Delaware Reports: Containing Cases Decided in the Supreme Court (excepting Appeals from the Chancellor) and the Superior Court and the Orphans Court of the State of Delaware, Volumen27
David Thomas Marvel, John W. Houston, James Pennewill, Samuel Maxwell Harrington, William Henry Boyce, William Watson Harrington, William J. Storey, Charles L. Terry
Mercantile Print. Company, 1915
Comentarios de la gente - Escribir un comentario
No encontramos ningún comentario en los lugares habituales.
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
action admitted adverse possession agent alleged amended amount appear application authority believe Boyce carry cause charged circumstances claim commerce common condition consideration considered Constitution contract corporation counsel County court damages deceased decision defendant defendant's Delaware delivered determine direct districts dollars duty effect entered entitled evidence exercise existing express facts filed give given ground guilty held hundred injuries Insurance intended interest intoxicating liquors issue Judges judgment jury justice land liquor March matter meaning motion necessary negligence opinion owner paid particular party payment person petition plaintiff plea pleaded possession present proceeding prohibited proof proper prove question reasonable received recover regulate relation respect rule sell shipment sold statement statute street sufficient Superior Court Term territory testimony thereof tion transportation trespass trial verdict violation witnesses writ
Página 596 - To regulate commerce with foreign nations, among the several States, and with the Indian tribes.
Página 617 - ... received, possessed, sold, or in any manner used, either in the original package or otherwise, in violation of any law of such State, Territory, or District of the United States, or place noncontiguous to but subject to the jurisdiction thereof, is hereby prohibited.
Página 122 - Morrison believed, or had reasonable grounds to believe, himself in danger of death or great bodily harm...
Página 368 - ... transported Into any State or Territory, or remaining therein for use, consumption, sale or storage therein, shall upon arrival In such State or Territory be subject to the operation and effect of the laws of such State or Territory enacted in the exercise of its police powers, to the same extent and in the same manner as though such liquids or liquors had been produced in such State or Territory, and shall not be exempt therefrom by reason of being introduced therein In original packages or...
Página 634 - Absence or failure of consideration is matter of defense as against any person not a holder in due course; and partial failure of consideration is a defense pro tanto, whether the failure is an ascertained and liquidated amount or otherwise.
Página 244 - May, in the twenty-ninth year, &c. contributed and paid divers large sums of money, amounting in the whole to a large sum of money, to wit, the sum of...
Página 113 - A holder in due course holds the instrument free from any defect of title of prior parties, and free from defenses available to prior parties among themselves, and may enforce payment of the instrument for the full amount thereof against all parties liable thereon.
Página 384 - No reason is perceived why, if Congress chooses to provide that certain designated subjects of interstate commerce shall be governed by a rule which divests them of that character at an earlier period of time than would otherwise be the case, it is not within its competency to do so.
Página 607 - That all fermented, distilled, or other intoxicating liquors or liquids transported into any state or territory or remaining therein for use, consumption, sale or storage therein, shall upon arrival in such state or territory be subject to the operation and effect of the laws of such state or territory...
Página 222 - A warehouseman is liable for damages for loss of or injury to the goods caused by his failure to exercise such care in regard to them as a reasonably careful man would exercise under like circumstances but unless otherwise agreed he is not liable for damages which could not have been avoided by the exercise of such care.