Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB
[graphic]

Every observer is quite familiar with the ordinary tion of corporations, and, by constitutional procourse and origin of legislation. Bills are intro-visions for making all corporate franchises in the duced with reference to special cases, and, gene- future, subject to amendment or repeal. These rally, laws are amended to meet the need of some- provisions are now found in nearly all State constibody's claim or remedy, or to provide for some- tutions. With a view to limit the operation of the body's business job; and in this manner the har- rule of that case, many State constitutions provide mony of laws is destroyed. that all charters not acted on at the time of the adoption of such constitutions should be annulled, and that no corporation previously organized should have the benefit of any future legislation, special or general, without becoming subject to the general laws of the State, and to the privilege of repeal and amendment.

This is especially the case where business projects are involved and the furious passion for moneymaking is to be gratified. No aid to these is so generally effective as the corporate franchise. The wildest, as well as the most dishonest, scheme of speculation or fraud may be carried on by its means, without responsibility on the part of the manager, and with risk only for the public.

Before the adoption of the Constitution of 1851, the usual mode of creating corporations was by special law. The people, in their anxiety to promote improvements and aid business enterprises, stimulated, rather than checked, the abuses of legislation in this form; which was rendered much more mischievous by the ruling in the Dartmouth College case, which, holding that a charter is a contract, and, when once granted, could not be revoked by subsequent legislation without the consent of the grantee of the charter, made the abuses of such legislation irrevocable. The consequences of that decision could hardly have been fully contemplated at the time it was rendered. Parliament had possessed the power of changing franchises and privileges granted of this character, whenever the interests of the public called for it. There had been no question raised as to similar authority among the States before the adoption of the Constitution; nor afterwards, until this decision was rendered. But, under this rule, the evil of bad legislation and the mischief of ill-regulated corporate power became irremediable.

Whatever may now be thought as to the wisdom or justice of it, it is established as a settled constitutional rule, and will stand. It has been assailed with great ability, but without effect. The eminence of the great lawyer to whose matchless logic and eloquence its result is credited, and of the great jurist who decided it, has imparted to the case a sacredness and authority that makes it almost impiety to question it. In my judgment, the judicial history of the English-speaking race presents no equal work of trial and decision, of eloquence and learning, to this, and it will stand like other great creations of art and literature.

But, however sound the law of that decision may be, the judgment of our American community has been against its policy and justice, especially as to all corporations intended for profit, and the uses of general business. Soon after its rendition States began to provide, by general law, for the organiza

Our own Constitution provides that no special privileges or immunities shall be granted that the General Assembly may not alter, revoke or repeal; and our statutes provide that all corporations created before the adoption of the Constitution, that shall have acted under the provisions of the general laws since, shall thereby be deemed to have consented to have and exercise their franchise, subject to the Constitution and laws. Like legislation has been adopted in other States, and, practically, the country has thus, in the main, relieved itself of the restrictions upon its powers over corporations im posed by the rulings in the Dartmouth College case.

But this class of legislation aims at other kinds of corporations than that involved in the celebrated case referred to. The founders of the Dartmouth College gave their property for charitable uses forever, without reserving any benefit therein to themselves. Any change in the charter, which was substantially a declaration of trust, would have been a legislative alteration of the conditions of the trust without the donors' consent; and a repeal thereof, if it was attempted after a lapse of time, would render it difficult and perhaps impossible to distribute the property donated to those equitably entitled to it. But these difficulties do not apply to private corporations organized solely for the benefit of those who contribute its property and who become its constituent members. They are the real owners, are perpetually represented in its management, and their several interests are exactly defined by their stock. If they are not satisfied with the conditions the State may impose as to the use of the corporate franchise, they may surrender it, and, in their own right, take possession of their business and property for future management, as shall best serve their own interest. The like is also the case when the State revokes the charter. The property is always for the use of those who give it and reverts to them, whether it be a factory, store or farm. The State gives the franchise, not for its own benefit, or that of the general public, but for the sole use of the incorporators and at their solicitation. It receives no consideration therefor, and the incorporators give

[ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

none. There is no element of contract, but a mere gratuity in the grant of corporate privileges. The repeal of its charter involves only the question, as to whether the property shall be held and the business conducted in the corporate name, or in the name of the owners themselves and upon their personal responsibility to creditors.

