Ohio Legal News, Volumen1Jay Ford Laning Laning Printing Company, 1894 |
Dentro del libro
Resultados 1-5 de 85
Página 15
... evidence did not disclose who opened the gate , but it was opened shortly before the time when it was usual every day for the plaintiff or his employes to drive the cattle over the crossing from the west field to the east field . There ...
... evidence did not disclose who opened the gate , but it was opened shortly before the time when it was usual every day for the plaintiff or his employes to drive the cattle over the crossing from the west field to the east field . There ...
Página 16
... evidence that the crossing or gate was ever used by the defendant or any of its employes . An ordinance of the city ... evidence as to the operation or man- agement of the train other than the rate of speed . The court held : I - As the ...
... evidence that the crossing or gate was ever used by the defendant or any of its employes . An ordinance of the city ... evidence as to the operation or man- agement of the train other than the rate of speed . The court held : I - As the ...
Página 18
... evidence on behalf of the plaintiff tended to show that there was no light of any kind at the rear of said freight train and that the persons upon the engine though looking ahead saw no such light . The evidence also shows that said ...
... evidence on behalf of the plaintiff tended to show that there was no light of any kind at the rear of said freight train and that the persons upon the engine though looking ahead saw no such light . The evidence also shows that said ...
Página 19
... evidence a copy of the judgment in case last mentioned , which was objected to on the ground that it was not the judgment described in the bond set forth in his pe- tition . Held , that the objection was well taken , and that the Court ...
... evidence a copy of the judgment in case last mentioned , which was objected to on the ground that it was not the judgment described in the bond set forth in his pe- tition . Held , that the objection was well taken , and that the Court ...
Página 22
... evidence as to whether or not the charge of $ 2.00 was a reasonable one should have been left to the jury and that the refusal to permit evidence tending to show that $ 2.00 was unreasonable was error . Verdict set aside and new trial ...
... evidence as to whether or not the charge of $ 2.00 was a reasonable one should have been left to the jury and that the refusal to permit evidence tending to show that $ 2.00 was unreasonable was error . Verdict set aside and new trial ...
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Términos y frases comunes
action affidavit agent alleged amended amount appear apply April assessment assignment attorney Auditor authority avers bank bill cars cause charge Circuit Court City claim Common Pleas consent constitution contract corporation council counsel Court of Common court of equity creditors Cuyahoga county decision decree defendant demurrer Docket duty election equity error evidence fact fendant filed Hamilton county Hancock County held Huron County injunction injury interest issue John Judge jurisdiction jury land liability lien Lucas County matter McConica ment mortgage motion notice Ohio Ohio ex rel owner paid parties passed payment person petition petn plaintiff plaintiff in error premises Probate Court proceedings Prosecuting purpose question railroad company Railway received record replevin rule statute street struck jury suit Supreme Court testimony thereof tion Toledo Legal track trial verdict
Pasajes populares
Página 588 - Any person may be made a defendant who has or claims an interest in the controversy adverse to the plaintiff, or who is a necessary party to a complete determination or settlement of the question involved therein.
Página 578 - Laws shall be passed, taxing, by a uniform rule, all moneys, credits, investments in bonds, stocks, joint stock companies, or otherwise ; and also all real and personal property, according to its true value in money...
Página 155 - The defendant may demur to the indictment or information, when it appears upon the face thereof either: 1. If an indictment, that the grand jury by which it was found had no legal authority to inquire into the offense charged...
Página 498 - The court may determine any controversy between parties before it, when it can be done without prejudice to the rights of others, or by saving their rights; but when a complete determination of the controversy cannot be had without the presence of other parties, the court must then order them to be brought in...
Página 400 - Each house shall be the judge of the election,, returns, and qualifications of its own members...
Página 419 - ... in any trial. in any court, the party accused shall be allowed to appear and defend in person and with counsel; to demand the nature and cause of the accusation against him, and to have a copy thereof...
Página 293 - We hold It to be clear that the Interest which can protect a power after the death of a person who creates it must be an interest in the thing itself. In other words, the power must be ingrafted on an estate in the thing. The words themselves would seem to Import this meanIng. 'A power coupled with an interest' Is a power which accompanies, or is connected with, an interest.
Página 314 - The liability of the owner of any vessel for any embezzlement, loss or destruction by any person of any property, goods or merchandise, shipped or put on board of such vessel, or for any loss, damage or injury by collision, or for any act, matter or thing, loss, damage or forfeiture, done, occasioned or incurred, without the privity or knowledge of such owner or owners, shall in no case exceed the amount or value of the interest of such owner in such vessel and her freight then pending.
Página 216 - ... and the cause remanded to the court of common pleas for a new trial and for such other and further proceedings as are agreeable to law.
Página 498 - When an officer, executor, or administrator within this state, by misconduct or neglect of duty, forfeits his bond or renders his sureties liable, any person injured thereby, or who is by law entitled to the benefit of the security, may bring an action thereon in his own name against the officer, executor or administrator, and his sureties, to recover the amount to which he may be entitled by reason of the delinquency.