Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

COMPLAINTS IN WHICH REPARATION WAS AUTHORIZED ON INFORMAL

PLEADINGS. NOVEMBER 30, 1907, TO JUNE 3, 1908.

562. John T. Leonard v. Atlanta, Birmingham & Atlantic Railroad Company. December 3, 1907. Refund of $39.30 on carload of sugar from Brunswick, Ga., to Roanoke, Ala., on account of excessive rate.

563. In the matter of relief of agents of the Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Company. Refund of $31.56 on shipments of apples representing difference between weight based on minimum of 30,000 pounds and actual gross weight.

564. National Wholesale Lumber Dealers' Association v. Southern Railway Company. December 1, 1907. Refund of $19.68 on carload of lumber from Nantahala, N. C., to New York, N. Y., on account of misrouting by defendant's agent.

565. Wabash Portland Cement Company v. Wabash Railroad Company. December 3, 1907. Refund of $708 on 236 carloads of cement from Stroh, Ind., to Detroit, Mich., on account of failure to absorb switching charges.

566. J. Rose & Company v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Company. November 30, 1907. Refund of $14.47 on 3 carloads of excelsior from Dalton, Ga., to Memphis, Tenn., on account of excessive minimum carload weight.

567. H. I. Ruth v. Missouri Pacific Railway Company. December 3, 1907. Refund of $22.22 on 2 carloads of oak lumber from Knizer, Mo., to Moline, Ill., on account of misrouting by defendant's agent.

568. W. S. Weyer v. Missouri Pacific Railway Company. December 3, 1907. Refund of $123.60 on carload of nails from Kokomo, Ind., to Ottawa, Kans., reshipped to St. Joseph, Mo., on account of misrouting by defendant's agent.

569. Boston Excelsior Company v. Canadian Pacific Railway Company. December 4, 1907. Refund of $86.40 on carload of excelsior from Milo, Me., to Dayton, Ohio, on account of excessive rate.

570. Harper & Company v. Wells, Fargo & Company Express. December 3, 1907. Refund of $51.60 on shipments of fruit and vegetables from Excelsior, Ark., to Pittsburg, Kans., on account of excessive rate.

571. Sigma Lumber Company v. Central of Georgia Railway. November 30, 1907. Refund of $11.70 on carload of lumber from Sigma, Ala., to Michigan City, Ind., on account of excessive through rate.

572. Vernon Cantaloupe Growers & Shippers' Association v. Wells, Fargo & Company Express. November 30, 1907. Refund of $357.55 on 3 carloads of cantaloupes from Vernon, Tex., to Denver, Colo., on account of excessive rate.

573. Phillips Sheet & Tin Plate Company v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company. November 30, 1907. Refund of $1,440.40 on 23 carloads of sheet bars from Pittsburg, Pa., to Clarksburg, W. Va., on account of erroneous publication of rate schedule.

574. II. A. Saggan v. Chicago & North Western Railway Company. November 30, 1907. Refund of $24.13 on 17 carloads of cattle, sheep, and hogs from Ceylon, Minn., to Chicago, Ill., on account of oversight in reprinting of tariff.

575. C. F. Woodward & Company et al. v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company. December 5, 1907. Refund of $1,258.99 on shipments of stone from various points to New York, N. Y., on account of advance in terminal charges without notice to complainants who could have shipped via other lines at the old and lower

rate.

576. Omaha Elevator Company and Trans-Mississippi Grain Company v. Union Pacific Railroad Company. December 7, 1907. Refund of $1,921.74 to Omaha Elevator Company and refund of $2,089.04 to Trans-Mississippi Grain Company on shipments of grain from points in Nebraska to Council Bluffs, Iowa, on account of excessive

rates.

577. American Sugar Refining Company v. Illinois Central Railroad Company. December 6, 1907. Refund of $66.78 on carload of sugar from New Orleans, La., to Gallatin, Tenn., on account of carrier's oversight in publishing rate schedule. 578. H. I. Ruth v. Missouri Pacific Railway Company. December 4, 1907. of $10.81 on carload of oak lumber from Harville, Mo., to Aurora, Ill., on account of misrouting by carrier's agent.

