68, 324, 328.. 1933-34 Laws, Spec. Sess., Acts Nos. 55, 56. 484 1935 Laws, Act No. 412. 484 1937 Laws, Acts Nos. 484 282, § 52; 323..... Stats. Anno. (Purdon) Title 30, § 240; Title 34, §§ 1001, 1311.... 52 Stats. Anno. (Purdon, Supp. 1940) Title 35, §§ 1801-1806. Stats. Anno. (Purdon) Title 63, §§ 1, 22, 137, Stats. Anno. (Purdon) Alien Registration Act, Workmen's Compensation Act, § 302.. 52 52 52 484 Rhode Island. South Carolina. 52 Texas. Code, §§ 9510-3, 9510-4. 270 Page's Gen. Code, Vol. 6, §§ 9510-3, 9510-4.. 270 Oklahoma. Const., Art. VI, §§ 2, Stats., Art. 6445...... 496 1933 Public Laws, $$ 5110-IX, 5110-XV, Vermont. 6,8... 246 5113.. (C) FOREIGN STATUTES. English. 31 & 32 Vict., c. 119, $ 26. 1 492 CASES ADJUDGED IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES AT OCTOBER TERM, 1940 SIBBACH v. WILSON & CO., INC. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 28. Argued December 17, 1940-Decided January 13, 1941. 1. Congress has power to regulate the practice and procedure of federal courts, and may exercise it by delegating to the Supreme or other federal courts authority to make rules not inconsistent with the statutes or Constitution of the United States. P. 9. 2. The Act of June 19, 1934, empowering the Supreme Court to prescribe rules for the District Courts of the United States in civil actions, was restricted in its operation to matters of pleading, practice and procedure. P. 10. 3. In so far as they are within the authority granted by Congress, the Rules of Civil Procedure prescribed by the Supreme Court under authority of the Act of June 19, 1934 repeal the Conformity Act. P. 10. 4. Rule 35 of the Rules of Civil Procedure for the District Courts of the United States, which provides that, in a suit in which the physical or mental condition of a party is in controversy, the court may order the party to submit to a physical or mental examination by a physician, held within the authority granted by Congress in the Act of June 19, 1934, and consistent with the limitation of that Act that the rules prescribed shall not abridge, enlarge or modify the "substantive rights" of any litigant. P. 14. 5. Union Pacific Ry. Co. v. Botsford, 141 U. S. 250, and Camden & Suburban Ry. v. Stetson, 177 U. S. 172, explained. P. 11. 6. Rules 35 and 37 of the Rules of Civil Procedure are rules of procedure, and their prescription did not exceed the authority granted by the Act of June 19, 1934 merely because they involve "important" or "substantial" rights. P. 13. 1 |