« AnteriorContinuar »
for damages (which are usually remitted), but also to recover his court, and jurisdiction over the lands, and to annul the former proceedings (n).
Thus much for the non-performance of contracts express or implied ; which includes every possible injury to what is by far the most considera. ble species of personal property ; viz. that which consists in action merely, and not in possession. Which finishes our inquiries into such wrongs as may be offered to personal property, with their several remedies by suit or action.
OF INJURIES TO REAL PROPERTY; AND FIRST OF DISPOSSESSION, OR OUSTER OF THE FREEHOLD (1).
I come now lo consider such injuries as affect that species of property which the laws uf England have denominated real; as being of a more
(n) Rast. Entr. 100. D. 3 Lev. 415. Lutw. 711. 749.
(1) “The different degrees of title which seised, so that if he fails to bring his writ of a person dispossessing another of his lands right within the time limited for the bringing, acquires in them, in the eye of the law (inde. of such writ, he is remediless, and the title of pendently of any anterior right), according to the dispossessor is complete. The original the length of time, and other circumstances writs by which droiturel actions are instituted, wbict intervene from the time such dispos. are called writs of right. The dilntoriness session is made, form differeut degrees of pre- and nicelies in these processes introduced the sumption, in favour of the litle of the dispos. writ of assize. The invention of this prosessor; and in proportion as that presumption ceeding is attributed to Glanville, chief justice increases, his tiile is strengthened; the modes to Henry II. (See M. Reeves's History of by which the possession may be recovered va. the English law, part I. ch. 3.) It was found ry; and more, or rather different proof is re. so convenient a remedy, that persons to avail quired from the person dispossessed, to esta- themselves of it, frequently supposed or ad. blish his ritle to recover. Thus, if A. is dis. mitted themselves in be disseised by acts seised by B.; while the possession cortinues which did not, in strictness, amount to a disin B. it is a mere naked possession, unsupported seisin. This disseisin, being such only ly the by any right: and A. may restore his own pos. will of the party, is called a disseisin by elecsession, and put a lotal end to the possession tion, in opposition to an actual dissesin; it is of B. by an entry on the lands, without any. only a disseisin as between the disseisor and previous action. But ir B. dies, the posses. disseisee, the disseisee still continuing the sion descends on the heir by act of law. In freeholder, as to all persons but the disseisor. this case the beir comes to the land by a law. The old books, particularly the reports of as. ful title, and acquires in the eye of the law an size, when they inention disseisins, generally apparent right of possession, which is so far relate to Jose cases where the owner admits good against the person disseised, that he has himself dissejsed. (See I Burr. 111. and see lost his right to recover the possession loy en. Bruct. I. b. 4. cap. 3.) As the processes upon try, and can only recover it by an action at law. writs of entry were superseded by the assize, The actions used in these cases are called pos. so the assize and all other real actions have sessory actions, and the original writs loy which been since superseded by the modern process the proceedings upon them are instituted, are of ejectment. This was introduced as a mode called writs of entry. But if A. perinits the of trying titles to lands in the reign of Henry possession to be withheld from him beyond a VII. From the ease and expedition with certain period of time without claiming it, or which the proceedings in it are conducted, it suffers judgment in a possessory action to be is now become the general remedy in these giren against him, by default or upon the me- cases. Booth, who wrote about the end of the rits; in all these cases B.'s title in the eye of last century, mentions real actions as then she law is strengthened, and A. can no longer worn out of use. It is rather singu,ar that recover by a possessory action, and his only this should be the fact, as many cases must reinedy then is by an action on the righi. frequently have occurred in which a writ of These last actions are called droiturel actions, ejectment was not a sufficient remedy. With in contradistinction to possessory actions. in these few years past, some attempts have They are the ultimate resort of the person dis. been made to revive real actions, and the mos
substantial and permanent nature, than those transitory rights of which personal chattels are the object.
Real injuries then, or injuries affecting real rights, are principally six : 1. Ous'er ; 2. Trespass ; 3. Nuisance; 4. Waste ; 5. Subtraction; 6. Disturbance.
Duster, or dispossession, is a wrong or injury that carries with it the amofion of possession : for thereby the wrongdoer gets into the actual occupation of the land or hereditament, and obliges him that hath a right to seek his legal remedy, in order to gain possession, and damages for the injury sustained. And such ouster, or dispossession, may either be of the
freehold, or of chattels real. Ouster of the freehold is effected by one of the following methods : 1***Abatement; 2. Intrusion ; 3. Disseisin , 4. Discontinuance; 5. Deforcement. All of which in their order, and afterwards their respective remedies,23 will be considered in the present chapter.
