Charles De Hart Brower for appellant. Charles E. Hughes for respondents. Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion of General Term. All concur. J. DE WITT BUTTS, Respondent, v. THE J. C. MACKEY COMPANY, Appellant. Reported below, 72 Hun, 562. (Argued October 18, 1895; decided November 1, 1895.) APPEAL from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered upon an order made October 3, 1893, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee. E. N. Wilson for appellant. William Nathl. Cogswell for respondent. Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. THE KNICKERBOCKER PRESS, Appellant, v. EDWARD P. BARKER et al., as Commissioners, etc., Respondents. Reported below, 87 Hun, 341. (Argued October 21, 1895; decided November 26, 1895.) APPEAL from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made June 14, 1895, which affirmed an order of the Special Term dismissing a writ of certiorari. Everett P. Wheeler for appellant. D. J. Dean for respondents. Order affirmed, on opinion below, with costs. All concur. THE PEOPLE OF THE STAte of New YORK ex rel. JOSEPH E. SMITH, Respondent, v. FREDERICK W. WURSTER, as Commissioner, etc., Appellant. Reported below, 89 Hun, 7. (Argued October 21, 1895; decided November 26, 1895.) APPEAL from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, made July 26, 1895, which reversed upon certiorari the action of the appellant in removing the relator from membership in the fire department of the city of Brooklyn. Howard O. Wood for appellant. Edward F. O'Dwyer for respondent. Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. JOSEPH S. UPSON, Appellant, v. CHARLES A. WEBSTER, as Superintendent, etc., Respondent. (Argued October 21, 1895; decided November 26, 1895.) APPEAL from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, made the first Tuesday of October, 1894, which affirmed an order of the county judge of Monroe county dismissing a writ of habeas corpus. H. B. Hallock for appellant. Howard H. Widener, for respondent. Order affirmed, on opinion below, with costs. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. LOUISE C. REDFIELD, Appellant, v. JOSEPH MURRAY et al., as Commissioners, etc., Respondents. Reported below, 87 Hun, 393. (Argued October 21, 1895; decided November 26, 1895.) APPEAL from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made June 14, 1895, which dismissed a writ of certiorari. Robert L. Redfield for appellant. Gibson Putzel for respondents. Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below. JOSEPH FOWLER, Appellant, v. THE NEW YORK CENTRAL AND HUDSON RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY, Respondent. Reported below, 74 Hun, 141. (Argued October 23, 1895; decided November 26, 1895.) APPEAL from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered upon an order made September 18, 1893, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendant, dismissing the complaint, entered upon a verdict. directed by the court. J. Newton Fiero for appellant. Hamilton Harris for respondent. Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. GRANNISS & HURD LUMBER COMPANY, Respondent, v. RICHARD DEEVES, Appellant. Reported below, 72 Hun, 171. (Argued October 24, 1895; decided November 26, 1895.) APPEAL from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made October 13, 1893, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon the report of a referee. Abner C. Thomas for appellant. Michael H. Cardozo for respondent. Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion in General Term. All concur. RICHARD FORAN, Appellant, v. THE NEW YORK CENTRAL AND HUDSON RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY, Respondent. Mem. of decision below, 72 Hun, 639. (Argued October 25, 1895; decided November 26, 1895.) APPEAL from so much of an order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, made May 9, 1893, as reversed a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon a verdict. Moses Shire for appellant. Charles A. Pooley for respondent. Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered for defendant, with costs, on opinion at General Term. All concur, except FINCH and HAIGHT, JJ., not sitting. ANNA BERGIN, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. THE NEW YORK CENTRAL AND HUDSON RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant. Mem. of decision below, 77 Hun, 612. (Argued October 30, 1895; decided November 26, 1895.) APPEAL from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered upon an order made May 18, 1894, which affirmed a judg ment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and also an order denying defendant's motion for a new trial. Frank H. Hiscock for appellant. Louis Marshall for respondent. Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. EDWARD A. ANDERSON, Respondent, v. ANNA ANDERSON. Appellant. Reported below, 74 Hun, 56. (Submitted October 31, 1895; decided November 26, 1895.) APPEAL from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered upon an order made December 1, 1893, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term. William J. Carr for appellant. Charles J. Patterson for respondent. Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. |