Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

January 13, 18, 1965.

379 U.S.

JANUARY 13, 1965.

Dismissal Under Rule 60.

No. 588, Misc. ALFORD V. NORTH CAROLINA. On petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of North Carolina. Dismissed pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court.

JANUARY 18, 1965.

Miscellaneous Orders.

No. 18, Original. ILLINOIS v. MISSOURI. The State of Missouri is directed to file a response within 30 days to the motion for leave to file the bill of complaint.

No. 19, Original. Assoc., INC., ET AL.

KELLY ET AL. v. E. H. SCHMIDT &
The motion to dispense with print-

ing the motion for leave to file the bill of complaint is granted. The motion for leave to file the bill of complaint is denied.

No. 73. UNITED STATES v. MISSISSIPPI ET AL. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi. (Probable jurisdiction noted, 377 U. S. 988.) The motion of the appellees to strike portions of the brief and to strike the appendix to the brief of the American Civil Liberties Union, as amicus curiae, is denied. Joe T. Patterson, Attorney General of Mississippi, Dugas Shands, Assistant Attorney General. P. M. Stockett and Charles Clark, Special Assistant Attorneys General, and Aubrey Bell on the motion.

No. 437. BURNETT v. NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD Co. (Certiorari, ante, p. 913, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.) The motion of Robert M. Dennis to withdraw his appearance as counsel for the respondent is granted.

379 U.S.

FORNIA V.

January 18, 1965.

No. 111. DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HYGIENE OF CALIKIRCHNER, ADMINISTRATRIX. (Certiorari, ante, p. 811, to the Supreme Court of California.) The motion of the National Association for Retarded Children, Inc., et al., for leave to file a brief, as amici curiae, is granted. A. Kenneth Pye, John R. Schmertz, Jr., and Bernard D. Fischman on the motion.

No. 348. LEH ET AL. v. GENERAL PETROLEUM CORP. ET AL. (Certiorari, ante, p. 877, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.) The petitioners are directed to file a response within 20 days to the affidavits filed in opposition to the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Maxwell Keith for petitioners. Howard Painter, Francis R. Kirkham, William E. Mussman, Thomas E. Haven, George W. Jansen, Jack E. Woods, Moses Lasky, Wayne H. Knight and Edmund D. Buckley for respondents.

No. 291. MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING Co. v. NEW JERSEY WOOD FINISHING CO. (Certiorari, ante, p. 877, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.) The motion of Reynolds Metals Co. for leave to file a brief, as amicus curiae, is granted. Lewis C. Green and Gustav B. Margraf on the motion.

No. 710, Misc. TURPIN v. MAXWELL, WARDEN, ET AL. Motion for leave to file petition for writ of habeas corpus and for other relief denied.

No. 619, Misc. CANADY v. MCGINNIS, CORRECTION COMMISSIONER, ET AL. Motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus denied. Petitioner pro se. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Paxton Blair, Solicitor General, William D. Bresinhan, Assistant Attorney General, and Julius L. Sackman for respondents.

No. 482. SCHREIBER ET AL.

[blocks in formation]

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION V. (Certiorari, ante, p. 927, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.) The motion of the Solicitor General for additional time for oral argument is granted, and 15 additional minutes are allotted to each side.

No. 670. FINNELL V. BROMBERG. On petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Nevada. The motion of George N. Leighton to withdraw his appearance as counsel for the petitioner is granted.

No. 525, Misc. DUDA, AMBASSADOR OF CZECHOSLOVAK SOCIALIST REPUBLIC v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND. On motion for leave to file petition for writ of prohibition and/or mandamus. The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief expressing the views of the United States.

No. 607, Misc. EASON v. MCGEE, CORRECTIONS ADMINISTRATOR, ET AL.;

No. 613, Misc. WHITE ET AL. v. WILSON, WARDEN, ET AL.;

[blocks in formation]

No. 693, Misc. HYMES v. DUNBAR, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR, ET AL.;

No. 697, Misc. FERRO v. DUNBAR, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR, ET AL.;

No. 716, Misc.

No. 717, Misc.

No. 740, Misc.

MACFADDEN v. UNITED STATES;

SCHACK v. FLORIDA ET AL.; and

JACKSON v. MARYLAND. Motions for

leave to file petitions for writs of habeas corpus denied.

[blocks in formation]

No. 95. LINKLETTER V. WALKER, WARDEN. (Certiorari, 377 U. S. 930, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit); and

No. 578. ANGELET V. FAY, WARDEN. (Certiorari, ante, p. 815, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.) The motions of the National District Attorneys' Association for leave to participate in oral argument, as amicus curiae, are granted. Michael Juviler on the motions.

No. 599, Misc. SCOTT v. ANDERSON, JAIL SUPERINTENDENT. Motion for leave to file petition for writ of habeas corpus denied. Treating the papers submitted as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Marshall and Harold H. Greene for respondent.

No. 626, Misc. LEEPER V. ANDERSON, JAIL SUPERINTENDENT;

No. 683, Misc. HOLLAND V. ANDERSON, JAIL SUPERINTENDENT;

No. 708, Misc. PARSONS v. ANDERSON, JAIL SUPERINTENDENT;

No. 719, Misc. MATTHEWS v. TEXAS ET AL.; and No. 725, Misc. CANTRELL v. CALIFORNIA ET AL. Motions for leave to file petitions for writs of habeas corpus denied. Treating the papers submitted as petitions for writs of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

No. 533, Misc. NEWMAN v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. Motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus denied.

No. 598, Misc. WILLIAMSON ET AL. v. Gilmer et al. Motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus denied. Petitioners pro se. William D. Neary for Gilmer et al., and T. W. Davidson, pro se, respondents.

[blocks in formation]

Probable Jurisdiction Noted.

No. 538. UNITED STATES v. HUCK MANUFACTURING Co. ET AL. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. Probable jurisdiction noted. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Robert B. Hummel and Arthur J. Murphy, Jr., for the United States. John A. Blair and Thomas W. Pomeroy, Jr., for appellees. Reported below: 227 F. Supp. 791.

No. 179. CORBETT, GUARDIAN v. STERGIOS, ALIAS STERYIAKIS. Appeal from the Supreme Court of Iowa. Probable jurisdiction noted. George S. Porikos for appellant. Harry H. Smith for appellee. Solicitor General Cox filed a memorandum for the United States. Reported below: 256 Iowa 12, 126 N. W. 2d 342.

No. 598. WESTERN PACIFIC RAILROAD Co. ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Probable jurisdiction noted. E. L. Van Dellen, Walter G. Treanor and E. Barrett Prettyman, Jr., for appellants. Solicitor General Cox for the United States, Robert W. Ginnane and Robert S. Burk for the Interstate Commerce Commission, and William P. Higgins, Charles W. Burkett, Earl F. Requa and Frank S. Farrell for Union Pacific Railroad Co. et al., appellees. Reported below: 230 F. Supp. 852.

Certiorari Granted. (See also No. 38, ante, p. 497; No. 25, ante, p. 644; and No. 263, Misc., ante, p. 648.) No. 580. GRAHAM ET AL. v. JOHN DEERE CO. OF KANSAS CITY ET AL. C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari granted. Claude A. Fishburn and Orville O. Gold for petitioners. W. W. Gibson and Thomas E. Scofield for respondents. Reported below: 333 F. 2d 529.

« AnteriorContinuar »