Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

This rule applies to deeds of trust, mortgages, pledges, confes

kin, 83 Ala. 142, 3 So. 296, 3 Am. St. Rep. 702; Kiser v. Gamble, 75 Ala. 386; Bradley v. Ragsdale, 64 Ala. 558; Pickett v. Pipkin, 64 Ala. 520; Coleman v. Smith, 55 Ala. 368; Governor v. Campbell, 17 Ala. 566; Borland v. Mayo, 8 Ala. 104; Stover v. Herrington, 7 Ala. 142, 41 Am. Dec.

86.

Ark.-Wallace V. Bernheim, 63 Ark. 108, 37 S. W. 712; Erb v. Cole, 31 Ark. 554; Galbreath v. Cook, 30 Ark. 417; De Prato v. Jester (1892), 20 S. W. 807.

Cal. Grunsky v. Perlin, 110 Cal. 179, 42 Pac. 575; Priest v. Brown, 100 Cal. 626, 35 Pac. 323; Cohen v. Knox, 90 Cal. 266, 27 Pac. 215, 13 L. R. A. 711.

Colo.-Riethmann v. Godsman, 23 Colo. 202, 46 Pac. 686.

75

Conn.-Unmack v. Douglass, Conn. 633, 55 Atl. 12; Knower v. Cadden Clothing Co., 57 Conn. 202, 17 Atl. 580; Sisson v. Roath, 30 Conn. 15.

D. C.-Droop v. Ridenour, 11 App. Cas. 224; Birdsall v. Welch, 6 D. C. 316.

Ga.-Hollis v. Sales, 103 Ga. 75, 29 S. E. 482.

Ill.-Hughes v. Noyes, 171 Ill. 575, 49 N. E. 703; Marmon v. Harwood, 124 III. 104, 16 N. E. 236, 7 Am. St. Rep. 345; Schroeder v. Walsh, 120 Ill. 403, 11 N. E. 70; Sawyer v. Moyer, 109 Ill. 461; Seeders v. Allen, 98 Ill. 468; Jewett v. Cook, 81 Ill. 260; Hatch v. Jordan, 74 Ill. 414; Miller v. Kirby, 74 Ill. 242; Mathes v. Dobschuetz, 72 Ill. 438; Herkelrath v. Stookey, 63 Ill. 486; Gridley v. Bingham, 51 Ill. 153; Hessing v. McCloskey, 37 Ill. 341; Meixsell v.

Williamson, 35 Ill. 529; Myers v. Kinzie, 26 Ill. 36; Brown v. Riley, 22 Ill. 45; Ewing v. Runkle, 20 Ill. 448; Eickstraedt v. Moses, 105 Ill. App. 634; Edwards v. Story, 105 Ill. App. 433; Ball v. Callahan, 95 Ill. App. 615; Johnston v. Hirschberg, 85 Ill. App. 47; Oakford v. Dunlap, 63 Ill. App. 498; Rhoades, etc., Co. v. Smith, 43 Ill. App. 400; Griffin v. Wolf, 31 Ill. App. 554.

Ind.-Hedrick v. Hall, 155 Ind. 371, 58 N. E. 257; Marmon v. White, 151 Ind. 445, 51 N. E. 930; Straight v. Roberts, 126 Ind. 383, 26 N. E. 73; Neisler v. Harris, 115 Ind. 560, 18 N. E. 39; First Nat. Bank v. Carter, 89 Ind. 317; Trentman v. Swartzell, 85 Ind. 443; Moore v. Lampton, 80 Ind. 301; Brown v. Rawlings, 72 Ind. 505; Spaulding v. Myers, 64 Ind. 264; Johnston v. Field, 62 Ind. 377; Kyger v. F. Hull Skirt Co., 34 Ind. 249; McCormick v. Hyatt, 33 Ind. 546; Palmer v. Henderson, 20 Ind. 297; Ewing v. Gray, 12 Ind. 64; Stewart v. English, 6 Ind. 176; Doe v. Horn, 1 Ind. 363, 50 Am. Dec. 470; South Bend Iron Works Co. v. Duddleson (App. 1891), 27 N. E. 312; Wilson v. Clark, 1 Ind. App. 182, 27 N. E. 310.

