Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

far from being simple. It will best be solved by regarding the heart the undeveloped mind, which comes to grow in two directions, on the one hand toward the intellect, on the other hand toward the will. The heart is like the acorn, which sends downward a root and sends upward a stalk. Or, to put it otherwise, the heart is polarized into intellect and will. The ideal way to train the emotions is through training the intellect and will.

A boy comes to our school and gets into a fight. That is human nature. That is heart. Most people want to give others as good as they send. Why not? Of course it is clear to the teacher. Why not? The child must not be allowed to develop into the sort of man that goes about the world with a chip on his shoulder. By influence of an authority and penalty the teacher leads the pupil to control his tendency to fight. The boy forms a habit of not fighting.

Yet this is not enough. If the boy has not been intellectually convinced that fighting is wrong, the habit is one he will lose when the restraints of school have been shaken off. In the long run people act upon their beliefs. The child must be made to see the evils that come out of habits of pugnacity. He must be taught the doctrine of the dependence of the individual upon the social whole. Not by mere moralizing, but by the example of teacher and classmates, he must be made to see the importance of self-control and self-sacrifice. He must learn the golden rule. His new habit must be approved by his intellect.

The important thing to see to is that the habits established by the will with the consent of the intellect become spontaneous. This is regeneration. Once the pupil obeyed only from external authority; then he obeyed from partial conviction, but still with a feeling of constraint; now he obeys from full conviction. He has mastered the art of living. He is free.

The duty of the school is plain. It should insist first upon the right practice. It is an institution. It cannot exist except upon condition that the children co-operate both with each other and with the teacher. There must be order. The community of the school cannot exist if the pupils exercise their evil propensities without restraint. Even corporal punishment is to be permitted as a last resort. The schools have rightly discarded it for

more progressive methods of discipline, but there are occasional cases in which it can properly be applied. At all cost correct discipline must be maintained.

Yet correct instruction is no less important, the second in order of time. The good school will be constantly working upon the pupil's intellect, in order to bring him into accord with the higher purposes of the school to which he belongs.

ENGLISH IN OUR SCHOOLS.

DR. EDWARD BROOKS.

T gives me great pleasure to express

tion in English in our public schools. The more so because Philadelphia has taken the lead among the cities of the country in the adoption of approved methods of teaching English. My appreciation of the supreme value of this instruction will appear in a statement of what we are doing in this direction in the elementary schools of our city.

In 1894 I reorganized the work in English in the elementary schools. Previous to that time technical grammar was begun in the third year of the primary schools and taught throughout the succeeding five years. While the definitions and rules of grammar, with parsing and analysis, were carefully taught, comparatively little was done to train pupils to the correct and ready use of English. Realizing the small value of technical grammar in teaching children "to speak and write the English language correctly" and that language is an art, and like other arts must be learned by imitation and practice, I had the study of grammar taken out of the primary grades, and I substituted for it a careful and extensive training in the use of English. In order to prepare our teachers to carry out this new work I delivered over thirty lectures to them upon the subject, and issued for their use a pamphlet of some seventy pages explaining the work in detail and suggesting appropriate exercises.

This pamphlet was used as a text-book by principals in training their teachers, and was also adopted in the Normal School as the basis of the instruction in language teaching for the young women who were being prepared as teachers in the public schools.

To give emphasis to the value of language in elementary education I set forth the doctrine that in the "correlation of studies" not history as held by the German educators, nor geography or nature study as held by many American teachers, but language should be made the centre around which the other studies should be grouped. This educational principle was subsequently adopted upon my recommendation by the celebrated "committee of fifteen" of the National Educational Association. In the discussion of this principle, that language should be the centre of a course of primary instruction, I endeavored to show its value in the mental development of the child as well as in furnishing its mind with knowledge, explaining that language is the instrument of thought as well as the means of expression, quoting Plato, who says that "" reason and discourse are one,” and also Max Müller," that language and thought are inseparable," summing up this portion with the following paragraph:

'Language, it is thus seen, is the one branch that naturally belongs at the head of all branches of elementary instruction. It is facile princeps among the common school branches. Its intimate relation to Its intimate relation to the human mind and to the development of its faculties explains why such splendid results in mental development were obtained in the much criticised scholastic system of education, with all its errors and shortcomings. A more general appreciation of its value is a need in modern education, and more attention to it will result in increased intelligence of the pupils of the public schools.