i. And firsi, an abatement is where a person dies seised of an [*168] inheritance, and before the heir or devisee enters, a stranger "who
has no right makes entry, and gets possession of the freehold: this entry of him is called an abatement, and he himself is denominated an abator (a). It is to be observed that this expression, of abating, which is derived from the French, and signifies to quash, beat down, or destroy, is used by our law in three senses. The first, which seems to be the primicive sense, is that of abating or beating down a nuisance, of which we .spoke in the beginning of this book (6); and in a like sense it is used in statute Westm. 1. 3 Edw I. c. 17. where mention is made of abating a castle or fortress ; in which case it clearly signifies to pull it down, and level it with the ground. The second signification of abatement is that of abating a writ or action, of which we shall say more hereafter : here it is taken figuratively, and signifies the overthrow or defeating of such writ, by some fatal exception to it. The last species of abatement is that we have now before us; which is also a figurative expression to denote that the rightful possession or freehold of the heir or devisee is overthrown by the rude intervention of a stranger (2).
This abatement of a freehold is somewhat similar to an immediate occupancy in a state of nature, which is effected by taking possession of the land the same instant that the prior occupant by his death relinquishes it. But this, however agreeable to natural justice, considering man merely as an individual, is diametrically opposite to the law of society, and particularly the law of England : which, for the preservation of public peace, hath prohibited as far as possible all acquisitions by mere occupancy: and hath directed that lands, on the death of the present possessor, should immediately vest either in some person, expressly named and appointed by (a) Finch. L. 195.
(6) Page 3.
remarkable of these are the case of Tissen v. sir William Blackstone's commentary, which
(23) See Hov. 11. (23) at the end of the Vol. B. IIL.
the deceased, as nis devisee ; or, on default of such appointment, in such of his next relations as the law haih selected and pointed out as his natural representative or heir. Every entry therefore of a mere stranger by way of intervention between the ancestor and heir or person next entiiled, which keeps the heir or devisee out of possession, is one of the highest injuries to the right of real property.
2. The second species of injury by ouster, or amotion of posses- (*169) sion from the freehold, is by intrusion (3): which is the entry of a stranger, after a particular estate of freehold is determined, before him in remainder or reversion. · And it happens where a tenant for term of life dieth seised of certain lands and tenements, and a stranger entereth thereon, after such death of the tenant, and before any entry of him in remainder or reversion (c). This entry and interposition of the stranger differ from an abatement in this,
that an abatement is always to the prejudice of the heir
, or immediate devisee ; an intrusion is always to the prejudice of him in remainder or reversion. For example; if A dies seised of lands in feesimple, and before the entry of B his heir, C enters thereon, this is an abatement; but if A be tenant for life, with remainder to B in fee-simple, and after the death of A, C enters, this is an intrusion. Also if A be tenant for life on lease from B, or his ancestors, or be tenant by the curtesy, or in dower, the reversion being vested in B; and after the death of A, C enters and keeps B out of possession, this is likewise an intrusion. So that an intrusion is always immediately consequent upon the determination of a particular estate ; an abatement is always consequent upon the descent or devise of an estate in fee-simple. And in either case the injury is equally great to him whose possession is defeated by this unlawful occupancy.
3. The third species of injury by ouster, or privation of the freehold, is by disseisin (4). Disseisin is a wrongful putting out of him that is seised of the freehold (ay. The two former species of injury were by a wrongful entry where the possession was vacant; but this is an attack upon him who is in actual possession, and turning him out of it. Those were an ouster from a freehold in law; this is an ouster from a freehold in deed. Disseisin may be effected either in corporeal inheritances, for incorporeal. (*170] Disseisin of things corporeal, as of houses, lands, &c. must be by entry and actual dispossession of the freehold (e); as if a man enters either by forceor fraud into the house of another, and turns, or a least keeps, him or his servants out of possession. Disseisin of incorporeal hereditaments can not be an actual dispossession : for the subject itself is neither capable of ac tual bodily possession, or dispossession ; but it depends on their respective natures, and various kinds ; being in general nothing more than a disturbance of the owner in the means of coming at, or enjoying them. With regard to freehold rent in particular, our ancient law-books (F) mentioned five methods of working a disseisin thereof : 1. By enclosure ; where the tenant 80 encloseth the house or land, that the lord cannot come to distrain thereon, or demand it : 2. By forestaller, or lying in wait ; when the tenant besetteth the way with force and arms, or by menaces of bodily hurt affrights the (c) Co. Litt. 277. F. N. B. 203, 204.
(f) Finch. L. 165. 166. Litt. 237, 4c. (3) See I Cru. Dig. 161-316. Co. Litt. 35. dem. Atkins v. Horde, I Burr. 60. 5 Cru. Dig. 1. 58. b. 357. b. 4 Co. 24. a. 2 Saund. 32. 321. See also 6 Brown Parl. Ca. 633
(4) See in general, Vin. Ab. Disseisin ; Saund. index, Disseisin; Adams on Eject Cru. Dig. index, Disseisin. And the judgment, 41. c. 'H. Chitty on Descents, index ment delivered by lord Mansfield, in Taylor ex. Disseisin and Ouster.