Ind. T.-Purcell Wholesale Grocery Co. v. Bryant (1905), 89 S. W. 662.

[ocr errors]

Iowa.-Atkinson v. McNider (1905), 105 N. W. 504; Urdangen & Greenberg Bros. v. Doner, 122 Iowa, 533, 98 N. W. 917; Thompson v. Zuckmayer (1903), 94 N. W. 476; Brooks v. Jones, 114 Iowa, 385, 82 N. W. 434, 86 N. W. 300; Roberts v. Press, 97 Iowa, 475, 66 N. W. 756; Davis v. Garrison, 85 Iowa, 447, 52 N. W. 359; Stroff v. Swafford, 81 Iowa,

sions of judgment, and other transfers to secure creditors, as

695, 47 N. W. 1023; Kellogg v. 217; Whiting v. Prentice, 12 Rob. Aherin, 48 Iowa, 299; Jones

V.

[blocks in formation]

Kan.-Parmenter V. Lomax, 68 Kan. 61, 74 Pac. 634; Schram v. Taylor, 51 Kan. 547, 33 Pac. 315; Farlin v. Sook, 30 Kan. 401, 1 Pac. 123, 46 Am. Rep. 100; Wilson v. Fuller, 9 Kan. 176; Diefendorf v. Oliver, 8 Kan. 365; Roach v. Barry, 5 Kan. App. 879, 48 Pac. 866.

Ky.-Anglin v. Conley, 27 Ky. L. Rep. 1177, 87 S. W. 1137, 24 Ky. L. Rep. 1551, 71 S. W. 926; Beadles v. Miller, 51 Ky. 32; Brown v. Smith, 46 Ky. 361; Brown v. Foree, 46 Ky. 357, 46 Am. Dec. 519; Boyce v. Waller, 41 Ky. 91; Violett v. Violett, 32 Ky. 323; Carter v. Richardson, 22 Ky. L. Rep. 1204, 60 S. W. 397; American Brewing Co. v. McGruder, 17 Ky. L. Rep. 762, 32 S. W. 603; Farmers', etc., Nat. Bank v. Connor, 13 Ky. L. Rep. 592; Meyer v. Specker, 10 Ky. L. Rep. 116; Wiseman v. McAlpin, 6 Ky. L. Rep. 660; Allen v. Gilliland, 5 Ky. L. Rep. 320; Ferguson v. May, 4 Ky. L. Rep. 989.

La.-Chaffe v. Gill, 43 La. Ann. 1054, 10 So. 361; Lowenstein v. Fudickar, 43 La. Ann. 886, 9 So. 742; Leen Kee v. Smith, 35 La. Ann. 518; Bastian v. Christesen, 34 La. Ann. 883; Montgomery v. Wilson, 31 La. Ann. 196; Shultz v. Morgan, 27 La. Ann. 616; Billgery v. Schnell, 26 La. Ann. 467; Southern Dry Dock Co. v. Bayou Sara Packet Co., 24 La. Ann.

141; Planters' Bank v. Watson, 9 Rob. 267; Barrett v. His Creditors, 4 Rob. 408; Thompson v. Gordon, 12 La. 260; Rhodes v. Beaman, 10 La. 363; McManus v. Jewett, 9 La. 170; Bauduc v. His Creditors, 4 La. 247; Kenney v. Dow, 10 Mart. 577, 13 Am. Dec. 342.

Me.-Tolman v. Ward, 86 Me. 303, 29 Atl. 1081, 41 Am. St. Rep. 556; Stevens v. Hinckley, 43 Me. 440; Davis v. Tibbetts, 39 Me. 279.

