Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

action at common law; it is sufficient to say they were judge of the Prerogative Court of Canterbury, in having considered adequate by Sir W. P. Wood, V.C., who refused the appellant, Mrs. Bishop, to conduct a testamade a decree in his favour. That learned judge, in mentary suit in formâ pauperis. The husband, a solithe course of his very able judgment, expressed his his salary could only procure the necessaries of life: the

citor's clerk, was an uncertificated bankrupt, and from entire concurrence with the principles laid down by wife was entitled to an annuity under a will, but there Parke, B., in the Exchequer Chamber. After ad

was no prospect of its early payment. Under these verting to the mistaken analogy to marine and fire circumstances the judgment below was reversed, the assurance set up in Godsall v. Boldero with respect to Court distinguishing the case from others that were life policies, his Honor made the following observa- cited, on the ground that the husband was an uncer

tificated bankrupt. tions:-“The policy never refers to the cause or reason for effecting the assurance, the annual premiums being The payment of the deposit by an allottee of shares calculated by the company upon the value which they upon the day specified for payment in the letter of

allotment is a condition precedent to his right to sue think ought to be paid in order to make the postponed for non-delivery of the shares. (Lucas v. The Port Zenpayment, without reference to any other circumstance, nant Patent Fuel Company, Feb. 7, Exch., Nisi Prius, whether of one event or of another event: that is a per Pollock, C. B., after consulting the other judges of matter of entire indifference to the company—it is no the Exchequer). part of their contract; they have founded their calcu

Acts of cruelty on the part of a husband had been lation upon the probable duration of human life, and condoned; he afterwards maliciously deserted his wife : they get paid the full value of that calculation. On it was held by Sir John Dodson that the acts of cruelty what principle, then, can it afterwards be said, that

were not thereby revived, so as to afford a ground for because somebody else is good enough to satisfy the hart v. Hart, Arches Court, Feb. 7). The learned

separation à mensâ et thoro, upon the prayer of the wife. object which the party had in effecting the assurance, judge stated, that by the law of several of the United they should be released from the contract ?" And in States, malicious desertion in itself affords a ground for reference to stat. 14 Geo. 3, c. 48, he observed further, divorce, referring, as his authority, to Bishop on Marthat he could not fairly say that the contract was either riage and Divorce, which he described as a valuable

book. within the words or the spirit of the enactment: nothing like a fraud upon the statute had been attempted The Insolvent Court orders the release of insolvents by the plaintiff, whose conduct shewed perfect bona who have been committed by a county court judge fides throughout the transaction: and further, the con- solvent Court, but refuses to do so when the committal

while they are in possession of the protection of the Intract, and the contract alone, as between the parties, takes place after they have been discharged, under the must be looked to: it was not void in reference to 1 & 2 Vict. c. 110. (Re Woraker, Feb. 7, per Mr. public policy, nor ought the amount to be received to Commissioner Murphy). be cut down by the operation of the statute, by reason

In Underwood v. Wing, the Lord Chancellor, assisted of the event upon which the legacy became payable by two common-law judges, has held (Feb. 5) that happening some short time before the termination of where persons perish by a common calamity, there is the policy

no legal presumption of survivorship. Mr. and Mrs. Independently of the natural satisfaction felt at the Underwood were swept off together from the deck of

The Dalhousie by a large wave, and they were never defeat of what we cannot but consider a most unjust

seen again. The claimant's title was dependent upon attempt on the part of the “Indisputable” office to one having survived the other. The onus of proof repudiate their own deliberate contract and the express lying upon him, and there being nothing from which terms of their prospectus, the judgment of Sir W. P. the Court could infer survivorship, judgment was given Wood, V.C., will, we are convinced, meet with the against him. Upon this interesting question we refer unanimous approbation of the Profession, as a clear and his “ Principles of Evidence,” pp. 479-481, 2nd ed.,

our readers to the observations made by Mr. Best in distinct statement of the law as now settled, and giving where it will be seen that the views suggested by him the coup de grace, if such were needed, to that decision have been fully confirmed in the above case. of Godsall v. Boldero which has so long burthened our text-books, and cast a slur upon the commercial policy of England, as expounded by our judges. Further The following appointments have been made during comment upon the case would be unnecessary, as we the past week :- Thomas Mackenzie, her Majesty's have so recently discussed the subject in our remarks Solicitor-General for Scotland, to be one of the Lords upon Dalby v. The India and London Life Assurance of Session in Scotland, in the room of Patrick RobertCompany. We will merely add, that it is matter of con- of Van Diemen's Land; Sydney Smith Bell,

