« AnteriorContinuar »
seen, containing this grant to the university of Oxford, was 28 Hen. III. A. D. 1244. And the same privileges were confirmed and enlarged by almost every succeeding prince, down to Henry the Eighth; in the fourteenth year of whose reign the largest and most extensive charter of all was granted. One similar to which was afterwards granted to Cambridge in the tkird year of queen Elizabeth. But yet, notwithstanding these charters, the privileges granted therein, of proceeding in a course different from the law of the land, were of so high a nature, that they were held to be invalid; for though the king might erect new courts, yet he could not alter the course of law by his letters patent. Therefore in the reign of queen Elizabeth an act of parliament was obtained (r), confirming all the charters of the two universities, and those of 14 Hen. VIII. and 3 Eliz. by
Which blessed act, as sir Edward Coke entitles it (o), established this high privilege without any doubt or opposition (p): or, as sir Matthew Hale (9) very fully expresses the sense of the common law and the
operation of the act of parliament, " although king Henry the Eighth, 14 A. R. sui, granted to the university a liberal charter, to proceed according to the use of the university ; viz. by a course much conformed to the civil law, yet that charter had not been sufficient to have warranted such proceedings without the help of an act of parliament. And therefore in 13 Eliz. *an act passed, whereby that charter was in effect enact- 1 *85 ] ed; and it is thereby that at this day they have a kind of civil law procedure, even in matters that are of themselves of common law cognizance, where either of the parties is privileged."
This privilege, so far as it relates to civil causes, is exercised at Oxford in the chancellor's court; the judge of which is the vice-chancellor, his deputy or assessor. From his sentence an appeal lies to delegates appointed by the congregation ; from thence to other delegates of the house of convocation ; and if they all three concur in the same sentence it is final at least by the statutes of the university (r), according to the rule of the civil law (s). But, if there be any discordance or variation in any of the three sentences, an appeal lies in the last resort to judges delegates appointed by the crown under the great seal in chancery.
I have now gone through the several species of private, or special courts, of the greatest note in the kingdom, instituted for the local redress of private wrongs; and must, in the close of all, make one general observation from sir Edward Coke(): that these particular jurisdictions, derogating from the general jurisdiction of the courts of common law, are ever strictly restrained, and cannot be extended farther than the express letter of their privileges will most explicitly warrant (17).
(*) 13 Eliz. c. 29. (0) 4 Inst. 227. (p) Jenk. Cent. 2. pl. 88. Cent. 3. pl. 33. Hard. 104. Godbolt, 201.
(9) Hist. C. L. 33.
(17) ? Wi's 40°, 9
OF THE COGNIZANCE OF PRIVATE WRONGS.
We aj o now to proceed to the cognizance of private wrongs; that is, 16 consider in which of the vast variety or courts, mentioned in the three preceding chapters, every possible injury that can be offered 10 a man's person or property is certain of meeting with redress.
The authority of the several courts of private and special jurisdiction, or of what wrongs such courts have cognizance, was necessarily remarked as those respective tribunals were enumerated; and therefore need not be here again repeated; which will confine our present inquiry to the cognizance of civil injuries in the several courts of public or general jurisdiction. And the order, in which I shall pursue this inquiry, will be by shewing: 1. What actions may be brought, or what injuries remedied, in the ecclesiastical courts. 2. What in the military. 3. What in the maritime. And, 4. What in the courts of common law.
