Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

Decisions Per Curiam, Etc.

242 U. S.

No. 316. THOMAS PATRICK KEYES, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, V. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Illinois. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted October 16, 1916. Decided October 23, 1916. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Bergmann v. Backer, 157 U. S. 655, 656; Caldwell v. Texas, 137 U. S. 692; Howard v. Fleming, 191 U. S. 126, 135; (2) Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102, 105; Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Overton v. Oklahoma, 235 U. S. 31. Mr. Chas. H. Soelke for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Patrick J. Lucey and Mr. Lester H. Strawn for the defendant in error.

No. 346. JOSEPH W. BULL, APPELLANT, v. HUGH CAMPBELL, JR. Appeal from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted October 16, 1916. Decided October 23, 1916. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Bagley v. General Fire Extinguisher Co., 212 U. S. 477; Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561; St. Anthony Church v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co., 237 U.S. 575; (2) Farrell v. O'Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720; Merriam Co. v. Syndicate Publishing Co., 237 U. S. 618, 621. Mr. John R. Van Derlip for the appellant. Mr. S. E. Ellsworth for the appellee.

No. 453. LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. C. L. CROAN ET AL. In error to the Court of Appeals of the State of Kentucky. Submitted pursuant to 20th rule October 12, 1916. Decided October 23, 1916. Per Curiam. Judgment reversed with costs upon the authority of Northern Pacific Railway

242 U. S.

Decisions Per Curiam, Etc.

v. Wall, 241 U. S. 87; Cincinnati & Pacific Railway v. Rankin, 241 U. S. 319. Mr. Chas. H. Moorman and Mr. Benjamin D. Warfield for the plaintiff in error. Mr. William W. Crawford for the defendants in error.

No. 484. THE MISSOURI, KANSAS & TEXAS RAILWAY COMPANY OF TEXAS ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. MRS. EMMA A. CASSADY, ADMINISTRATRIX, &c. In error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Second Supreme Judicial District of the State of Texas. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted October 10, 1916. Decided October 23, 1916. Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of Chicago Junction Railway Co. v. King, 222 U. S. 222; Seaboard Air Line v. Padgett, 236 U. S. 668, 673-674; Great Northern Railway Co. v. Knapp, 240 U. S. 464. Mr. Joseph M. Bryson, Mr. Alexander Britton, and Mr. Evans Browne for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. H. L. Stuart for the defendant in error.

No. 507. JOHN G. CHRISTOPHER ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, V. JANE MUNGEN AND HENRY MUNGEN, HER HUSBAND. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Florida. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted October 9, 1916. Decided October 23, 1916. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Gaar, Scott & Co. v. Shannon, 223 U. S. 468, 470; Mellon v. McCafferty, 239 U. S. 134; (2) Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102, 105; Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Parker v. McLain, 237 U. S. 469. Mr. George C. Bedell for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. Nathan P. Bryan and Mr. J. T. G. Crawford for the defendants in

error.

Decisions Per Curiam, Etc.

242 U.S.

No. 3. MARY HELEN BROWN, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK. In error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Argued October 20, 1916. Decided October 30, 1916. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102, 105; Consol. Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Ennis Water Works v. Ennis, 233 U. S. 652, 658; Parker v. McLain, 237 U. S. 469, 471-472; (2) Shoemaker v. United States, 147 U. S. 282, 321; Prosser v. Northern Pacific R. R., 152 U. S. 59; Bauman v. Ross, 167 U. S. 548, 596; Ramapo Water Co. v. City of New York, 236 U. S. 579. Mr. Omri F. Hibbard, Mr. N. T. M. Melliss and Mr. Nathan I. Sachs for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Terence Farley for the defendant in error.

