COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH. February 12. The court delivered judgment in the following cases:— Reg. v. Commissioners of Excise.-Rule for mandamus discharged. Phillips v. Shervill.-Rule absolute for entering verdict for defendant. Cobb v. Becke.-Rule absolute for entering a nonsuit. Mayor, &c. of Rochester v. Ledy.-Rule for new trial discharged. Reg. v. Trustees of Taunton Market.-Order of sessions confirmed. Hopkinson v. Lee.-Rule absolute for entering a nonsuit. In the press, and shortly will be ready, A PRACTICAL TREATISE on the LAW of RAIL. WAYS. CONTENTS. Procedure of Railway Bills through Parliament.-Standing Orders in Parliament.-Jurisdiction of the Board of Trade: first, by Parliamentary Resolutions; secondly, by the Statute Law.-Registration of Companies under 7 & 8 Vict. c. 110.-Compensation Cases-On Mandamus. On Injunction-Liabilities of Shareholders and Holders of Scrip.-Rating of Railways. Forms of Pleadings-Reports of Railway Committees; and all the Statutes.-Forms of Deeds, &c. By W. HODGES, Esq., of the Inner Temple, Barrister at Law. S. Sweet, 1, Chancery-lane. Of whom may be had, recently published, A TREATISE on PRESUMPTIONS of LAW and FACT, with the Theory and Rules of Presumptive or Circumstantial Proof in Criminal Cases. By W. M. BEST, Esq., A. M., LL. B., of Gray's Inn, Barrister at Law. In 8vo., price 15s. boards. Also, preparing for the Press, LAW BOOKS. Mr. HODGSON will SELL by AUCTION, at his Great Room, 192 Fleet-street, (Corner of Chancery-lane), on TUESDAY next, Feb 18, at half-past 12, THE VALUABLE LAW LIBRARY of THOMAS CO MERFORD BARTRUM, Esq., of Lincoln's Inn, Barrister at Law deceased, including Statutes at Large from Magna Charta to 7 Vict. the Year-Books, Statutes of the Realm, Domesday Book, Comyns's Di gest by Hammond, Jarman's Conveyancing by Sweet, Cruise's Digest by White, Series of the Reports in Law and Equity, complete to the presen Time; modern Books of Practice and Treatises: the whole in fine Preservation. To be viewed, and Catalogues had. EASE IN WALKING AИD COMFORT TO THE FEET. PANNUS-CORIUM. EASE in WALKING and COMFORT to the FEET. Wellington-street, Strand, London.-HALL & Co., SOLE PATENTEES of the PANNUS CORIUM, or Leather-Cloth Boots and Shoes for Ladies and Gentlemen.-These articles have borne the test and received the approbation of all who have worn them. Such as are troubled with tenderness of feet from Corns, Bunions, Gout, Chilblains, or any other cause, will find them the softest and most comfortable ever invented. They never draw the feet or get hard, are very durable, and adapted for every climate. They resemble the finest leather, and are cleaned with common blacking. The Patent India-Rubber Goloshes are light, durable, elastic, and waterproof; they thoroughly protect the feet from damp or cold. Hall & Co.'s Portable Waterproof Dresses for Ladies and Gentlemen.This desirable article claims the attention of all who are exposed to the wet. Ladies' Cardinal Cloaks, with Hoods, 188. Gentlemen's Dresses, comprising Cape, Overall, and Hood, 21s. The whole can be carried with convenience in the pocket. N.B.