XIV Greenwich Farmers' Telephone Co. and The Clinton Air Line Telephone 842 Harrison and Jefferson Telephone Co. and The Central District Telephone 764 Hossafous v. The Pittsburg, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. L. Ry. Co. et al, 44 Henry Burkhart Packing Co. and The American Express Co., cause dis- Hilliard Light and Power Co., and LeRoy Dobyns, sale of light plant...... 885 366 535 Hocking Valley Ry. Co. et al, The Doville Sand & Gravel Co. et al vs., 561 Hocking Valley Ry. Co. and T. E. Mcllfresh, overcharges on coal ship- 1001 Home Telephone Co., and The Central Union Telephone Co., by Receiv- 643 Horner Tobacco Co., vs. The Pittsburg, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. L. 45 Investigation and Suspension Docket No. 1... Interurban Railway & Terminal Co., The Cincinnati and Suburban Bell 728 321 401 Investigation and Suspension Docket No. 3. 571 Kermit Gas Co., and The United Fuel Gas Co., purchase of property. Jackson Iron & Steel Co., vs. The Baltimore & Ohio S. W. R. R. Co., 124 809 607 Knoxville Rural Telephone Co., and The Central District Telephone Co., 212 Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Ry. Co., The Northwestern Ohio Ry. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Ry. Co., et al., in re. New York Central 250 534 McCarron, James & Son, vs. The Pennsylvania Co., rates modified. 528 1001 Masi, Gabriel, et al., vs. The Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co., Order modified.. 123 728 644 Moor, Clarissa, vs. The Ohio Electric Ry. Co., cause dismissed. 123 763 Mt. Ephraim Telephone Co., and The Pleasant City Telephone Co., 41 National Tube Co. vs. The New York Central R. R. Co., et al., modifica- National Cash Register Co., The Ohio Electric Co., vs. application to 245 521 New York Central Lines Equipment Trust of 1913 in re.. 250 New York Central R. R. Co., et al., The National Tube Co., vs. modifica- 521 New York Central R. R. Co., in re. New York Central R. R. Equipment 766 New York, Chicago & St. L. R. R. Co., et al., The River Furnace Co., vs., New York, Chicago & St. L. R. R. Co., The Brownell Co., vs., cause Northern Ohio Ry. Co., The Akron Gravel & Sand Co., vs., cause dis- Northwestern Ohio Light Co., and The Electric Light Co., Purchase of Northwestern Ohio Ry. Co., vs. The Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Ry. 365 534 Northwestern Telephone Co. and J. W. Shuter, sale of property.. 42 441 Ohio Electric Ry. Co. vs. The Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Ry. Co., et 209 Ohio Electric Ry. Co. vs. The Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Ry. Co., et 326 Ohio Electric Ry. Co. vs. The Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. L. 281 Ohio Electric Ry. Co., Moor, vs., cause dismissed... 123 Ohio Electric Ry. Co. vs. The National Cash Register Co., Application to 245 Ohio Electric Ry. Co. vs. The Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Ohio Electric Ry. Co., O. C. Robinson, vs., cause dismissed. 287 Ohio Electric Ry. Co. vs. The Toledo & Ohio Central Ry. Co., Permission 609 Ohio Fuel Supply Co., Ervin, vs., Cause dismissed.. 126 Ohio Service Co., and The Coshocton Light & Heating Co., Purchase of 765 Pandora Electric Light & Power Co., and The D. C. Shank Co., Purchase 286 Pennsylvania Co., The Detroit, Toledo & Ironton R. R. Co., vs., Cause 1011 Pennsylvania Co., James McCarron and Son, vs., Rates modified. 528 761 Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. L. Ry. Co., in re. Cincinnati, Indus- 564 Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. L. Ry. Co. et al., Hossafous, vs., 44 Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. L. Ry. Co., The Horner Tobacco 45 Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. L. Ry. Co., The Ohio Electric Ry. 608 Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. L. Ry. Co., The J. E. Wells Co., 288 Pleasant City Telephone Co., and Mt. Ephraim Telephone Co., Transfer 41 Rates, investigation of value of property to fix....... 943 River Furnace Co., vs. The New York, Chicago & St. L. R. R. Co., et 526 Robinson O. E., vs. The Ohio Electric Railway Co., Cause dismissed. 287 166 761 Scioto Valley Traction Co., and Allen D. Newmyer, Purchase of Electric 881 Settle & Co. vs. The Baltimore & Ohio S. W. R. R. Co., Cause dismissed.... 