ocr errors]

TABLE OF CASES— VOL. VI.

............................................

••••••••••••••••••••••••••............................

..........

•••••••••••.............................

..............................

..............

.....................................

(Cases marked, are reported in full.) Abbott v. Huston, Ohio.............................................................876, 220 Alcott y. Hugus, Pa........... ..................

304 Alford v. Wilson, U. 8. C. C., D. Conn........

303 Andrew v. Runyon, Cal............

247 Anthony v. Wood, N. Y..........

802 Armstrong v. Donough, Ohio.........

278 Arrowsmith v. Harmoning, Obio.........................

.222, 276, 868, Sup. 46 Artbur v. Tucker, Obio............

....... ......................... 276 Ashland Co. Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Cagner, Ohio.............................. 801 Aulger v. Clay, Ill................

228 Avery v. Wilson, U. 8. C. C., W. D. 8. C...........

292 Backus Oil & Car Grease Co. v. Backus Oil Co., Ohio...........

290 Baker v. Kinsey, Ohio...........

356 Baker Salvage Co. v. Schooner“ Kate Collins," U. 8. D. C., D. Del..... 228 B. 4 C. R. R. Co. v. Adams Exp. Co.,U. 8. C. C., E. D. Mo.

847 Baltimore City, etc., R. R. Co: v. Komp, Md....

83 B. &0. R. R. Co. v. Ulrich's Adm'r, Ohio........

870 Bangs v. Dunn, Adm'r, Ohio

819 Bank v. Singer, Obio............

869 Bank of Healdsburg v. Bailpace, Cal...

194 Banks & Bros, v. LeWitt, Obio...........

Sup. 78 Bank of Bucyrus v. Sherman, Adm'r, Ohio

276 Bantz v. Gates, Ex'r, Ohio........

............................... ......... 278 Barnes v. Dyer, Vt............

347 *Bartram v. McCracken, Obio ....

318 Bates v. People's Savings and Loan Ass'n, Obio ................ ............... 234 Bates v. Fismer, Ad's, Ohio...........

........................................ 801 Beardsley v. Wing, Guard., Ohio..... ................................. .................. 319 Becker v. Walworth, Ohio

856 Bedell v. Brown, Obio......

226 Belden v. Hann, Ia............

168 Bentley, Treas., v. Barton, Ohio

.......................... 856 Bernheim & Co. v. Porter, Cal........................................................

84 Besondy, in re Min..... Bierce v. Bierce, Ohio...

.207, Sup. 26 Bishop v. Union R. R. Co., Rb. I...............

872 Black v. Davis. Obio....

226 Blackwell's Ad'r, v. Bragg, Trustee, Va

804 Bland v. South, Pac. R. R. Co., Cal...........

280 Blandy's Ad'r, v. Benedict Hall & Co., Ohio.......................

.237, Sup. 106 Bliss v. Kaweah C. & I. Co., Cal.

111 Block v. Holzman, Ohio.........

868 Bolles v. Stockman, Obio..........

848 Bolton y. King, Pa ..........

17 Boswell v. City of Philadelphia; Pa............

28

.................................................................

..............................

.........

.........., 187

..............

........