-Hall & Co. particularly invite attention to their Elastic Boots. which are much approved of; they supersede lacing or buttoning, an drawn on in an instant, and are a great support to the ancle. CHEAP SELF-SNUFFING PATENT CANDLES, which burn, without snuffing, like the finest wax, are now retailed throughout the country, at or under 18. per lb. But care must be taken to prevent any imitations being passed off as the Patent Candles, this attempt being made, and with too frequent success, by some dealers, on account of the greater profit upon the imitations. The Trade may obtain them wholesale from Edward Price & Co., Belmont, Vauxhall; and Palmer & Co., Sutton-street, Clerkenwell. PATENT PARAGON CAMPHINE LAMPS. The great fault which was last year found with the Vesta, from its great smoke and emission of black smuts, is happily entirely obviated in the The LAW of RAILWAYS. By EDWARD W. COX, of the Middle Paragon, which surpasses in brilliancy and whiteness of light anything Temple, Barrister at Law. hitherto seen-giving the light of 16 wax candles at the cost of one halfpenny per hour. The largest stock in London to select from at C. WATSON'S Warehouses, 41 and 42, BARBICAN, and 16, NORTON FOLGATE. The Spirit, analysed and recommended by Dr. Ure, is delivered by C. Watson's carts, at 4s. per gallon in screw cans. SILVER SUPERSEDED, and those corrosive and injurious Metals called Nickel and German Silver, supplanted by the introduction of a new and perfectly matchless ALBATA PLATE.-C. WAT EXAMINATION QUESTIONS at HILARY TERM, SON, 41 and 42, BARBICAN, and 16, NORTON FOLGATE, aided by being the Eighth Series, are now ready; with full Answers and References to Cases and Authorities. By the Editors of the "Law Student's Magazine." Price is. 6d., or sent free on receipt of twenty-four postage stamps. Series 1, 3. 4. 5, 6, and 7, may still be had. Kelly & Co., 20, Old Boswell-court, Temple Bar, and all Booksellers. MR. HENRY OLDHAM, A.B., Solicitor, 42, Fleet street, Dublin, Master Extraordinary in Ireland of the Court of Chancery in England, and Commissioner for taking Affidavits, &c. in Ireland for the Courts of Queen's Bench, Common Pleas, and Exchequer in England. Patents for Ireland inrolled. NEW RULES AND ORDERS IN BANKRUPTCY. a Person of Science in the Amalgamation of Metals, has succeeded in bringing to public notice the most beautiful article ever yet offered; possessing all the richness of Silver in appearance, with all its durability and hardness, with its perfect sweetness in use, (undergoing, as it does, a chemical process, by which all that is nauseous in mixed metals is entirely extracted), resisting all acids, may be cleaned as silver, and is manufactured into every Article for the Table and Sideboard. Plain Threaded Fiddle. Fiddle. King's Table Spoons, per doz. Pattern. 35s. Albert Pattern 42.3. ditto ditto 17s. 6d. 425. THE LAW TIMES of this Day contains the above, just Table Forks issued, with the Forms; verbatim Reports of the written Judgments just delivered, as taken by short-hand writers; and all the variety of Legal Intelligence and Professional Advertisements usually found in its Columns. THE TWO SERIES of the NEW RULES and ORDERS, in two THE SECOND EDITION of the INSOLVENT DEBTORS ACT; with practical Notes and Precedents. By J. A. HOMES, Esq., Barrister at Law. Price 58. Law Times Office, 29, Essex-street. WRITING FLUID. 58. 6d. 16s. 6d. 12s. 6d. 258. 32s. Dessert ditto C. WATSON begs the Public will understand that this Metal is peculiarly his own, and that Silver is not more different from Gold, than his Metal is from all others. On its intrinsic merits alone he wishes it to be tested; and, from the daily increasing Eulogiums he receives, he is convinced that nothing can prevent its becoming an article of univer sal wear. C. WATSON'S handsomely ILLUSTRATED CATALOGUE and PRICE CURRENT is just published; and Families who regard Economy and Elegance should possess themselves of this useful Book, which may be had Gratis, and Post Free from the above Address. CAUTION to the Makers and Sellers of Imitations of STE- paid) sent to the Office, No. 3, CHANCERY LANE, or to V. and R. PHENS'S PATENT BLUE WRITING FLUID.