RULES OF COURT. SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS.1 Ordered, that the common law rules of this court be amended as follows: The 32d rule is amended by striking out all after the word "docket" at the end of the fifth line. The 38th rule is amended so that it shall read as follows: Applications under Public Statutes, chapter 159, section 38, for admission to practice here, shall be referred to the state board of The 35th, 36th, and 37th rules are repealed. bar examiners, unless the court shall other wise order. Adopted January 7, 1898. For rules as originally adopted, see 5 N. E. iii., and 36 N. E. v. 50 N.E. (v)* 1115 Baum v. Thoms (Ind. Sup.). 357 Allen v. National Bank of America (Ill.). .1123 | Bay State Beneficiary Ass'n, Attorney Gen Allen, Clapp v. (Ind. App.). Allen, Huie v. (N. Y.). .1118 Allen, Yocum v. (Ohio). 909 Burgess, Redman v. (Ind. App.). Burgett v. Osborne (III.).. Burgett, Frain v. (Ind. Sup.). Burgraff, R. Brand Co. v. (Ohio). Burgunder, Jashenosky v. (Ohio). 825 City of Buffalo, Eckhardt v. (N. Y.). 206 City of Cambridge, Jurada v. (Mass.). 873 City of Chelsea, Fox v., two cases (Mass.).. .1127 City of Chicago, Banta v. (Ill.).. .1130 City of Chicago, Hibbard v. (Ill.). Burhyte, City of East Dubuque v. (Ill.)...1077 | City of Chicago, Holden v. (Ill.). Burroughs v. Tradesmen's Nat. Bank of City of New York (N. Y.).. ..1115 Burton v. Burton Stock-Car Co. (Mass.)...1029 Burton Stock-Car Co., Burton v. (Mass.). .1029 Bushnell. Sheldon v. (Ohio). Butler, Craig v. (N. Y.). .1128 1116 537 622 233 256 181 City of Chicago, Illinois Cent. R. Co. v. (Ill.) 1104 Butler, Drury v. (Mass.). Butt v. Worthington (Ohio). City of Chicago, Larson v. (Ill.). City of Chicago, Lingle v. (Ill.). .1133 City of Chicago, McChesney v. (Ill.). 962 City of Chicago, West Chicago St. R. Co. v. 527 (III.) .1127 City of Cincinnati v. Davis (Ohio). 179 192 191 185 918 Byrnes, Clapp v. (N. Y.). 277 Calumet Canal & Improvement Co., Mason v. (Ind. Sup.). City of Cincinnati v. Sterritt (Ohio)... .1128 .1126 .1128 85 Calumet Electric St. R. Co. v. Van Pelt (Ill.) 678 |