It has indeed been strenuously urged that corporate franchises should never be granted for private use and profit; that, as a power of government, it should never be used for private purposes; that it assists to aggregate wealth and create monopoly; that it tends to withdraw property from circulation and place it in mortmain; that it places at disadvantage individual enterprise and smaller capital, in that lesser and distributed management that constitutes the great nursery of the business training and independence of our people. There is great force in this objection, but the policy of granting such franchises for such purposes is so firmly fixed in the legislation of the country that it cannot be readily disturbed. So far as it may aid legitimate private business, without danger to society, I do not propose any interference. But the regulation of such franchises is first subject to the control of the public interest; private convenience should be served only after the general safety and interest of society shall have been secured.

To some of the special dangers and abuses that have developed themselves in the management of corporations I wish to call your attention. The Constitutional Convention in 1851 recognized the need of careful restriction upon the grant of corporate franchises in the provisions I have referred to. But of more practical value than these, is the third section of the thirteenth article, which provides that the "dues from corporations shall be secured by such individual liability of the stockholders, and other means, as may be prescribed by law; but in all cases each stockholder shall be liable over and

above the stock by him owned, and any amount paid thereon, to a further sum at least equal in amount to such stock."

This charges upon the Legislature a specific which has in it several important elements:

No

of the corporation, in any cvent, "shall be secured." The Legislature shall provide a substantial capital, and, in addition, an adequate security for the sure payment of the debts. The duty thus imposed has been essentially and disastrously neglected. adequate provisions for a capital have been made; the remedy for enforcing the additional liability is crude and ill-defined, and no laws exist to further secure the creditor, while there has been given, on the other hand, ample authority for the issuing of bonds and incurring of debt. In this condition of legislation, the State has equipped its irresponsible creatures and sent them out clothed with an imposing, though false, appearance of substance, with authority to trade and contract debt among its citi

zens.

I feel confident no one means, active in the business conduct of this country, during the past forty years, has been so productive of loss and fraud to the community at large, and has transferred of their substance so much to the pockets of those who have been permitted to use these ill-advised franchises, without consideration. It has stimulated unscrupulous adventure, and furnished a lawful cover for scandalous rascality. Let us look at the matter with some detail.

Sec. 3244 of the Revision of the Corporation Laws, in 1878, aiming to correct the confusion then existing, as to subscription and payment of stock, required that fifty per cent of the capital stock should be subscribed, and that ten per cent should be paid before the corporation should be organized. This restriction was not permitted to stand long. By the Act of April 5th, 1880, it was amended so as to require a subscription of merely ten per cent of the capital stock, without the payment of any portion of it, as a condition of organization. Upon making a certificate that such subscription had been made, and filing the same with the Secretary of State, the corporation is authorized to organize, and upon its orWithout ganization is fully equipped for its work.

a dollar in the treasury, or a dollar paid upon its subscriptions, it engages in business and begins condutytracting debts and issuing bonds.

1. It contemplates at the outset and requires that a capital should be provided.

2. It requires that the stockholders should be made liable also, in addition to stock subscribed and constituting the capital of the corporation, for a further equal amount.

3. In addition to the capitai and the further liability so provided, it requires that the debts of the corporation shall be secured" generally by a liability of stockholders and such other means as may

be prescribed by law."
The idea underlying this section is, that the debts

The mode of manipulating these corporations varies according to the circumstances and conditions of the business or enterprise in which they shall engage. But in all cases they have the two elements; little or no capital, and business at the risk of their creditors. It is now common in this country to find corporations, every dollar of whose means is furnished by creditors, and every dollar of whose stock actually represents no assets, with the management of their affairs in the hands of those who have no pecuniary investment in them, and with the actual investor excluded from all voice in their operation.

