Statement of Profit and Loss on the transactions at the Puget's Sound Agricultural Company's Farm at Cowlitz, Oregon Territory, as shown by their books of Accounts, confirmed at meetings of the Shareholders. 1844, (Ledger settlement abroad Page 9.) PROFIT. May 31. Profit on the year 1843-44, £179 8 1 1845, Profit on the year 1844-45 797 7 7 1846, Profit on the year 1845-46 - 351 4 11 1850-51 129 16 Loss. 3 £850 3 6 594 19 6 1847, Profit on the year 1846-47 - year 1856, Loss on the year 1855-56 867 1 10 Statement of Profit and Loss on the transactions at the Puget's Sound Agricultural Company's Farm of Nisqually, Oregon Territory, as shown by their books of accounts, confirmed at the meeting of Shareholders. (Ledger settlement abroad Page 11.) May 31, 1844, Profit on the year 1843-44, 1845, 66 66 66 "1846, 66 "1844-45, "1845-46, p. 12, 1,300 8 2 "1846-47, 66 66 66 པ 35 " 1847-48, "1848-49, "1849-50, 66 1,944 1 8 1850-51, p. 24,- 2,021 18 9 66 "1853-54, "1854-55, "1855-56, p. 25, - 1,876 15 6 BRITISH AND AMERICAN JOINT COMMISSION, ON THE H. B. AND P. S. A. Co.'s CLAIMS. This and the foregoing five exhibits initiated by me are exhibits referred to in the deposition of William Armit, sworn before me this third day of September, 1866. SALEM C. HARRIS, Notary Public, 24 Royal Exchange, London. 57, COLEMAN STREET, LONDON, E. C., DEAR SIR: We have the pleasure to hand you enclosed the two papers which Mr. Roberts of the Hudson's Bay Company has made out since you left yesterday, and which we beg may accompany the more formal documents which were handed to you by the notary yesterday. We are, dear sir, yours faithfully, A. M. MAYNARD, SON & Co. Profit and Loss on Trade of the Columbia Department conducted from Fort Vancouver, Oregon, for ten years, ending with the year 1846. *District accounts for years 1836-'38, not forwarded to London. Profit at Trading Establishments within the Oregon Territory In the matter of the Commission for settling the claims of the Hudson's Bay Company and the Puget's Sound Agriclutural Company against the United States of America. I hereby certify that the within is the Profit and Loss account on trade of the Columbia Department, conducted from Fort Vancouver, Oregon, for ten years, ending with the year 1846, as made out from the books of the Hudson's Bay Company, in London, by Mr. Roberts, the accountant of the Company. JAMES DENTON, 57 Coleman Street, London, Solicitor. Profit and Loss of the Columbia Department, Outfit 1843. In the matter of the Commission for settling the claims of the Hudson's Bay Company and the Puget's Sound Agricultural Company against the United States of America. I certify that this is a copy of the account taken from the books of the Hudson's Bay Company, showing the Profit and Loss account for the year 1843 at the several posts of the Company in the Columbia Department. J. DENTON, Solicitor, 57 Coleman street, London. DR. PROFIT AND Loss, COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT, OUTFIT 1843. CR. BRITISH AND AMERICAN JOINT COMMISSION ON THE HUDSON'S BAY AND PUGET'S SOUND AGRICULTURAL COMPANIES' CLAIMS. In the matter of the Claim of the Hudson's Bay Company vs. the United States of America. 355 H street, WASHINGTON, March 5, 1857. It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the Hudson's Bay Company, claimant, and the United States, respondent, as follows: 1. The re-examination of Dugald MacTavish, Esq., shall be resumed and completed as to all matters of competent and lawful evidence, affecting the claim of said Company or the defence of the United States. 2. It is insisted by the United States that such re-examination is to be regarded as continuation of the cross-examination of said MacTavish by the United States; and in view thereof, the United States are to propound all such interrogatories as would be competent on cross-examination, either in substance or in form; and the testimony to be thus given shall, if otherwise competent, be received as lawful evidence, subject only to the determination of the Commissioners, at the final hearing, whether such testimony shall be regarded as cross-examination of the claimant's witness, or whether the witness shall be regarded pro hac vice as the witness of the United States. 3. It is insisted, on the part of the Hudson's Bay Company, that, at the present stage of the case, the United States have no right to resume the cross-examination of said MacTavish, and that, in the contemplated re-examination, he ought to be regarded as pro hac vice a witness produced by the United States; in which point of view the Hudson's Bay Company shall have the right to propound any inter |