Entered according to act of Congress, in the year one thousand eight hundred and ninety-seven,

CAUSES in which the decisions contained in Hun's Reports, and in the Appellate Division Reports, have been passed upon by the Court of Appeals.

ANDERSON v. BLOOD.....

HUN, VOL. PAGE. 86 244

Order affirmed and final judgment ordered in favor of the respondents:

9 App. Div. 536

HUN, VOL. PAGE. 78 352

FOSTER . BOOKWALTER.
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against the plaintiffs:

PEOPLE EX REL. D., L. & W. R. R. Co. v. COUNTY COURT..... 4 App. Div. 542 Order affirmed: 152 N. Y. 214.

PEOPLE v. GILES...

12 App. Div. 495

Judgment of the Appellate Division reversed and that of the Court of Sessions affirmed: 152 N. Y. 136.

.....

14 App. Div. 188

PEOPLE v. HAWKER..
Judgment of the Appellate Division reversed and that entered upon the
conviction affirmed, and the proceedings remitted to the Court of Gen-
eral Sessions of the Peace in and for the city and county of New York,
there to be proceeded upon according to law: 152 N. Y. 234.
PEOPLE EX REL. CRUMMEY v. PALMER.

9 App. Div. 58

Judgment and order reversed and motion for a mandamus denied: 152

The attention of the profession is called to the fact that the Court of Appeals in many cases decide an appeal upon other grounds than those stated in the opinion of the court below.

The affirmance or reversal of the judgment of the Appellate Division does not necessarily show that the Court of Appeals concurred in, or dissented from, the statements contained in the opinion of the Supreme Court. (Rogers v. Decker, 131 N. Y. 490.)-[REP.