to be

son, deceased; Valentine Fleming, to be Chief Justice gratulation that both sides of Westminster Hall have Puisne Judge, and John Watts Ébden, second Puisne boldly construed the act of Geo. 3 in an enlarged and Judge of the Cape of Good Hope ; and Arthur Bigge, liberal spirit, and no longer rendered, necessary the to be a Police Magistrate and Justice of the Peace for interference of the Legislature for the purpose of the borough of Brighton. amending that statute, in accordance with the ordinary practice of assurance offices and the present demands The Right Hon. Sir John Jervis, Knt., Lord Chief of society.

Justice of her Majesty's Court of Common Pleas at

Westminster, has appointed the following Gentlemen NOTES OF THE WEEK.

to be Perpetual Commissioners for taking the acknowledgments of deeds to be executed by married women :

George Lockett Robinson, of Longton, Staffordshire, in A curious question came before the Judicial Com- and for the county of Stafford; John Houchen the mittee of the Privy Council in Bishop. v. Wildbore, younger, of Thetford, Norfolk, in and for the county of (Feb. 7); which was an appeal from the decision of the Norfolk

2

9

{ Petitions peal peticions. Bankruptcy,

23 Appeals.

{
26 } Appeals.

9

Saturday

24 Court Papers.

.
Monday.

26
Tuesday. 27 Third Seal.--Appeal Motions.

28
EQUITY SITTINGS, AFTER HILARY TERM, Thursday.. March 1 } Appeals.
1855.

Friday

es Petitions in Lunacy and Bankruptcy,

1 and Appeal Petitions. Court of Chancery.

Saturday

3

Monday..
Before the LORD CHANCELLOR, at Lincoln's Inn.

Appeals.
Tuesday..

6

7 Thursday. Feb. 8{ Fipseascal.--Appeal Motions and Ap. Wednesday,

8 Fourth Seal.- Appeal Motions. Friday 9 Petitions and Appeals.

Friday

s Petitions in Lunacy and Bankruptcy, Saturday 10

1 and Appeal Petitions. Monday. 12

Saturday

10 Tuesday. 13

Monday.

12 Wednesday 14 $ Appeals.

Tuesday. 13 Appeals. Thursday 15

Wednesday 14 Friday 16

Thursday .. 15 Saturday 17)

Friday

16

and Appeal Petitions Monday.... 19 { Secondeascal.-- Appeal Motions and Appeals.

Saturday 17 Appeals. Tuesday... 20)

Monday. 19 Fifth Seal.- Appeal Motions. Wednesday 21

Tuesday..

20 Thursday 22

Wednesday 21 Appeals. Friday

Thursday

22 Saturday 24

Friday ...

Petitions in Lunacy and Bankruptcy,

23 Monday 26

and Appeal Petitions.

24 Tuesday....

27 Third Seal.- Appeal Motions and Ap- Saturday
peals.

Monday
Wednesday
28

Tuesday. 27 Sixth Seal.- Appeal Motions.
Thursday.. March 1
Friday
2

Notice.-The days on which the Lords Justices shall be Saturday 3 > Appeals.

engaged at the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council are Monday. 5

excepted. Tuesday

6 Wednesday 7 Thursday

8

Fourth Seal.- Appeal Motions and
Appeals.

Before the Right Hon. the MASTER OF THE Rolls, at Friday

Chancery-lane. Saturday

10 Monday.. 12

Thursday. Feb. 8 First Seal. Tuesday.. 13

Friday

97 Wednesday 14 Appeals.

Saturday

10 Thursday 15

Monday.

12 Friday 16

Tuesday. 13 Pleas, Demurrers, Causes, Claims, Saturday 17

Wednesday 14 Further Directions, and Exceptions. Monday....

15
19
{ Fifth Seal.- Appeal Motions and Ap- Thursday
peals.

Friday

16 Tuesday.. 207

Saturday

17 Wednesday 21

Monday.

19 Second Seal. Thursday 22 Appeals.

Tuesday..

20 Friday 23

Wednesday 21 Pleas, Demurrers, Causes, Claims, Saturday 24

Thursday.