125 201 Shafer. Wm. A., vs. The Cincinnati & Suburban Bell Telephone Co., et 332 Shank, D. C. & Co., and The Pandora Electric Light & Power Co., Sale 286 Shuter, J. W., and The Northwestern Telephone Co., Purchase of prop- 42 Sidney Electric Co., and The Standard Power & Equipment Co., et al., 241 Slag, in re. rate of commercial. 530 Standard Power & Equipment Co., and The Sidney Electric Co., sale of 241 Star Furnace Co. vs. The Baltimore & Ohio S. W. R. R. Co., Cause dis- 124 Summit Silica Co. vs. The Erie Railroad Co., et al., Former order sus- 606 125 Toledo & Ohio Central Ry. Co., et al., Geiger vs., Cause_dismissed... Toledo Telephone, Telegraph & Messenger Co., and The American Dis- United Fuel Gas Co., and The Kermit Gas Co., Sale of property.. Wager, A. L., and The Frick & Lindsay Co., Purchase of gas plant... 609 964 809 443 251 288 Western Ohio R. R. Co., The Dayton & Troy Electric Co., vs., Cause dis- 572 Williams County Telephone Co., and The Blakeslee Mutual Telephone 642 Williams County Telephone Co., and The Montpelier Telephone Co., 644 SUPREME COURT JOURNAL ENTRIES, IN: Boettler et al. vs. City of Akron, Damage by construction of water works. 716 385 Cleveland-Akron Bag Co. vs. City of Akron, Damage by construction of 715 Moody & Thomas Milling Co. vs. City of Akron, et al. Damage by con- 715 Poulson vs. City of Akron, et al., Waiver by deed. 716 OPINIONS IN: Adena Railroad Co., et al., vs. The Public Service Commission of Ohio.... 354 Hocking Valley Ry. Co. vs. Public Utilities Commission of Ohio. Cincinnati, Milford & Loveland Traction Co. vs. State of Ohio.. 199 237 352 837 Crawford, et al., vs. Weidemeyer.. Crowley vs. State of Ohio..... 834 836 Doan vs. The Cleveland Short Line Ry. Co.. Hardin-Wyandotte Lighting Co. vs. Village of Upper Sandusky. 556 595 835 Hutton, et al., vs. Curry.. Hesse, in re.... Hocking Valley Ry. Co. vs. Public Utilities Commission, et al.. Interurban Railway & Terminal Co., et al., vs. City of Cincinnati. 354 836 836 238 Parkside Cemetery Association vs. The Cleveland, Bedford & Geauga State, ex rel., vs. Board of Deputy State Supervisors, etc.. Civil Service, Municipal Commission, expiration of 60 day limitation for 238 Contract, Burden on plaintiff to show substantial performance.. 837 837 Constitutional Law: Charter provision of city dispensing with consent of abutting prop- 200 749 Conflict between Court of Appeals record must be certified to Su- 834 Constitutional amendment should be construed so as to accomplish Jurisdiction on appeal, Sec. 12224, G. C. unconstitutional. 835 835 Court, change of name of, does not change court.. 353 Franchise acquired prior to adoption of Sec. 4, Art. XVIII, not 595 Home Rule Amendment: Will permit cities to provide for selection of municipal officers.. Secretary of State, 237 238 required to print argument and explanation against proposed amend- 158 Implied power of, under Sec. 1g of Art 11. 158 Statute, when go into effect.. 238 before can fall for inconsistency with constitution... 353 Section 9105, G. C., in reference to grant of franchise, constitutional. County, ditch, petition for when granted cannot afterwards be dismissed 353 Corporations, Statutory requirements of Secs. 8632, et seq., in organiza- 352 Courts: Error, not, to refuse special requests when substance embodied in 835 Jurisdiction of, in patent cases.. 351 Cause properly in court all questions raised by record may be deter- 352 Municipal Court of Cincinnati, provision limiting jurisdiction of Jus- 354 Reviewing Court, cannot remit excessive finding of jury, may re- 834 Submission on merits, after, error to sustain motion to dismiss 835 Substitution of parties, cannot be questioned after contest on merits. 835 708 Criminal Law: Acquittal for minor offense no bar to prosecution of greater, when.... 836 353 Embezzlement, deputy superintendent of banks.. 273 Estoppel as applied to agency may be invoked in criminal case. Candidate offering to take smaller salary invalidates election, is 555 Contest of election... 555 Petitions, time for filing nominating, when expires, duty of boards 158 Electric Light and Power Company, subject to municipal control. 835 835 Eminent Domain: Railroad cannot appropriate land for which it has no beneficial use... Right of railroad to exercise, and essential elements of proof.. 352 556 352 352 |