No. 28. RIGHT REVEREND LIBERT HUBERT BOEYNAEMS, BISHOP OF ZEUGMA, VICAR APOSTOLIC OF HAWAII, TRUSTEE, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. L. AH LEONG. In error to the Supreme Court of the Territory of Hawaii. Submitted October 23, 1916. Decided October 30, 1916. Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of Lewis & Cooke v. Atcherley, 222 U. S. 285, 294; John Ii Estate v. Brown, 235 U. S. 342, 349; Kapiolani Estate v. Atcherley, 238 U. S. 119, 136; Cardona v. Quinones, 240 U. S. 83, 88. Mr. Lorrin Andrews for the plaintiff

in error.

error.

Mr. David L. Withington for the defendant in

No. 31. SOUTHERN RAILWAY, CAROLINA DIVISION, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. FANNIE G. DRIGGS AND HER HUSBAND, H. D. DRIGGS; and

242 U. S.

Decisions Per Curiam, Etc.

No. 32. SOUTHERN RAILWAY, CAROLINA DIVISION, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. HUBERT DRIGGS, BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, H. D. DRIGGS. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of South Carolina. Submitted October 25, 1916. Decided October 30, 1916. Per Curiam. Judgments reversed with costs upon the authority of Kansas City Southern Ry. v. Carl, 227 U. S. 639, 653; Boston & Maine R. Co. v. Hooker, 233 U. S. 97, 110-113; Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Maxwell, 237 U. S. 94, 97-98. Mr. Benjamin Lindsay Abney and Mr. John K. Graves for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Stanwix G. Mayfield for the defendants in error.

No. 36. MARTIN H. FREE, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. THE WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Wisconsin. Argued October 25 and 26, 1916. Decided October 30, 1916. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102, 105; Consol. Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Ennis Water Works v. Ennis, 233 U. S. 652, 658; Parker v. McLain, 237 U. S. 469, 471-472; (2) John v. Paullin, 231 U. S. 583, 585-586; McDonald v. Oregon R. & Nav. Co., 233 U. S. 665, 669–670; (3) Simon v. Craft, 182 U. S. 427, 437; Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Schmidt, 177 U. S. 230. Mr. B. I. Salinger and Mr. Frederick S. Tyler for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Rush Taggart, Mr. George H. Fearons and Mr. Francis Raymond Stark for the defendant in error.

No. 41. THE CITY OF MONTGOMERY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. R. H. GREENE ET AL.; and

Decisions Per Curiam, Etc.

242 U. S.

No. 42. THE CITY OF MONTGOMERY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. W. R. MCDADE ET AL. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Alabama. Argued for plaintiff in error October 27, 1916. Decided October 30, 1916. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102, 105; Consol. Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Ennis Water Works v. Ennis, 233 U. S. 652, 658; Parker v. McLain, 237 U. S. 469, 471-472; (2) Stewart v. Kansas City, 239 U. S. 14, 16; County of Sioux v. Newton Rule, 241 U. S. 640. Mr. W. A. Gunter for the plaintiff in error. No appearance for the defendants in error.

No. 82. ILLINOIS SURETY COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. FRANK MILLER ET AL. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York. Argued for appellees and submitted for appellant November 9, 1916. Decided November 13, 1916. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction, with five per cent damages, upon the authority of Aspen Mining & Smelting Co. v. Billings, 150 U. S. 331; Brown v. Alton Water Co., 222 U. S. 325; Metropolitan Water Co. v. Kaw Valley District, 223 U. S. 519; Union Trust Co. v. Westhus, 228 U. S. 379; Shapiro v. United States, 235 U. S. 412. Mr. L. Laflin Kellogg and Mr. Nelson L. Keach for the appellant. Mr. H. W. Goodrich, Mr. Arthur M. Allen, Mr. George R. Coughlan, Mr. George W. Bristol, Mr. Henry E. Mattison and Mr. Frederick P. King for the appellees.

No. 86. VANDALIA RAILROAD COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, V. NATHANIEL G. STRINGER. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Indiana. Argued for the

« AnteriorContinuar »