Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

no doubt, of the "caitiffs," who, pay its notes, if called upon. He in that town, carry on the farce of said, if the people begin to dis

[ocr errors]

'purity of election," and who trust the Bank, they will run for are constantly employed in endea- gold; and, if they do this, away vours to get at a share of the goes the bubble; away goes Bank

pickings out of the public granary.

But, hang the "rascals:" let us

and away go boroughmongers."

The distrust arose the next year;

leave them, and come to our sub-the run for gold took place; the jeet; namely, the proof, that your Bill has not been carried into

full effect the i

་་་

Bank could not pay; but, the bubble remained; the Bank and the boroughmongers did not go. Yet, was this opinion of Mr. PAINE falsified? Oh, no! For, who was

"

[ocr errors]

I may observe, that, if the Bill had gone into full effect, we must have waited to see the conse quences, before we pronounced have been found to propose, a

[ocr errors]

F

to expect, that a Ministry would

་་

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

the opinion to have been falsified; Parliament to sanction, and a for, what was clearly the meaning people to endure "Bank-restricof my words? Why, that it was tion?" Therefore, even if your impossible to carry the Bill into Bill had been carried into full full effect without producing effects effect, we must have looked to before we pro

[merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][ocr errors]

have said, it is impossible that
Mr. CARLILE's sister should, un-
der the name of a fine, be kept in measures, or, indeed of any acts,
gaol for life. And, if she were say that it is impossible to do or
would
kept,
any one ac-execute them, we mean, and the
so to be
cuse me of having given a false world understands us as meaning,
opinion? Mr. PAINE said, in that it is impossible to do or

[ocr errors]

1796, that the Bank could not execute them without producing

f

something so destructive as to dreadful mischiefs in the country, make it monstrously foolish or without producing confusion, and,

wicked to think of doing or executing them. I once, in writing to

a person, and upon this very sub

finally, a blowing up of the Government itself.

Now, this, as far as the Bill

ject too, observed, "When I say has gone, has been the effect of "that they cannot do it, you will it. This is notorious; and, there-"understand, of course, that I “mean, that they can do it; but

fore, I assert with truth clearly on

my side, that even if the Bill had

"that, they cannot do it without been carried into full effect, the

66

producing something very much prediction would not have been "like their own destruction." I say, avfalsified. But, it has s been carried

that you cannot swallow fire. 1 into full effect. It has not been

know

[ocr errors]

I you can swallow fire; but, my repealed expressly. No law has Mosavethat Peel's

[ocr errors]

meaning is that you cannot swal- been passed to say,

[ocr errors]

low fire without destroying your Bill should be repealed, or that of ageBill any part of it should be repealed;

self. In short, that which is mani

festly against right, against reaof thi Is

son, against the interest of the

parties who are to act, and evi

but laws have been passed to nul

[ocr errors]

lify your Bill; to render it of now

effect; to prevent its principal. object from being accomplished;

dently calculated to produce the Jo notify destruction of of themselves and and what is it to me whether tha

[ocr errors]

all belonging to them, we say Bill be repealed by name, or set

is impossible; though we know aside without being named ?

[ocr errors]

that the thing may be done; I observed once before, that the that it is within the power of the SMALL NOTE BILL passed in parties to do it. My meaning 1822; that the Small Note Bilf clearly was, that it was impos-passed last year: I observed once sible to carry the Bill into full before that this Bill was, in fact, effect without producing most a repeal of your Bill in part; and

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

that it would necessarily lessen the any further, let us have before us fall of prices, which I had ex- the full, true, and curious history. pected to take place immediately of this Bill.

after the first of May 1823. Be

2

fore the passing of the Small Note Bill, I always told my readers to look out sharp for the month of

May 1823, when the country rag

men would be compelled to pay

their eash in gold. The Small Note Bill made an alteration in

In the year 1775 (we go a great,

way back), an Act was passed to restrain the issuing of small promissory notes and bills of exchange. The preamble of this Bill says, "Whereas various notes, &c. "&c. have for some time past been

