...the goods levied, and before the Prothonotary made (a) Vide Tmuuint v. Jfartop, 1 Moore, 287, where a verdict was taken for the plaintiff by consent, subject to the award of an arbitrator, such reference being authorized by an order of mri prim, and the defendant...

...Deeping, in the county of Lincoln. At the trial before Denman,C. J. at the Lincoln Spring assizes, 18.'J3, a verdict was taken for the plaintiff by consent, subject to the opinion uf the Court of King's Bench upon the following case :— 10th March, 1801, William Spratt devised...

...the suit three years before. The suit was brought to trial at the Oneida circuit in June, 1813, and a verdict was taken for the plaintiff by consent, subject to the opinion of the supreme court upon a case made, in which the title of the State and that of Thurman, as assignee of...

...entitled to sign judgment in the ordinary way, and to lax his bill of costs in the action. 1837- TT, a verdict was taken for the plaintiff by consent, subject to the taxation of the bill of costs within the first five days of the present Term. The defendant, however,...

...protesting that there was not nor is such custom as in that plea mentioned, replied de injuna. At the trial a verdict was taken for the plaintiff, by consent, subject to the award, order, arbitrament, final end, and determination of a barrister, who was by the order of nisi...

...protesting that there was not nor is such custom as in that plea mentioned, replied de injuria. At the trial a verdict was taken for the plaintiff, by consent, subject to the award, order, arbitrament, final end, and determination of a barrister, who was by the order of nisi...

...to an action, in cases where the matter in dispute could be more conveniently settled in this mode. A verdict was taken for the plaintiff by consent, subject to the award of an arbitrator agreed upon by the parties, and the reference was made a rule of court. This...

...offering the preemption and refusal to them, or paying them the one-tenth of the price of such assignment. A verdict was taken for the plaintiff by consent, subject to the opinion of the Supreme Court, which gave judgment for the plaintiff. The judges, however, assigned different reasons...

...the second day of sittings, the objection was again made ; but, on the recommendation of the Court, a verdict was taken for the plaintiff, by consent, subject to the objection. By the 215th section of the new practice act, the practice and proceedings of the Court,...

...the second day of sittings, the objection was again made ; but, on the recommendation of the Court, a verdict was taken for the plaintiff, by consent, subject to the objection. By the 215th section of the new practice act, the practice and proceedings of the Court,...