-A verdict of 2000 dollars, liable to be increased to 6000 dollars, having been obtained against parties who have been convicted of Selling Imitations of this article, in violation of the Patent rights of the inventor, in the United States of America, and several notices having been repeatedly issued to caution persons against infringing those rights in this country, by making or selling this article, the Proprietor issues this as a Final Notice, which if disregarded, he will be compelled to institute proceedings at law against all who may be committing those illegal acts. HENRY STEPHENS, 54, Stamford-street, Blackfriars'-road, London, Orders for THE JURIST given to any Newsman, or letter (post STEVENS & G. S. NORTON, (Successors to J. & W. T. Clarke, late of Portugal Street), 26 and 39, BELL-YARD, will insure its punctual delivery in London, or its being forwarded on the evening of publication, through the medium of the Post Office, to the Country. Printed by WALTER M'DOWALL, PRINTER, residing at No. 4, Pemberton Row, Gough Square, in the Parish of St. Bride, in the City of London, at his Printing Office, situate No. 5, Pemberton Row aforesaid; and Published at No. 3, CHANCERY LANE, in the Parish of St. Dunstan in the West, in the City of London, by HENRY SWEET, LAW BOOKSELLER and PUBLISHER, residing at No. 11, John Street, Bedford Row, in the County of Middlesex. Saturday, February 15, 1845. No. 424-VOL. IX. FEB. 22, 1845. Price 1s.-with Supplement 28. ** The following are the Names of the Gentlemen who favour THE JURIST with Reports of Cases argued and decided in the several Courts of Law and Equity: Is Mr. Sidney Smith's generally excellent work on the Practice in Chancery, the following passage occurs upon contempt: "It was considered to be the practice of the court, that, if a party was in contempt, he could not be heard, nor take any step except touching his contempt, until he had cleared the same; but it is now decided, that a party being in contempt is no bar to his prosecuting the cause." (1 Smith, 206). The latter part of this passage is stated too broadly, and is calculated to mislead the practitioner who should unwarily rely upon it, without consulting the authorities referred to by Mr. Smith, as well as several others. We shall endeavour to shew, though in contempt, had a right to be heard to shew This rule is still more explicitly laid down in the I. That it is, as well as was, the general rule, that a party in contempt cannot take any step strictly aggressive and voluntary; that is, that he cannot take any aggressive step not absolutely essential to the regular movement of the cause, without clearing his contempt. II. That a plaintiff may, notwithstanding he is in contempt, take, in general, those steps without which the cause would be necessarily totally stopped; and III. That a party may take any step which is technically or substantially pure matter of defence. King v. Bryant (3 My.& C. 191) supports the third position above stated. In that case, the defendant being in contempt for want of answer, the plaintiff proeeded to take the bill pro confesso against him, and proceeded in taking the account in the Master's Office ex parte, instead of serving the defendant with warFata, and finally obtained an order, absolute in the first instance, for confirming the Master's report. The defendant petitioned, upon this state of things, for an order to discharge the order confirming the Master's held, firstly, that the defendant, al- tempt. F report; and it was VOL. IX. NEWSPAPE is obvious that this is a case sui generis; and t same observation will apply to Cattell v. Simons, Bea. 304). The first proposition, that a party in