And, with regard to the three first of these particulars, I must beg leave not so much to consider what hath at any time been claimed or pretended to belong to their jurisdiction, by the officers and judges of those respective courts; but what the common law allows and permits to be so. · For these eccentrical tribunals (which are principally guided by
the rules of the imperial and canon laws), as they subsist and [*87 ] are *admitted in England, not by any right of their own (a), but
upon bare sufferance and toleration from the municipal laws, must have recourse to the laws of that country wherein they are thus adopted, to be informed how far their jurisdiction extends, or what causes are permitted, and what forbidden, to be discussed or drawn in question before them. It matters not therefore what the pandects of Justinian, or the decretals of Gregory, have ordained. They are here of no more intrinsic authority than the laws of Solon and Lycurgus : curious perhaps for their antiquity, respectable for their equity, and frequently of admirable use in illustrating a point of history. Nor is it at all material in what light other nations may consider this matter of jurisdiction. Every nation must and will abide by its own municipal laws; which various accidents conspire to render different in almost every country in Europe. We permit some kinds of suits •lo be of ecclesiastical cognizance, which other nations have referred entirely to the temporal courts; as concerning wills and successions to intestates' chattels : and perhaps we may, in our turn, prohibit them from interfering in some controversies, which on the continent may be looked upon as merely spiritual. In short, the common law of England is the one uniform rule in determine the jurisdiction of our courts : and, if any tribunals whatsoever attempt to exceed the limits so prescribed them, the king's courts of common law may and do prohibit them; and in sono cases punish their judges (6).
Having premised this general caution, I proceed now to consider, I. The wrongs or injuries cognizable by the ecclesiastical courts. I .) See Book I. introd. $ 1.
(0) Hal. Hist. C. L. c. 2.
mean such as are offered to private persons or individuars (1); vhich are cognizable by the ecclesiastical court
, not for reformation of the offender himself or party injuring (pro salute animae, as is the case with immoralities in general, when unconnected with private injuries), but for the sako of the party injured, to make him a satisfaction and redress for the damage which he has sustained. And these I shall rerluce [ *88 1 under three general heads; of causes pecuniary, causes matrimorial, and causes testamentary..
1. Pecuniary causes, cognizable in the ecclesiastical courts, are such as arise either from the withholding ecclesiastical dues, or the doing or neg. lecuing some act relating to the church, whereby some damage accrues to the plaintiff; towards obtaining a satisfaction for which he is permitted to institute a suit in the spiritual court.
The principle of these is the subtraction or withholding of tithes from the parson or vicar, whether the former be a clergyman or a lay appropriator (c). But herein a distinction must be taken: for the ecclesiastical courts have no jurisdiction to try the right of tithes unless between spiritual persons (d); but in ordinary cases, between spiritual men and lay men, are only to compel the payment of them, when the right is not disputed (e). By the statute or rather writ (S) of circumspecte agatis (g), it is declared that the court christian shall not be prohibited from holding plea, “si rector petat versus parochianos oblationes et decimas debitas et consuetas :" so that if any dispute arises whether such tithes be due and accustomeil, this cannot be determined in the ecclesiastical court, but before the king's courts of the common law; as such question affects the temporal inheritance, and the determination must bind the real property. But where the right does not come into question, but only the face, whether or no the tithes allowed to be due are really subtracted or withdrawn, this is a transient personal injury, for which the remedy may properly be had in the spiritual court; viz. the recovery of the tithes, or their equivalent. By statute 2 & 3 Edw. VI. c. 13. it is enacted, that if any person shall carry off his predial tithes (vis. of corn, hay, or the like), before the tenth part *is duly set [ *89 ] forth, or agreement is made with the proprietor, or shall willingly withdraw his tithes of the same, or shall stop or hinder the proprietor of (c) Stat. 32 Hen VIII. c. 7.
(c) 2 Inst. 364. 489, 490. (d) 2 Roll. Abr. 309, 310. Bro, Abr. c. jurisdic- () See Barrington, 123. 3 Pryn. Rec. 336. lion, 85.
(g) 13 Edw. I. st. 4. or rather 9 Edw. II. (1) See in general, Bac. Ab. tit. Courts Ec- which impute an offence, merely cognizable clesiastical, D. & iit. Slander; Com. Dig. in a spiritual court, may be punished in that Prohibition; where sce G. when the ecclesi. court; as calling a person heretic, adulterer, astica! court has jurisdiction and when not. fornicator, whore, &c.; but if the words are The ecclesiastical court has no jurisdiction coupled with others for which an action at law over trusts, and therefore where a party sued would lie, as calling a woman a whore and a as a trustee, was arrested on a writ de con. thief, the ecclesiastical court has no jurisdic. tamace capiendo, the court of K. B. discharged tion, and a prohibition lies. 2 Rol. Ab. 297. 1 him ont of custody. 1 B. & C. 655.
