Burke, City of Huntington v...133

Burke v. Lukens......

Burtt v. Little........

.648

..567

Barnett v. Washington Glass

Co..

..631

Bauer v.Oldendorf, Jr., by Next

Friend..

.397

Citizens' St. R.W. Co.v. Lowe.. 47

City of Bluffton v. McAfee......490

City of Elkhart, Trout v.........343

City of Elwood v. Carpenter.....459

City of Huntington v. Burke...133
City of Huntington et al v. Ken-

Bedford Belt R. W. Co. v. Mc-
Donald

ower.

.620

.456

City of Lebanon v. McCoy......500

City of Valparaiso v. Moffitt et

Bierhaus et al, Western Union

Tel. Co. v....

Blair et al. v. Porter..

Blue et al. v. Briggs

Board of Commissioners of

Jackson Co. v. Nichols.........315

Board of Commissioners of Mi-

ami Co. v. Woodring et al....173

Board ofCommissioners of Rush
County v. Trees........
..479

Bookwalter et al, Hammond v..177

Bray et al, Levi et al v..........

Briggs, Blue et al. v...

Clear Creek Township v. Ritt-

ger......

.355

.464

..206

Clements, Crawfordsville Music
Hall Association v..

Clemmitt, by Next Friend,

Island Coal Co. v....

Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago

and St. Louis R. W. Co. v.

Adair.

..569

9

105

Hammond v. Bookwalter et al..177

Hammond, G. H., Co. v. Ma-

son, Admr........

.469

.340

285

...511

27

..161

Coburn v. Whitaker and Garret

Lumber Co....

Coit, Trustee, Citizens' Ins. Co.

of Evansville v..........

Cook, Louisville, New Albany

and Chicago R. W. Co. v......109

Consumers' Gas Trust Co. v.

Huntsinger

Corbin v. Thompson.

Cox et al, McCloy v...

Crawfordsville Music Hall As-

sociation v. Clements.............. .464

Craycraft, Louisville, New Al-

bany and Chicago R.W.Co.v..203

Cronbach, Admr., Louisville

and Nashville R. R. Co. v....666

Crum et al v. Yundt...... ..308

Crunk, Rhea et al v

Cutshaw et al, Fargo & Co. v...392

....

23

Hays, Moore v....

Herrod et al. v. Smith et al...... 21

Hilfiker, Lake Erie and West-

ern R. R. Co. v.

Hobbs, Hadley v

.280

...351

Hoch et al. v. Monroe Tp. of

Pulaski Co.....

.595

Hoffstetter et al., Dougherty v..699

Holmes, Sheriff et al. v. Hen-

derson & Co........

.698

Holsapple, Louisville, New Al-

bany and Chicago R. W. Co.

V.....

..301

Horner, Campbell, Admr., v... 86

Huey et al., Clark et al. v.......224
Hunt et al., Town of Markle, v..353
Hunt et al. v. Town of Markle..335
Huntsinger, Consumers' Gas
Trust Co. v.........

Indianapolis Union R. W. Co.,

Myers et al v....

Island Coal Co. v. Clemmitt,

.285

..170

by Next Friend..... ........206

Island Coal Co.v. Wright et al..640

Ives, Pittsburgh, Cincinnati,

Chicago and St. Louis R. W.

Co. V..............

..602

.347

Kaufman, Levi v........
Keck et al v. State, ex rel. Natl.
Cash Register Co............ 119

Kellar, Wetzel, Admr., v........ 75

Keller et al v. Reynolds...... ..383

Kendall, Roberts et al v.........269

Kennedy, Admx., Small et al v..155

Kenower, City of Huntington

et al v.......

.456

.240

.421

.629

Galloway et al., Leak v....... .700

Goben v. Phillips.....

Goodlander, Dunphy v........

Gundlefinger et al., Carey v.....645

Hadley, Cleveland, Columbus,

Chicago and St. Lous R. W.

Co. v

.609

.516

Kleespies v. McKenzie........ ..404