Bowlby v. Thunder, Pa............
Boyle v. State, Wis..........
Brady v. Hebling & Kamler, Ohio......
Brandenburg v. Miles, Cal.........
Brayton v. Carr, Onio.....
Bremmer v. Green Bay, S. P. & N. R’y Co., Wis
Brenner v. Dooley, Obio..........
Bridenbaugh v. Cottrill, Ohio.........
Bridenbaugh v. King, Ohio..........
Brill v. singer M'f'g Co., Obio.......
Brodberger v. Miller, Treas'r, Ohio......
Brokaw v. Dally, Ohio
Bronson v. Village of Oberlin, Ohio.....
Brookover v. Helm, Ohio...........
Brown v. Henry, Pa.........
Brown v. R. R., Min ........
Bronson v. Village of Oberlin, Ohio.....
Brown v. Washtenaw, Treas., Mich.
Brown, Treas., v. Noble, Ohio.......
Brownell v. Colbath Steam Heating Co., Ohio..........
Brumbach v. Chapman, Ohio.........
Buchner v. Chic. M. & N. R'y. Co., Wis..
Buckbolder's Appeal, Pa.........
Bugb v. Sturgeon, Ohio......
Burbank v. Dodd, Oreg......
Burgner v. Humphreys, Ohio.........
Callahan v. B’k. of Kentucky, Ky
Campbell v. Johnson, Ohio.......
Campbell Printing Press & M'f'g Co. v. Overend, Ohio.
Carey v. Chic., M. & St. P. R. R. Co., Wis
Carpenter, Assignee, v. Dick & Meyer, Ohio.............
Carson v. Wood, Vict. (Austr).....
Carver, v. Seiberling, Ohio.........
Carr v. Brand & Co., Ohio........
Carr v. Rothman, Ohio..........
Casselman v. Winship, Dakota..
Ch., B. & Q. R. R. Co., v. Painter, Neb......
Cin. Str. R. R. Co., v. Fulbright, Ohio......
Citizens' Nat'l. B’k. v. Brown, Ohio.....
Civil Rights Cases, U. S. C. C..
Cochran & Fulton v. Anderson Co. Nat'l B’k, Ky.
Cochran v. Walker's Ex’rs, Ky..
Collins' Appeal, Pa ..........
Collins v, City of Portsmouth, O.....
Collins v, Collins, Ct. App., Engl........
Col. & Tol. R. R. Co. v. Steinfield, 0.......
Cou'l Bank of Union (ity v. Steel, O
coml Exchango B'k v. McLood, Ia
Com'i Nat'l B'k Henninger, Pa....
rom’rs Huddin Co. v. Seny, (......

170 371 319 319 259 292 331 354 314

371 .259, 275

301 263 226 200

28 204 227 222 368 355 125 167 358

28 .299, 371

263 317 278

304 ..261, Sup*. 57

372 299

316 .343, Sup*. 169

196 196 359 331 201 264 264 280 299

68 353 370

43 195 354 ............. 187

Com'ns Wood Co. v. Stato, ex rel Holtz, O........................................

...... 870 Commonwealth*v. Arnold, Ky

..................................... 279 Commonwealth v. Coolidge, Mass.....

389 Commonwealth v. Iron Co., Pa.................................................

847 Commonwealth v. McBride, Pa..... ......

49 Conith ex rel. v. Phoonix Iron Co., Pa..

20 Connor v. Simpson, Pa Connor v. Stanley, Cal

26 Cont'l Fire Ins. Co. v. Hamilton, O...........

208 Cook v. Benson, Ia.........

240 Cook v. Lockwood, O..................................................................... 204 Cordon v. Tyler, Mich

884 Cosler v. Hardman, O

801 Covert v. Covert, O ........................................................................

..206, 224 Cow Run Lion Tank Co. v. Lohmer, O......

844 Cowley v. Pulsifer, Mass........

82 Cox v. Forrest, Md......

124 Cox v. O'Neil, Cal.........

84 Crebs v. Jones, V&.....

268 Crittenden v. Commonwealth, Ky.............

847 Cundy v. LoCocq, Eng...........

33 Currick v. Landman, U. 8. C. C., N. D., Ala

28 Currie v. Holmes, Lafferty & Co., O...........

859 Curl v. Chic., R. I. & P. R’y Co., la........

138 Davis v. Bauer, Ohio ............................................................?

.207, Sup. 109 Davis v. Berger, Mich.....

292 Davenport v. Magoon, Oreg

28 Day v. King, Ohio ..................................................................... 210 Day, Williams & Co. v. N. Y., Pa. & O. R. R. Co., Ohio ......845, Sup. 192 Dean v. City of Denver, Col........