contempt ca not, in general, take any purely aggressive step un he has cleared his contempt, seems to rest on the 78 of Lord Bacon's Ordinances, and on the dicta whi have sanctioned the doctrine, ( Wilson v. Bates, 3 My. C., p. 201; King v. Bryant, Id., p. 195; Vowles v. Your 9 Ves., p. 173; Anon.,'15 Ves., p. 175; et al.), rather th on any specific authority. There can, however, be question of such being the general rule of practi Everett v. Prythergh (12 Sim. 368) may also be ranged among the authorities in support of the above proposition. In [that case, the defendant, being in contempt for want of answer, filed exceptions to the bill for scandal and impertinence, and obtained an order of reference. It was held, that, although in contempt, it was regular for him to take such a step, principally on the authority of a case in Vesey, (Anon., 5 Ves. 656), in which it was held, that a party, having obtained time to answer, might refer the bill for scandal. The principle of Everett v. Prythergh is obviously, that referring the bill for impertinence was in the nature of defence. "Until the reference for scan-though, as we have seen, the classes of exceptions e dal is disposed of," said the Vice-Chancellor, "the defendant cannot tell what he ought to answer; and, in my opinion, although he is in contempt, he has a right to call upon the court to tell him what it is that he is bound to answer." In other words, it is a part of his defence to ascertain against what he is to defend himself. In support of our second proposition, that a plaintiff may, notwithstanding he is in contempt, take those proceedings without which the cause would necessarily be at a stand-still, Wilson v. Bates (3 My. & C. 197) and Plumbe v. Plumbe (3 You. & C. 622) are authorities. brace so wide a range, as most materially to cut dov the effect of the general rule. We would observe, also, before concluding this bri résumé of the state of the practice in equity on th point, that there may be a marked distinction between party being in contempt merely for non-payment of cos and his being so for neglect to take some step in t cause required by the practice for its regular progress, for instance, neglecting or refusing to put in an answe It may be very reasonable, that a party himself sto ping the cause, and preventing the opposite party fro taking a step forward, should be precluded from taki any step until he has withdrawn the clog that he hin self has interposed in the way of the movements of h opponent; but the same reason does not necessaril apply to the case of a party who does not, in the lea degree, stop the cause, but only resists a personal de mand of his opponent. It is obvious, also, that grea hardship may be imposed on a party, if his mere non payment of costs, which may result from inability, i to preclude him from all active movement in the cause In Plumbe v. Plumbe, the question was, whether a while, on the other hand, as the remaining in contemp plaintiff in contempt for non-payment of costs could of a party who is so for refusing to put in an answe move upon the defendant's answer for production of or for other similar contumacy, is a voluntary defaul documents; and it was held, that, Wilson v. Bates which the party can scarcely, in any case, be unable having decided that a plaintiff in contempt is, never-cure, there can be no harshness or injustice in requirir theless, entitled to enforce an answer, it followed that he was entitled to all the incidents of an answer, and the motion was allowed. In the first of those cases, the plaintiff, being in contempt for non-payment of the costs of an unsuccessful motion, sued out an attachment against