Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB
[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

82, 083 485, 401

412, 758 c1,000,000 2, 715, 914 3, 838, 728 6,731, 723 d11,000,000 10, 473, 334 10, 587, 962 4, 904, 191

112, 628

(c)

Alabama Arkansas.. California.. Colorado Connecticut Delaware.... Florida Georgia. Illinois Indiana. Jowa........ Kansas Kentucky Louisiana. Maine Maryland... Massachusetts.. Michigan Minnesota.. Mississippi Missouri Nebraska. Nevada New Hampshiro.. New Jersoy. New York North Carolina Ohio Oregon Pennsylvania.. Rhode Island. South Carolina.. Tennessee Texas Vermont.. Virginia. West Virginia. Wisconsin. Alaska Arizona Dakota District of Columbia Idaho Montana.. New Mexico.... Utah..... Washington Wyoming..

[blocks in formation]

945, 450, 000 11, 850, 871 I...583, 815 399, 729, 706 6, 846, 200 1.1, 597, 311 140,000,000 725, 775,239 9, 733, 903 I...245, 725 133, 418, 700 3, 890, 750 I...463, 346

26, 247, 018 237, 976 230, 588, 551 2, 314, 815 D...74, 097

565, 500, 687 6,832, 926 I.. 482, 119 3, 224, 682, 343 935, 662, 084 1.2, 314, 503

202, 752, 622 653, 106 I....87, 146 1, 688, 676, 163 28, 467, 005 I... 497, 248 75, 306, 453 1, 2:39, 998 I....79, 565

33, 371, 849 1.2, 757, 403

2, 294, 571 I.... 67, 436 149, 973, 365 h 393, 903 D...11, 194 226, 844, 184 1, 797, 769 1...421, 988 169, 986, 413 311, 735, 707 1, 838, 942 I....19, 685 159, 514, 752 1, 964, 945 D...13, 595 498, 725, 843 7, 184, 033 I.1, 051, 398

4, 373, 846 1,000,000

15, 525

2, 200, 000

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

880,000

152, 404

a Seo Table 1, p. 5, for year of report. b Valne of securities held in trust for school fund. c Income capitalized. d Value of lands unsoli. e There are a number of permanent local funds in the State. f Income capitalized at 6 per cent.

Sites and buildings only.

School-houses. i Income from State bonds. į 103,130 acres of land unsold. * Estimated. 1 Ba lance on hand.

Receipts and expenditures.- There are apparently as many different methods of keeping school accounts as thero are States and Territories, and no classification of roceipts and expenditures can be made which can be responded to by all State superintendents. That which has been adopted in the present Report has been deemed the best, taking into consideration both the number of State superintendents that are ablo to reply to it and its value in studying educational questions.

The amount raised by local taxes has increased $801,141 in eleven States and Territories, and decreased $243,832 in seven States and Territories, the net increase being $557,309. The States and Territories participating in the increase are Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Illinois, Maryland, Missouri, New Jersey, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Dakotá, and Montana. Of these, Missouri, West Virginia, and Wisconsin also show increase in the Stato tax. In Connecticut, where the local tax has decreased by a little more than 6 per cent., there has been a slight increase (less than 1 per cent.) in the State tax.

The total amount expended for public schools in the United States, according to the latest returns at hand, is $111,304,927, being an increase over last year of $920,270. This does not express the real increase, however, since this year, so far as possible, the payments on bonded indebtedness have been stricken out of the expenditures, these suns presumably having appeared as expenses in previous years.

The particulars under which increase or decrease appears are snggestive, as indicating the state of the public mind with reference to the essential conditions of efficiency in a school system. The tendency with respect to teachers' salaries has already been noted. Nine States and one Territory show an increase in superintendents' sal. aries amounting to $27,600, and fivo States decrease amounting to $53,595, giving a net decrease of $25,995. It should be observed that $51,695 of the total decrease must be credited to Massachusetts. According to the full statistics from this State the entire sum paid for supervision in the State is $9,014 more than the corresponding sum for 1881-285, although the total sum paid for superintendents' salaries is as noted, $51,695 less than for 1881–85. The State report throws no light upon this decline in superintendents' salaries. That it is not in accordance with the views entertained either by the State board or by Hon. J. W. Dickinson, who has for many years held the important ottice of secretary of the board, is evident from their latest utterances upon the subject of supervision.

In the report of the former for the current year wo read : Among the prime needs of the schools, often emphasized in the reports of this board, aro better supervision and better teachers in the towns outside the considerable centers of population, Good supervisiou will secure good teachers, but how to obtain the former in these localities is the problem of the day. In the cities and large towns the concentration of wealth and population atfords an easy solution to this question by the employment of a paid superintendent who devotes all his time to the caro and improvement of the schools. But the expense of such an agency is beyond the means of the sparsely-settled towns, and it is every year becoming more and more difficult to find persons in such localities competent for the work, or who are willing to perform it gratuitously or for the meager pittance only which the towns can pay.”