279 Dearborn v. People's Loan Ass'n, Ohio.

224 Docker v. Britting, Ohio......

388 Delphos Paper Co. v. King, Ohio

228 Deming v. N. & W. R. R. Co., U. 8. C. C., E. D. Pa.........

28 Dickman v. Krousch, Treas., Ohio............

331 Dillenbach v. City of Xenia, Ohio........................................

.......... Sup. 56 Dodd v. Jones, Mass

122 Doe v. State, Ohio

206 Donahue v. Drexler, Ky

248 Dornebecker v. State, Ohio

206 Daughtry v. American Union Tel. Co., Ala...........

120 Dovett v. Hobard, N. J

212 Drake v. Stato, Ohio

206 Drake v. State, Ohio...............

843 Dreunen & Co. v. London Ass. Co., U. 8. C. C., Min....

248 Dunne v. Dunne, Cal

66 Durlee v. Garvey, 'Cal....... Durgin, jr., v. Brasbear, Obio...........

859 Early v. Rice, Ohio..........

206 Edwards v. Conn. Mat. Life Ins. Co:, U. 8. C. C., N. D. N. Y

27

......

Eichelberger v. Gross, Ohio..............

854 Elliott, Ad’r, v. Kuhn, Ohio...............

331 Ellis v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R. Co., N. Y.

180 Ely v. Topliti, Ohio.......

800 Emerick v. Longsocker, Ohio

224 Erte & Pac. Despatcb v. Cocil, Jr... Erstein v. Rothschild, U. 8. C. C., E. D. Mich

348 Eschbach v. Collins, Md.........

228 Este v. Wilsbire, Ohio.

331 Eversdon v. Mayhew, Cal

56 Ewing v. Binz, Ohio

319 Farmers' & Merchants' Nat. Bk. v. Wallace, Ohio.......

365 Fastbinder v. State, Ohio.......

..206, 316, Sup.* 172 Fochheimor v. Nat. Bk. of Norfolk, Va

16 Fechheimer v. Nat. Exchange Bk., Va..........

228 Ferrier v. Storer, Ia.

138 Fields v. Eichenlaub, Ohio...........

230 Fidelity Ing. Co. v. Trust & Safe Dep. Co., Pa.

248 First Nat. Bk. of Northumberland v. McMichael, Pa..........

302 First Nat. Bk. of Xenia v. Cornell, Obio.........

358 Flanders v. Blandy, Ad'r, Ohio...........

205 Flash v. Dillon, U. S. C. C., E. D. Tex

889 Flickingor v. Smith, Ohio

211 Folk, John, Ex parte, Ohio.....

.259, 364 Fontaine v. Dunlap, Ky

264 Fonts v. Pierce, Ia...... .......

346 Ft. Scott City v. Hickman, U. S. 8. C

297 Foster v. Berry & Co., Pa...............

303 Foster, County Att'y, v. State of Kansas, U. 8. 8. C........................... 294 Fowler v. Poyer, Ohio

370 Franc'v. Nirdlinger, Obio...........

........ ..281, Sup. 41 Frank'. Ingalls, Receiver, Ohio...........

207 Garretson, Blackmore & Co. v. Ballour, Sheriff, Ohio

868 Gaston v. McBane, Obio ....

319 German Evang. Prob. Church v. Cincinnati, Ohio...........

224 Gertz v. Filchburg Ry, Co., Mass...........

18 Gibbs & 8. M'Ig Co. v. Brucker, U. 8. 8. C...........................

248 Gilbert v. Carlton, Ad'r, Ohio

228 Gillespio v. Sawyer, Neb.

227 Glenn v. Gleason, Ia..........

187 Globę Woolen Co. v. Earhart, N. Y......

167 Glover v, Shepperd, Ohio.

292 Goodwin v. Com'rs Van Wert Co., Ohio..............

346 Goodyear Rubber Co. v. Day, U. 8..C. C., E, D. MO.......

348 Gould v. City of Topeka, Kan....

840 Gray v. Christian Society, Mass

140 Grifin v. Larned, nul..............

384 Grove v. Graham, Ohio..........

262 Grove v. Jenkins, Ohio.................................................................

263 Gurney v. Gurney, Ohio..........

859

« AnteriorContinuar »