the defendant for want of answer; and it was held, that the attachment was regular. Lord Cottenham observing, that the question involved was, whether, under the circumstances, the plaintiff could take any step in the cause; "for, if he could not compel an answer, of course the cause would be entirely stopped." Bickford v. Skewes (10 Sim. 193) was decided upon its own peculiar grounds, and seems not to be an authority for any general rule. In that case, the plaintiff had obtained an injunction upon terms of his bringing an action against the defendant: he did commence an action, and then suffered a long time to elapse without going to trial. Thereupon, the defendant moved that he might proceed to trial at the ensuing assizes, or that the injunction might be dissolved; and that motion was refused with costs, the Lord Chancellor, however, intimating, that the plaintiff would be expected to proceed to trial within a specific time. The defendant being in contempt for non-payment of these costs, the plaintiff moved that all proceedings in the action might be staid, or that he might defer proceeding to trial until the defendant had cleared his contempt. The motion was refused, on the double ground, firstly, that the defendant might, and non constat he would not, clear his contempt before the trial; and, secondly, that, when the Lord Chancellor's order was made, he was not in contempt, and his subsequently getting into contempt did not discharge that order. It him to cure it before he enjoys the privilege of takin any other step, at least of an aggressive character, in tl cause. We are not aware that this distinction has bee specifically recognised by any of the authorities; b there are several expressions to be found justifying th inference, that contempt for mere non-payment of cos is of a peculiar character: and the well-established rul that, if a defendant in actual contempt for want answer puts in an answer without first clearing his co tempt, the answer may be taken off the file, seems, b comparison with the cases above cited, to warrant th distinction we have pointed out. COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH. - 8 VICT.-Feb. 20, 1845. This court will, on Saturday, the 1st day of Marc next, at 10 o'clock, A. M., hold a sitting, and will d liver judgment in cases that have been argued. BY THE COURT. MASTERS IN CHANCERY.-The Lord Chancellor h appointed the following gentlemen Masters Extraord nary in the High Court of Chancery:-Richard Gibson Wigan, Lancashire; James Joseph Blake, Croydo Surrey; Henry Yorke, Oundle, Northampton. LIST OF SHERIFFS AND UNDER-SHERIFFS, WITH THEIR DEPUTIES AND AGENTS, FOR 1845. As the List of Sheriffs given in last Week's Number of THE Berkshire-John B. Monck, Esq., Coley Park. Undersh., Edward Vines, Esq., Reading. Deps., Abbott, Jenkins, & Abbott, 8, New Inn. Berwick-upon-Tweed-Geo. Gilchrist, Esq., Berwick-upon Tweed. Undersh., Rob. Home, Esq., Berwick-upon-Tweed. Bristol (City of)—John Harding, Esq., Clifton. Undersh., William Ody Hare, Esq., Bristol. Deps., Bridges & Mason, 23, Red Lion-square. Buckinghamshire-E. F. Dayrell, Esq., Lillingstone Dayrell. Undersh., Acton Tindal, Aylesbury. Dep., Owen Tickel Alger, 37, Bedford-row. Camb. & Hunts.