Decisions of the Commissioner of Patents and of the United States Courts in Patent and Trade-mark and Copyright CasesU.S. Government Printing Office, 1876 "Compiled from Official gazette. Beginning with 1876, the volumes have included also decisions of United States courts, decisions of Secretary of Interior, opinions of Attorney-General, and important decisions of state courts in relation to patents, trade-marks, etc. 1869-94, not in Congressional set." Checklist of U. S. public documents, 1789-1909, p. 530. |
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Términos y frases comunes
Abandoned Applications Acting Commissioner alleged amended application for patent application for reissue arrangement BOARD OF EXAMINERS-IN-CHIEF bobbin Carlock cation cited claim combination Commissioner of Patents construction court Decided decision declared described device drawing Edison embodied estoppel evidence Examiner of Interferences Exhibit fact February 18 filed an application glycerine Guernsey Hart Haseltine held Henderson improvement India Rubber Comb interlocutory appeal invention to practice inventor issue January 21 lawful trade-mark LETTERS PATENT Linus Yale machine manufacture MARCH 25 matter McBride oath objection Official Gazette operation original application paper vessel parties Patent Office Perry and Dickey preliminary statement Prescott present PRINCIPAL EXAMINER prior priority of invention purpose question reason reduction to practice referred regard registration reissue application rejected Rouse and Stoddard rule September 22 shown sketches Smith SPEAR specification statute subject-matter subsequent substantially T. A. Edison testifies testimony THACHER tion wheel wire witness words zinc
Pasajes populares
Página 73 - ... a statement of the mode in which the same is applied and affixed to goods, and the length of time during which the trade-mark has been used.
Página 49 - I say that where a given matter becomes the subject of litigation in and of adjudication by a court of competent jurisdiction the court requires the parties to that litigation to bring forward their whole case and will not, except under special circumstances, permit the same parties to open the same subject of litigation in respect of matter which might have been brought forward as part of the subject in contest, but which was not brought forward only because they have from negligence, inadvertence...
Página 49 - I state the rule of the court correctly, that where a given matter becomes the subject of litigation in, and of adjudication by, a court of competent jurisdiction, the court requires the parties to bring forward their whole case, and will not, except under special circumstances, permit the same parties to open the same subject of litigation in respect of a matter which might have been brought forward...
Página 86 - ... or corporation has the right to such use, either in the identical form or in any such near resemblance thereto as may be .calculated to deceive, and that the fac-simile or counterparts filed therewith are true and correct.
Página 100 - ... after any action therein, of which notice shall have been given to the applicant, they shall be regarded as abandoned...
Página 34 - The case would then have come directly within the seventh section of the act of 1836, which makes a "patent" or a "description in a printed publication" of the invention claimed, a bar to a further patent therefor. But a mere application for a patent is not mentioned as such a bar. It can only have a bearing on the question of prior invention or discovery. If upon the whole of the evidence it appears that the alleged prior invention or discovery was only an experiment and was never perfected or brought...
Página 75 - That when an application for a patent has been rejected or withdrawn, prior to the passage of this act, the applicant shall have six months from the date of such passage to renew his application, or to file a new one ; and if he omit to do either, his application shall be held to have been abandoned. Upon the hearing of such renewed applications abandonment shall be considered as a question of fact.
Página 36 - And be it further enacted, that any person or firm domiciled in the United States, and any corporation created by the authority of the United States, or of any State or Territory thereof, and any person, firm, or corporation resident of or located in any foreign country which, by treaty or convention, affords similar privileges to citizens of the United States...
Página 104 - First. By causing to be recorded in the Patent Office a statement specifying name, domicile, location, and citizenship of the party applying; the class of merchandise and the particular description of goods comprised in such class to which the particular...
Página 141 - The Commissioner of Patents shall not receive and record any proposed trade-mark which is not and cannot become a lawful trade-mark...