Sid. 404. 3 Mod. 74. i Hagy. Rep. 463 in Suits for defamation may be added to the notes. So a suit cannot be instituted in the three heads above considered: as to these in spiritual court for a written libel, because any general, see Burn Ecc L. Defamation ; Com. slander of a person reduced into writing, and Dig. Prohibition. G. 14; Bac. Ab. Slander, T. which can be the subject of any proceeding. is U.; Stark. on Slander, 32. 474. Words im- actionable or indictable. Comb. 71. Bac. Ab. puting an offence, merely spiritual, are not in Courts Ecclesiastical, D. The power of the themselves actionable at law, unless followed ecclesiastical court is confined to the infliction by special damage, and the party slandered of penance pro salute animæ, and awarding can only institute a suit in the spiritual court; costs, and does not extend to the awarding and though the law discourages suits of this damages to the injured party. 4 Co 20.3 kind, yet redress for the insult and injury is inst. 492. on denied. 2 Pbil. Ec. Cases, 106. Words
the tithes or his deputy from viewing or carrying them away; such offende er shall pay double the value of the tithes, with costs to be recovered bu fore the ecclesiastical judge, according to the king's ecclesiastical laws. By a former clause of the same statute, the treble value of the tithes, so subtracted or withheld, may be sued for in the temporal courts, which is equivalent to the double value to be sued for in the ecclesiastical. For one may sue for and recover in the ecclesiastical courts the tithes themselves, or a recompense for them, by the ancient law; to which the suit for the double value is superadded by the statute. But as no suit lay in the temporal courts for the subtraction of tithes themselves, therefore the statute gave a treble forfeiture, if sued for there; in order to make the course of justice uniform, by giving the same reparation in one court as in the other (h)(2). However, it now seldom happens that tithes are sued for at all in the spiritual court ; for if the defendant pleads any custom, modus, composition, or other matter whereby the right of tithing is called in question, this takes it out of the jurisdiction of the ecclesiastical judges : for the law will not suffer the existence of such a right to be decided by the sentence of any single, much less an ecclesiastical, judge ; without the verdict of a jury. But a more summary method than either of recovering small tithes under the value of 40s is given by statute 7 & 8 W. III. c. 6. by complaint to two justices of the peace ; and, by another statute of the same year, c. 34. the same remedy is extended to all tithes withheld by quakers under the value of ten pounds (3).
Another pecuniary injury, cognizable in the spiritual courts, is the nonpayment of other ecclesiastical dues to the clergy; as pensions, mortuaries, compositions, offerings, and whatsoever falls under the denomination of sur
plice-fees, for marriages or other ministerial offices of the church: [ *90 ] all which injuries are redressed by a decree for their actual *pay
ment. Besides which, all offerings, oblations, and obventions not exceeding the value of 40s. may be recovered in a summary way before two justices of the peace (i). But care must be taken that these are real and not imaginary dues ; for, if they be contrary to the common law, a prohibition will issue out of the temporal courts to stop all suits concerning them. As where a fee was demanded by the minister of the parish for the baptism of a child, which was administered in another place (k); this, however authorized by the canon, is contrary to common right: for of common right, no fee is due to the minister even for performing such branches of his duty, and it can only be supported by a special custom (1); but no custom can support the demand of a fee without performing hem at all. (h) 2 Inst. 230.
(k) Salk. 332. (i) Stat. 7 & 8 W. III. c. 6.
(1) Ibid. 334. Lord Raym. 450. 1558. Figz. 55.