Mr. Dickinson's discussion of the subject will be found in full in this appendix, p. 43.

COMPARATIVE STATISTICS OF STATE SYSTEMS. The table of comparative statistics of State systems (Table 8), compiled from the preceding tables, expresses the relation of each part of the several State systems to every other part. The student of the subject is likely to find here the answer or material for the answer to every inquiry which arises in his mind, so far as the facts are attainable.

Of the many particulars involved, two may perhaps be regarded as more fully representative of the educational situation, viz, the ratio of current expenditure to tho population 6-14 years of age, and the ratio of averago attendance to the same population. The first expresses the effort put forth by the State, the second its most important outcome, viz, the attendance of pupils upon the instruction.

Between the two, as set forth in the table under consideration, a relation is apparent which cannot be purely accidental.

With three exceptions, the States whose average current expenditure per capita of population 6-14 years falls below the average for the United States (viz, 59.15), also show a ratio of average attendance (to population (-14) below the average for the

nited States (viz, 66.51). The States here referred to are Alabama, Arkans.is, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, North Carolina, Virginia, Maryland, Minnessota, Missouri, and West Virginia. Thó three of the above States which give a ratio of average attendance higher than that for the United States are Tennessee, Missouri, and West Virginia. On the other hand, with the single exception of Wisconsin, all the States in which the ratio of current expenditure per capita of population 6 to 14 is above the average for the Cnited States, show also a ratio of average attendance per capita of population 6 to 14 higher than the average for the country at large.

It may be remarked by way of caution that, in drawing inferences from the data contained in Tablo 8, too much stress should not be laid upon isolated facts, but the different parts of the table should be studied in connection with each other. For instance, of two States, one may have a smaller proportion of its total population enrolled in its public schools, but a greater proportion of its child population (6 to 14); or, one may have a smaller proportion of its population 6 to 14 enrolled in its public schools, but a greater proportion in average daily attendance. Similarly, the total wealth of a State should be kept in mind when treating of the amount raised by taxation for the support of its schools or the value of its school property.

[blocks in formation]

103. 7

1 Alabama...
2 Arkansas
3 California..

Colorado
5 Connecticut.
6 Delaware
7 Florida.
8 Georgia
0 Illinois..
10 Indiana
11 Iowa
12

Kansas 13

Kentucky. 14 Louisiana 15 Maine. 16 Maryland 17 Massachusetts 18 Michigan 19 Minnesota 20 Mississippi 21 Missouri 22 Nebraska 23 Nevada 24 New Hampshire 25

New Jersey. 26 New York 27 North Carolina. 28 Ohio 20 Oregon 30 Pennsylvania 31 Rhode Island 32 South Carolina. 33 Tennessco 34 Texas 35 Vermont 36 Virginia 37 West Virginia 38 Wisconsin 39 Alaska... 40 Arizona.... 41 Dakota.. 42 District of Columbia 43 Idaho

Indian Territory. 45 Moptana. 46 New Mexico 47

Utah 48 Washington 49 | Wyoming

Per cent. Per cent. Per cent. Per cent. 28.5

22. 27 17. 23 77.39 17.6 22. 68 18. 81 82.97 0.4 15. 85

18. 90 119.21 2.4 12. 38 16. 08 134. 80 138.5 15. 59 18. 71 120.01 81.0 6.2

22. 19 17. 96 80.91 28.7 22, 20 18. 86 81.97 58.6 19. 66 22. 66 115.25 374

20.17 24. 56 121.78 31.8 15. 7 20. 16 28. 43 140.98 45.0 22. 2

21. 67 10. 25 47.30 21.7 16.02 22. 45 140.13 102.4 19. 10 17.33 90. 74 241.6 14.71 18.00 122. 34 33. 3 17.64 21.79 123.52 14. 1

18. 17 20. 91 115. 03 26.7 22. 86 35. 4 21.06 23. 38 111.02 9.7

19.79 0.5 11.94 13, 30 110.37 44. 1 14.03 17. 73 128. 38 171.4 111.9 16. 48 19. 28 117. 02 31.4 21. 07 20.03 92.89 82.2 19. 08 23. 15

121.32 2. 5 18.40 20. 96 113. 95 105.0 18. 87 20.95 111.04 280.4 15. 18

15. 74

103. 67 36.0 22. 25

16. 94 76. 15 41.3 22. 25

22. 23

99.97

79.2

111.0

88.6

[blocks in formation]

93.5

36.5 41. 4 28.1 28.7 0.1 0.7

2.8 3391.0

0.7

[blocks in formation]

11. 40

12. 24

107. 36

0.6 1.1 2. 2 1.6 0.3

17. 62

81. 87

21.52
17. 75

« AnteriorContinuar »