Refund

579. C. L. Centlivre Brewing Company v. Toledo, St. Louis & Western Railroad. December 7, 1907. Refund of $2 on shipment of empty beer barrels and bottles from Decatur, Ind., to Fort Wayne, Ind., on account of misrouting by carrier's agent. 580. Western Produce Company v. Atlanta & St. Andrews Bay Railway Company. March 9, 1908. Refund of $150.97 on 4 carloads of watermelons from Cottondale, Fla., to Chicago, Ill., on account of excessive rate.

581. Idaho Lumber Campany v. Oregon Short Line Railroad Company et al. January 3, 1908. Refund of $115.50 on 2 carloads of coal from Erie, Colo., to Twin Falls, Idaho, on account of excessive rate.

582. Minneapolis Cedar & Lumber Company v. Northern Pacific Railway Company. December 17, 1907. Refund of $14.20 on shipments of lumber on account of excessive

rate.

583. Morris & Company v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company. December 30, 1907. Refund of $48.87 on 2 carloads of cotton-seed oil from Weleetka Junction, Okla., and 1 carload of cotton-seed oil from Ada, Okla., to Chicago, Ill., on account of excessive rate.

584. Shoal Creek Coal Company v. Toledo, St. Louis & Western Railroad Company. December 12, 1907. Refund of $9.52 on carload of coal from Panama, Ill., to Kokomo, Ind., on account of excessive minimum carload weight.

585. Morey & Company v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company et al. December 20, 1907. Refund of $245.39 on shipment of 313 casks of china clay from Newport News, Va., to Kankauna, Wis., on account of contracts having been made at the rate on which claim is made and rate was canceled by Chicago & Northwestern Railway Company through a misunderstanding.

586. Hanford Produce Company v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Company. December 30, 1907. Refund of $27.80 on shipment of eggs from Sioux City, Iowa, to Minneapolis, Minn., on account of excessive rate caused by classification rule as to straps on egg cases.

588. Schloss & Kahn v. Seaboard Air Line Railway. January 6, 1908. Refund of $89.10 on shipment of sugar bagging from Savannah, Ga., to Union Springs, Ala.,

on account of excessive rate.

589. Northwestern Leather Company v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Company. December 11, 1907. Refund of $10.54 on shipment of bark extract from New York, N. Y., to Sault Ste. Marie, Mich., on account of excessive rate.

590. Colorado Fuel & Iron Company v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company. December 9, 1907. Refund of $420.36 on carload of steel pans from Joliet, Ill., to Minnequa, Colo., on account of excessive rate.

591. Bienville Lumber Company v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company. December 12, 1907. Refund of $32.13 on carload of lumber from Alberta, La., to Chester, La., on account of misrouting by carrier's agent.

592. Paterson Crushed Stone Company and Morris County Crushed Stone Company v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad Company. December 9, 1907. Refund of $208.77 to Paterson Crushed Stone Company and refund of $36.74 to Morris County Crushed Stone Company on 71 carloads of crushed stone from Paterson and Millington, N. J., to Chenango Forks, N. Y., on account of excessive rate.

593. J. Stirneman v. Wabash Railroad Company. December 9, 1907. Refund of $31.40 on carload of apples from Jameson, Mo., to Winona, Minn., on account of misrouting by carrier's agent.

594. Volkmer Lumber Company v. Missouri Pacific Railway Company. December 7, 1907. Refund of $8.27 on shipment of oak lumber from Kensett, Ark., to Galesburg, Ill., on account of misrouting by carrier's agent.

595. Stewart & Booth Timber Company v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Company. December 7, 1907. Refund of $45.48 on shipment of cedar posts from Cotter, Ark., to Rossville, Ind., on account of erroneous diversion by carrier's agent.

597. Norman Milling & Grain Company et al. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company. December 9, 1907. Refund of $183.07 to Norman Milling & Grain Company, refund of $38.41 to Model Roller Mills, refund of $88.70 to C. M. Maple, refund of $106.45 to Purcell Mill & Elevator Company, refund of $55.06 to J. H. Shaw and refund of $83.48 to Smith Grain & Elevator Company on 8 carloads of seed wheat from points in Kansas to points in Oklahoma on account of agreement made for charitable purpose to refund to a lower than tariff rate if wheat was used for seed purposes. 598. Crookston Milling Company v. Great Northern Railway Company. December 9, 1907. Refund of $1,909.76 on 39 carloads of wheat from Climax, Nielsville and Fisher, Minn., to Crookston, Minn., on account of change in original billing and assessment of local rates in addition to milling in transit rate, shipment having been delivered short of original destination.

