Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB
[ocr errors]

ENTERED according to act of Congress, in the year 1888, by THOMAS SEAY as Governor of Alabama, for the use of said State,

In the office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington, D.C.

Rice, Aps, 10.88

کی

OFFICERS OF THE COURT

DURING THE TIME OF THESE DECISIONS.

GEORGE W. STONE, CHIEF JUSTICE, Montgomery.
HENDERSON M. SOMERVILLE, Associate JUSTICE, Tuskaloosa.
DAVID CLOPTON, ASSOCIATE JUSTICE, Montgomery.

THOS. N. MCCLELLAN, ATTORNEY-GENERAL, Athens.
JOHN W. A. SANFORD, CLERK, Montgomery.
JUNIUS M. RIGGS, MARSHAL, Montgomery.
PHARES COLEMAN, PRIVATE SECRETARY, Greensboro.

H

1

TABLE OF

OF CASES.

Abney, et al. v.DeLoach, Adm’r.393 Carter Bros. & Co. v. Coleman Agnew, Adm’r v. Walden & Son 502 et al

256 Aiken et al. v. Bridgeford & Co.295 Chandler et al. v. Bush. . 102 Ala. Gt. So. R.R. Co. v. Arnold.159 Chapman et al. v. Peebles.

283 Ala. Gt. So. R. R. Co. v. Mt. Chidester ats. Liddell... 508 Vernon Co...

.173 City Council of Montgomery v. Ala, Gt. So. R. R. Co. v. S. & L. & N. R. R. Co..

127 N. R. R. Co.,

..570 City Council of Montgomery v. Alexander v. Hooks et al

605
Townsend

.478 Alexander et al. v. Stee!e et al. 332 Coleman et al. ats. Carter Bros. Allen V. Allen

367
& Co.

256 Andrews ats. Powers et al 209 Coleman, Trustee, ats. May et Arnold ats. Ala, Gt. S. R. R. Co.159 al..

325 Askew v. Sanders.

356 Collier & Pinckard v. McCall, 190 Atkinson et al. ats. Walton Commercial R, E. & B. Asso, v. Whaun & Co.... ..592 Parker et al

298 Çox et at. v. Bridges.

553 Ballard v. Johns

70 Banks v. State.

430 Daughtery et al, ats. Evans ... 68 Barnes, ex parte ..

.540 Daughtery, pro ami, v. Stewart. 69 Bass, Adm'r ats. Linn et al. .281 Dees ats. Lyon et al.

.595 Belgart ats. Singer M'f'g Co.. 519 DeLoach, Adm’r ats. Abney et Bell v. Bell... 64 al....

393 Bell ats. Headley.

.346 Dewberry et al. ats. Ware. ...568 Bell ats. Reynolds & Lee. 496 Donovan ats, S. & N. A. R. R. Betts v. Nichols et al. 278 Co

141 Bibb v. State..

13 Dowdell et al. v. Empire F. & Bibb St.Church ats. State, ex rel. 23 L. Co...

316 Bingham, Adm'r v. Jones et al.202 Dreher ats. Knaus.

319 Blanton ats Ga. Pac. R. R. Co.154 Brgan v. State

.449 Eborn ats. Jefferson Co. Savings Boscowitz, Ex parte.. .463 Bank

.529 Boutwell v. Steiner. .307 Edwards v. Edwards.

361 Bradley ats. S. & N. R. R. Co. 468 Ellis v. Ellis.

348 Bridgeford & Co. ats. Aiken, Elyton Land Co. ats. Butler 384 et al..

.295 Empire F. & L. Co. ats. Dowdell Bridges ats. Cox et al. .553

et al

316 Brooks ats. Ga. Pac. R’y Co...138 Evans v. Daughtery et al 68 Brunson et al. v. Morgan et al.598 Ex parte Barnes

.540 Buckalew, Ex

460
Boscowitz.

.463 Burks ats. Snider.

53
Buckalew

460 Bush ats. Chandler et al 102

Byrd.

17 Bushi ats. Hinson...

368
Henderson,

36 Butler v. Elyton Land Co. 384

Mayor, &c., of AnnisByrd, Ex parte....

17

ton in re Ballew ..... 21 Byrd, Adm’r v. Jones, Adm'r. .336

Forcheimer v. Port of Mobile. . 126 Calhoun Co. ats. Forney.. 215 Forney v. Calhoun County .....215 Campbell et al. v. Larmore et al.499 Foster v. State

.451 Cannon & Co.ats. Miller, Adm'r 59 Frazer & Co. v. West. U.T. Co.487 Carney v. State

7 Futterer et al, ats. Girard et al.323 Carden v. State

.417

parle..

