and 121 New York State Reporter
1. Acts constituting conversion and liability therefor.
After demand and refusal to pay, an action for conversion will lie against one who has re- ceived money in a fiduciary capacity.-Jackson v. Moore (Sup.) 1101.
Charitable trusts, see "Charities."
a prior act of trustee.-In re Long Island Loai & Trust Co. (Sup.) 65; Appeal of Sloan, Id.
Trustee, relying on decree in accounting to estop beneficiary, has burden of showing that the question involved was litigated.-In re Long Island Loan & Trust Co. (Sup.) 65; Appeal of Sloan, Id.
Testamentary trustee held not liable for re- fusing to accept refund of dividends erroneousl paid out to life beneficiary as income.-In r
Combinations to monopolize trade, see "Mo- Elting (Sup.) 833; In re Curtiss' Will, Id. nopolies," § 1.
Creation by will, see "Wills," § 4.
The division of a testamentary trust estate into five separate trusts, disclosed in an ac-
Trust deeds, see "Chattel Mortgages"; "Mort- counting by the trustee and passed upon and gages."
§ 1. Creation, existence, and validity. Evidence in action to declare trust as to pro- ceeds of sale of real property examined, and held insufficient to show the existence of a trust relation arising out of contract.-Mackall v. Olcott (Sup.) 757.
Evidence in action to declare trust as to pro- ceeds of sale of real property examined, and held insufficient to show the existence of a trust ex maleficio by reason of confidential relations. -Mackall v. Ölcott (Sup.) 757.
approved by the surrogate over objection, be- comes res judicata.-In re Elting (Sup.) 833; In re Curtiss' Will, Id.
Under Code Civ. Proc. § 2813, surrogate's decree approving final account of testamentary trustee held to conclude parties thereto, and also remainderman not in esse, as to alleged devastavit; section 2481 being inapplicable.- In re Elting (Sup.) 833; In re Curtiss' Will, Id.
Certain conditional devisees in remainder of a trust fund held necessary parties to a suit by the receiver of the first tenant in remainder to compel the trustee to file an interlocutory ac- pur-count.-Leonard v. Pierce (Sup.) 978.
Transferee of corporate stock held to hold the same as trustee to accomplish the specific pose for which the stock was conveyed, so as to be liable to an accounting.-Slayback v. Ray- mond (Sup.) 931.
Savings deposited in trust held to cover money deposited after the death of the beneficiary. In re Bulwinkel (Sur.) 250.
§ 2. Construction and operation.
Under Personal Property Law, § 3, title to trust personalty held to vest in the cestui que trust, so as to be liable for his debts.-Ullman v. Cameron (Sup.) 148.
Trust created by will held to be in favor of infant children of testator, not his widow.- Brown v. Doherty (Sup.) 563.
§ 3. Management and disposal of trust property.
Entry in report of trustee to beneficiary held not notice to beneficiary of sale of certain prop- erty to the trust.-In re Long Island Loan & Trust Co. (Sup.) 65; Appeal of Sloan, Id.
The sale by a trustee of its own property to the trust is void as against public policy.-In re Long Island Loan & Trust Co. (Sup.) 65; Appeal of Sloan, Id.
That power conferred on trustee is broad does not discharge him from obligation of good faith and accounting.-Spier v. Hyde (Sup.) 285. § 4.
Accounting and compensation of trustee.
Refusal to open former decree in accounting between trustee and beneficiary held not to estop beneficiary in a subsequent accounting from questioning validity of prior act of trus- tee. In re Long Island Loan & Trust Co. (Sup.) 65; Appeal of Sloan, Id.
Decree on trustee's accounting held not to estop beneficiary from questioning validity of
account held maintainable against him in his A suit to compel a testamentary trustee to representative capacity only.-Leonard v. Pierce (Sup.) 978.
5. Establishment and enforcement of
Under Real Property Law (Laws 1896, p. 592, c. 547, § 207), a trust of real property could not be proved by parol, as against an answer containing general denial.-Hill v. Warsawski (Sup.) 551.
TURNPIKES AND TOLL ROADS.
Taxation of turnpike company, see "Taxation," § 1. ULTRA VIRES.
See "Corporations," § 2.
Taxation of federal bonds, see "Taxation," § 4.
UNIVERSITIES.
Taxation of, see "Taxation," § 1.
USE AND OCCUPATION.
A reservation in a sale of premises of the right of the vendor to use part thereof for a
amited time held not subject to any duty to |§ 1. Construction and operation of con- pay for the use.-Becker v. Davis (Sup.) 422.
1. Usurious contracts and transac- tions.
Whether a transaction was a sale or loan of personal credit, or a cloak to cover a usurious an, is a question of fact.-Forgotson v. Raubit- chek (Sup.) 503.
Contract for purchase of property held not tainted by usury.-Flagg v. Fisk (Sup.) 530.
In an action to reform a deed, held, that the evidence showed an investment by the grantee, rather than a loan to the grantor, so as to show usury.-Connolly v. Keenan (Sup.) 630.
Mere fact of payment of interest in excess of legal rate held not to authorize an inference of a usurious agreement.-Bosworth v. Kinghorn (Sup.) 983.