[graphic]

Many corporations have been organized for the construction of works, such as railways, waterworks and others for public use; bonds and stocks have been issued and manipulated by the promoters and managers of the corporation, so that the one is sold at par or a discount, and the other held as a bonus in such sale, without other consideration. The company is thus represented by stock not representing a copper of capital, and its money received from the sale of bonds, which represent the whole investment, and often considerably exceed it. If the venture proves successful, the bonds are paid, or made good, and the profits realized by the holder of the stock, for which nothing is paid.

The mischief arising from these enterprises is obvious. The profits of the corporation are derived from charges or rates paid by the public for the uses such corporation furnish. The amount of stock issued and bonds outstanding with the amount of dividends, which, it must be conceded, honest stock is fairly entitled to, and the amount of interest which bonds, representing real loans, are entitled to claim, constitute the basis upon which fair rates are calculated.

And, on this pretense, the public are required, in such cases, to pay greatly more than fair rates for the services rendered, and if complaints are made of such charges, the dividends upon the pretended capital and the payment of interest upon bonds that may have been sold at a discount, become the excuse or justification. Indeed the situation becomes such that it is difficult to resist, by fair reasoning, the claim for sufficient rates to pay such interests and dividends. The bonds are held, finally, by innocent purchasers. The purchaser may well say to the State - You have authorized or enabled this corporation to issue its stock without the payment of any money for it, we have bought it and paid full consideration, and if there is any fraud for which any one should suffer, it should be the public, who have authorized the issue of stock and enabled it to be done without the investment of a copper by the original stockholders, and you should not destroy our dividends, which we are entitled to receive, by the unfair reduction of rates."

On the other hand, the stockholders of the corporation meet the appeal for the advance of wages, on the part of the employe, or enforce reduction against them, with the same plea that the business is not paying sufficient to afford an adequate dividend to the stockholders, and to pay the interest upon its indebtedness; and thus this fictitious stock becomes the necessity for extorting from the public, on one hand, and oppressing the wage-carner, on the other. The projectors of this scheme, which legislative neglect renders practicable, are the only ones that profit by the situation, and society suffers

without remedy, unless it shall throw the loss upon the innocent purchasers of such stock who may have paid full consideration therefor. The fair rate which the public should be called upon to pay should be that, only, which may be necessary, after the payment of reasonable expenses, to afford a just and reasonable return to the investor, for the use of the capital actually invested in the work.

If the scheme fails, we have another aspect of its evils. With no capital, with its property mortgaged as an insufficient security for the payment of its bonds, and a general indebtedness, without any security, the deceived creditors find themselves bearing the sole burden of the loss. This is usually attended with great distress, such as commonly fol lows great failures. The laborer and his family are stinted or starved with the loss of his wages, the contractor broken up and bankrupted, and trusts of every description, for charities, schools, widows, helpless age and infancy alike are impaired or wrecked by bonds issued by these corporations with little or no security to uphold them. The broker's skill is found equal to the work of foisting them upon the inexperienced and simple. The secrecy and mystery of corporate management renders investigation fruitless and gives full scope to the bond broker's doubtful arts and plausible inducements. And thus we have disaster after disaster visited upon the suffering communities of the country, who re ceive and endure them much as they do the devastation of wind or fire, as visitations of God with which they are classed. The author of this waste with such of the plunder as he can save, may now address himself to such new venture as he may devise.

Stock liability is inadequate or wholly worthless as a security for the creditor. In some cases the stock is manipulated in the name of an irresponsible

[ocr errors]

dummy." In others, stockbooks disappear, and I have known cases of the pursuit of them, with the aid of secret agents, from one city to another in an eventful search, chiefly useful as disclosing the ways of concealment, and mode of escaping liability. And where the ownership can be traced it is often found that, by transfers of stock and novation of corporate indebtedness, the responsible stockholder has been released and in his place substituted an irresponsible one who has received the stock as a gift or pretended sale. Protection is found against the claim upon the bonds by inserting in them, as a part of their conditions, the release of statutory liability.

Indeed, I think the experience of the profession will bear me out in the statement that, as each new catastrophe comes to these forms of business venture, and these managers grow in experience and skill in their manipulations, less and less is got by creditors out of the statutory liability of stockholders. When

[merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

the end approaches, the managers of the scheme disappear; a wreck follows; the captain and his associates, at a safe distance, may look on without anxiety, but with, it is to be hoped, a decent sympathy for the distress and disaster in which the passengers and crew are involved.