22 Further Directions, and Exceptions. Monday.. 26 Petitions and Appeals.

Friday

23

24 General Petition day.. peals.

Monday.... 26

Further Directions, and Exceptions. Notice.-Such days as his Lordship is engaged in hearing | Tuesday

27 Third Seal, Appeals in the House of Lords excepted.

Wednesday 28
Thursday.. March 1
Friday

Pleas, Demurrers, Causes, Claims,
Saturday

3 Before the LORDS JUSTICES, at Lincoln's Inn.

Further Directions, and Exceptions.

Monday. Thursday.

6
Feb. 8 First Seal.- Appeal Motions.

Tuesday.
Petitions in Lunacy and Bankruptcy,

Wednesday 7
Friday
and Appeal Petitions.

Thursday

8 Fourth Seal. Saturday 107

Friday:

9 Monday.. 12

Saturday.

10 Tuesday 13 Appeals.

Monday.. 12 Wednesday 14

Tuesday 13 Pleas, Demurrers, Causes, Claims, Thursday

14 15

Wednesday

Further Directions, and Exceptions.

15
Petitions in Lunacy and Bankruptcy, Thursday
Friday ...

16
and Appeal Petitions.

Friday

16 Saturday 17 Appeals.

Saturday

17 Monday.. 19 Second Seal.-Appeal Motions.

Monday

19 Fifth Seal. Tuesday. 20

Tuesday..

20 Wednesday 21 Appeals.

Wednesday

21

Pleas, Demurrers, Causes, Claims, Thursday 22

22 Thursday

Further Directions, and Exceptions. Friday ... and Appeal Petitions.

Saturday

24

{

{e

2

}
23 { Petitionspiel von dem and Bankruptcy, Saturde

23

[ocr errors]

{

Thursday .... Fel. 8 { "papers

{

{ Serapdr. Seal.—Motions and General Fridayday

{

Monday........ 26{ Please heredirers, Causes, Claims, Thursday

27

26{

Monday.. 26 General Petition-day.

Tuesday..... 20 Tuesday.

Pleas, Demurrers, Exceptions, Causes, 27 Sixth Seal.

Wednesday 21

Claims, and Further Directions. Thursday

22 N.B.--Short Causes, Short Claims, Consent Causes, Un

Friday

23 Petitions and General Paper. opposed Petitions, and Claims every Saturday. The Unopposed Petitions to be taken first.

Saturday

24

Short Causes and Claims, and General {

Paper. Notice.-Consent Petitions must be presented, and copies

Monday..... 26 left with the Secretary, on or before the Thursday preceding

Claims, and Further Directions. the Saturday on which it is intended they should be heard. Tuesday.. 27 Third Seal.-Motions and Causes.

Wednesday 28 Pleas, Demurrers, Exceptions, Causes,
Thursday .. March 1 ) Claims, and Further Directions.
Friday

2 Petitions and General Paper.
Before Vice-Chancellor Sir RICHARD T. KINDERSLEY, at
Lincoln's Inn.

Saturday

Short Causes and Claims, and General

Paper.
First Seal. — Motions and General Monday...

Pleas, Demurrers, Exceptions, Causes,
Tuesday.

6 Friday

Claims, and Further Directions.

Wednesday 9 Petitions (unopposed first).

7 Saturday 10 Short Causes, Short Claims, & Causes. Thursday

8 Fourth Seal.-Motions and Causes. Monday. 12

Friday.

9 Petitions and General Paper. Tuesday. 13 Pleas, Demurrers, Causes, Claims,

10 Saturday

Short Causes and Claims, and General Wednesday 14 Further Directions, and Exceptions.

Paper. Thursday 15

Monday.. 12) Friday 16 Petitions (unopposed first).

Tuesday.. 13 Pleas, Demurrers, Exceptions, Causes, Saturday 17 Short Causes, Short Claims, & Causes. Wednesday 14 Claims, and Further Directions.

15 Monday...... 19 Paper

16 Petitions and General Paper. Tuesday.... 20

Short Causes and Claims, and General Wednesday

17
Pleas, Demurrers, Causes, Claims, Saturday
21

Paper.
Thursday

Further Directions, and Exceptions. 22

Monday.

19 Fifth Seal.-Motions and Causes. Friday 23 Petitions (unopposed first).

Tuesday.

20

Pleas, Demurrers, Exceptions, Causes, Saturday 24 Short Causes, Short Claims, & Causes. Wednesday 21

Claims, and Further Directions.