599. Jones & Laughlin Steel Company v. Pittsburg & Lake Erie Railroad Company. December 10, 1907. Refund of $30.03 on 4 carloads of steel billets from Pittsburg, Pa., to Kokomo, Ind., on account of excessive rate.

600. Lutcher & Moore Lumber Company v. Texas & New Orleans Railroad Company. December 18, 1907. Refund of $11.88 on carload of lumber from Orange, Tex., to Chicago, Ill., on account of misrouting by carrier's agent.

601. Roy Campbell v. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Company. December 28, 1907. Refund of $6 on carload of watermelons from Candlish, Tex., to Fort Worth, Tex., thence diverted to Chicago, Ill., on account of excessive reconsignment charge.

602. J. D. Hollingshead Company v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company. January 6, 1908. Refund of $6.65 on carload of oak staves from Paragould, Ark., to Keokuk, Iowa, on account of misrouting by carrier's agent.

603. J. E. Stewart Produce Company v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Company. January 6, 1908. Refund of $58.19 on carload of potatoes from Peters, Ill., to Muskogee, Okla., on account of excessive rate.

605. Iola Portland Cement Company v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Company. December 21, 1907. Refund of $32.30 on carload of cement from Iola, Kans., to Council Bluffs, Iowa, on account of excessive rate.

606. Crowder & Company v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Company. December 17, 1907. Refund of $21.88 on shipment of snapped corn from Falls City, Okla., to Howe, Tex., on account of excessive rate.

607. Frank Geisler v. Michigan Central Railroad Company. January 9, 1908. Refund of $16.88 on shipment of manure from Union Stock Yards, Ill., to Derby, Mich., on account of excessive rate.

608. Clarinda Poultry, Butter, and Egg Company v. Illinois Central Railroad Company. December 14, 1907. Refund of $70.87 on 4 carloads of lumber from Cairo, Ill., to Creston, Iowa, on account of misrouting by carrier's agent.

609. Norfolk Hardwood Company v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company. December 12, 1907. Refund of $6 on 3 carloads of gum logs from Manning, N. C., to Pinners Point, Va., on account of excessive rate.

610. Trans-Mississippi Grain Company v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Company. December 12, 1907. Refund of $11.75 on carload of oats from Winside, Nebr., to Council Bluffs, Iowa, on account of excessive rate.

612. McGowan Brothers v. Northern Pacific Railway Company. January 3, 1908. Refund of $24.18 on carload of wagons from Winona, Minn., to Spokane, Wash., on account of excessive rate.

614. J. O. McIntosh v. San Pedro, Los Angeles & Salt Lake Railroad Company. February 19, 1908. Refund of $118 on shipment of ice from Los Angeles, Cal., to Las Vegas, Nev., on account of excessive rate.

615. H. I. Ruth v. Missouri Pacific Railway Company. March 20, 1908. Refund of $11.22 on shipment of oak lumber from Fisk, Mo., to Moline, Ill., on account of misrouting.

616. Hammond Iron Works v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company. May 6, 1908. Refund of $11.60 on shipment of steel tank from Warren, Pa., to New Orleans, La., on account of excessive rate.

617. Lottman- Myers Manufacturing Company v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Company. January 8, 1908. Refund of $75.65 on carload of iron beds from Richmond, Ind., to Houston, Tex., on account of excessive rate.

618. Illinois Glass Company v. Pittsburg, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Company. January 2, 1908. Refund of $47.55 on 2 shipments of glass bottles from Gas City, Ind., to Winona, Minn., on account of excessive rate.

619. Battle Creek Breakfast Food Company v. Wabash Railroad Company. February 7, 1908. Refund of $88.06 on 6 carloads of cereals from Quincy, Ill., to eastern points on account of inadvertence in canceling rate.

