Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

BEFORE THE THIRD DIVISION, SEPTEMBER 5, 1968

No. P68/382.-Ross Products, Inc. v. United States, protest 59/18385

(New York).

No. P68/383.-Ross Products, Inc. v. United States, protest 67/60546 (New York).

CUPS AND SAUCERS DECORATED CHINAWARE, OTHER THAN TABLEWARE-TRADE AGREEMENT.

LANDIS, J. In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of W. Kay Company, Inc. v. United States (53 Cust. Ct. 130, C.D. 2848), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

BEFORE THE SECOND DIVISION, SEPTEMBER 9, 1968

No. P68/384.-Beacon Cycle & Supply Co. v. United States, protest 59/6801 (Milwaukee).

No. P68/385.-Raleigh Industries of America, Inc. v. United States, protest 60/16376 (Cleveland).

BICYCLES-TRADE AGREEMENT.

RAO, C. J. In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of bicycles, with or without tires having wheels in diameter (measured to the outer circumference of the tire) over 25 inches, weighing less than 36 pounds complete without accessories, and not designed for use with tires having a cross-sectional diameter exceeding 15% inches and that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. Schmidt Pritchard & Co., Mangano Cycles Co. (47 CCPA 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

No. P68/386.-N. Erlanger Blumgart Co., Inc. v. United States, protest 64/6562 (New York).

No. P68/387.-N. Erlanger Blumgart & Co., Inc. v. United States, protests 65/18122, etc. (New York).

COTTON SUEDE CLOTH-WATERPROOF COTTON CLOTH-TRADE AGREEMENT.

RAO, C. J. In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of quality VV9 and 430 heavyweight cotton suede cloth weighing 11 ounces or over per square yard similar in all material respects to that the subject of N. Erlanger Blumgart & Co., Inc. v. United States (59 Cust. Ct. 121, C.D. 3092), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

No. P68/388.-Robert Bosch Corp. and P. W. Bellingall, Inc., et al.
v. United States, protests 60/28016, etc. (San Francisco).
SPARK PLUGS-PARTS OF AUTOMOBILES AND MOTORCYCLES-PARTS OF
INTERNAL-COMBUSTION ENGINES OF THE CARBURETOR TYPE-TRADE

AGREEMENT.

RAO, C. J. In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of spark plugs similar in all material respects to those the subject of Lodge Spark Plug Co. v. United States (49 Cust. Ct. 158, C.D. 2379), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

BEFORE THE FIRST DIVISION, SEPTEMBER 16, 1968

No. P68/389.-R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. v. United States, protests 64/458 and 64/18238 (New York).

FOLDING DOORS-MANUFACTURES OF WOOD-WOOD DOORS-TRADE AGREEMENT.

WATSON, J. In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of folding doors similar in all material respects to those the subject of Gitkin Co. v. United States (58 Cust. Ct. 383, C.D. 2997), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

BEFORE THE SECOND DIVISION, SEPTEMBER 16, 1968

No. P68/390.-Raleigh Industries of America, Inc. v. United States, protest 62/18595-13045 (Chicago.)

BICYCLES-TRADE AGREEMENT.

RAO, C. J. In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of bicycles with or without tires having wheels in diameter (measured to the outer circumference of the tire) over 25 inches, weighing less than 36 pounds complete without accessories, and not designed for use with tires having a cross-sectional diameter exceeding 15% inches and that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. Schmidt Pritchard & Co., Mangano Cycles Co. (47 CCPA 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

No. P68/391.-N. Erlanger Blumgart & Co., Inc. v. United States, protests 63/18428, etc. (New York).

COTTON SUEDE CLOTH-WATERPROOF COTTON CLOTH-TRADE AREEGMENT.

RAO, C. J. In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of quality VV9

and 430 heavyweight cotton suede cloth weighing 11 ounces or over per square yard similar in all material respects to that the subject of N. Erlanger Blumgart & Co., Inc. v. United States (59 Cust. Ct. 121, C.D. 3092), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

No. P68/392.-Dumont Handkerchiefs, Inc. v. United States, protests 67/68123 and 67/68143 (New York).

No. P68/393.-Handcraft, Inc. v. United States, protest 67/68133 (New York).

No. P68/394.-Dumont Handkerchiefs, Inc. v. United States, protest 67/74922 (New York).

SILK WEARING APPAREL SILK HANDKERCHIEFS, HEMMED-TRADE AGREEMENT.

FORD, J. In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of silk handkerchiefs similar in all material respects to those the subject of Ashear Bros., Inc. v. United States (55 Cust. Ct. 238, C.D. 2582), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

(NOTE: The following protests were decided by a special second division consisting of RAO, FORD, and RICHARDSON, Judges.) No. P68/395.-T.A.P. Equipment, dba Thrifty Equipment Co. et al. v. United States, protests 61/16393, etc. (Los Angeles).