Md.-Crooks v. Brydon, 93 Md. 640, 49 Atl. 921; Cooke v. Cooke, 43 Md. 522; Troxall v. Applegarth, 24 Md. 163; Waters v. Riggin, 19 Md.

536.

Mass.-Russell v. Cole, 167 Mass. 6, 44 N. E. 1057, 57 Am. St. Rep. 432; Morse v. Aldrich, 130 Mass. 578; Snow v. Paine, 114 Mass. 520; Hamilton v. Cone, 99 Mass. 478; Green v. Tanner, 49 Mass. 411; Foster v. Hall, 29 Mass. 89, 22 Am. Dec. 400; Kittredge v. Sumner, 28 Mass. 50; Harrison v. Phillips Academy, 12 Mass. 456.

Mich.-Delavan v. Wright, 110 Mich. 143, 67 N. W. 1110; Spring Lake Ins. Co. v. Waters, 50 Mich. 13, 14 N. W. 679.

Miss.-Osborn v. McCallum (1905), 38 So. 609; Tennent-Stribling Shoe Co. v. Davie, 75 Miss. 447, 23 So. 188; Ladnier v. Ladnier, 64 Miss. 368, 1 So. 492; Ewing v. Cargill, 13 Sm. & M. 79; Pope v. Andrews, S. & M. Ch. 135; Bernheim v. Dibrell (1892), 11 So. 795.

Mo.-Mansur-Tebbetts

Implement

Co. v. Ritchie, 159 Mo. 213, 60 S. W. 87; Alberger v. White, 117 Mo. 347, 23 S. W. 92; State v. Mason, 112 Mo.

well as to absolute conveyances, and to transfers of personal as

374, 20 S. W. 629, 34 Am. St. Rep. 390; State v. Hope, 102 Mo. 410, 14 S. W. 985; Hurley v. Taylor, 78 Mo. 238; Byrne v. Becker, 42 Mo. 264; Wise v. Wimer, 23 Mo. 237; Little v. Eddy, 14 Mo. 160; Kelly-Goodfellow Shoe Co. v. Vail, 84 Mo. App. 94; Wachtel v. Ewing, 82 Mo. App. 594; Esselbruegge Mercantile Co. v. Troll, 79 Mo. App. 558; Simon-Gregory Dry Goods Co. v. Schooley, 66 Mo. App. 406; Pierson v. Slifer, 52 Mo. App. 273; Gens v. Hargadine, 45 Mo. App. 38; Hausmann v. Hope, 20 Mo. App. 193.

Mont.-Curtis v. Valiton, 3 Mont.

153.

Neb.-Farmers', etc., Nat. Bank v. Mosher, 63 Neb. 130, 88 N. W. 552; Steinberg v. Buffum, 61 Neb. 778, 86 N. W. 491; Powell v. Yeazel, 46 Neb. 225, 64 N. W. 695; Blumer v. Bennett, 44 Neb. 873, 63 N. W. 14; Edwards v. Reid, 39 Neb. 645, 58 N. W. 202, 42 Am. St. Rep. 607; Farrington v. Stone, 35 Neb. 456, 53 N. W. 389; Crabb v. Morrisey, 31 Neb. 161, 47 N. W. 697; Hedman v. Anderson, 6 Neb. 392.

Nev.-Gregory v. Frothingham, 1 Nev. 253.

N. H.-Currier v. Taylor, 19 N. H. 189; Badger v. Story, 16 N. H. 168.

N. J.-Kinmonth v. White (Ch. 1900), 47 Atl. 1; Flemington Nat. Bank v. Jones, 50 N. J. Eq. 244, 24 Atl. 928; Mathiez v. Day, 36 N. J. Eq. 88; Roe v. Moore, 35 N. J. Eq. 526; New York Fire Ins. Co. v. Tooker, 35 N. J. Eq. 408; Muirhead v. Smith, 35 N. J. Eq. 303; First Nat. Bank v. Irons, 28 N. J. Eq. 43, 625; Tantum v. Green, 21 N. J. Eq. 364; Atwood v. Impson, 20 N. J. Eq. 150.