22 Further Directions,

23 Petitions and General Paper. Third Seal. - Motions and General Tuesday

Saturday

Short Causes and Clainis, and General

24 Paper.

Paper. Wednesday 28 Pleas, Demurrers, Causes, Claims,

Pleas, Demurrers, Exceptions, Causes,

Monday... Thursday .. March 1 ) Further Directions, and Exceptions.

Claims, and Further Directions. Friday 2' Petitions (unopposed first).

Tuesday....... 27 Sixth Seal.--Motions. Saturday

3 Short Causes, Short Claims, & Causes. Monday..

5 Tuesday..

Pleas, Demurrers, Causes, Claims,

6 Wednesday

Before Vice-Chancellor Sir W. P. Wood, at Lincoln's Inn. 7

Further Directions, and Exceptions.
Fourth Seal.--Motions and General

First Seal. - Motions and General Thursday

Thursday Feb. 8
Paper.

Paper.
Friday
9 Petitions (unopposed first).

Friday

Pleas, Demurrers, Exceptions, Causes,

9 Saturday 10 Short Causes, Short Claims, & Causes.

Claims, and Further Directions. Monday, . 12

Saturday

....... 10 Petitions, Short Causes and Claims, Tuesday.. 13 Pleas, Demurrers, Causes, Claims,

and General Paper. Wednesday 14 Further Directions, and Exceptions. Monday.. 12 Thursday 15

Tuesday.

13

Pleas, Demurrers, Exceptions, Causes, Friday 16 Petitions (unopposed first).

Wednesday 14

Claims, and Further Directions. Saturday

17 Short Causes, Short Claims, & Causes. Thursday Monday.. 19 Fifth Seal.

16) - Motions and General Friday

Paper. Tuesday..

Saturday
20

Paper.
Wednesday
Pleas, Demurrers, Causes, Claims,

Second Seal.-Motions and General Thursday 22 ) Further Directions, and Exceptions. Monday.....

19

Paper. Friday 23 Petitions (unopposed first).

Tuesday..

20 Saturday 24 Short Causes, Short Claims, & Causes. Wednesday 21 Pleas, Demurrers, Exceptions, Causes,

22 Monday....

Claims, and Further Directions. 26 Further Directions, and Exceptions. Friday

23 Sixth Seal.--Motions and General Tuesday........ 27

Saturday

24 Petitions, Short Causes and Claims, 1 Paper.

and General Paper. N. B.-Petitions will be heard on Petition-days only. Monday........ 26

Pleas, Demurrers, Exceptions, Causes,

Claims, and Further Directions.

Third Seal. - Motions and General Tuesday.... 27

Paper. Before Vice-Chancellor Sir J. STUART, at Lincoln's Inn.

Wednesday

28

Pleas, Demurrers, Exceptions, Causes,

Thursday .. March 1 Thursday Feb. 8 First Seal.--Motions and Causes. Friday

2

Claims, and Further Directions. Friday

9 Petitions and General Paper.
Short Causes and Claims, and General

Saturday

and General Paper. Saturday Paper.

Monday..

Pleas, Demurrers, Exceptions, Causes, Monday. 12

Tuesday..

6 Tuesday 13 Pleas, Demurrers, Exceptions, Causes, Wednesday 7

Claims, and Further Directions. Wednesday 14 Claims, and Further Directions.

Fourth Seal.-Motions and General Thursday 15

Thursday

Paper. Friday 16 Petitions and General Paper.

Pleas, Demurrers, Exceptions, Causes, Saturday 17

1 Claims, and Further Directions. Paper.

Saturday ....... 10 Petitions, Short Causes and Claims, Monday........ 19 Second Seal.-Motions and Causes.

2 and General Paper.

[graphic]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

{

.........

{

102

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

Cookson :Bingham }(Cau.) Hannah v. Kilner Causes

Monday........ 19 { Fifadeseal. - Motions and General Jones v. Dickson (M for dec.)