-John B. Rooper, Esq., Abbotts Ripton. Undersh., George Game Day, Esq., St. Ive's. Deps., Milne, Parry, Milne, & Morris, 2, Harcourtbuildings, Temple. Canterbury (City of)-Jos. Jackson, Esq., St. Margaret-st. Undersh., Robert George Chipperfield, Esq., Canterbury. Dep., T. Kirk, 10, Symond's Inn, Chancery-lane. Cheshire-Sir W. T. S. M. Stanley, Bart., Hooton Park. Wm. Eaton Mousley, Esq., Derby. Undershs.,John Hostage, Esq., Chester. A. U. Deps., Gregory, Faulkner, & Co., 1, Bedford-row. Chester (City of)-Edward Tilston, Esq., Chester. Undersh., John Finchett Maddock, Esq., Chester. Cinque Ports-His Grace The Duke of Wellington. Gloucester (City of)—Charles Parker, Esq., Gloucester. Undersh., Charles Seagrim, Esq., Winchester. Herefordshire-James King King, Esq., Staunton Park. Hereford. Dep., Geo. Pleydell Wilton, 1, Raymond-buildings, Hertfordshire-Sir H. Meux, Bart., Theobald's Park. Hunts. & Camb., J. B. Rooper, Esq., Abbotts Ripton. Kent-Sir Moses Montefiore, Knight, Earl Cliff, St. Lawrence, Isle of Thanet. Undersh., David W. Wire, Esq., 9, St. Swithin's lane, London. Hull. Deps., Palmer, France, & Palmer, 24, Bedford-row. Kingston-upon-Hull-Robt. Harrison, Esq., Kingston-upon Undersh., J. Earnshaw, Esq., Kingston-upon-Hull. Dep., Z. Brooke, 17, Featherstone-bdgs., Holborn. Lancashire-P. Dawson, Esq., Hornby Castle, Hornby. John Higgin, jun., Esq., Lancaster. Undershs., John Stanfield, Esq., Preston. A. U. Deps., Bell, Broderick, & Bell, 9, Bow Church-yard. Leicestershire-W. C. Smith, Esq., Bitteswell Hall. Undershs., {} Rob. Wm. Fox, Esq., Lutterworth. Wm. Gregory, Esq., Leicester. A. U. Deps., Campbell & Witty, 21, Essex-street, Strand. Lincolnshire-T. Coltman, Esq., Hagnaby Priory. Undershs., John Walker, Esq., Spilsby. Deps., Taylor & Collisson, 28, Great James-street, Deps., Waterman, Wright, & Kingsford, 23, Essex- Lincoln (City of)-John Summerscales, Esq., Lincoln. street, Strand. Cornwall-Francis Rodd, Esq., Trebatha Hall. Undersh., Thomas Whitford, Esq., St. Columb. Deps., Paynter & Ollard, 13, South-sq., Gray's Inn. Coventry (City of )—Act 5 & 6 Vict. c. 110, s. 10, abolished the Office of Sheriff for this City, and Warrants are now granted by the Sheriff of Warwickshire. Cumberland-Timothy Fetherstonhaugh, Esq., The College, Kirkoswold. Undersh., Silas Saul, Esq., Carlisle. Dep., George Carew, 9, Lincoln's Inn-fields. Derbyshire-Thomas Pares, Esq., Hopwell Hall. Undersh., John Barber, Esq., Derby. Deps., Gregory, Faulkner, & Co., 1, Bedford-row. Devonshire-Edward Simcoe Drewe, Esq., The Grange. Undersh., Mark Kennaway, Esq., Exeter. Undersh., William Manfield, Esq., Dorchester. Undershs., T. M. Gepp, Esq., Chelmsford. A. U. Undersh., John Burrup, Esq., city of Gloucester. Undersh., Richard Mason, Esq., Lincoln. Bedford-row. Lichfield (City of)-John Thanis Blood, Esq., Lichfield. London (City of)— Middlesex Underhs., Wm. Hunter, Esq., 10, Finsbury Circus. Robt. Sidney, Esq., Leyton House, Leyton, Essex. W. H. Ashurst, Esq., 137, Cheapside. G. Marten, Esq., Commercial Chambers, Mincing-lane. Deps., {Secondar, 21, fece 5, Basinghall-street. Burchell, 24, Red Lion-square. Monmouthshire-W. Phillips, Esq., Whitsun House. Newcastle-upon-Tyne.-John Featherstone Ayton, Esq., New castle-upon-Tyne. Undersh., W. Harle, Esq., Newcastle-upon-Tyne. Deps., Raimondi & Gooday, 14, South-sq., Gray's Inn. Norfolk.-Theophilus R. Buckworth, Esq., Cockley Cley. Charles Bonner, Esq., Spalding. Undershs., { Adam Taylor & Sons, Norwich. A. U. Deps., Temple & Bonner, 16, Furnival's Inn. Norwich (City of)-John Betts, Esq., Norwich. Undersh., John Oddin Taylor, Esq., Norwich. Deps., Grimaldi, Stables, & Burn, 1, Copthall-court, Northumberland-Ralph Carr, Hedgley. Undersh., P. G. Elison, Esq., Newcastle-upon-Tyne. Nottinghamshire-William H. Barrow, Esq., Southwell. J Richard B. Barrow, Esq., Southwell. Denbighshire-Charles Wynne, Esq., Garthmeilio, near Cerrigydrindion. Undershs., Edward Robert Butler, Esq. James Vaughan Horne, Esq., Denbigh. A. U. Dep., Edward Robert Butler, 7, Furnival's Inn. Undershs., J. Brewster, Esq., Nottingham. A. U. | Flintshire-Ralph