So it may be entirely proper to organize an existing business carried on by individuals, or partnerships, into a corporation. But the assets of such business should not be transferred upon a valuation fixed by the owner, in payment of stock subscriptions, but such assets should be valued by disinterested apAnother case of a corporation, with large capital praisers, under the direction of an impartial and stock, but little or no capital, is found in the or- competent public authority, as is provided in the ganization of a bankrupt partnership into a corpora- | laws of some of the most careful and conservative tion, or a bankrupt corporation sold out and reor- States. ganized. I know of no method, except discharge in bankruptcy, more effective than that which has been occasionally used by insolvent firms, to relieve their members of the loss or ruin resulting from unsuccessful business.

solvent concern.

Take an example: A and B are partners in an inThey organize a corporation, fix its capital at a large sum, subscribe for the stock, giving clerks and employes a share each to make up a board of directors, and upon a stuffed invoice, partly fictitious and excessively overvalued, they transfer the firm business to the new corporation, in satisfaction of their stock subscription, the corporation assuming the indebtedness of the partnership.

The first step then begins. The obligations of the corporation are substituted for those of the partners, and in time their liability as such is discharged.

The second step then follows.

The stock taken by the partners is transferred to a clerk for a consideration that is never paid or expected to be paid, and then another change of indebtedness takes place and the partners are thus relieved of their statutory liability to their creditors.

Usually it takes some money and a little time to carry through these processes, and in one case coming under my observation, the partners, advancing the necessary funds for this purpose, after having secured their release from their debt as partners, and their liability as stockholders, took a mortgage upon the assets that were left to secure to them the repayment of the money they had been compelled to advance to support the corporation while their scheme was in process. Upon foreclosure, they take the proceeds of corporate property, and leave their creditors, the victims of their schemes, to bear the whole loss. In this case there was a semblance of an

adequate capital at the outset, and also of an adequate security to creditors in responsible stockholders, but the capital is a sham, and the escape from statutory liability easy and entirely practicable, under existing legislation.

In the case I have just described, the owners of the property acted as both buyer and seller, as trustees for the corporation and representatives of their own interests, and the corporation was made substantially the administrator of the business of a worthless partnership, for the real purpose and with the real result of relieving the partners from liability and throwing the loss upon the creditors.

The same result is achieved in the reorganization of bankrupt corporations, including especially railroad companies and other corporations for operating a public use. These enterprises begin with inadequate capital, with the utmost use of crèdit, resulting in contracting a large debt with an unfin

ished work. In the process of foreclosure it is sold for a small sum. Under the laws of this State, which have been from time to time amended, and especially under the act of April 24, 1890, a syndicate of persons are authorized to become the purchaser of both the property and franchise. Upon filing deed therefor with the secretary of State they

become a corporation with full capacity to maintain and operate such road. They are not required to pay a dollar in any subscription to capital stock, but are authorized to provide for the purchase price of the property, by the issue of capital stock, and bonds secured by mortgage, in whatever amount the incorporators may have agreed on, which stock and bonds so issued shall be valid, and taken as fully paid for, by the transfer to the corporation of such property. It imposes no limit upon the amount of bonds and stock with reference to the value of

the property purchased, or the amount of security which shall be afforded for the payment of such bonds.

We have thus provided by express legislation the legalized means of perpetrating the abuses and frauds to which I have referred. Many such properties are fit only for gambling uses, consisting of railroads that answer no public need, or are many years in advance of the public necessity.