INSTRUCTION IN LANGUAGE.-The nature and value of the course of instruction in language in the elementary schools will be understood by the statement of a few principles as set forth in my "Suggestions to Teachers" to prepare them for the work, which I herewith present:

1. All work in the language training of children should be based upon their oral language. The child first learns to speak in the sacred precincts of its home, and this spontaneous expression should be continued in the school-room and be made the basis of further instruction in language. It is thus seen that during the first three or four years the work of the school in oral language is of paramount importance. Special pains should be taken to train the pupil to a correct and facile use of the mother tongue. Day by day Day by day

his vocabulary should be enlarged and habits of correct expression inculcated. The most important classes during the child's first year in school are what may be called "talking classes."

2. The child at home speaks of what it sees and of what it feels and thinks. The instruction of the school should be based upon this principle of the spontaneous expression of actual knowledge to which the child is accustomed before it enters school. Care is, therefore, to be taken that real thoughts shall be in the mind of the child as the basis of its expression. Teachers should prevent that parrot-like repetition of words so often heard in the school-room without any content of knowledge in the mind. Children's words are to be living words, like the language of the home, rather than the "dead language" so often heard in the recitations of the class-room.

3. For the content of expression the principal sources are the objects of the material world and the incidents of history and literature. Both of these when properly presented by the teacher arouse the interest of the child and stimulate it to natural and simple expression. These objects, under the form of "nature study," are to be brought into the schoolroom for the child to observe. Stories from history and literature are to be read and related by the teacher, and the pupil is to be required to reproduce them in his own words. Thus, day by day, the child's vocabulary is enlarged and his power of expression improved.

4. As the pupils progress in this work they should be required to originate descriptions and narratives. Incidents occurring in their home life, the experiences of a visit to the Park or Zoological Garden, etc., are to be used as materials for language lessons. These exercises with young children should be oral at first, and may be called "oral compositions;' and oral compositions in this new system of language teaching should precede written compositions. Pupils should be trained first to "talk compositions," and subsequently to "write compositions," and taught in this way the writing of a composition is merely the writing of the pupil's talk. This will be appreciated by newspaper men and others, who in these days dictate their literary productions rather than write them.

5. Teachers are expected to exercise constant care to correct the faulty ex

pressions to which children of all classes | with the classics of literature suitable

are liable. Especially should this care be taken with children that come from ignorant and uncultured homes, and with children of foreign-born parents, who hear no English spoken in their own families. Special care should be taken also with the pupil's faulty articulation and pronunciation, as well as with the correct construction of sentences.

6. The copying of written productions, both prose and poetry, is made prominent in this work. The pupils thus become familiar with the correct use of capitals and punctuation marks, the proper use of words and the construction of sentences, and, in time, with the graces of literary expression. Such an exercise is called "copying compositions," in distinction from "writing compositions," and the former is regarded as an essential preparation for the latter. Many writers, ancient and modern, practiced the copying of the productions of the masters of literature. Demosthenes, it is said, copied the history of Thucydides seven or eight times in order to acquire his clear, concise and elegant style.

7. TO MEMORIZE PROSE AND POETRY. -Pupils are also required from the first to commit to memory choice selections of prose and poetry. The use of these

choice selections" in the public schools is one of the most prominent features of our language instruction. They not only give ideas to express, but also present model forms of expression, and are thus of incalculable value in the training to good English. Besides, they furnish the mind with gems of moral truths and noble sentiments that refine and elevate the character, as well as improve the power of expression. This also has been the practice of many of the masters of the English language. Burke and Pitt developed their wonderful powers of oratory by committing the orations of Demosthenes, and Fox could recite from memory the Book of Job, and drew from it his grandeur and force of expression. Ruskin ascribed his skill in the use of English to the fact that as a child he was required by his mother to learn and recite large portions of the Bible, especially the Psalms.

8. In addition to these special exercises of the class-room, efforts are made to lead children to read good literature. For this purpose supplementary reading is provided. Our schools are supplied

to children, and pupils are encouraged to use the libraries located in the vicinity of their homes. In many cases school libraries have been organized containing books especially suitable to the various tastes and capacities of the pupils.