Richardson, Esq., Greenfield Hall, near Deps., Capes & Stuart, 1, Field-court, Gray's Inn. Nottingham (Town of)-William Knight, Esq., Nottingham. Undersh, Christopher Swann, Esq., Nottingham. Deps., Holme, Loftus, & Young, 10, New Inn. Oxfordshire-John Sidney North, Esq., Wroxton Abbey. Undersh., S. Cooper, Esq., Henley-upon-Thames. Undersh., Henry Mooring Aldridge, Esq., Poole. Rutlandshire-Henry Bennet Pierrepoint, Esq., Ryhall. Shropshire-St. John Chiverton Charlton, Esq., Undershs., William Nock, Esq., Wellington. Jos. J. Peele, Esq., Shrewsbury. A. U. Undersh., Richard Blanchard, Esq., Southampton. Deps., White, Eyre, & White, 11, Bedford-row. Suffolk-Henry Wilson, Esq., Stowlangtoft. Undersh., Harry Wayman, Esq., Bury St. Edmund's. Deps., Walter & Pemberton, 4, Symond's Inn. Surrey-Richard Fuller, Esq., The Rookery, Dorking. Undersh., Mark Smallpiece, Esq., Dorking. Deps., Abbott, Jenkyns, & Abbott, 8, New Inn. Sussex-James Baril Daubuz, Esq., Offington. Undersh., Thomas France, Esq., 24, Bedford-row, London. Deps., Palmer, France, & Palmer, 24, Bedford-row. Undersh., Thomas Heath, Esq., Warwick. Westmoreland-The Right Hon. the Earl of Thanet. Undershs.,{ Wm. Stone, Esq., Bradford. M.T.Hodding, Esq., Salisbury. A. U. Deps., Smith & Atkins, 12, Serjeant's Inn, Fleet-st. Worcestershire-Thomas Simcox Lea, Esq., Astley Hall. Undershs., {Henry Saunders, Esq., Kidderminster. Gillam & Son, Worcester. A. U. Undersh., Robert Henry Anderson, Esq., city of Dep., Charles Lever, 10, King's-road, Bedford-row. Undersh., Henry Richardson, Esq., York. Holywell. Undersh., Roberts & Son, Mold. Deps., Milne, Parry, Milne, & Morris, 2, Harcourt- Merionethshire-Richard Watkin Price, Rhiwlas. Dep., Robert Wynne Williams, 3 Paper-buildings, Undersh., Charles Thos. Woosman, Esq., Newtown. SOUTH WALES. Breconshire-William Williams, Esq., Aberpergwm. Deps., Jones, Trinder, & Tudway, 1, John-street, Carmarthen (Borough of)-John Lewis Brigstocke, Esq., Undersh., George Thomas, jun., Esq., Lammas-st., Carmarthenshire. Deps., Rickards & Walker, 29, Lincoln's Inn-fields. Carmarthenshire-David Jones, Esq., Glanbrane Park, Llandovery. Undershs., David Thomas, Esq., Brecon. 1C. Bishop, Esq., Llandovery. A. U. square. Radnorshire-James Davies, Esq., Colva, Radnorshire, and Undersh., Richard Banks, Esq., Kington, Hereford shire. Dep., Henry Hammond, 16, Furnival's Inn. Warrants are granted in Town for the Borough of Carmarthen, and all places except Berwick-upon-Tweed, Canterbury, Cinque Ports, Chester, Durham, Exeter, Gloucestershire, Kingston-upon-Hull, Lancashire, Lincoln (City), Norwich, Southampton, York (City), and the Welch Counties. London Gazettes. TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 18. BANKRUPTS. EDWARD CLOSSON, Lower Holborn, London, stationer, dealer and chapman, Feb. 28 at 2, and April 3 at half-past 12, Court of Bankruptcy, London: Off. Ass. Whitmore; Sol. Fraser, 2, Furnival's-inn, Holborn.-Fiat dated Feb. 12. JOHN PEART BIRLEY, Brompton-row, Brompton, Kensington, Middlesex, plumber and glazier, dealer and chapman, Feb. 28 at half-past 1, and March 28 at 2, Court of Bankruptcy, London: Off. Ass. Whitmore; Sols. Buchanan & Grainger, Basinghall-street.-Fiat dated Dec. 12. SAMUEL CREW, St. Phillip's and Jacob, Bristol, coal merchant, dealer and chapman, March 4 at 1, and April 1 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Bristol: Off. Ass. Kynaston; Sol. Gray, Bristol and Bath.-Fiat dated Feb. 12. JOHN HUTCHINGS, Bath, Somersetshire, boot and shoe maker, March 3 at 1, and April 3 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Bristol: Off. Ass. Kynaston; Sol. Bachelor, & Co., Bath.-Feb. 10. |