N. C.-Wolf v. Arthur, 118 N. C. 890, 24 S. E. 671; Nadal v. Britton, 112 N. C. 180, 16 S. E. 914; Woodruff v. Bowles, 104 N. C. 197, 10 S. E. 482; Brown v. Mitchell, 102 N. C. 347, 9 S. E. 702, 11 Am. St. Rep. 748; Beasley v. Bray, 98 N. C. 266, 3 S. E. 497; Savage v. Knight, 92 N. C. 493, 53 Am. Rep. 423; Tredwell v. Graham, 88 N. C. 208; Lassiter v. Davis, 64 N. C. 498. Ohio.-Bancroft V. Blizzard, 13 Ohio, 30.

Okla.-McFadyen V. Masters, 8 Okla. 174, 56 Pac. 1059; Kansas Moline Prow Co. v. Sherman, 3 Okla. 204, 41 Pac. 623, 32 L. R. A. 33; Jackson v. Glaze, 3 Okla. 143, 41 Pac. 79; Chandler v. Colcord, 1 Okla. 260, 32 Pac. 330.

Or.-Livesley v. Heise (1906), 85 Pac. 509; Jennings v. Frazier (1905), 80 Pac. 1011; Garnier v. Wheeler, 40 Or. 198, 66 Pac. 812; Sabin v. Columbia Fuel Co., 25 Or. 15, 34 Pac. 692, 42 Am. St. Rep. 756; Bonser v. Miller, 5 Or. 110.

Pa.-Snayberger v. Fahl, 195 Pa. St. 336, 45 Atl. 1065, 78 Am. St. Rep. 818; Werner v. Zierfuss, 162 Pa. St. 360, 29 Atl. 737; Thompson v. Lee, 3 Watts & S. 479; Towar v. Barrington, Brightley N. P. 253. See Helfrich v. Stem, 17 Pa. St. 143.

S. C.-McElwee v. Kennedy, 56 S. C. 154, 34 S. E. 86; Weinges v. Cash, 15 S. C. 44; Means v. Feaster, 4 S. C. 249.

Tenn.-Jones v. Cullen, 100 Tenn. 1, 42 S. W. 873.

Tex.-Sanger v. Colbert, 84 Tex. 688, 19 S. W. 863; Dodd v. Gaines, 82 Tex. 429, 18 S. W. 618; Le Page v. Slade, 79 Tex. 473, 15 S. W. 496;

well as real property." It is held by some of the authorities

Tillman v. Heller (1890), 14 S. W. 271; Hadock v. Hill, 75 Tex. 193, 12 S. W. 974; Collins v. Cook, 40 Tex. 238; Mills v. Howeth, 19 Tex. 257, 70 Am. Dec. 331; Matador Land & Cattle Co. v. Cooper (Civ. App. 1905), 87 S. W. 235; Wade v. Odle, 21 Tex. Civ. App. 656, 54 S. W. 786; Koch v. Bruce, 20 Tex. Civ. App. 634, 49 S. W. 1101; Garahy v. Bayley, 25 Tex. Suppl. 294; Mills v. Waller, Dall. 416; Hillboldt v. Waugh (Civ. App. 1898), 47 S. W. 829; Tempel v. Dodge, 11 Tex. Civ. App. 42, 31 S. W. 686; Cox v. Morrison (Civ. App. 1895), 31 S. W. 67; Dittman v. Weiss (Civ. App. 1895), 31 S. W. 67; Ward v. Wofford (Civ. App. 1894), 26 S. W. 321; Bailey v. Crittenden, 3 Tex. Civ. App. Cas., § 179. Vt.-Wilson v. Spear, 68 Vt. 145, 34 Atl. 429; Leach v. Francis, 41 Vt. 670.

