casc of Carlon v. Ireland, ib. supposed inconsistency of, with that of Bellamy v. Ma- examination of this question, 498, 499 CHINA, THE CENSUS IN, 486 object of, ib. COMMON-LAW PROCEDURE ACT, 1854, EQUI- opinion of the Court of Queen's Bench upon, ib. not allowed in ejectment, ib. COMMON-LAW PROCEDURE UNDER THE NEW COMMON-LAW PROCEDURE ACT, 1854, WITH authority of the Lord Warden in certain civil proceedings COMMON-LAW PROCEDURE ACTS OF 1852 AND abolished, ib. 1854, WITH NOTES, &c. By W. F. Findon, Esq. COMMON-LAW PROCEDURE ACT, 1854. Order in CONCEALMENT OF BIRTH. Case of Reg. v. Perry as CORRESPONDENCE-(continued). to, 257 letter of" C. B." as to a point raised in the case of Rus- "A Court-house in Upper Canada," 143 letter of "W. J. A." as to special juries in criminal cases, 144 letter of "G. F." on the same subject, 154 letter of "W." as to the Limited Liability Act, 303 letter of "A Barrister" on the case of Walts v. Porter, 323 second letter on the same subject, 330 letter of "Hugo" as to the phrase "cestui que trustent," 359 letter of "A Solicitor" as to the necessity for a revision letter of" Observer" on the ship registry laws, 382 when this is established, holder must prove consideration, CORYTON, J., ESQ., HIS TREATISE ON THE LAW observations on the Expurgatory List of Statutes ordered note on the Personal Estates of Intestates Bill, 428 SPONDEAT SUPERIOR IN CASES WHERE principles established by, 425, 426 distinction between the two cases, ib. rule when act is illegal, ib. OF LETTERS-PATENT FOR INVENTIONS. COSTS IN BANKRUPTCY. General Order of May 19, schedule, 222-237 COUNTY COURT ACT, CAUSE OF ACTION WITHIN COUNTY COURTS COMMISSION. First report of, 179 original, ib. concurrent, ib. jurisdiction by consent, 181 friendly societies, ib. provident societies, ib. charitable trusts, ib. literary institutions, ib. Common-law Procedure Act, ib. how appointed and removeable, ib. judge may act in the commission of the peace, ib. holding courts, 140 clerk, ib. high 'bailiff, 204 treasurer, ib. recommendations as to jurisdiction, ib. Before the Vice-Chancellor Kindersley, 430 Equity Sittings after Michaelmas Term, 1855. Lords Justices, 466 Master of the Rolls, ib. Vice-Chancellor Kindersley, ib. Stuart, ib. Wood, ib. Common-law Sittings, Hilary Term, 1856. Court of Queen's Bench, 523 Common Pleas, ib. COWLING, MR. JOHN. Death of, 501 as to additional securities for the due exercise of the juris- CREDITOR AND SURETY, CONTRACT BETWEEN. diction, 273 as to judges, officers, and advocates, 274 as to procedure, 276 as to fees, 285 proposed table of fees, 288 as to metropolitan districts, 299 London Small Debts Court, ib. observations by Mr. J. P. Taylor, 300 COURT PAPERS: Equity Sittings, Hilary Term, 1855. Lords Justices, ib. Master of the Rolls, 7 Vice-Chancellor Kindersley, ib. Equity Sittings after Hilary Term, 1855. Before the Lord Chancellor, 41 Lords Justices, ib. Master of the Rolls, ib. Vice-Chancellor Kindersley, 42 Stuart, ib. Wood, ib. Common-law Sittings, Easter Term, 1855. Court of Queen's Bench, 135 Common Pleas, ib. Equity Sittings, Easter Term, 1855. Before the Lord Chancellor, 144 Lords Justices, ib. Master of the Rolls, ib. Equity Sittings, Trinity Term, 1855. Before the Lord Chancellor, 191 Lords Justices, ib. Master of the Rolls, ib. Vice-Chancellor