[ocr errors]

circulated in lieu of cash to the

the prospect. It procured a little" great prejudice of His Majesty's respite for the THING. I shall subjects." The Bill goes on show by-and-by how this Small then to inflict pecuniary penalties Note Bill works, how the rag fel- for the issuing of such small notes, lows put it forth as a sort of legal this Act is chap. 51, year 15, of tender Bill; I shall show how it Geo. 3. Two years afterwards; works as a respite; and, if I can 17 Geo. 3. chap. 30. another Act: find time, I will show that it can- was passed, recapitulating the not prevent the ultimate blowing enactments of the other Act, then up of the bubble; I shall show declaring, that "Whereas the said, that it only blunts the edge of your" Act hath been attended with very

scythe, and does not permit it to" salutary effects." The Bill then cut quite so fast as it would have cut; I shall show that it cannot

save the everlasting curse from destruction; I shall show that it

cannot prevent the jews and job

bers from having the estates of the

goes on to enact that no promissory note shall be issued for an amount under five pounds, and to make all such notes void, and then to inflict penalties for issuing such notes. In the year 1787; that is,

jolterheads: but, before we go in the twenty-seventh year of the

late "good old King," an Act] neficial to His Majesty's sub(chap. 16. of that year) was passed jects!

to make the two former Acts per- Now then, what was this done petual, because "the said Acts for? Why, because the Bank have been found to be useful had no gold to pay with. It was and beneficial." in the year 1797; the thirtyVery well, then; so far so good. seventh year of the "good old People were in the habit of issuing King," chap. 32, of that year. small notes, an Act was passed to It was absolutely necessary to set prevent this, in the fifteenth year these salutary, useful and beneof the "good old King." That ficial laws aside; because a law Act having been found to be "very was now passed to protect the salutary,” another Act was passed in the seventeenth year of the “good old King,” in order to push this salutary restraint somewhat out the other. In short, if these further. The Acts were passed for a limited time; but in the twenty-seventh year of the "good old King" they were made per petual, because they had been

[merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

Bank against the note-holders that came for gold and silver. It was useless to pass one Act with

salutary laws about small notes had not been suspended, there must have been an instant blow up; for there would have been no money at all to circulate...

This suspension or setting aside, having once taken place, it was necessarily continued... First it was passed for six weeks; then, for two or three months; then to the end of that session of Parlia

ment, then to the beginning of the

next session, and soon after that

salutary and so useful and be- it was suspended until six months

[ocr errors]

after the termination of the then however, have the Act itself. They war. Well, peace came in 1802; dropt all mention of the Act passed and then the suspension was con- in, the fifteenth year of the late tinued again for a year; and, in King's reign; and, indeed, it was short, they went on suspending not necessary to mention it; betill March 1805, when they passed cause, by prohibiting, the issue a Bill to suspend further until six of all notes under five pounds, onths after the termination of the the issuing of one pound notes then war. The then war having was necessarily included. Let us

ware

terminated in 1814, the suspen- have the Small Note Act, word

towe

sion was a was again continued until for word. It is a little thing but 1816. In this year, the fifty-sixth a thing of very great importance, year of the good old King, the and one that we shall have freAct was revived and continued quently to revert tools as again; but not now for any fixedSMALL NOTE ACTING period but UNTIL TWO" Whereas an Act was passed "YEARS AFTER THE EX-in, the, seventeenth year of the "PIRATION OF THE RE- reign of his late Majesty king STRICTION UPON PAY George the Third, for restrain"MENTS IN CASH BY THE "BANK OF ENGLAND," 10′ Now, 7, also; or, at least in the previous Act, a very material altera

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

ing, for a limited time, theɔnegociation of Promissory Notes and Inland Bills of Exchange for twenty shillings, or any şum 45

tion took place, if it be possible, of money above, that suir, and

really and truly to understand these Agts, piled on upon one another in the manner in which they are continuing,reciting, doubled up and doubled down, as they everlastingly are. Let us,

under five pounds. And where15 as the said Act was, by an Act passed in the twenty-seventh year of the reign of his said late Majesty, made perpetual; And whereas by an act passed in

4

« AnteriorContinuar »