REPORTS OF CASES HEARD AND DECIDED IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN, FROM OCTOBER 18, 1864, TO NOVEMBER 11, 1865. ELIJAH W. MEDDAUGH, REPORTER. VOL. I. BEING VOLUME XIII. OF THE SERIES. HARVARD LAW LIBRARY DETROIT: PUBLISHED BY WM. A. THROOP & CO. 1866 Entered according to Act of Congress in the year 1866, by ELIJAH W. MEDDAUGH, In the Clerk's Office of the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Michigan. 5.16.1866 ADVERTISER AND TRIBUNE COMPANY, DETROIT. NOTE. The Reporter cannot permit this volume to go into the hands of his brethren of the profession without an accompanying apology to them for the many gross errors it contains, as well as for the unusual delay in its appearance. Both have been caused by circumstances not altogether within his control; and he can only add that whatever perplexity may be the result to them it can not equal the regret and mortification he experiences. The more important of the errors will be found referred to, and corrected, under the head of "Errata.” ERRATA. The word defendant, in line 21, page 59, should read plaintiff. On page 71, Maynard & Meddaugh should appear as attorneys for plaintiff in error, and Wm. A. Moore as attorney for defendant in error. The word Detroit, in the marginal heading on each right hand page from 77 to 151, inclusive, should read Lansing. In the tenth line of the first head note on page 81, instead of the words the legal title thereto was read the rights of legal ownership were. The word Twitchell, in the title of the case on each page from 128 to 186, inclusive, should read People. On page 231, instead of Albert Williams, Attorney General, and G. V. N. Lothrop, read H. C. Knight and C. I. Walker. On page 303, the name of G. V. N. Lothrop should also appear as counsel for complainant. On page 319, the name of H. C. Knight should also appear as counsel for plaintiff in error. On page 320, the name of G. V. N. Lothrop should appear as counsel for defendant in error. In second line on page 325, 90 should read 91. In eighteenth line on page 327, the word Charles should read Charless. On page 365, the name of J. W. A. S. Cullen should also appear as counsel for plaintiff in error. On page 368, the name of G. V. N. Lothrop should also appear as counsel for appellec. In tenth line on page 377, M. & R. should read M. & K. In the third line from the bottom of page 377, Beryan v. Ramiser should read Bryan v. Ramirez. In the eighth line from the bottom of page 394, 277, after the word Johns., should read 278. In same line, on same page, Messerean should read Mersereau. In third line of same page, 615, after the word Cal., should read 515. In thirteenth line of same page, Mendane should read Mendum. In twentieth line of same page, after the word Cal., 324 should read 334. In ninth line from bottom of same page, after the word Ohio, 433 should read 434, and Buckenrigde should read Breckenridge. |