Va.-Wheby v. Moir, 102 Va. 875, 47 S. E. 1005; Merchants' Bank v. Belt (1898), 30 S. E. 467; Clay v. Walter, 79 Va. 92.

W. Va.-R. M. Sutton & Co. v. Christie (1906), 53 S. E. 602; Dent v. Pickens (1906), 53 S. E. 154; Timms v. Timms, 54 W. Va. 414, 46 S. E. 141; Baer Sons Grocer Co. v. Williams, 43 W. Va. 323, 27 S. E. 345; Casto v. Fry, 33 W. Va. 449, 10 S. E. 799; Lockhard v. Beckley, 10 W. Va. 87; Bishoff v. Hartley, 9 W. Va. 100; Hill v. Ruffner, 3 W. Va. 538.

Wis.-Bannister v. Phelps, 81 Wis. 256, 51 N. W. 417; Second Nat. Bank v. Merrill, 81 Wis. 142, 50 N. W. 503, 29 Am. St. Rep. 870; Mehlhop v. Pettibone, 54 Wis. 652, 11 S. W. 553, 12 N. W. 443; Hopkins v. Langton, 30 Wis. 379. See Bleiler v. Moore, 94

Wis. 385, 69 N. W. 164; Shoemaker v. Katz, 74 Wis. 374, 43 N. W. 151. Can.-Smith v. Moffatt, 28 U. C. Q. B. 486, 27 U. C. Q. B. 195; Bank of Montreal v. Condon, 11 Manitoba, 366; Tucker v. Young, Manitoba T. Wood, 186; Mason v. Scott, 20 Grant Ch. (U. C.) 84; Allan v. McTavish, 8 Ont. App. 440; Brown v. Sweet, 7 Ont. App. 725.

Eng. In re Reis (1904), 2 K. B. 769, 73 L. J. K. B. 929, 91 L. T. Rep. N. S. 592, 11 Manson, 229, 20 L. T. Rep. 547, 53 Wkly. Rep. 122; Halifax Banking Co. v. Gledhill (1891), 1 Ch. 31, 60 L. J. Ch. 181, 63 L. T. Rep. N. S. 623, 39 Wkly. Rep. 104; Parnell v. Stedman, 1 Cab. & E. 153; Golden v. Gillam, 51 L. J. Ch. 503, 20 Ch. 389, 51 L. J. Ch. 154, 46 L. T. Rep. N. S. 222.

30. N. Y.-Fuller Electrical Co. v. Lewis, 101 N. Y. 674, 5 N. E. 437; Metcalf v. Moses, 35 App. Div. 596, 55 N. Y. Supp. 179; Smith v. Post, 3 Thomps. & C. 647.

Ark.-Cornish v. Dews, 18 Ark.

[blocks in formation]

Del.-Slessinger v. Topkis, 1 Marv. 140, 40 Atl. 717; Gamble v. Harris, 5 Del. Ch. 512.

Ga.-Newhoff v. Clegg, 99 Ga. 167, 25 S. E. 184.

Ill.-Young v. Clapp, 147 Ill. 176, 32 N. E. 187, 35 N. E. 372; School Trustees v. Mason (1887), 13 N. E. 235; Webber v. Mackey, 31 Ill. App. 369.

Ind.-Pinnell v. Stringer, 59 Ind.

555.

that to render a conveyance void as to creditors, on the ground that it was made with intent to defraud them, the grantee must have knowledge of, and participate in, the fraud of the grantor.

Ind. T.-Purcell Wholesale Grocery Co. v. Bryant (1905), 89 S. W. 662.

Iowa.-Mills v. Miller, 109 Iowa, 688, 81 N. W. 169; Cox v. Collis, 109 Iowa, 270, 80 N. W. 343; Roberts v. Press, 97 Iowa, 475, 66 N. W. 756; Kohn v. Clement, 58 Iowa, 589, 12 N. W. 550; Moss v. Dearing, 45 Iowa, 530.