621. C. L. Gray Lumber Company v. Mobile, Jackson & Kansas City Railroad Company. January 22, 1908. Refund of $26.65 on carload of lumber from Stringer, Miss., to Chattanooga, Tenn., on account of misrouting by carrier's agent.

623. Valley Construction & Manufacturing Company v. Eastern Railway Company of New Mexico. December 9, 1907. Refund of $52 on carload of cement plaster from Élida, N. Mex., to Roswell, N. Mex., on account of excessive rate.

624. Bradford Wholesale Furniture Manufacturing Company v. Virginia & Southwestern Railway Company. December 11, 1907. Refund of $8 on shipment of chairs from Elizabethton, Tenn., to Nashville, Tenn., on account of misrouting by carrier's agent.

625. Antrim-Todd Lumber Company v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company. December 10, 1907. Refund of $4.10 on carload of lumber from Antrim, La., to Enid, Okla., on account of misrouting by carrier's agent.

626. Town of Opelousas, La., v. Morgan's Louisiana & Texas Railroad & Steamship Company. December 4, 1907. Refund of $33 on shipment of cast-iron pipe from Bessemer, Pa., to Opelousas, La., on account of excessive rate.

627. Gisholt Machine Company v. Illinois Central Railroad Company et al. March 20, 1908. Refund of $43.89 on shipments of castings from Quincy, Ill., to Madison, Wis., on account of excessive rate.

628. Southern Cotton Oil Company v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company. December 9, 1907. Refund of $87.83 on 3 shipments of cotton-seed oil from Scotland Neck, N. C., to Savannah, Ga., on account of excessive rate.

629. H. I. Ruth v. Missouri Pacific Railway Company. December 10, 1907. Refund of $7.50 on carload of oak lumber from Harviell, Mo., to Moline, Ill., on account of misrouting by carrier's agent.

632. W. F. Bartles v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Company. January 6, 1908. Refund of $303.66 on 14 carloads of sheep from Belle Fourche, S. Dak., to Hubbard, Nebr., on account of excessive rate.

634. Norris Safe & Lock Company v. Great Northern Railway Company. December 26, 1907. Refund of $74.25 on carload of desks from Cincinnati, Ohio, to Seattle, Wash., on account of excessive minimum carload weight.

635. Jones & Laughlin Steel Company v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company. December 26, 1907. Refund of $21.77 on carload of steel from Pittsburg, Pa., to East Moline, Ill., on account of excessive rate.

637. American Hide & Leather Company v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Company. January 3, 1908. Refund of $3 on shipments of hides from Chicago, Ill., to Milwaukee, Wis., on account of error in tariff.

638. Coyle & Diehl v. Cumberland Valley Railroad Company. December 7, 1907. Refund of $48.64 on shipment of wheat from East Fayetteville, Pa., to Chilhowie, Va., on account of excessive rate.

639. Toaffe & Company v. Southern Pacific Company.

December 13, 1907. Refund of $13.57 on 6 carloads of sheep from Reno, Nev., to San Francisco, Cal., on account of erroneous publication of rate schedule.

641. Nebraska Bridge Supply & Lumber Company v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Company. January 3, 1908. Refund of $17.68 on shipment of cedar posts from Farley, Ala., to Omaha, Nebr., on account of oversight in publication of tariff.

642. Cuthbert Grocery Company v. Norfolk & Western Railway Company. December 21, 1907. Refund of $44.92 on shipment of mixed produce from Rural Retreat, Va., to Cuthbert, Ga., on account of excessive rate.

645. In the matter of relief of agent at Duluth of Great Northern Railway Company. January 23, 1908. Refund of $11.27 on 2 carloads of maple flooring from Wells, Mich., to Duluth, Minn., on account of excessive rate.

646. Riverside Milling & Fuel Company v. Southern Pacific Railway Company. January 29, 1908. Refund of $55.02 on carload of vetch seed from Tangent, Oreg., to Riverside, Cal., on account of failure to divert as per instructions and excessive rate.

648. L. Fish Furniture Company v. Pittsburg, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Company. March 25, 1908. Refund of $44.82 on 7 shipments of furniture from Shelbyville, Ind., to Chicago, Ill., on account of excessive rate.

