Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB
[blocks in formation]

BANKS & BROTHERS.
NEW YORK.

ALBANY, N. Y.

Entered according to act of Congress, in the year one thousand eight hundred and ninety-seven,

BY BANKS & BROTHERS,
in the office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington.

[blocks in formation]

OF

The APPELLATE Division OF THE SUPREME COURT.

First Department.
Hon. CHAS. H. VAN BRUNT, P.J.
" GEORGE C. BARRETT.
" WILLIAM RUMSEY.
“ PARDON C. WILLIAMS.
" EDWARD PATTERSON.
• MORGAN J. O'BRIEN.
06 GEORGE L. INGRAHAM.

Second Department.
Hon. WILLIAM W. GOODRICH, P. J.
“ EDGAR M. CULLEN.
" WILLARD BARTLETT.
· EDWARD W. HATCH.
“ GEORGE B. BRADLEY.

Third Department,

Hon. CHARLES E. PARKER, P. J.
" JUDSON S. LANDON.
“ D. CADY HERRICK.
6 MILTON H. MERWIN.
" JOHN R. PUTNAM.

Fourth Department.
Hon. GEORGE A. HARDIN, P. J.
" DAVID L. FOLLETT.
" WILLIAM H. ADAMS.
0 MANLY C. GREEN.
o HAMILTON WARD.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

CAUSES in which the decisions contained in Hun's Reports, and

in the Appellate Division Reports, have been passed upon by the Court of Appeals.

HUN, VOL. PAGE. ANDERSON v. Blood..........

.......... 86 244 Order affirmed and final judgment ordered in favor of the respondents:

152 N. Y. 285. CADWELL c. ARNHEIM........

.......... 81 39 Judgment reversed : 152 N. Y. 182. CLASON v. BALDWIN...,

Judgment affirmed : 152 N. Y. 204. FARLEY v. MAYOR......

....... 9 App. Div. 536 Judgment reversed : 152 N. Y. 222.

HUN, VOL. PAGE. FOSTER 4. BOOKWALTER. .........

..... 78 352 Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against the plaintiffs :

152 N. Y. 166. HARROUN v. BRUSH EL. L. Co. ....

......... 12 App. Div. 126 Appeal dismissed : 152 N. Y. 212.

HUN, VOL. PAGE. McNAMARA 0. Mayor........

.. 84 611 Judgment affirmed: 152 N. Y. 228. PEOPLE EX REL. D., L. & W. R. R. Co. v. COUNTY COURT..... 4 App. Div. 542

Order affirmed : 152 N. Y. 214. PEOPLE v. GILES, ....

......... 12 App. Div. 495 Judgment of the Appellate Division reversed and that of the Court of Ses

sions affirmed : 152 N. Y. 136. PEOPLE v. HAWKER.............

... ........... 14 App. Div. 188 Judgment of the Appellate Division reversed and that entered upon the

convictim affirmed, and the proceedings remitted to the Court of Gen. eral Sessions of the Peace in and for the city and county of New York,

there to be proceeded upon according to laro : 152 N. Y. 234. PEOPLE EX REL. CRUMMEY V. PALMER........., ........... 9 App. Div. 58 Judgment and order reversed and motion for a mandamus denied : 152 N. Y. 217.

HUN, VOL. PAGE. SAND 0. CHURCH.....

.......... 82 615 Judgment reversed : 152 N. Y. 174. STARBUCK v. HOUSATONIC R. R. Co........

............. 83 534 Judgment affirmed : 152 N. Y. 251. Sun PUBLISHING Assn. v. Mayor.......

....... 8 App. Div. 230 Judgment affirmed: 152 N. Y. 257.

HUN, VOL. PAGE. WARD v. BOYCE................................

........ 80 499 Judgment affirmed : 152 N. Y. 191. The attention of the profession is called to the fact that the Court of Appeals in many cases decide an appeal upon other grounds than those stated in the opinion of the court below.

The affirmance or reversal of the judgment of the Appellate Division does not necessarily show that the Court of Appeals concurred in, or dissented from, the statements contained in the opinion of the Supreme Court. (Rogers v. Decker, 131 N. Y. 490.) — [REP.

« AnteriorContinuar »