WITH TABLES OF THE CASES REPORTED AND CASES
CITED AND AN INDEX.

BY AUGUSTUS N. MARTIN,

OFFICIAL REPORTER.

VOL. LXVI.,

CONTAINING CASES DECIDED AT THE MAY TERM, 1879,
NOT REPORTED IN VOL. LXV.

INDIANAPOLIS:

SENTINEL COMPANY, PRINTERS.
1880.

Entered according to the act of Congress, in the year 1880, by AUGUSTUS N. MARTIN,

In the office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington, D. C.

Tue May 5, 1880

PRINTED AND BOUND

BY THE

INDIANAPOLIS SENTINEL CO.

ELECTROTYPED AT THE

INDIANAPOLIS

ELECTROTYPE FOUNDRY.

KETCHUM & WANAMAKER.

TABLE OF THE CASES

REPORTED IN THIS VOLUME.

Alexander, Wentworth et al. v... 39 Colter, Case et al. v.........

Delano v. The State.. Dienhart, Welsh billig et al. v 604 Doherty v. Farnsley, Adm'r....... 183 Dollman, Pattison v..................601 422 Donnell et al., Anderson v......... 150 376 Duggins v. The State.................850

Hadley v. The State, ex rel. The City of Richmond................... 271 448

Hall v. Harlow et al.

...............

Manson et al. v. The State, ex rel.

Lee 78 Maranda et al, Reeder et al. v.....485 Marion and Monroe G. R. Co. v. Kessinger et al

...549

............... 968

Marion and Monroe G. R. Co. et al. v. McClure et al.. Mauck v. The State 365 Maxwell et al v. Morehart

474 V

.......

301

Harlow et al., Hall v................ ............. ................ .448 Harris v. Rice, Adm'r, ......... ............ - 267 Harris, Burns et al. v ..536 Harshman et al., Ayers v............ ................ 291 Hattabough, The State v.......... 223 Hetherington, Over v...... Hibben et al., Root et al. v 247 McCarthy v. McCarthy et al.....128 Higbee et ux. v. Moore...... .............. 263 McClelland et al, Boling, Adm'r, Hills et al., Lee et al. v. Hinds v. Overacker. Hood, Indianapolis, Peru and Chicago R. W. Co. v.. Hopkins, Cook v.................... .208 Howe Machine Co. v Reber .498 Humphrey et al., Mississippi Valley Ins. Co v Huntington, City of, v. The State, ex rel. Steele

.......

..................

547

580

600

600

...373

.468 243

McClure et al., Marion and Monroe
G. R. Co. et al. v.....
McCormick et al., Ulrich v
McLaughlin v. The State............ 193
Mercer, Egbert et al. v.
Merchants National Bank, Locke
et al. V......

305

......353

Moore, Higbee et ux. v
Mooresville and Waverly G. R.
Co., Neff v......
279
Morehart, Maxwell et al. v.. 301

52 Nave et al., Leary et al. v........ 220
Neff v. Mooresville and Waverly

.....

258

G. R. Co v

..279

.......

452

588
370

Kellum v. The State
Kennedy v. The State
Kessinger et al., Marion and Mon-
roe G. R. Co. v..................... 549
Kimmel et al. v. Commons et al... 35
Knowlton et al. v. Citizens Build-
ing, Loan and Savings Ass'n...602
Kosure et al., Armstrong Furni-
ture Co. v

Kramer et al. v. Warth

...........

545 Patterson v. The State.............. 185
.548 Pattison v. Dollman
Perkins, Fryberger v

19

Lambert, Wiles v.. ............494 Pontious et al., Garver v............ 191 Langdon, Convery, Adm'r, v 311 Porter, Choen v

Leonard et ux., Barnett v ....422 Raub et al., Spencer et al. v........603 Liming v. Nesbitt et al. 602 Reber, Howe Machine Co. v 498 Locke et al. v. Merchants Nation- Reed v The State, ex rel. Roberts. 70 al Bank 353 Reed, Schoonover v Lockwood, Salander v...............285 Reed et al. v. Tioga ManufacturLong et al. v Brown Louisville, New Albany and Chicago R. W. Co. v. Richardson... 43