by some Roman ladies, she produced her two boys as the only jewels she set her heart upon. On the reciprocal affections of parent and child, Shakspeare has rivalled, if not surpassed the poets of antiquity. What can be deemed more powerful in sentiments and language, than some of the bursts of King Lear in regard to his daughters. For example I tax not you, ye elements, with unkindness; That have with two pernicious daughters joined So old and white as this. And again at the sight of the counterfeited Mad Tom What, have his daughters brought him to this pass? So Hamlet's interview with his mother is one of the most powerful scenes in any dramatic composition. His answer, also, when pressed to mitigate his grief for his father, is a great literary treat. The mode of repeating the last line but one was considered among Garrick's masterpieces of acting. Seems, madam! nay it is; I know not seems, No, nor the fruitful river in the eye, Though Fielding has paid a high compliment to Garrick, where he describes Partridge's feelings on witnessing the Ghost scene in Hamlet, yet he is generally supposed to have been inferior to Betterton in that scene. Betterton had conversed with the performer who had acted the part according to Shakspeare's own instructions; he looked so ghastly horrified, that one ghost caught the infection and could not go on with his part. From the description of Garrick's acting in Churchill's Rosciad, and other places, it would seem that his starts, and pauses, were more electrical even than the repetition of Shakspeare's words. Churchill contends that in this Garrick did no violence to nature. Each start is nature, and each pause is thought. There are some fine touches of parental affection in Barbantio's conduct to Desdemona; and still finer in Lady Constance's language concerning young Arthur, as in her answer to the priest. He talks to me that never had a Son. But, Janus-like, Shakspeare makes Lady Constance utter some rubbish, though mixed up with beauties, as in the following passage : King P. You are as fond of grief as of your child. Lies in his bed, walks up and down with me, Stuffs out his vacant garments with his form, If this stricture on Shakspeare appear unmerited, I doubt if any one will be found who will defend the following passage, occurring also in the midst of considerable beauties. The Duchess of York prays the king to pardon her son, who had been guilty of treason, but the Duke of York unnaturally presses the king not to relent. Duke. Duchess. No word, like pardon, for king's mouth so meet. Speak it in French, king, say, pardonnez-moi. Duchess. Dost thou teach pardon, pardon to destroy? That set'st the word itself against the word. Speak pardon as 'tis current in our land This chopping French I do not understand. Shakspeare has a humorous description of Launce parting with his parents, which he relates by making his hat, staff and shoes represent the persons present. He is surprized at his dog not having wept, "which a Jew would have done;" he must have been a 66 very pebble-dog, with no more pity in him than a dog." One of the most humorous things written in any age or country is the scene, in which first Falstaff, in King Cambyses' vein, and then Prince Henry, takes off the old king, and supposes him to be lecturing his son upon the subject of his associates. But in the same play, as if to show the extraordinary versatility of his genius, Shakspeare puts into the mouth of Prince Henry the most becoming sentiments of filial piety, where he restores the crown to his father whom he supposed to have been dead. Many pretty touches of parental tenderness are interspersed in the writings of our minor poets. The following are quo tations extracted from longer passages on the same subject: Delightful task! to rear the tender thought, Sweet babes! who like the little playful fawns Thomson. By your delighted mother's side, Who now your infant steps shall guide ? Ah! where is now the hand whose tender care, How childhood in its winning years Th' attempered soul to tenderness can move, The thoughts and cares inwoven with that love, My daughter! with thy name this song began. I see thee not,—I hear thee not, but none Can be so wrapt in thee; thou art the friend As, with a sigh, I deem thou might'st have been to me. We may usefully compare the unhappy state of mind in the last extracted passage with that of persons who are contented to follow the course which nature has prescribed. Burns' "Cotter's Saturday Night :" Then homeward all take off their several way, And proffer up to Heaven the warm request It is from And decks the lily fair in flowery pride, Compared with this, how poor religious pride, In all the pomp of method and of art, May hear, well pleas'd, the language of the soul, Burns has also described the toddling wee-things coming to meet the father on his return from work; this family incident is, however, best described by Gray : For them no more the blazing hearth shall burn, Or busy housewife ply her evening care Nor children run to lisp their sire's return Or climb his knees the envied kiss to share. Nor shall we allow Burns to put us out of conceit with the sacerdotal stole," if it serve the village children to pluck, as they did that of Goldsmith's good Parson, in order to catch his parental smile. 66 In Gay's fable of the changeling it is given as a reason why Fairies would not change their children for those of mortals, that, Every mother prefers her booby to another." This predilection is found to exist, even where the child is not such a counterpart of the Parent as Dryden gives Flecknoe in Mac-Flecknoe. Benvenuto Cellini, the celebrated artist, whose little bell is now one of the principal curiosities exhibited at Strawberry Hill, used a similar argument to the |