Our statute provides, likewise, for what is called While it is true that corporations may, with en- "capitalization" of debt and stock of railroad comtire propriety, take needed property such as may be panies that have become embarrassed, by an agreenecessary for corporate purposes, in payment of ment between the stockholders, bondholders, and stock subscriptions, they should be permitted to general creditors; and upon sale of the railroad, in take nothing else than such necessary property. | pursuance of such agreement, they are authorized

[graphic]

to reorganize the corporation, and to issue capital stock and bonds therefor, of such amount as they may deem proper, and may fix by agreement, without any reference to the actual value of the property so capitalized.

public, or an evidence that the original value of the corporate property has become depreciated. If it be once admitted that a corporation may issue stock without receiving a consideration therefor, and where it does not represent actual value, or In other cases, stock dividends are made. By substituted value in corporation assets, there is, apgeneral provision, our statute authorizes corpora-parently, no limit to the extent to which the origitions for profit to increase their capital stock. It nal stock may be watered, except the caprice of prescribes no limit and defines no purpose for which stockholders." the stock may be issued, nor does it control in any manner the authority of the corporation as to its disposition.

[ocr errors]

I cannot believe that it is necessary to legitimate and prosperous business, under the conduct of corporations, that their stock books should be made, It has been estimated that in water-works prop- substantially "lies," and its stock and bonds the erty alone, in the United States. there is outstand-juggler's scheme for deceiving the public. There ing $150,000,000 of stock wholly fictitious, or, in is no doubt of the usefulness of railroads and the other words, to use the general phrase, wholly necessity for all legitimate encouragement for their watered." The Interstate Commerce Commission construction and operation, but surely that, like all says: "It is believed that cases are now compara- other business, may be done honestly. Their stock tively rare in which the capital stock of our railroad may represent actual values, and their bonds real companies, as the same now exist, was actually is- credit and consideration. Or, must it needs be that sued for cash to bona fide investors." the false pretense and deceit that sends the vulgar criminal, who obtains money from the confiding countryman on our city streets, to the station house and police court, must be tolerated as a necessary rule of business, in the conduct of the great business corporations of the country?

A few years ago the Western Union Telegraph Company declared a stock dividend of $15,000,000, which the Court of Appeals of New York held to be legal. In 1868 the New York Central made a stock dividend of $23,036,000, being eighty per cent of the capital stock then existing. This device of Vanderbilt was adopted in order to apparently reduce the great percentage of dividend upon stock earned by the remarkable growth and prosperity of his road, instead of reducing his rate of freight and fares.

What is true of the corporations named, is also an index to that which is true with respect to nearly all classes of the great corporations of the country, whose profits are derived from the rates and charges made to the public. These companies, being of a semi-public character, in the exercise and performance of the public use, and accountable to the people and the State, are compelled to guard against legislative interference with their charges, by expedients of that description. The charges, especially by gas, water, and railway companies, have been the subject of frequent examination and criticism, and also of legislative action. The "watering" process, with respect to their stock, becomes, in a considerable measure, a matter of necessity to enable them to maintain their rates as against the public demand for a reduction.

What would be thought of issuing warehouse receipts for definite amounts of grain to represent a less holding in the elevator; or executing deeds for a specific quantity of land, there being much less to answer the description; or the use of a yardstick of indefinite length, or of a dollar of fluctuating value? Safe and honest business requires the elimination of every element of uncertainty that is practicable. Gambling thrives amid confusion of prices, or values, or quantities. The grain pit and the pool room live upon the element of mere chance, and the railroad wrecker upon the mystery and confusion of railroad values and conditions.

It is true that these abuses are not all allowed by legislation, nor indeed sanctioned by judicial decision, but where they are without authority of law the remedy is inadequate.

It is greatly to be regretted, in my judgment, that the Supreme Court of the United States has gone so far in three decisions, reported in 139 U. S., in legalizing the sale of unissued stock, or in giving it away, without receiving payment therefor of its actual amount. It is not questioned by that court, or

Justice Brown, in Handley v. Stutz, 139 U. S., any court that I know of, that a corporation cannot thus describes the uses of stock certificates:

"The stock of a corporation is supposed to stand in the place of actual property of substantial value, and as being a convenient method of representing the interest of each stockholder in such property. To the extent to which it fails to represent such value, it is either a deception or a fraud upon the

issue its certificates of stock, in the first instance, at its inception without full payment of the whole value thereof, and that, by no device, can the payment for such stock then issued be avoided by any arrangement between the corporation and its stockholders, as against the claim of creditors. But it is really difficult to comprehend the distinction in

« AnteriorContinuar »