 no one can claim protection for the exclusive use of a trade-mark or tradename which would practically give him a monopoly in the sale of any goods other than those produced or made by himself.  Agricultural Advertising - Página 570editado por - 1907Vista completa - Acerca de este libro
 | United States. Patent Office - 1884 - 580 páginas
...restriction of the right of selection: No one can clnim protection for the exclusive use of a trade-name or trade-mark •which would practically give him a monopoly...goods other than those produced or made by himself. * * * Nor can a Runeric name, or a name merely descriptive of an article of trade, of its qualities,... | |
 | Charles Sidney Whitman - 1875 - 814 páginas
...is applied. Ibid. 7. No one can claim protection for the exclusive use of a trade mark or trade name which would practically give him a monopoly in the sale of any goods otlier than those produced or made by himself. If he could, the public would be injured rather than... | |
 | United States. Patent Office - 1877 - 678 páginas
...such by association. No oue can claim protection for the exclusive use of a tnule-mark or trade-name which would practically give him a monopoly in the sale of any gooda other than those produced or made by himself. A generic name, or a name merely descriptive of... | |
 | 1879 - 550 páginas
...to be over, looked. No one can claim protection for the exclusive use of a trade mark or trade name which would practically give him a monopoly in the...himself. If he could, the public would be injured mther than protected, for competition would be destroyed. Nor can a generic name, or a name merely... | |
 | David Hall Rice, Lepine Cooper Rice - 1880 - 508 páginas
...trade mark. Ibid. 88. No one can claim protection for the exclusive use of a trade mark or a trade name which would practically give him a monopoly in the...goods other than those produced or made by himself. Ibid. 89. "For Family Use," when applied to an article, indicates as plainly as words can the use for... | |
 | 1881 - 1900 páginas
...Justice Strong, that no one can claim protection for the exclusive use of a trade-mark or trade-name which would practically give him a monopoly in the...of any goods other than those produced or made by him&lf. If he could, the public would be injured rather than protected, for competition would be destroyed.... | |
 | 1896 - 2118 páginas
...exclusive use of a trade-mark or tradename which would practically give him a monopoly in the wile of any goods other than those produced or made by himself. If he could, the public wnuld be injured, rather than protected; for competition would be destroyed. Nor can a generic name,... | |
 | Isaac Grant Thompson - 1882 - 962 páginas
...protection for the exclusive use of a mark which Lawrence Manufacturing Co. v. Lowell Hosiery Mills. would practically give him a monopoly in the sale of any goods other than those of his own manufacture. See also, Oilman v. Hunnewell, 122 Mass. 139. Letters and figures, when used... | |
 | 1917 - 1232 páginas
...However, under this rule, one cannot claim protection for the exclusive use of a trade-name which would give him a. monopoly in the sale of any goods other than those of his own. Neither can a generic name or a name descriptive of an article of trade, of its qualities,... | |
 | William Henry Browne - 1885 - 774 páginas
...of the thing, may not be appropriated by one to his exclusive use.4 No one can claim protection for the exclusive use of a trademark which would practically give him a monopoly in the sale of any goods.6 The foregoing remarks, which are mostly in the exact words of judges, are examples of the sayings... | |
| |