Kindersley, ib. Wood, ib. On the suggestion that the former is bound to commu- dictum of Lord Truro in Owen v. Homan, ib. not acquiesced in by the House of Lords, ib. case of The North British Assurance Company v. Lloyd, ib. facts of the case, ib. principle established by, ib. result of the decisions, 358 CRIMINAL APPEAL, COURT OF. Synopsis of cases decided in, 257 concealment of birth, ib. case of Reg. v. Carlisle, ib. case of Reg. v. Harris, ib. false pretences, ib. case of Reg. v. Eagleton, ib. case of Reg. v. Archer, 258 stat. 11 Geo. 4 & 1 Will. 4, c. 66, s. 18, ib. case of Reg. v. Keith, ib. larceny, ib. case of Reg. v. Watts, ib. case of Reg. v. Featherstone, ib. case of Reg. v. Pratt, ib. case of Reg. v. West, ib. provisions of the 16 & 17 Vict. c. 96, s. 9, ib. case of Reg. v. Rundle, 258 maliciously cutting trees, ib. stat. 7 & 8 Geo. 4, c. 29, s. 38, ib. case of Reg. v. Whiteman, 259 remarks of the judges on this question, ib. DEPOSITS IN THE HANDS OF AN AUCTIONEER supposed opinion as to practice respecting, 3 how such deposits ought to be applied, 4 DORLING, J., ESQ., HIS TREATISE ON THE AD- MINISTRATION OF TRUST FUNDS UNDER effect of instrument executed before that day on dower of case of Reg. v. Harris, ib. case of Reg. v. Gibbs, ib. on the cases of declarations from which it is distinguish- EMMENS v. ELDERTON, DECISION IN THE able, ib. EQUITABLE DEFENCES IN ACTIONS AT LAW, &c. FREIGHT, PAYMENT OF, IN CASES WHERE THE CARGO WAS INCREASED IN BULK DURING THE VOYAGE. Case of Gibson v. Sturge as to, -(continued). rules of court, 329 writs of mandamus, ib. judgment in replevin, ib. how practice in these cases might be modified to suit the difficulty, ib. review of cases on this subject, ib. case of The Mines Royal Society v. Maynay, ib. injunction granted in, in equity, 330 case of Steele v. Haddock, ib. decision in, ib. case of Woodhouse v. Farebrother, ib. observations on, by the Court of Common Pleas, ib. case of Chilton v. Carrington, ib. case of Farebrother v. Welchman, ib. equitable defence not pleadable in ejectment, ib. EXECUTORS, LIABILITY OF, UNDER AN AGREE. MENT TO TAKE A LEASE. Review of cases as to, 499 case of Stephens v. Hotham, ib. case of Phillips v. Everard, ib. case of Worley v. Frampton, ib. observations on, ib. 116 interesting nature of the question, ib. decision in, ib. facts of the case, ib. power to revoke orders, ib. schedule of forms, ib. FRIVOLOUS AND FICTITIOUS DEFENCES TO meaning of the provisions of, ib. GAMING CONTRACTS, ALTERATION IN THE LAW AS TO, EFFECTED BY THE 8 & 9 VICT. c. 109. Observations on, 233 provisions of, ib. distinction between considerations illegal and those merely void, ib. it has been recognised in a recent case, ib. case of Knight v. Chambers, ib. facts of, ib. decision of the Court in, ib. result of, ib. the case of Knight v. Fitch is to the same effect, ib. case of Parsons v. Alexander, 234 decision in, ib. remarks upon, ib. case of Jessopp v. Lutwyche, 245 pleas in, ib. held bad, ib. transactions which may form the subject of an action, provided it be not between the parties to the wager, ib. cases illustrative of this, ib. provisions of the 5 & 6 Wil. 4, c. 41, s. 1, ib. remarks upon, ib. effect of, on right to sue on bills of exchange, ib. cases on this subject, 246 concluding remarks, ib. |