Holder of usurious note held to have burden of proving that he was a bona fide purchaser. -Simpson v. Hefter (City Ct. N. Y.) 243.
A plea of usury in an action on a note held good.-Simpson v. Hefter (City Ct. N. Y.) 243. Accommodation note held void because of usury in discounting the same.-Simpson v. Hefter (City Ct. N. Y.) 243.
Where a note is payable in the city of New York, it was governed as to interest by the laws of New York, though no rate was fixed.-| Simpson v. Hefter (City Ct. N. Y.) 243.
In office, see "Judges," § 1.
Effect of irregular vacation of attachment on liability on bond, see "Attachment," § 4. Vacating particular proceedings. See "Attachment," § 3; "Judgment," §§ 1, 3. Order in dispossession proceedings, see "Land- lord and Tenant," § 6.
Option for reconveyance on repayment held to survive time limit, where grantee receives payments thereon.-Connolly v. Keenan (Sup.) 630.
Where a grantor, in a deed with an option for payment and reconveyance, finally refuses to make further payments, claiming that his advances to the grantee have exceeded the con- sideration of the deed, he must at once sur-
render and deed the property, or exercise his option to purchase.-Connolly v. Keenan (Sup.) 630.
The measure of liability of a person under an option contract for the purchase of a tract of land held determined by the actual acreage of the tract.-Warden v. Tesla (Sup.) 853.
Modification or rescission of con- tract.
Where a purchaser of land, under a contract by the vendor to repurchase in case the ven- dee did not sell the same at a profit, parted with a portion of his interest in the land, he could only enforce the vendor's agreement to the extent of the loss sustained to such ven- dee's interest.-Maier v. Rebstock (Sup.) 85.
Whether a purchaser of land had used rea- sonable diligence to resell the same, and wheth- er the vendor had acquiesced in the purchaser's delay in demanding reconveyance under a con- tract, held for the jury.-Maier v. Rebstock (Sup.) 85.
A purchaser of real estate held entitled to a reasonable time, after the expiration of the time limited in a contract by the vendor to repurchase, within which to elect to enforce the same.-Maier v. Rebstock (Sup.) 85.
§ 3. Performance of contract.
Specific performance of contract to purchase land denied, because of mistake as to the area of land contracted to be sold.-McIntyre v. Har- rington (Sup.) 1028.
§ 4. Remedies of vendor.
In an action on an option contract for the pur- chase of a tract of land, the exclusion of evi- dence offered by defendant as to the number of acres in the tract held error.-Warden v. Tesla (Sup.) 853.
§ 1. Change of venue or place of trial. A party, by noticing a case for trial at a cer- tain term, and by then appearing and secur- ing a continuance, waives his right to move for a change of venue.-Coleman v. Hayes (Sup.) 12.
Change of place of trial to county of plain- tiff's residence held error.-Ferrin v. Huxley (Sup.) 1005.
Setting aside, see "New Trial," § 2.
and 121 New York State Reporter
VESTED REMAINDERS.
Creation, see "Wills," § 4.
VICE PRINCIPALS.
See "Master and Servant," § 5.
See "Municipal Corporations," § 8.
See "Master and Servant," § 2.
Of objections to particular acts or proceedings. See "Pleading," § 8; "Trial," § 7. Breach of contract, see "Sales," § 2.
Amendment of certiorari to review tax assessment, see "Taxation," § 2.
Forfeiture of insurance, see "Insurance," § 7.
For dispossession of tenant, see "Landlord and Tenant," § 6.
By insured, see "Insurance," $$ 5, 6. In leases, see "Landlord and Tenant," § 1. On sale of goods, see "Sales," §§ 3, 5.
WATERS AND WATER COURSES. § 1. Conveyances and contracts.
Designation of beneficiary of insurance by will see "Insurance," § 13.
Equitable conversion of devised partnership A real estate, see "Partnership," § 3. Gift of legacy, see "Gifts," § 1. Legacy and succession taxes, see "Taxation § 4.
§ 1. Contracts to devise or bequeath. Evidence in an action to partition land ke insufficient to support a finding of a par agreement, partly performed, of deceased will his property to one of defendants.-Patt v. Pattat (Sup.) 140.
§ 2. Requisites and validity.
Evidence held sufficient to admit a be graphic will to probate.-In re Palmer's W (Sur.) 249.
§ 3. Probate, establishment, and anndment.
A beneficiary under a destroyed will held : entitled to contest a later will, in case the struction was purposely done by testatrix vi she had testamentary capacity.-In re Raya Will (Sup.) 23.
A surrogate's order denying probate of a held sufficiently doubtful to require a trial jury, as authorized by Code Civ. Proc. § 258 re Rayner's Will (Sup.) 23.
A grantee in a deed held to have taken there under as an appurtenance of the premises the right of taking water from adjoining land.-Ma-In son v. Thwing (Sup.) 991.
Where probate of a will is denied, the exec A purchaser of lands held not a bona fide pur-utor named therein is entitled to appeal, un chaser as to the waters of a spring on the lands. Code Civ. Proc. §§ 1294, 2568.-In re Rayner -Mason v. Thwing (Sup.) 991. Will (Sup.) 23.