(2) This statute enacts, that every person pasture, and that it was never known to pay shall justly divide, set out, yield, and pay all in predial lithe, was not sufficient to defeat manner of predial tithes in such manner as the action. The same action might also be they have been of right yielded and paid with supported to recover tithes of lands enclosed in forty years, or of right or custom ought to out of wastes, which never paid tithes before, have been paid, before ihe making of that act, Mitcheli v. Walker, 5 T. R. 260. under the forfeiture of treble value of the (3) The 53 Ger. III. c. 127. extends the jutithes so carried away.- And in an action upon risdiction of the two justices to tithes, obla. this statute, in which the declaration stated tions, and compositions, of the value of 10L; that the tithes were within forty years before and in respect of tithes and church-rates, dno the statute yielded and payable, and yielded from quakers, to 501., see statute and preseed. and paid, it was held that evidence that the ings, Buru J. Tithes. The 54 Gea Il cent lani had been as far as any witness knew in extends the same provisions to Ire ine
For fees also, settled and acknowledged to be due to the officers of the ecclesiastical courts, a suit will lie therein : but not if the right of the fees is at all disputable ; for then it must be decided by the common law (m). It is also said, that if a curate be licensed, and his salary appointed by the bishop, and he be not paid, the curate has a remedy in the ecclesiastical court (n); but, if he be not licensed, or hath no such salary appointed, or hath made a special agreement with the rector, he must sue for a satisfaction at commom law (o); either by proving such special agreement, or else by leaving it to a jury to give damages upon a quantum meruit, that is, in consideration of what he reasonably deserved in proportion to the service performed (4)
Under this head of pecuniary injuries may also be reduced the several matters of spoliation, di.apidations, and neglect of repairing the church and things thereunto belonging ; for which a satisfaction may be sued for in the ecclesiastical court.
Spoliation is an injury done by one clerk or incumbent to another, in taking the fruits of his benefice without any right there. [991 ] unto, but under a pretended title. It is remedied by a decree to account for the profits so taken. This injury, when the jus patronatus or right of advowson doth not come in debate, is cognizable in the spiritual court : as if a patron first presents A to a benefice, who is instituied and inducted thereto ; and then, upon pretence of a vacancy, the same patron presents B to the same living, and he also obtains institution and induction. Now, if the fact of the vacancy be disputed, then that clerk who is kept out of the profits of the living, whichever it be, may sue the other in the spiritual court for spoliation, or taking the profits of his benefice. And it shall there be tried, whether the living were, or were not vacant : upon which the validity of the second clerk's pretensions must depend (p). But if the right of patronage comes at all into dispute, as if one patron presented A, and another patron presented B, there the ecclesiastical court hath no cognizance, provided the tithes sued for amount to a fourth part of the value of the living, but may be prohibited at the instance of the patron by the king's writ of indicavit (9). So also if a clerk, without any colour of title, ejects another from his parsonage, this injury must be redressed in the temporal courts : for it depends upon no question determinable by the spiritual law (as plurality of benefices or no plurality, vacancy or no va cancy), but is merely a civil injury.
For dilapidations, which are a kind of ecclesiastical waste, either voluntary, by pulling down; or permissive, by suffering the chancel, parsonage- , house, and other buildings thereunto belonging, to decay; an action also ies, either in the spiritual court by the canon law, or in the courts of com mon law (r), and it may be brought by the successor against the predecessor, if living, or, if dead, then against his executors. It is also said to de good cause of deprivation, if the bishop, parson, vicar, or other ecclesiastical person, dilapidates the buildings, or cuts down timber grow
(m) 1 Ventr. 165.
(9) Circumspecte agatis ; 13 Edw. I. st. 4. Artie. Clcri. 9 Edw. Il. c. 2. F. N. B. 45.
(1) Cart. 224. 3 Lev. 268.
(4) That such an action is sustainable, see c. 99. under the control of the bishop, and any
Jup. R. 437; Dougl. 14; Burn Ecc. L. Cu. agreement contrary to the act is coid, and the .sie.' The amount of the salary of a curate of bishop may enforce payment of arrears o! fiscal • non-resiuent clergyman is, by 57 Geo. II. salary. VOL. II.