of his words, 52; his early speeches bombastic, 124; his use of plain words, 124; his temperance of language, 192. Wellington, on his "duty," 64. Whately, Archbishop, his sim- plicity in preaching, 123. whether, 453.
Whipple, E. P., on the words of Chaucer, Edwards, and Barrow, 54; on the suggestiveness of Shakespeare's diction, 54, 55; on the styles of Sydney Smith, Bacon, Locke, etc., 219, 220; his style, 237; his knowledge of English literature, 237. Whitney, W. D., quoted, 234. Whittington and his cat, 417. whole, entire, complete, total, 460, 469. William, 326.
Willmott, Rev. Robert A., on Dryden's and Pope's versifica- tion, 253. window, 404.
Wolcott, Dr., his lines on John- son, 113. woman, 391.
women, their language, 240. Words, their significance, 1-61; their range and power, 2, 46; are things, 3; Mirabeau on, 3; Hazlitt on, 3; more enduring than sculpture or painting, 4, 5; Homer's, 5; the incarnation of thought, 6; Milton's, 7-9; Montgomery on Milton's, 8, 9; Bacon's, 10; Dryden's, 10; Mon- taigne's, 10; Rousseau's, 10; Coleridge's, 10; Tennyson's, 11; Swinburne's, 11; De Quincey's mastery of them, 12; of the 17th century writers, 13; diffi- culty of defining, 14-16; Daniel Webster's study of, 17; Lord Chatham's study of, 17; Will- iam Pinkney's study of, 17; Theophile Gautier's fondness for picturesque, 19; comprehen- |
sive, 23; their use a test of culture, 25, 26; should fit close to the thought, 26; never strict- ly synonymous, 26; Wm. Pitt's use of, 96; Robert Hall's use of, 26; John Foster's scrutiny of, 27; Thomas Moore's use of, 27; how used by the ancient writers, 27-30; Demosthenes's choice of, 28, 29; Cicero's use of, 29; Cowper on, 34; their necromantic power, 34, 35; how regarded by the ancients, 43- 45; use of in "the black art," 45; T. W. Higginson on, 46; Prof. Maurice on, 46; Haw- thorne on their spells, 47; their meaning and force depend up- on the man who uses them, 50– 56; E. P. Whipple on the trans- figuration of common, 54; sug- gestiveness of Shakespeare's, 54, 55; media for the emission of character, 55, 56; no new ones can be invented, 56, 57; diffi- culty of restoring obsolete, 57; their significance disclosed by life, 59, 60; their morality, 62- 104; an index to character, 62- 104; their power over the pop- ular imagination, 82; test of thought, 82; embalm mistaken opinions, 84; Bacon on their power, 84; Balzac on their witchery, 85; South on the en- chantment of popular ones, 85, 86, 87; illustrations of their power, 86, 87; their influence in theology, 88, 89; their influ- ence in science, 89; their influ- ence upon authors, 90; em- ployed as expletives, 90; calum- nious, 92; their power in politics, 93; Bulwer on their influence, 93; their perversions by the Greeks and Romans, 96; used to gloss over vices, 99, 100; auctionee.' use of, 100; crimi- nality of their corruptors, 101, 102; James Martineau on, 103; a startling fact about them,
104; grand, 105-138; the mania ideas to different minds, 318, for big, 106-108; St. Paul on, 319, 320; denote but part of an 109; the simplest best, 124; the object, 320; their power in the affectation of foreign, 125, 126; French revolution, 349, 350; uncouthness of scientific, 130, fascination of their study, 367, 131; small, 139-157; conven- 368; concentrated poems, 369; tional, 158, 160, 172; used with- knowledge embodied in, 371; out meaning, 162-176; lose their Arab in English, 371; changes significance by handling, 170, in their meaning, 374-382; their 171, 190; some abuses of, 177- degradation, 382-397; common 193; the secret of apt, 210-241; with curious derivations, 387- only symbols, 213; their ar- 412; of illusive etymology, 412– rangement on the battle-fields 420; causes of their corruption, of thought, 226, 228; onomato- 412; Anglicizing of foreign, poetic, 242-256; phonetic cor- 412; their contradictory mean- ruption of, 247; fallacies in, ings, 420-423; origin of new, 257-322; effect of equivocal in 428; legitimate once denounced, theology, 257-264; and in phil- 429; coined by poets, 432; ad- osophy, 264; their changes of vantages of their accurate use, meaning, 271; dictionary defi- 436-440; the use of pet, 444; nitions of, 275; "rabble-charm- the coining of, 425, 432-434. ing," 275; question-begging, Words without meaning, 158-176. 279; derivative and primitive, Wordsworth, lines from, 251. 280; mere hieroglyphics, 288;Wotton, Sir Henry, his definition shadow forth more than they of an ambassador, 166. express, 289; their insinuations of error, 292; in legal instru- ments, 311; their ambiguity in statutes, 311, 312; express only the relations of things, 317; im- perfect signs of our conceptions, 317, 318, 321; convey different zero, 419.
Youth and Age, Coleridge's lines on, 256.
« AnteriorContinuar » |