Reports of Cases Decided in the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota, Volumen5
North Dakota. Supreme Court, Hiram A. Libby, Robert Milligan Carothers, John McDowell Cochrane, Robert Dimon Hoskins, Edgar Whittlesey Camp, Edwin James Taylor, Ames Francis Wilbur, Joseph Coghlan
Lawyers Co-operative Publishing Company, 1897
Comentarios de la gente - Escribir un comentario
No encontramos ningún comentario en los lugares habituales.
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
accused action admiralty affidavit alleged allowed amount answer appeal application assignment assume attorney authority bank bond cause charge City claim Codes Comp complaint condition consideration constitution contempt contract counsel decision defendant defendant's delivered directed District Court duty effect election enforce entered error established evidence execution exercise existence fact filed follows force further give given grant ground held hold indorsed interest issue judge judgment jurisdiction jury land language matter mortgage motion N. W. Rep necessary notes notice objection opinion original party payment person plaintiff possession practice presented proceedings proper provisions purchase question reason received record refused relating respondent rule secure specific statute sufficient Supreme Court taken Territory testimony thereof tion transfer trial court true vote witness writs
Página 361 - The supreme court, except as otherwise provided in this Constitution, shall have appellate jurisdiction only, which shall be co-extensive with the State, and shall have a general superintending control over all inferior courts, under such regulations and limitations as may be prescribed by law.
Página 612 - No special privileges or immunities shall ever be granted which may not be altered, revoked or repealed by the Legislature; nor shall any citizen, or class of citizens, be granted privileges or immunities which, upon the same terms, shall not be granted to all citizens.
Página 224 - ... and in such amount as the Court or the Judge thereof may direct, to the effect that the appellant will obey the order of the Appellate Court upon the appeal.
Página 427 - An action is commenced as to each defendant when the summons is served on him, or on a co-defendant, who is a joint contractor, or otherwise united in interest with him.
Página 209 - ... the same jurisdiction, in all cases arising under the Constitution and laws of the United States as is vested in the circuit and district courts of the United States...
Página 473 - ... in its discretion, and upon such terms as may be just, at any time within one year after notice thereof, relieve a party from a judgment, order, or other proceeding, taken against him through his mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect...
Página 175 - When several proximate causes contribute to an accident, and each is an efficient cause, without the operation of which the accident would not have happened, it may be attributed to all or any of the causes ; but it cannot be attributed to a cause unless without its operation the accident would not have happened.
Página 6 - No person, association or corporation shall within this state, manufacture for sale or gift, any intoxicating liquors, and no person, association or corporation shall import any of the same for sale or gift, or keep or sell or offer the same for sale, or gift, barter or trade as a beverage. The legislative assembly shall by law prescribe regulations for the enforcement of the provisions of this article and shall thereby provide suitable penalties for the violation thereof.
Página 427 - The summons may be served by the sheriff of the county, where the defendant may be found, or by any other person, not a party to the action.
Página 632 - It is undoubtedly true that there may be cases where one part of a statute may be enforced as constitutional, and another be declared inoperative and void, because unconstitutional; but these are cases where the parts are so distinctly separable that each can stand alone, and where the court is able to see, and to declare, that the intention of the legislature was that the part pronounced valid should be enforceable, even though the other part should fail. To hold otherwise would be to substitute,...