Evolution and the Common Law
Cambridge University Press, 2005 M04 4
This book offers a radical challenge to accounts of the common law's development. Contrary to received jurisprudential wisdom, it maintains there is no grand theory which will explain satisfactorily the dynamic interactions of change and stability in the common law's history. Offering original readings of Charles Darwin's and Hans-Georg Gadamer's works, the book shows that law is a rhetorical activity that can only be properly appreciated in its historical and political context; tradition and transformation are locked in a mutually reinforcing but thoroughly contingent embrace. In contrast to the dewy-eyed offerings of much contemporary work, it demonstrates that, like life, law is an organic process (i.e., events are the products of functional and localized causes) rather than a miraculous one (i.e., events are the result of some grand plan or intervention). In short, common law is a perpetual work-in-progress - evanescent, dynamic, messy, productive, tantalising, and bottom-up.
Comentarios de la gente - Escribir un comentario
No encontramos ningún comentario en los lugares habituales.
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
accepted Accordingly adapt adjudication approach argument authority become believe better biological challenge circumstances claim commitments common law complex Consequently constitutional context continuing course courts critical Darwin Darwinian debate decision demands determine direction doctrine Dworkin dynamic effect efforts entirely environment evolution evolutionary existing explain fact force formal future Gadamer hermeneutical historical human ideas important insist interpretation judges judgment judicial jurisprudence jurisprudential jurists justice kind largely law's lawyers less limits living Lord maintain matter meaning method moral Moreover move natural objective offer operation organisms particular past philosophical political possible practice pragmatic precedent present principles problem progress radical reason remains response result rhetorical rules scientific selection sense simply situation social society substantive suggest supra theory thing tion tradition transformation treated truth turn understanding universal values