23

24

26

Pennell o. Breley } Peperincones ticartine - S. Doros Confesser Shor?in. Petition–R. Re- stere Geneseo dohnson }(Pop. Melrejska o. Bulpin (M for de

Stephens o, Wanklin}(Caus.) Bentley . Taylor (CI)

Hodgson v. Smithson (M for Monday.... Claims, and Further Directions.

decree) Tuesday.. 13

Same v. Elliott Wednesday 14 Pleas, Demurrers, Exceptions, Causes, M‘Mullen o. Rea (M for dec.) | Leisinger v. Winter (M for de Thursday

15

Claims, and Further Directions. Att.-Gen. v. Harman (M for cree) Friday 16

decree)

Davis v. Earl of Dysart (M for
Petitions, Short Causes and Claims, Att.-Gen. Moor (Cause)
Saturday

decree)
17
and General Paper.

Turner o. Ramsey (Cause) Att.-Gen. v. Barrow (Further

consideration).

Hooper v. Barry (Further con- Art.-Gen. o. Maclean (FD, C) Tuesday 20

sideration)

Higham 0. Bolt (M for dec.) Wedaesday 21 Pleas, Demurrers, Exceptions, Causes, Hambly o. Michell (Further Higham v. Bott (M for dec.) Thursday 22 Claims, and Further Directions. consideration)

Alexander v. Simms (Further Friday

Stockley o. Pearson (Further consideration)
Saturday
Petitions, Short Causes and Claims, consideration)

Worthington o. Wiginton (E, and General Paper.

Allan v. Ruyssenaers (Cause) F D, C) Monday......

Pleas, Demurrers, Exceptions, Causes, Carew v. Yates (Cause) Antram v. Harvey (M for de

Claims, and Further Directions. Dania v. Hollows (Further cree) s Sixth Seal. - Motions and General consideration)

Bold 6. Hutchinson (Cause) Tuesday...... 27 Paper.

Johnson v. Cammell (M for Palmer v. Newell (Cause) decree)

Bell v. Hornby (Further conEdwards v. Bayley (M for de.

sideration) cree)

Paul v. Hare (Cause) EQUITY CAUSE LISTS, AFTER HILARY Watts v. Shrimpton (Cause)

Towne v. Towne (Cause) TERM, 1855.

Freeman o. Stone (Cause)

Portus v. Street (CI)
Collins o.

Collins (M for dec.) Soame v. Rogers (Cause) The following abbreviations have been adopted to St. Aubyn v. Humphreys (Fur- Scawin o. Jordan (M for dec.) abridge the space the Cause Papers would otherwise have occu.

ther consideration)

Collard v. Wiseman (Cause) pied: A. Abated-Adj. Adjourned-A. T. After Term - Ap. Orrett v. Corser (M for dec.) Appeal-C. D. Cause Day-Cl. Claim-C. Costs-D. De Gregory v. Faulkner (M for Pennell v. Pease Ptn) murrer-E. Exceptions--F. D. Further Directions—M. Mo

decree)

Hill o. Taine (Supr. claim). hearingS. O. Stand Over-Sh. Short.

Same v. Seddon

C) cree)

Minet v. Leman (M for decree) Higgins v. Pettman (M for Court of Chancery.

)

Same v. Salway
Before the LORD CHANCELLOR.

Att.-Gen. v. Corporation of Drax v. Burton (M for decree)
APPEAL.

Great Yarmouth (Cause)

Hatch o. Hatch (Special case) CAUSE. Woodgate r. Archer Burton

Griffin o. Clowes (Further con- Cragoe v. Mager (Further conWoodgate . Archer Burton Neale v. Farrer.

sideration)

sideration)
Coard v. Holderness (M for Rodney o. Rodney (4) (F D,
decree)

C)
Before the LORDS JUSTICES.

Cowling v. Bowstead (Further Douglas v. Douglas (3) (F D,
consideration)

C)
APPEALS.

Haigh v. Hepworth (Further Pepper v. Pepper (Cause)
Penney u. Goode
Walters v. Northern Coal. consideration)

Brace o. Pepper (M for decree) mining Co.

Lingard v. Lingard (M for Stewart v. Sturgis (SuppleDuncan v. Cannan Maynell v. Surtees (2)

decree)

mental cause) Smith v. Pawson (Part heard) Harrison v. Mayor of South- Tew v. Austen (CI)

Inglis v. Inglis (Further cons.) Maoning o. Purcell (2)

ampton

Rendlesham v. Norman (Fur. Hindle v. Taylor (Sp. case) Alexander v. Brame (2) Lancellat v. Ballachey

ther consideration)

Bent v. Buckley (E) Hope o. Hope

Raby v. Ridehalgh (5) Band v. Fardell (Further con. Berington v. Berington (Fur. Nicholson o. Whalley (3) (Ori. Carver v. Burgess

sideration)

ther consideration) Sh ginal causes)