PARTS OF DIESEL ENGINES-MACHINES-PARTS OF AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENTS TRADE AGREEMENT.

RICHARDSON, J. In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of parts of diesel engines which are parts of agricultural tractors similar in all material respects to those the subject of TAP Equipment Co., dba Thrifty Equipment Co. v. United States (58 Cust. Ct. 559, C.D. 3051), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

BEFORE THE SECOND DIVISION, SEPTEMBER 17, 1968

No. P68/396.-S. Hiller & Co. v. United States, protest 67/73311 (New York).

DISC TUMBLER PADLOCKS-PADLOCKS, NOT OF PIN TUMBLER OR CYLINDER CONSTRUCTION-TSUS.

FORD, J. In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of disc tumbler padlocks similar in all material respects to those the subject of Shriro Trading Corp. v. United States (56 Cust. Ct. 422, C.D. 2669), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

BEFORE THE THIRD DIVISION, SEPTEMBER 17, 1968

No. P68/397.-Haruta & Co., Inc. v. United States, protests 67/38736, etc. (New York).

CUPS AND SAUCERS DECORATED CHINAWARE, OTHER THAN TABLEWARE-TRADE AGREEMENT.

LANDIS, J. In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. The Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co. a/c United China & Glass Company (47 CCPA 1, C.A.D. 719), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

BEFORE THE SECOND DIVISON, SEPTEMBER 18, 1968

No. P68/398.-Brown Boveri Corp. and Gehrig, Hoban & Co., Inc. v. United States, protest 61/5965 (New York).

No. P68/399.-Brown Boveri Corp. and Rohner Gehrig & Co., Inc. v. United States, protests 63/3922, etc. (New York).

COMPRESSORS AND PARTS-ELECTRICAL ARTICLES-MACHINES, PARTS OF-TRADE AGREEMENT.

FORD, J. In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of compressors and parts thereof dedicated to use on compressors similar in all material respects to those the subject of Brown Boveri Corp. and Gehrig, Hoban & Co., Inc. v. United States (58 Cust. Ct. 131, C.D. 2905), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

BEFORE THE SECOND DIVISION, SEPTEMBER 23, 1968

No. P68/400.-Seedman International Corp. v. United States, protests 308403-K, etc. (New York).

No. P68/401.-G. Joannou Cycle Co., Inc., et al. v. United States, protests 61/8568, etc. (New York).

No. P68/402.-The Trico International Co., Inc. v. United States, protests 64/8460, etc. (New York).

INNER TUBES-BICYCLES AND PARTS-ARTICLES IN PART OF CARBONTRADE AGREEMENT.

RAO, C.J. In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of inner tubes similar in all material respects to those the subject of Seedman International Corp. et al. v. United States (60 Cust. Ct. 127, C.D. 3285), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

BEFORE THE SECOND DIVISION, SEPTEMBER 24, 1968

No. P68/403.-F. W. Woolworth Co. v. United States, protests 66/65797, etc. (New York).

PAPER SEWING BASKETS-ARTICLES OF TEXTILE MATERIALS-ARTICLES OF PAPER-TRADE AGREEMENT.

RAO, C.J. In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of Toyo paper sewing baskets similar in all material respects to those the subject of John Dritz & Sons, Inc. v. United States (59 Cust. Ct. 570, C.D. 3231), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

No. P68/404.-D. P. Harris Hdw. & Mfg. Co., Inc. v. United States, protest 66/9447 (New York).

ELECTRIC HORNS-ELECTRICAL SIGNALING DEVICES-TRADE AGREE

MENT.

FORD, J. In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of electric horns similar in all material respects to those the subject of S. Hiller & Co. et al. v. United States (59 Cust. Ct. 79, C.D. 3082), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

No. P68/405.-Pacific Wood Products Company v. United States, protests 64/25783 and 65/19544 (Los Angeles).

VINYL SEAT COVERS-SYNTHETIC TEXTILE MANUFACTURES OF LEATHER SIMILITUDE TRADE AGREEMENT.

FORD, J. In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of vinyl seat covers similar in all material respects to those the subject of Judson-Sheldon and Pacific Wood Products Co. v. United States (53 Cust. Ct. 255, Abstract 68744), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

BEFORE THE SECOND DIVISION, SEPTEMBER 25, 1968

No. P68/406.-Otto C. Ling & Son, Inc. v. United States, protests 58/17281, etc. (New York).

No. P68/407.-Otto C. Ling & Son, Inc. v. United States, protests 59/23056, etc. (New York).

No. P68/408.-R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. v. United States, protest 60/268 (New York).

No. P68/409.-Otto C. Ling & Son, Inc. v. United States, protests 60/3962, etc. (New York).

No. P68/410.-Raleigh Industries of America, Inc. v. United States. protest 61/5002 (Seattle).

« AnteriorContinuar »