The Chase Court : Justices, Rulings, and Legacy"This look into the Supreme Court explains why the rulings made by Salmon Chase played a major role in healing a union divided by strong opinions and beliefs and helped reinforce the foundation of the Constitution. The examination of the justices who served on this Court, aided by a detailed representation of the time period, clearly illustrates why many of these decisions still hold a place in current legislation. The Chase Court examines a country as it recovered from the bloodiest conflict in its history and turned to the forethought of a small group of men to help lead it into peace."--BOOK JACKET. |
Dentro del libro
Resultados 1-5 de 5
Página 88
Alcanzaste el límite de visualización de este libro.
Alcanzaste el límite de visualización de este libro.
Página 114
Alcanzaste el límite de visualización de este libro.
Alcanzaste el límite de visualización de este libro.
Página 127
Alcanzaste el límite de visualización de este libro.
Alcanzaste el límite de visualización de este libro.
Página 207
Alcanzaste el límite de visualización de este libro.
Alcanzaste el límite de visualización de este libro.
Página 208
Alcanzaste el límite de visualización de este libro.
Alcanzaste el límite de visualización de este libro.
Comentarios de la gente - Escribir un comentario
No encontramos ningún comentario en los lugares habituales.
Contenido
3 | |
References | 16 |
The Justices | 19 |
Salmon P Chase | 20 |
James Wayne | 27 |
John Catron | 30 |
Samuel Nelson | 32 |
Robert C Grier | 35 |
Veazie Bank v Fenno 1869 | 70 |
Collector v Day 1871 | 71 |
Hepburn v Griswold 1870 | 73 |
Knox v Lee and Parker v Davis 1871 | 77 |
The Slaughterhouse Cases 1873 | 79 |
Bradwell v Illinois 1873 | 84 |
References | 85 |
Legacy and Impact | 87 |
Nathan Clifford | 37 |
Noah H Swayne | 39 |
Samuel F Miller | 41 |
David Davis | 43 |
Stephen J Field | 46 |
William Strong | 48 |
Joseph P Bradley | 50 |
Ward Hunt | 52 |
Major Decisions | 55 |
Cummings v Missouri 1867 | 58 |
Ex Parte Garland 1867 | 59 |
Ex Parte McCardle 1869 | 62 |
Mississippi v Johnson 1867 | 66 |
Texas v White 1869 | 67 |
Crandall v Nevada 1868 | 68 |
State Authority | 88 |
Due Process in Wartime | 95 |
Conclusion | 100 |
References | 101 |
Reference Materials | 103 |
Key People Laws and Events | 105 |
Documents | 173 |
Chronology | 203 |
Table of Cases | 211 |
Glossary | 213 |
Annotated Bibliography | 225 |
Index | 231 |
About the Author | 247 |
Términos y frases comunes
Abraham Lincoln action Andrew Johnson antislavery appointed April attorney authority became bill blacks Bradley Buchanan Buren Catron Chase Court chief justice citizens Civil Rights Act Compromise of 1850 Confederacy Confederate Congress congressional Davis decision Democratic dissent Dred Scott due process elected enacted Ex parte Milligan executive Fairman federal courts Fifteenth Amendment Fourteenth Amendment Grant Grier habeas corpus High Court Hoar Illinois impeachment issue Jackson John John Catron judicial jurisdiction Kansas-Nebraska Act law practice legal tender legislative legislature Louisiana Lurie majority McCardle Miller Milligan Missouri Nelson nomination Northern opinion party’s person political Polk presidential protection rebellion Reconstruction reelection represented Republican Party resigned Roger Taney seat seceded secession secretary served Seward Slaughterhouse slavery South Southern Stanton statute Stephen Swayne Taney term territories Test Oath Texas tion Tyler U.S. Constitution U.S. Senate U.S. Supreme Court Union United veto Virginia vote Wayne Whig William York
Pasajes populares
Página 57 - The Constitution of the United States is a law for rulers and people, equally in war and in peace, and covers with the shield of its protection all classes of men, at all times, and under all circumstances.
Página 176 - Plainly, the central idea of secession is the essence of anarchy. A majority held in restraint by constitutional checks and limitations, and always changing easily with deliberate changes of popular opinions and sentiments, is the only true sovereign of a free people.
Página 173 - I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so.