Jenkinson v. Harcourt Bicknell v. Boulcott (Further | Bassett v. Hider (CI)
Thomas o. Cooper
Dormer v. Phillips

consideration)

Eyre v. Nicholson (CI)
Davison v. Mason
Myers v. United Guarantee Dorman o. Buckley (Cause)

Griffith o. Owens (M for dec.) Daniel o. Gosset

Life Assurance Co.
Daniel o. Gosset
Feb. 13

Bradbury v. Ward (M for dec.) Moore ». Perry (CI) Sh United Guarantee and Life Thomas v. Woodhouse (M for Hedley v. Williamson (Cause) Williams v. Hodgson

Assurance Co. v. Cleland decree)
Burrows v. Walls
Farley v. Woodman
Moore v. Brookes (F D, C)

Same v. Same
Schofield v. Schofield

CAUSE.
Miller 0. Chapman
Aveling v. Martin.

Before Vice-Chancellor Sir RICHARD T. KINDERSLEY.
CAUSES, &c.

Birley v. Owen (CI)
Before the Right Hon. the MASTER OF THE Rolls.

Angell v. Angell (D)

Clements o. Pulman (Cause) Causes, &c. Hollingsworth v. Woodhead Saunders v. Druce (Pl) Yeates v. Roberts (M for dec.) Davis o. Earl Dysart (E) (Cause)

Lord o. Colvin (Cause) Colvin 0. Lord (Cause) Edmonds o. Millett (M for Pullen v. Fairthorne (M for Bush v. Peterson (Cause, part Maybery v. Brooking (Reb.) decree, part heard) decree)

heard)

Upton v. Forster (Cause) Wilson v. Harley (Cause, part | Rogers 0. Rogers (Cause) Fisher v. Baldwin (Cause)

o heard) Not until mentioned Caledonian Railway Co. v. Gossip v. Wright (Cause) Blunt o. De Mallets (Cause) ; Woodrow (Cause)

Darvell v. Roper (M for dec.) Summers v. Summers (CI) Watson o. Cleaver (M for de- Arkell v. Henly (Cause) Wallace v. Blackwell (Cause) Other v. Iveson (M for decree) cree)

Henly v. Henly (Cause)
Brady o. Morgan (M for dec., Capell o. Hyatt (M for decree) Coombs v. Mansfield

Kearns o. part beard)

Houlding v. Cross (Sp. case) Robinson o. Anderson (Cause) Ptn)

Nixon v. Masterton (M for Gurney v. Gurney (CT) Harford o. Lloyd (Cause) Bensley v. Riches (M for dec.) decree)

Fawtrop o. Craven (Sp. case) Child o. Child (Cause) Brocklebank o. Johnson (M Lukey v. Higgs (CI)

vTwining (F D, Jefferies o. Michell (Cause) for decree)

[graphic]
[ocr errors]

Gough ö. Lewis }(Cause)

Att.-Gen. o; Vansittart (Cau.) Roeland v. Doyle } (Cause) Davids v. Hilabete den Coombs •. Hennifedh }(ca.)

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

}

Barton v. Dixon (7) (Subseq. Wood mo. Taylor }(F D, C)

Thornber v. Wilson (Cause). Lawley v. King (M for decree) Crawley v. Orchard (M for | Basham 0. Smith (Cause) Creed v. Corner (M for dec.) Adlington Chippendale decree)

Buxton v. Roberts (F D, C). Tomson v. Judge (Cause) (Further consideration) Pennell v. Hume (Cause) Lewarne v. Collins (Cause) Newman v. Stone (CI) Holmes v. Holmes (FD, C,

Before Vice-Chancellor Sir J. STUART. Moodie v. Bannister (Cause) Same v. Same

Ptn)

PLEAS, DEMURRERS, CAUSES, &c. Campbell v. Lord Stafford (M Taylor v. Johnson (M for dec.) Goode v. Hollier (Cause) S O Wheatley v. Bastow (2) (Cau.) for decree)

Wood v. Wood (CI)
Rogers v. Hooper (Cause) Marryatt v. Marryatt (M for Wiggins v. Peppin (4) (F'D,C) Orford v. Ardern (Further

Howard v. Lloyd (M for dec.) consideration)
Henderson v. Cook (Cause) decree)
Tennant o. Parker (Cause) Fletcher v. Moore (Supplem.

