 | United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner - 1952 - 1030 páginas
...indirectly, that will should be recognized and obeyed. The major premise of the conclusion expressed in a statute, the change of policy that induces the enactment,...have not said it, and therefore we shall go on as before." JohnFRANKFURTER, J., dissenting. 343 US son v. United States, 163 F. 30, 32 (per Holmes, J.);... | |
 | United States. Court of Claims, Audrey Bernhardt - 1953 - 968 páginas
...States, 163 Fed. 30, 32, should not be done by a court in the interpretation of statutes. His words were "We see what you are driving at, but you have not said it, and therefore we shall go on as before." This case illustrates the inherent wisdom of the canon of construction to which we have referred... | |
 | United States. General Accounting Office - 1943 - 1414 páginas
...indirectly, that will should be recognized and obeyed. The major premise of the conclusion expressed in a statute, the change of policy that induces the enactment, may not be set out ID terms, but it is not an adequate discharge of duty for courts to say : We see what you are driving... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Appropriations Committee - 1940 - 296 páginas
...obeyed. The major premise of the conclusion expressed in a statute, the change of policy that endorses the enactment may not be set out in terms, but it...have not said it, and therefore we shall go on as before.' " See also United Mine Workers v. Coronado Coal Co. (259 US 344, 385-389; 1922) ; Funk v.... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner - 1941 - 816 páginas
...indirectly, that will should be recognized and obeyed. The major premise of the conclusion expressed in a statute, the change of policy that induces the enactment,...terms, but it is not an adequate discharge of duty for the courts to say: We see what you are driving at, but you have not said it, and therefore we shall... | |
 | United States. General Accounting Office - 1941 - 1080 páginas
...indirectly, that will should be recognised and obeyed. The major premise of the conclusion expressed in a statute, the change of policy that induces the enactment,...terms, but it is not an adequate discharge of duty for the courts to say : We see what you are driving at, but you have not said it, and therefore we shall... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner - 1941 - 828 páginas
...indirectly, that will should be recognized and obeyed. The major premise of the conclusion expressed in a statute, the change of policy that induces the enactment,...terms, but it is not an adequate discharge of duty for the courts to say: We see what you are driving at, but you have not said it, and therefore we shall... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Interstate Commerce - 1942 - 118 páginas
...obeyed. The major premise of the conclusion expressed in a statute, the change of policy that enduces the enactment, may not be set out in terms, but it is not an adequate discharge of duty for the courts to say : We see what you are driving at, but you have not said it, and therefore we shall... | |
 | 1943 - 580 páginas
...indirectly, that will should be recognized and obeyed. The major premise of the conclusion expressed in a statute, the change of policy that induces the enactment,...have not said it, and therefore we shall go on as before." Johnson v. United States, 168 Fed. 30, 32 ; and in Van Beeck v. Sattne Towiny Co., 300 US... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Agriculture - 1949 - 262 páginas
...indirectly, that will should berecognized and obeyed. The major premise of the conclusion expressed in a statute, the change of policy that induces the enactment,...have not said it, and therefore we shall go on as before.' Johnson \. United States ( (CCA 1st) 163 F. 30, 32, 18 LRA (NS) 1194, 2 Am. Bank. Ilep. 724)."... | |
| |
The Legislature has the power to decide what the policy of the law shall be, and if it has intimated its will, however indirectly, that will should be recognized and obeyed. The major premise of the conclusion expressed in a statute, the change of policy... 