651. Nangle Pole & Tie Company v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Company. February 3, 1908. Refund of $12 on 4 carloads of poles originating on the Minnesota & International Railway on account of unreasonable switching charges.

652. Advance Lumber Company v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company. December 16, 1907. Refund of $4.90 on carload of oak lumber from England, Ark., to Richford, Vt., on account of misrouting by carrier's agent.

653. Humbird Lumber Company v. Northern Pacific Railway Company. January 24, 1908. Refund of $24.80 on 3 carloads of lumber from Sand Point, Idaho, to McClusky, N. Dak., on account of excessive rate.

654. City of Weiser v. Oregon Short Line Railroad Company. February 19, 1908. Refund of $130.10 on shipments of coal from North Kemmerer, Wyo., to Weiser, Idaho, on account of error in publishing tariff.

655. E. D. Carlton v. Missouri Pacific Railway Company. December 16, 1907. Refund of $6.90 on shipment of household goods from Jewell City, Kans., to La Junta, Colo., on account of misrouting by carrier's agent.

656. Superior Manufacturing Company v. Great Northern Railway Company. January 24, 1908. Refund of $130.32 on mixed carload of salt and lime from Superior, Wis., to Saco, Mont., on account of clerical error in publishing tariff.

657. Grandjean & Derby v. Trinity & Brazos Valley Railway Company. March 18, 1908. Refund of $157.26 on shipments of lumber from stations on its line to Laredo, Tex., destined to Monterey, Mexico, on account of excessive rate.

660. New Prague Flouring Mill Company v. Erie & Western Transportation Company. January 4, 1908. Refund of $0.47 on shipment of flour from New Prague, Minn., to Cresson, Pa., on account of excessive estimated weight.

661. New Prague Flouring Mill Company v. Erie & Western Transportation Company. January 4, 1908. Refund of $0.58 on shipment of flour from New Prague, Minn., to Nanty Glo, Pa., on account of excessive estimated weight.

662. George Tileston Milling Company v. Erie & Western Transportation Company. January 4, 1908. Refund of $1.24 on shipment of flour from St. Cloud, Minn., to Hartford, Conn., on account of excessive estimated weight.

663. Listman Mill Company v. Erie & Western Transportation Company. January 4, 1908. Refund of $0.96 on carload of flour from La Crosse, Wis., to York, Pa., on account of excessive estimated weight.

664. Commander Mill Company v. Erie & Western Transportation Company. January 4, 1908. Refund of $0.66 on carload of flour from Duluth, Minn., to Rolfe, Pa., on account of excessive estimated weight.

665. Minnesota Flour Mill Company v. Erie & Western Transportation Company. January 4, 1908. Refund of $0.51 on carload of flour from Stillwater, Minn., to Hamburg, Pa., on account of excessive weight.

666. Eagle Roller Mill Company v. Erie & Western Transportation Company. January 4, 1908. Refund of $0.98 on carload of flour from New Ulm, Minn., to Harrisburg, Pa., on account of excessive estimated weight.

667. Jennison Brothers & Company v. Erie & Western Transportation Company. January 4, 1908. Refund of $1.51 on carload of flour from Janesville, Minn., to Lebanon, Pa., on account of excessive estimated weight.

668. Everett, Aughenbaugh Company v. Erie & Western Transportation Company. January 4, 1908. Refund of $1.04 on carload of flour from Waseca, Minn., to Mont Clare, Pa., on account of excessive estimated weight.

669. Wylie, Son & Company v. Erie & Western Transportation Company. January 4, 1908. Refund of $0.98 on carload of flour from Milwaukee, Wis., to Baltimore, Md., on account of excessive estimated weight.

671. San Pedro, Los Angeles & Salt Lake Railroad Company v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Company. December 1, 1907. Refund of $273 on shipment of 3 dining cars from Chicago, Ill., to Salt Lake City, Utah, on account of excessive rate. 674. L. Goldsmith & Son v. Southern Railway Company. December 10, 1907. Refund of $30.69 on carload of trunk slats from Johnson City, Tenn., to Newark, N. J., on account of excessive rate.

« AnteriorContinuar »