Vincent v. Godson (F D, C, Mullens o. Bush (M for dec.)
Pun)

Pound v. Vickers (Cause) Williamson v. Wootton (CI) Cause)

Franklin v. Franklin (Cause) Holt v. Bailey (Cause)
Wardle v. Marsden (M for de- Moseley v. Glen (M for decree)
Sealy v. Waugh | M for decree) Gay v. Tudor (Further cons.)

Fowler v. Holt (F D, C) cree)

Warde v. Leigh (2) (F D, C)

Clarke v. Cope (P D, C) Bean ú. Dawson (M for dec.) Chester v. Brown (Cause)

v. (CI) Clark v. Chappell (Further Ramball . Poole Rumball v. Peachy (FDC) | Shew v. Marsh (M for decree) | Gibson v. Fairlamb (Further consideration)

o. Miller (Cause Williams v. Hughes (Cause)

Morgan v. Lucking (CI) Ball v. Freeman (Cause)

consideration) Greene o. Norton (4) (FD, C) Weston v. Hobson (F D, C)

Perry v. Walker (E, 2 sets, F Hope v. Mayor, Aldermen,

D, C) Hudson v. Whimpole (Fur- Baynard v. Woolley (M for

and Citizens of Gloucester

Weston v. Tompson (Cause) (Cause) ther consideration)

decree)

Stockin v. Lane (Cause) Andrew 0. Andrew (4) (F D, Elder o. Maclean (3) (E, F D, Wearing v. Baynard (Cause)

C)

Brayshaw v. Preston (Cause)
C)
Jones v. Lodge (4) (F D, C)

Roberts v. Vercoe (Cause) Wilson v. Gill (Cause) , C)

Gage o. Gage (Further cons.) Anderson v. Norton (M for Same o. Lord

Plumbe o. Straford (M for de. decree) Mott v. Jollye (Cause) Carter v. Sanders (Further

cree)

Crosby v. Bell (F D, C) Kent v. Porter (Cause)

consideration) Greenwood o. Taylor (5) (E, Eckford o. Roome (F D, C)

Russell v. M'Culloch (2) (Ca.) M'Intoch v. Great Western

Corke v. Higgins (F D, C) Railway Co. (Cause)
FD, C)
Shelley v. Clarke (F D, C)

Evans v. Brown (Cause) Hudson v. Pickett (CI) Thompson 0. Jeves (Cause)

Turner v. Goodrich (M for Hitcbman o. Stewart (Fur.

Hatwill v. Rimell (Further Blackman v. Light (Further
decree)
consideration)

consideration)
Trail v. Stewart
Evans o. Kinsey (Cause)
Miller v. Pridden (Further Rittson v. Stordy (F D, C)

Savory v. Barber 1 (Subseqt. Bowles v. Field (Cause)

Lucas v. Hoffman (F D, C) consideration) Garner o. Moore (Cause)

Ramsbottom v. Brierly (Cau.) Smith v. Smee (M for decree) Whittingstall v. Field (Fur- Burton v. Sills (Further cons.) Clibron v. Craven (Further Boughen v. Farrer (Sp. case)

ther consideration) Ramsden v. Hirst (M for dec.) Wearing v. Baynard (Cause)

Crow o. Colombine (2) (F D, consideration)
C)

Jones v. Williams (M for dec.)
Harley v. Moon (Further con. Aspland v. Watte (Cause)
sideration)
Christ's Hospital v.

Paddon v. Richardson (Cause) Rawlins ». Druitt (M for dec.)

Granger Beaumont v. James (F D, C) Nicholas v. Nicholas (3) (FD, Monrov. Proctor (F D, C)

(F D, C)
Sh

C)
Rogers v. Dicks (M for dec.) Pattenden v. Hobson (Fur.
Sh
Pattenden v. Church | cons.)

Earl of Mansfield v. Ogle (6) Collier v. Nicholas (2) (F D, Lacon v. Allen (Cause)

(E, 2 sets)

C) Bloor v. Bloor (4) (Further Lewis v. Lewis (4) (E,FD, C) Tanner v. Barton (FD, C) Wild v. Booker (Further con- consideration) sideration)

Anderson v. Sandeman (2) (F Keedwell v. Cook (F D, C) Price v. Hamblett (2) (Cause) Berry v. Charnock (M for de- Vigurs v. Vigurs (3) (F D, C) Nicholls v. Hoblyn (E)

D, C)

Tucker o. Hernaman (Further

consideration) cree)

Earl of Haddington v. Crosse Dolman v. Curling (Cause)

Martindale v. Challis (CI) Thorne v. Button (M for dec.)

