LIST OF LEADING ARTICLES IN VOLUME 65. No. 1. Validity of Municipal Ordinances Vesting Discretion in Public Officers or Departments. By Eugene McQuillin, 2. No. 2. Discharge of Contracts by Alteration— A Discussion of Material and Immaterial Alterations. By Geo. A. Lee, 18. No. 3. The Power of Municipal Corporations to Make Special Assessments for Local Improvements. By Edson B. Valentine, 38. No. 4. Is a Person Liable to a Legal Action for not Saving Life, when he is Under no Apparent Obligation to Use Effort to this End. By Linton D. Landrum, 62. No. 5. Publicum Bonum Private Est Preferendum. I. By Franklin A. Beecher, 79. No. 6. Publicum Bonum Private Est Preferendum. II. By Franklin A. Beecher, 100. No. 7. Publicum Bonum Private Est Preferendum. III. By Franklin A. Beecher, 119. No. 8. Is the Licensing of Dramshop Keepers Unconstitutional. By D. C. Allen, 138. No. 9. Corporate Citizenship a Legal Fiction. By R. M. Benjamin, 157. No. 10. On the Implied Power to Exclude "Obscene" Ideas from the Mail. By Theodore Schroeder, 177. No. 11. Competitive Bidding in Letting Municipal Contracts for Street Paving when Patented or Monopolized Articles of Materials are Involved, as a Phase of the Case of the Will of the Law vs. the Will of the Judge. By Eugene McQuillin, 198. No. 12. Corporations and the Commerce Clause. By Smith W. Bennet, 217. No. 13. The Doctrine of Error of Judgment in the Law of Negligence. By O. H. Myrick, 238. No. 14. Liability of Estates of Deceased Cosureties to Contribute to a Surety who has been Compelled to Pay the Obligation. By John Hipp, 256. No. 15. Injunctions against Strikes, Boycotts and Similar Unlawful Acts. By F. C. Donnell, 273. No. 16. The Right of Recovery for Partial Performance of Entire Contracts. By Graham B. Smedley, 292. No. 17. The Segregation of Hawaiian Lepers by Administrative Process. By W. F. Meier, 314. No. 18. Statements by Attorneys in Arguments, Pleadings and Briefs l'ertaining to Rulings and Decisions, as Contempt of Court. By Sumner Kenner, 331. No. 19. Levy of Attachment Upon Rolling Stock of a Railroad Company Doing Interstate Business-is it a Regulation of, or an Infringement upon the Freedom of, Interstate Commerce. By W. F. Meier, 351. No. 20. Identity of Issues on Appeal from Justice's Court. By Charles Sumner Lobingier, 368. No. 21. The Application of Judicial Remedies in the Regulation of Railway Rates by Public Authority. By Fred K. Nielson, 385. No. 22. The Constitutionality of Employer's Liability Acts as Applied to Street Railways. By G. W. Payne, 410. No. 23. Courts of Equity-In Coses of Nuisances Committed by Riparian Owners. By F. Beecher, 430. No. 24. The Registration of Land Titles Under the Torrens System. By W. F. Meier, 449. No. 25. Statutory Regulation of Wages. By O. H. Myrick, 468. TABLE OF CASES. This list includes only those cases commented upon editorially or in our Notes of Import- Adams Express Co. v. Commonwealth of Ken- tucky (U. S. S. C.) C. O. D. Shipments of Intoxicating Liquors as Affecting Liability of Express Companies, ann. case, 202. Doyle v. Eschen (Cal.) Right of court to Take Dust Sprayer Mfg. Co. v. Western Fruit Grower case, 435. Equitable Building and Loan Assn. v. Bank of Commerce & Trust Co. (Tenn.) Abstracts of Title-Liability of Abstracter, ann. case, 370. Hargis v. Marcum (Ky.) Trial and Procedure Harter v. Curry (Tex.) Justices of the Peace- Effect of Appeal on Judgment of Justice Where Appeal is Subsequently Dismissed, ann. case, 142. Holbrook v. Holbrook (N. H.) Trusts-Distinc- tion between Capital and Income in Case of Dividends on Corporate Stocks, ann. case, Home Telephone Company v. Fields (Ala.) Tele- graphs and Telephones-Liability of Tele- phone Company for Injury Resulting from Leaving Loose or Uncut Wires on Streets House v. Cramer (Iowa) Highways-What Use Ingold v. Symond (Iowa) Trial and Procedure -The "Ambulatory Rule" Denied by Com- pelling a Party to Plead His Case as He Ex- Iowa-Minnesota Land Co. v. Conner (Iowa) Con- tract-Whether Damages Resulting from Breach of Contract to Erect Building are James v. Trustees of Wellston Tp. (Okla.) Lia- bility of Township for Defect in Highway, Jetton-Dekle Lumber Co. v. Mather (Fla.) Con- Johnston v. New York City'Railway Co. (N. Y.) Jones v. Carter (Tex.) Monopolies-Reservation Keeney v. McVoy (Mo.) Descent and Distribu- Lacoste v. City of New Orleans, (La.) Municipal McDonald v. State (Ark.) Criminal Law-Bur- Memphis Consolidated Gas & Electric Co. v. Simpson (Tenn.) Estoppel-Stipulations in Judicial Proceedings, ann. case, 183. Testify Concerning Transaction with De- ceased Party Under Federal Procedure, R. Murtagh v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. (Minn.) Adverse Possession-School Lands, R. D. Nichols, In re (Mo.) Superior Right of Father to Custody of Minor Child as Against the O'Dell v. Goff (Mich.) Wills-When Belief in Spiritualism May Affect Testatmentary Ca- Pennowfski v. Coerver (Mo.) Conclusion of Consideration of First Conserving Principle People v. Messer (Mich.) Criminal Trial-Right of Defendant to Refuse to Testify to be Carefully Guarded by Proper Instructions, Peterson v. State (Neb.) Criminal Law-Is a Violation of a City Ordinance a Criminal or Pierce v. State (Tenn.) Criminal Trial-Neces- sity of Presence of Accused at Every Stage of a Criminal Proceeding, R. D., 157. Prewitt v. Southwestern Telegraph & Telephone Co. (Tex.) Witnesses-Incompetency of Stenographer's Transcript of Previous Tes- timony as Ground for Impeachment, R. D. Raymond v. Chicago Union Traction Company State v. Libbey (Mo.) Trial and Procedure- Taylor v. Mathews (Fla.) Specific Performance Thompson v. Mills (Tex.) Error Presumed to be Thompson v. Supreme Tent of the Knights of Town of Dothan v. Hornsby (Ala.) -Whether Agent as Well as Corporation Must Take Out License to do Business, R. D. Tuite v. Tuite (N. J.) Partnership-No Consid- eration for Partnership Agreement Between Parent and Minor Child, R. D., 410. Vanderbilt v. Mitchell (N. J.) The Power of a Wefel v. Stillman (Ala.) Pleading and Practice -Improper Use of Motion to Strike Out in Wright v. City of Anniston (Ala.) Criminal 99. Young v. United States (Ind. Ter.) Criminal |