Kan.-Davis v. McCarthy, 52 Kan. 116, 34 Pac. 399.

Ky.-Foster v. Grigsby, 64 Ky. 86; Ford v. Williams, 42 Ky. 550.

Mich.-Franklin Needle Co. V. Amazon Hosiery Co., 128 Mich. 198, 87 N. W. 211; Andrews v. Fillmore, 46 Mich. 315, 9 N. W. 431; Beurmann v. Van Buren, 44 Mich. 496, 7 N. W. 67.

Mo.-Byrne v. Becker, 42 Mo. 264; Chouteau v. Sherman, 11 Mo. 385; Frank v. Curtis, 58 Mo. App. 349; Kendall v. Baltis, 26 Mo. App. 411. Neb.-National Bank of Commerce v. Chapman, 50 Neb. 484, 70 S. W. 39; Hedman v. Anderson, 6 Neb. 392.

N. J.-Platt v. McClong (Ch. 1901), 49 Atl. 1125; Folk v. Fonda (Ch. 1894), 29 Atl. 676; Demarest v. Terhune, 18 N. J. Eq. 45.

N. C.-Battle v. Mayo, 102 N. C. 413, 9 S. E. 384. But see Mitchell v. Eure, 126 N. C. 77, 35 S. E. 190.

Pa.-Magee v. Raiguel, 64 Pa. St. 110; Greenwalt v. Austin, 1 Grant, 169; Jennings v. Smith, 22 Pa. Co. Ct. 554, 30 Pitts. L. J. 125.

8. C.-Anderson v. Pilgram, 41 S. C. 423, 19 S. E. 1002, 20 S. E. 64; Smith v. Pate, 3 S. C. 204.

Tenn.-Wilson v. Eifler, 47 Tenn. 31.

32

Tex.-Galveston Dry Goods Co. v. Blum, 23 Tex. Civ. App. 703, 57 S. W. 1121; White v. Sterzing, 11 Tex. Civ. App. 553, 32 S. W. 909; Lewis v. Alexander (Civ. App. 1895), 31 S. W. 414.

Va.-Oberdorfer v. Meyer, 88 Va. 384, 13 S. E. 756.

Wash.-Samuel

v. Kittenger, 6 Wash. 261, 33 Pac. 509.

W. Va.-Baer Sons Grocer Co. v. Williams, 43 W. Va. 323, 27 S. E. 345.

Wis.-Dornbrook v. M. Rumely Co., 120 Wis. 36, 97 N. W. 493.

31. See cases cited in last two preceding notes.

32. N. Y.-Beals v. Guernsey, Johns. 446, 5 Am. Dec. 348.

U. S.-Means v. Montgomery, 23 Fed. 421; Wilson v. Prewett, 30 Fed. Cas. No. 17,828, 3 Woods, 631, rev'd Prewit v. Wilson, 103 U. S. 22, 26 L. Ed. 360.

Ala.-Marshall v. Croom, 52 Ala.

554.

Ark. Trieber v. Andrews, 31 Ark. 163; Splawn v. Martin, 17 Ark. 146. Conn.-Partelo v. Harris, 26 Conn.

480.

Ga.-Claflin v. Ballance, 91 Ga. 411, 18 S. E. 309.

Ill.-Rothgerber v. Gough, 52 Ill. 436; Aultman & Taylor Co. v. Weir, 34 Ill. App. 615; Webber v. Mackey, 31 Ill. App. 369.

Ind. Scott v. Davis, 117 Ind. 232, 26 N. E. 139.

Kan.-La Clef v. Campbell, 3 Kan. App. 756, 45 Pac. 461.

Me.-Blodgett v. Chaplin, 48 Me.

« AnteriorContinuar »