(F D, C) Ashcroft o. Powell (3) (Cause) Bunney v. Bunney (2) (M for

Wood v. Ordish (6) (F D, C, Lloyd v. Evans (M for decree) Patch o. Graves (M for dec.)

Ptn)

Slight o. Adey (2) (Cause) decree) Countess of Mornington v. Baker v. Taylor (M for decree) Spink v. Hutton (6) (F D, C, Hoyes v. Kindersley (2) (F D,

C)
Greenly (M for decree)

Seabrook v. Hadden (FDC) Foster v. Cautley (Further Dean v. Setchfield (Further
Judson 0. Judson (Further

consideration)

* consideration) Same v. Same

consideration) Welch v. Coles (F D, C) Perkins v. Lees (Cause)

Evans v. Nixon (M for decree) Kay v. Kay (M for decree) Sh Dickenson v. Peacock (Fur. Smeedley v. Potter

Rippon v. Baker (CI) Lonergan v. Scholefield (2) ther consideration)

Wyatt v. Fisher (3) (Further

(FDC) Shelton v. Potter

consideration)

Brown v. Oliver (M for dec.) Mayne o. Mayne (Cause) Mays o. Dean (F D, C) Dolman v. Nokes (Cause)

Jones v. Richards (M for dec.) Spencer o. Storr (Cause) Sh Remnant v. Lozell (Cause) Smith o. Banbury (F D, C, Halsey o. West (M for decree)

In re Kirby's Trust 1 (Further Weller v. Brown (M for dec.) Ptn)

Povey v. Gregory (5) (FD, C) Phillips v. Kirby s consid.) 'Massey v. Massey (Cause). Attorney-Gen. v. Drapers Co. Brumbridge v. Burton (M for (Cause)

decree) Gibson u. Homes (Cause)

Before Vice-Chancellor Sir W. P. Woon.
Hope v. Hope (Special case)
Sturcb v. Bolton
Pargeter v. Pargeter (Further

Causes, &c.

Lawrie v. Bankes (M for dec.) consideration)

Leyson o. Wood (E to answer) Watson 0. Freeman (M for Shelford v. Kane (Cause) Fryer v. Rogers (2) (Further Chaffers v. Day 1 (E to decree) Dresser o. Hoare (M for dec.) consideration)

Chaffers v. Dayanswer) Woodhouse v. Herrick (SpeWiles v. Gresham (Further Essex v. Essex (Cause)

cial case) consideration) Mortimer o. Fisher (Cause)

Same v. Same SO Wale v. Rackstraw (Cause) Morland v. Isaacs (Cause) Myers v. Perigal (2) (F D,'C) Pierce v. Beanland (M for de- Allport v. Stephens (Cause) Banks v. Braithwaite (F D, C) | Olney o. Bates (Further con. cree, part heard)

Cropper v. Babb (Cause) Att.-Gen. o. Baines (F D, C) sideration)

Attenborough v. Attenborough Chappell v. Atkinson (M for Barnes o. Carter (CI) Mayberry v. Miller (CI)

(CI)

decree) London and South-western Riley o. Dickinson (M for de- Sands v. Handley (CI). Bullock v. Bennett (Sp. case) Railway Co. v. Humphrey cree)

Mills v. Birch (M for decree) Horsfield o. Ashton (F D, C) (Cause)

Greatrex v. Duffield (3) (FD, Baker v. Armitage (M for de. Att.-Gen. 0. Queen ElizaAubert v. Aubert (Cause) C)

cree)

beth's College (Cause) Taylor v. Portington (M for Atherton v. Mather (CI) Scott ó. Bentley (M for decree) Lee u. Head (Special case) decree)

Huddlestone v. Saurey (M for Thompson v. Wedlake (Cause) Desborough v. Harris (Cause) Pogson 0, Burton (F D, C) decree)

Alderson o. Dalton (Cause) Phipps v. Kelson (CI)

Stephenssam:Popple }(Caus.)

}(Cause

)

Same v. sameton }(Cause)

[ocr errors]
« AnteriorContinuar »