9. This instruction in the art of language is supplemented during the last three years of the elementary schools by the study of grammar or the science of language. Efforts are made that this instruction shall be practical by requiring the pupils to apply the principles of grammar in their conversation and their literary exercises. The exercises in language previously described are continued during these three years and combined with the lessons in grammar. Throughout the entire course written exercises, including descriptions, narratives, letterwriting, compositions, etc., are required.

The above statements indicate the methods of training in English which have been introduced into the elementary schools of Philadelphia. That all of our teachers do this work with artistic skill is not to be expected; yet many of them show marked ability for the work, and all are making improvement year by year. The younger teachers coming from the Normal School, where these methods are made prominent in their professional training, take hold of this work with especial interest and intelligence.

But all pupils, even under the most skillful instruction, cannot be trained to satisfactory results in the use of language. To change the habits of children, who in their homes are constantly hearing and using incorrect English, is not an easy task, and to train the tongues of children of foreign-born parents, who hear and use no English in their homes, to speak pure and correct English is wellnigh impossible.

That Philadelphia appreciates the value of training in the use of English, that she organized this work over eight years ago, and that she was one of the first cities of the country to introduce it into her public schools, are facts for which we have reason for congratulation. The work of our public schools in language training is widely known. Requests for our course of study in language are received from all parts of the country, and our example has stimulated the work in many other cities.

Much praise is due to Dr. Hamilton for his excellent paper, read at the recent meeting of the Pennsylvania Educational Association at Wilkes Barre, which, it is believed, will widen interest in the subject. The work in Philadelphia already begun we shall endeavor to improve each succeeding year, striving to attain the highest standard possible in our public schools. -Philadelphia Ledger.

BREAK IN MONOTONY.

followed with an account of the excavation and the theories advanced concerning it. A piece of wood from the petrified forest of Arizona was shown, and intense interest was manifested in the accompanying description. Another had brought a pretty specimen of edelweiss, that rare plant that grows and blooms amidst the perpetual snows of Alpine heights, and she gave a beautiful wordpainted picture of an ascent on Mount Blanc, and another showed a piece of scoria from Mount Vesuvius.

When the bell rang they were not yet through and they begged for more time. Thus had the hour passed not only profitably but pleasantly. The benefit to the pupils had been at least threefold; actual knowledge was gained, descriptive powers were developed, and an enthusiasm

T was a room in a high school of restless, active girls and boys, and the hour for the stated weekly rhetoricals had come. In order to give variety and consequent interest to these exercises, the teacher often departed from the usual routine work of composition writing.for more earnest work was awakened. For this particular Thursday she had asked them each to bring some relic or article of special interest, and to be prepared to give a brief verbal history of it; and as they returned to their sectionroom from their various recitations, a look of eagerness marked every face, for they well knew a feast of good things was coming.

Varied and numerous were the articles collected, and as each in turn was being passed around and examined, an animated history of it was given by the one that brought it.

But this is only meant to convey a little glimpse of how one teacher prevents the rhetorical hour of the week from becoming tiresome and monotonous and fills it so full of that which is practical and interesting, that the pupils realize and appreciate the fact that they have not merely been "killing time.”—Popular Educator.

DIAGNOSING INSANITY AT

SIGHT.*

BY STEPHEN SMITH, M. D.

"WHAT!

WHAT! Do you affirm that you can diagnose insanity at sight?''

"I do," was the calm, dignified, but emphatic response.

This question was put by John Van Buren, Esq., at that time Attorney-General of the State of New York, and was answered by Dr. Amariah Brigham, Su

A boy presented the ears of a jack rabbit, and gave a lively description of the chase his brother experienced down in Texas in catching the curious little animal. Another had brought a letter written by his great-grandfather while serving in the war of 1812, and this faded, yellow document he read aloud. Thus was that period of history brought closer and rendered more real than ever before. A girl displayed a silver shoe-buckle that had been worn by her great-great grand-perintendent of the Utica Asylum for the father during the colonial period, and described the customs and manner of dress belonging to the time. She spoke of her worthy ancestor as being related to Cowper, the poet, and of the circumstances of his removal to this country, and again was the link that binds us to our mother

country welded more closely. A specimen of the long Spanish moss that adorns the trees of the Gulf region was shown and an explanation given. One girl exhibited a curious piece of pottery dug from a mound near her old home, and

Insane. The occasion was remarkable for the intense popular interest in the results of the trial, the scientific questions involved, and the eminence of the now historical personages engaged in its management. This occasion was the trial of William Freeman, a negro, for the murder of the Van Ness family in the vicinity of Auburn, Cayuga County, New York on the night of the 12th of March, 1846.