A reservation in a deed held to have rendered the right of taking water from the premises conveyed an appurtenance to other premises of the grantor.-Mason v. Thwing (Sup.) 991. § 2. Artificial ponds, reservoirs, and channels, dams, and flowage. One's easement of flooding lands held not affected by his periodical letting the water out, to suit his own pleasure only.-Hall v. State (Sup.) 338.
Where a surrogate's decree denying proba of a will is not entirely satisfactory, it will reversed, and the issues of fact directed to tried by a jury.-In re Shannon's Will (Sup 656.
A bequest by an attorney held not to includ claims for legal services.-In re Northup's W (Sup.) 318; In re Long Island Loan & Tru Co., Id.
A will construed, and held, that the childre of a deceased daughter of the testator took ai of her share under the will, and not as next e kin, subject to the interest of her husband.→ Lewisohn v. Henry (Sup.) 325.
to whom he represented in a certain purchase; An attorney held exempt from testifying as this involving the disclosure of confidential com- munications. In re Shawmut Min. Co. (Sup.) 1059; Appeal of Miller, Id.
Where a will is not punctuated with accura- | under Code Civ. Proc. § 834.-Becker v. Metro- cy, or even systematically, the punctuation aids politan Life Ins. Co. (Sup.) 980. its construction but little, and must otherwise be disregarded, if it conflicts with the testa- mentary scheme as gleaned from its provisions, or prevents ascribing to its words their ordi- nary meaning.-Lewisohn v. Henry (Sup.) 325. A bequest in a will of a fund "to be equally divided between the Indian missions and the domestic missions of the United States of America," does not entitle the "Domestic & Foreign Missionary Society of the Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of Amer-§ ica" to claim the bequest.-Bowman v. Domes- tic & Foreign Missionary Soc. of Protestant Episcopal Church (Sup.) 621.
Will held to vest in testator's niece and her heirs, subject to its provisions, title to prop- erty immediately on testator's death.-Rooney v. Bodkin (Sup.) 800.
( A will construed, and held, that testator's widow took an absolute estate, rather than a life estate. Oakes v. Massey (Sup.) 1118.
Amount necessary to be set aside, under will, to meet annuities provided for in the will, de termined. In re Sproule's Estate (Sur.) 432. § 5. Rights and liabilities of devisees and legatees.
Legacy held a general one, and executor was entitled to commissions for making sale and dividing the property bequeathed thereby.-In re Fisher (Sup.) 567.
Under a will, a deed by testator's executors, his widow, and then living heirs held insufficient to convey a fee, as against future rights of the issue of testator's children, in whom interests might vest at the death of the widow, after the death of their parent during the widow's life- time.-Huber v. Case (Sup.) 663.
Executors held, under provisions of will, not entitled to hold certain property devised to tes- tator's niece, and liable to account for rents when they did so hold it.-Rooney v. Bodkin (Sup.) 800.
Legacy made to adopted child held not sub- ject to abatement.-In re Brown (Sur.) 247.
tify on the accounting by an executor, under Certain witnesses held not incompetent to tes- Code Civ. Proc. § 829, as interested in the event.-In re Sproule's Estate (Sur.) 432. 2. Examination.
Question held not objectionable as calling for the condition of the building after the accident; and, if such evidence came in in the answer, the remedy was to strike.-Nelson v. Young (Sup.) 69.
In action for servant's injuries, question on cross-examination as to defendant's duties as contractor held not objectionable, in view of witness' testimony on direct examination.— Nelson v. Young (Sup.) 69.
Where a witness refuses to answer a pertinent question on cross-examination, his testimony in chief should be stricken out.-Gallagher v. Gal- lagher (Sup.) 343.
Where a witness was cross-examined as to part of his testimony at a coroner's inquest, the counsel for the opposite party was entitled to introduce the balance of the witness' statement on such subject.-Sexton v. Onward Const. Co. (Sup.) 550.
3. Credibility, impeachment, contra- diction, and corroboration.
In a criminal prosecution, it was error for the called in rebuttal, to characterize the testimony court to permit the witness for the people, of defendant's witnesses as untrue.-People v. Buckley (Sup.) 191.
In action for injuries, exclusion of evidence testify for plaintiff held error.-Brown v. In- as to how much physician had been paid to terurban St. Ry. Co. (Sup.) 461.
WORK AND LABOR.
Documentary evidence, see "Evidence," & 4. Liens for work and materials, see "Mechanics' Liens."
Opinion evidence, see "Evidence," § 6.
In an action for services, plaintiff held entitled to a judgment under the evidence.-Mulligan v. Tobin (Sup.) 406.
See "Execution"; "Habeas Corpus"; "Injunc- tion"; "Mandamus"; "Quo Warranto"; "Re- plevin." Of inquiry, see "Damages," § 4.
Physician held incompetent to testify as to in- formation obtained in a professional capacity, Estates for years, see "Landlord and Tenant."
WEST PUBLISHING CO., PRINTERS AND STEREOTYPERS, ST. PAUL, MINN.
« AnteriorContinuar » |