.499

Ga. Pac. R’y Co. v. Blanton. . 154 | King ats. Strange & White.....212

v. Brooks...138 Knaus v. Dreher..

.319

Gage & Co. v. M. &0. R. R. Co.224 Knowles ats. Steed et al. ..205

Ganey et al, v. Sikes

.348

Gaston et al. v. Weir..

193 Lang v. State.

1

Gay v. Gay.

38 Larmore et al, ats. Campbell et

Gibson y. Williams.

228 al...

Girard et al. v. Futterer et al. .323 Latham et al. ats. Grayson,

Gray ats. Thomason.. ..559 Adm'r.

.546

Grayson, Adm’r v. Latham et Lawrence v. State.

424

al...

.546 Lay et al., Ex’rs, ats. Purcell. .287

Gullatt et al. ats. Jackson Co. .243 Lehman, Durr & Co. v. Pritch-

ett..

512
Hamner ats. Lyons

197 Lehman, Durr & Co. v. Robert-
Handley et al. v. Heflin et al. ..600 son.

489

Hanna v. Steele

305 Liddell v. Chidester.

.508

Hardie ats. Mitchell, et al. 349 Ligon v. Ligon..

.555
Hardy & Co. v. Ingram. .544 Linn et al. v, Bass.

281
Harmon Bros. y. Jenks. 74 Long et al. v. Walker, Guard'n, 72
Hartline ats. Thompson, Guar- Lou. & Nash. R. R. Ço, ats. City
dian...
65 Council of Montgomery.

127

Hartwell et al, ats. Union Nat. Lou. & Nash. R. R. Co. atš. Port

Bank..

.379 of Mobile

115

IIawk v. State.

6 Lou. & Nash. R. R. Co. y. Sher-
Hawk et al. v. State

.466
rod.

..178
Headley v. Bell
346 Lyon et al. v. Dees.

..595
Heflin et al. ats. Handley et al.600 Lyons v. Hamner...

197

Hembree ats. M. & C. R. R. Co.182

Henderson, Ex parte

36 May et al. v. Coleman, Trustee.325

Henderson v. Vincent.

99 Mayor, &c., of Anniston in re

Hinson v. Bush..

368 Ballew, Ex parte....

21

Holborn ats. M. & B. R. R.Co.133 Mayor, &c., of Birmingham v.

Homer v. Schonfeld... .313

.469

Hooks et al, ats. Alexander. 605 McCall ats. Collier & Pinckard.190

Horton v, Miller & Bro... .537 McCary ats. Mayor, &c., of Bir-

Hough ats. Mooney

80 mingham

469

Hoyt & Bros'. M'f'g Co v. Tur- McCullough ats. Thweatt 517

ner & Oates.

.523 McIntyre ats. Union W. & E.

Co

78

Ingram ats. Hardy & Co.s.....544 McQuirk v. State.

435
Ives et al. v. Rice..

282 Memphis & Charleston R. R. Co.
v. Hembree...

182
Jackson v. Jackson et al., .343 Mem. & Charleston R. R. Co. v.
Jackson Co. v. Gullatt et al....243 Womack, Adm’rx.

149

Jefferson County Savings Bank

Messer ats. Riddle.

236

v. Eborn..

.529 Michael & Lyons et al. ats. Roo-

Jenks ats. Harmon Bros. 74 ney

585
Johns ats. Ballard...

70 Middleton v. Wilson & Lozano. 264

Johnson et al. ats. Parsons & Miller, Adm'r, v. Cannon & Co. 59

Sons et al.,

254 Miller & Bro. ats. Horton.. .537

Jones ats. Thomas.

302 Mitchell et al. v. Hardie. .349
Jones ats. Thompson.

279 Mob. & Birm. R’wy Co. v. Hol-

Jones et al. ats. Bingham, Admr.202 born..

133

Jones et al. ats. Simmons et al. 354 Mob. & Ohio R.R. Co, ats. Gage
Jones, Adm'r, ats. Byrd, Adm’r.336

224

Jones, Adm'r, v. Pelham et al. .208 Montev. C. & T. Co. ats. Woods.560

Jones & Bro. ats Woolsey & Sons 88 Mooney v. Hough..

80

Moore et al. ats. Wood et al.. 253

Katzenberger & Sons ats. Mo- Moorer v. Moorer et al.... ..353

ses.

95 | Morgan et al. ats. Brunson et al.598

« AnteriorContinuar »