Fair TradeU.S. Government Printing Office, 1958 - 679 páginas |
Dentro del libro
Resultados 1-5 de 100
Página 2
... Supreme Court in Schwegmann v. Culvert Distillers Corporation in 1951, in which the Court held that the Miller- Tydings Act did not exempt from these Federal laws the enforcement of State fair-trade laws with respect to nonsigners. The ...
... Supreme Court in Schwegmann v. Culvert Distillers Corporation in 1951, in which the Court held that the Miller- Tydings Act did not exempt from these Federal laws the enforcement of State fair-trade laws with respect to nonsigners. The ...
Página 2
... Supreme Court in Schwegmann v . Calvert Dis- tillers Corporation in 1951 , in which the Court held that the Miller- Tydings Act did not exempt from these Federal laws the enforcement of State fair - trade laws with respect to nonsigners ...
... Supreme Court in Schwegmann v . Calvert Dis- tillers Corporation in 1951 , in which the Court held that the Miller- Tydings Act did not exempt from these Federal laws the enforcement of State fair - trade laws with respect to nonsigners ...
Página 21
... supreme court of 14 States . Largely as a result of these court decisions , many companies have abandoned fair trade pricing . H. R. 10527 has the great advantage over the earlier FAIR TRADE 21.
... supreme court of 14 States . Largely as a result of these court decisions , many companies have abandoned fair trade pricing . H. R. 10527 has the great advantage over the earlier FAIR TRADE 21.
Página 32
... courts of the sixth circuit was the view taken that a system of contracts estab- lishing resale prices was in restraint of trade ; other Federal courts disagreed . In 1911 , however , the Supreme Court of the United States in Dr. Miles ...
... courts of the sixth circuit was the view taken that a system of contracts estab- lishing resale prices was in restraint of trade ; other Federal courts disagreed . In 1911 , however , the Supreme Court of the United States in Dr. Miles ...
Página 33
... Supreme Court declared the fair trade law of that State to be unconstitutional . In 1951 , the United States Supreme Court found a technical defect in the Miller - Tydings Act in respect of its operation in interstate commerce . But ...
... Supreme Court declared the fair trade law of that State to be unconstitutional . In 1951 , the United States Supreme Court found a technical defect in the Miller - Tydings Act in respect of its operation in interstate commerce . But ...
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Términos y frases comunes
advertising ALGER antitrust laws appliances AVERY brand Chairman committee commodity competitors Congress consumer cost customers cut prices dealers discount houses distribution distributors DOLLINGER drug druggists economic effective Electric enacted enforcement equitable servitudes established fact Fair Trade Act fair-trade laws fair-trade price Father MCEWEN Federal Trade Commission free and open going goodwill GWYNNE Harris bill HERMAN HUBBELL identified merchandise independent interest Justice KLAMON loss leader loss-leader selling MACK manufacturer market place McGuire Act MERMEY Miller-Tydings Act monopoly Moss non-fair-trade nonsigner clause open competition operation percent practices predatory price price competition price cutter price cutting price fixing price war profit proprietor protect question reason resale price maintenance retail Robinson-Patman Act Schwegmann sellers Sherman Act small business small retailer sold statement statute sumer Sunbeam Sunbeam products Supreme Court tion trade laws trademark WALLER wholesalers
Pasajes populares
Página 3 - Columbia, which in substance provides that willfully and knowingly advertising, offering for sale, or selling any commodity at less than the price or prices prescribed in such contracts or agreements whether the person so advertising, offering for sale, or selling is or is not a party to such a contract or agreement, is unfair competition and is actionable at the suit of any person damaged thereby.
Página 58 - ... whether the person so advertising, offering for sale or selling is or is not a party to such contract, is unfair competition and is actionable at the suit of any person damaged thereby, and may be enjoined by a court of competent jurisdiction.
Página 55 - ... when contracts or agreements of that description are lawful as applied to intrastate transactions, under any statute, law, or public policy now or hereafter in effect in any State, Territory, or the District of Columbia in which such resale is to be made, or to which the commodity is to be transported for such resale...
Página 324 - Unfair methods of competition in commerce, and unfair or deceptive acts or practices in commerce, are hereby declared unlawful. The Commission is hereby empowered and directed to prevent persons, partnerships, or corporations, except banks, common carriers subject to the Acts to regulate commerce, air carriers and foreign air carriers subject to the Civil Aeronautics Act of 1938...
Página 3 - Commission where applicable to common carriers engaged in wire or radio communication or radio transmission of energy ; in the Civil Aeronautics Board where applicable to air carriers and foreign air carriers subject to the Civil Aeronautics Act of 1938...
Página 323 - An Act to create a Federal Trade Commission, to define its powers and duties, and for other purposes...
Página 323 - That nothing herein contained shall render illegal, contracts or agreements prescribing minimum prices for the resale of a commodity which bears, or the label or container of which bears, the trade mark, brand, or name of the producer or distributor of such commodity and which is in free and open competition with commodities of the same general class produced or distributed by others, when contracts or agreements of that description are lawful as applied...
Página 406 - So far as the requirement of due process is concerned, and in the absence of other constitutional restriction, a state is free to adopt whatever economic policy may reasonably be deemed to promote public welfare, and to enforce that policy by legislation adapted to its purpose. The courts are without authority either to declare such policy, or, when it is declared by the legislature, to override it. If the laws passed are seen to have a reasonable relation to a proper legislative purpose, and are...
Página 260 - The power of Congress over interstate commerce is not confined to the regulation of commerce among the states. It extends to those activities intrastate which so affect interstate commerce or the exercise of the power of Congress over it as to make regulation of them appropriate means to the attainment of a legitimate end, the exercise of the granted power of Congress to regulate interstate commerce.
Página 434 - The essence of the statutory violation then consists not in the bare disposition of the commodity, but in a forbidden use of the trade-mark, brand or name in accomplishing such disposition. The primary aim of the law is to protect the property — namely, the good will — of the producer, which he still owns. The price restriction is adopted as an appropriate means to that perfectly legitimate end, and not as an end in itself.