A similar added element from the man's mind accompanies every endeavor of his to tell what he has heard, or even, at some other time, thought or felt. From these facts, it follows that the aim of language, so far as this can be determined by what it actually and necessarily does, is to cause the same effects to be produced in the hearer's mind that are experienced in the speaker's mind. Now if one, when talking, conceive that this is an easy aim to attain; that what he has heard or seen or thought or felt, needs only to be told in clear, intelligible phraseology, in order to produce in another the same effects as in himself, then he will be content with conventional modes of expression; he will use in the main plain language, whether referring to what he has heard, as in this: And there was mounting in hot haste: the steed, Roused up the soldier ere the morning star; While thronged the citizens with terror dumb, Or whispering, with white lips,-"The foe! they come ! they come ! Or to what he has seen, as in this: Then from the shining car -Childe Harold, 3: Byron. Leaped Hector with a mighty cry, and seized His fallen brother to the foe, but walked -Iliad, 8: Bryant's Tr. Or to what he has thought, as in this: By the world, I think my wife be honest, and think she is not; -Othello, iii., 3: Shakespear. Ay, you did wish that I would make her turn; Or to what he has felt, as in this: Six feet in earth my Emma lay; And yet I loved her more, For so it seemed, than till that day And turning from her grave, I met, A basket on her head she bare; Her brow was smooth and white; It was a pure delight! There came from me a sigh of pain I looked at her, and looked again, And did not wish her mine! -Idem, iv., I. -Two April Mornings: Wordsworth, On the other hand, however, if a man conceive that the end at which he is aiming is difficult to attain; that what he has heard, or seen, or thought, or felt, either on account of its own nature, or of the nature of those whom he is addressing, is hard for them to realize in its full force, and with all its attendant circumstances, then, as his object is to convey not merely an apprehension but a comprehension, both complete and profound, of that of which he has to speak, he will dwell upon it; he will repeat his descriptions of it; he will tell not only what it is, but what it is like; in other words, he will try to produce the desired effect, by putting extra force into his language, and, in order to do this, inasmuch as the force of language consists in its representative element, he will augment the representation by multiplying his comparisons; his language will become figurative. It will be so for the same reason that the language of a savage or a child, even when giving utterance to less occult ideas, is figurative, because he feels that the words at his command are inadequate to express or impress his meaning completely. Notice the exemplifications of these statements in the following, referring to what has been heard: A cry that shivered to the tingling stars, And as it were one voice, an agony Of lamentation, like a wind that shrills All night in a waste land where no one comes. -Mort d'Arthur: Tennyson. And the wide hum of that wild host I had rather be a kitten, and cry mew, Than one of these same metre ballad-mongers; I had rather hear a brazen can'stick turn'd, Or a dry wheel grate on the axle-tree ; And that would set my teeth nothing on edge, 'Tis like the forc'd gait of a shuffling nag. - Henry IV., iii., 1: Shakespear. She moves as light across the grass And like my shadow, close yet free, The thought of her aye follows me, -A Mercenary Marriage: D. M. Mulock. And to what has been felt: Oh, what a noble mind is here o'erthrown! The courtier's, scholar's, soldier's eye, tongue, sword; The glass of fashion, and the mould of form, Th' observed of all observers, quite, quite down! -Hamlet, iii., I: Shakespear. CHAPTER XIX. PROSE AND POETRY; PRESENTATION AND REPRESENTATION IN ITS VARIOUS FORMS. Tendencies of Plain Language toward Prose, and of Figurative toward Poetry-Plain Language tends to Present Thought, and Figurative to Represent it-All Art Representative-But Plain Language may represent, and Figurative may present-Poetic Representation depends upon the Character of the Thought-If a Poet thinks of Pictures, Plain Language describing them will represent according to the Method of Direct Representation-If not of Pictures, he may illustrate his Theme by thinking in Pictures, and use Figurative Language according to the Methods of Indirect Expressional or Descriptive Representation-Pure Representation is solely Representative-Alloyed Representation contains some Presentation. THE HERE is a subtle feeling in the minds of many, but especially of those who, with strong imaginations and delicate æsthetic sensibilities, have not improved their critical faculties by a wide acquaintance with the best poetry, that figurative language only is in the highest sense poetic. Whenever a feeling like this exists, it should be treated with respect; we may be sure that there is a reason for it. The feeling in the particular case before us, leads to an erroneous inference, as we must conclude from considerations already noticed, and this conclusion will be confirmed as we go on. But how about the origin of the feeling? It springs, as seems most likely, from the fact that plain and figurative language are judged less from the effects that they produce when actually used |