* Read at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, District of Columbia, May 14. 1903.

The frightful tragedy was thus described in a local paper:

William Freeman, a negro, a native of Auburn, who has recently been discharged after five years' confinement in the States Prison, having provided himself with weapons, proceeded to the house of John G. Van Ness, in the suburbs of Auburn, and there, without any notice, and without any apparent motive, slew Mr. Van Ness, a wealthy and worthy citizen, Mrs. Van Ness, her sleeping infant, and her aged mother, and wounded mortally, it is believed, the laboring man who dwelt with them, leaving only the maid servant of the family, and she had only been spared because he had been disabled in the arffay.

The murderer was arrested and confessed the perpetration of the crime, but showed no signs of regret; on the contrary, he freely described all the incidents of the murder, and laughed continually during the recital. The incensed and excited public saw in his strange acts and unaccountable conduct, together with the entire absence of motive for the crime, grounds for the belief that he might escape punishment on the plea of some wily lawyer that the prisoner was insane. Crowds of excited people gathered about the jail, determined to seize the prisoner and lynch him, but the sheriff adopted such precautions that no serious effort was made at a rescue. But popular feeling now took another form. It was determined to resist to the last any effort that might be made to secure the escape of the criminal under cover of alleged insanity. The greatest vigilance was maintained over every movement in the legal proceedings in order to prevent that issue. What made the apprehension that this question would be raised more decisive was the circumstance that only a month previous a murderer had escaped the awful punishment of his crime through the plea of insanity interposed by his counsel, William H. Seward, Esq. There was, indeed, a wide-spread belief that the criminal in the Van Ness tragedy was emboldened to perpetuate murder owing to the results of the recent trial. The excitement of the public was in some measure allayed by the remark of a prominent judge that the prisoner would not escape conviction by any plea or defense of Seward.

But the judge and the public were destined to be disappointed. Freeman was indicted and in due time brought into court for arraignment. The court

[ocr errors]

house was densely packed by an eager and excited crowd of citizens. The District Attorney arraigned the prisoner on the several indictments for murder. Freeman's appearance was said to be that of a man "deaf, stupid, unable to talk connectedly or to any sensible purpose, had an idiotic laugh upon his face, and apparently was ignorant of, or indifferent to, his own situation." To the question, "Have you any counsel?" the prisoner replied, I don't know?" To the further question, "Who are your counsel ?" he replied, "I don't know." These questions led up to the tragic features of these proceedings. The judge asked the usual question, Will any one defend this man?" A death like hush fell upon the audience. The report states that the spectators looked at each other in breathless silence, broken only when Mr, Seward, pale with emotion, but with inflexible determination in every feature, rose and said, "May it please the court, I shall remain counsel for the prisoner until his death." It is added, "A murmur of indignation ran around the court-room at this continued defiance, as it was regarded, both of public opinion and of public justice."

At that period the anti-slavery agitation had reached a degree of development which converted the prejudices of the great masses of the people against the negro into an uncontrollable frenzy when he committed crimes. Scarcely less bitter was the public feeling against the few anti-slavery sympathizers in the community who, though equally shocked by the murder, desired to have a fair trial given the criminal. But nothing could have occurred which tended to arouse greater popular indignation than the announcement that the negro was to have as his legal adviser and protector one who, under the specious plea of insanity, had recently secured a disagreement of the jury in a trial for murder. And it is certain that no man of less reputation than Mr. Seward would or could have had the courage to assume, voluntarily, the position of counsel of this self-convicted negro murderer. One prominent local attorney who was impressed with the conviction that the prisoner was insane or an imbecile, and that he might not receive fair treatment owing to the popular excitement, and had volunteered to defend him, publicly withdrew from the case rather than face the storm of indignation which awaited the

« AnteriorContinuar »