(e) Co. Litt. 181.
(d) Co. Litt. 277.
lessor from coming : 3. By rescous ; that is, either by violently retaking a distress taken, or by preventing the lord with force and arms from taking any at all: 4. By replevin ; when the tenant replevies the distress at such tine when his rent is really due : 5. By denial ; which is when the rent being lawfully demanded is not paid. All, or any of these circumstances amount to a disseisin of rent ; that is, they wrongfully put the owner out of the only possession, of which the subject matter is capable, namely, the receipt of it. But all these disseisins, of hereditaments, incorporeal, are only iso at the election and choice of the party injured ; if, for the sake of more easily trying the right, he is pleased to suppose himself disseised (3). Otherwise, as there can be no actual dispossession, he cannot be compulsively disseised of any incorporeal hereditament.
And so too, even in corporeal hereditaments, a man may frequently suppose himself to be disseised, when he is not so in fact, for the sake of entitling himself to the more easy and commodious remedy of an assize of novel
disseisin (which will be explained in the sequel of this chapter), [*171) instead of being driven to the more tedious process of a writ of
entry (R). "The true injury of compulsive disseisin seems to be that of dispossessing the tenant, and substituting oneself to be the tenant of the lord in his stead ; in order to which in the times of pure feodal tenure the consent or connivance of the lord, who upon every descent or alienation personally gave, and who therefore alone could change, the seisin or investiture, seems to have been considered as necessary. But when in process of time the feodal form of alienations wore off, and the lord was no longer the instrument of giving actual seisin, it is probable that the lord's acceptance of rent or service, from him who had dispossessed another, might constitute a complete disseisin. Afterwards, no regard was had to the lord's concurrence, but the dispossessor himself was considered as the sole disseisor : and this wrong was then allowed to be remedied by entry only, without any form of law, as against the disseisor himself ; but required a legal process against bis heir or alienee. And when the remedy by assise was introduced under Henry II. to redress such disseisins as had been commit. ted within a few years next preceding, the facility of that remedy induced others, who were wrongfully kept out of the freehold, to feign or allow themselves to be disseised, merely for the sake of the remedy:
These three species of injury, abatement, intrusion, and disseisin, are such wherein the entry of the tenant ab initio, as well as the continuance of his possession afterwards, is unlawful. But the two remaining species are where the entry of the tenant was at first lawful, but the wrong consists. in the detaining of possession afterwards."
4. Such is, fourthly, the injury of discontimance (5); which happens when
(g) Litt. 568, 58y.
(h) Hengh. parv. c. 7. 4 Burr. 110.
(5) See in general, Adams on Ejectment, lies in grant, tas in no stage, and under no 35 to 41; Com. Dig. Discontinuance ; Bac. circunstances, any other remedy but hy ac. Ab. Discontinuance ; Vin. Ab. Discontinu- tion. The books often mention both disseisins ance ; Cru. Dig. index, Discontinuance ; Co. and discontinuances of incorporeal hereditaLitt. 325; 2 Saund. index, tit. Discontinu. ments, but these disseisins and discontinuan.
The term discontinuance is used to ces are only at the election of the party, for distinguish those cases where the party, the purpose of availing himself of the remedy whose freehold is ousted, can restore it by ac. by action. Co. Litt. 330. b. n. But a dis tion only, from those in which he may restore seisin or discontinuance of corporeal heredi. it by entry. Now things which lie in grant taments necessarily operates as a disseisin oi cannot ether be devested or restored by en. discontinuance of all the incorporeal rights trv The owner therefore of any thing which or incidents which the disseisee or discos
we who hath an estate-tail, maketh a larger estate of the land than by law
5. The fifth and last species of injuries by ouster or privation of the freehold, where the entry of the present tenant or possessor was originally lawful, but his detainer is now become unlawful, is that by deforcement. This, in its most extensive sense, is nomen generalissimum; a much larger and more comprehensive expression than any of the former : it then signifying the holding of any lands or tenements to which another person hath à right (k). So that this includes as well an abatement, an intrusion, a disseisin, or a discontinuance, as any other species of wrong whatsoever,
a whereby he that hath right to the freehold is kept out of possession. But, as contradistinguished from the former, it is only such a detainer of the "freehold, from him that hath the right of property, but (*173] never had any possession under that right, as falls within none of the injuries which we have before explained, As in case where a lord has a seignory, and lands escheat to him propter defectum sanguinis, but the seisin of the lands is withheld from him ; here the injury is not abatement,
(*) Finch. L. 190.
(k) Co. Litt. 277.
tinuee has himself in, upon, or out of the land tinuance. See 2 D. & R. 373 ; 1 B. & C.
(24)dce Hov, n. (24) at the end of the Vol. B. III