ADDITIONS AND CORRECTIONS.

(The additions and corrections following should, if possible, be noted in the work before us.)

Page 62, note a, line 12, after "The Queen v. Tugwell, L. R. 3 Q. B. 704," add "The Queen v. Harrald, L. R. 8 Q. B. 418."

Page 64, note j, line 3, for "6 Ven." substitute "6 Vin."

66

Page 83, at the end of note l, add "Hardwick v. Brown, L. R. 8 C. P. 406." Page 84, note n, at the end of the third line, add see further, Hardwick v. Brown, L. R. 8 C. P. 406."

Page 86, at the end of note 8, add "see further, Folkard v. Met. R. Co., L. R. 8 C. P. 470."

Page 144, note a, at the beginning, for "the money" substitute "the moneys."

Page 161, at the end of note c, add "There is a distinction between a

gratuity and an annuity. See Gibson v. East India Co., 5 Bing.
N. C. 262; Clarke v. Miss. Gas Co., 4 B. & Ad. 315; Nines v. East
India Co., 17 C. B. 351; Marchant v. Lee Conservatory Board,
L. R. 8 C. P. 290."

Page 166, at the end of note k, add "In re G. W. R. Co. and North
Cayuga, 23 C. P. 28."

Page 167, in text, for word "rade" substitute "trade."

Page 174, sec. 231, sub. s. 2, line 4, erase the word "the" and substitute "some."

Lines 5, 6, erase the words "and also in either case in a newspaper published," before the words "in the County Town;" also erase the words "if any such newspaper," after the words "in the County Town."

Page 175, s. 231, line 1, erase the words "each of," and for the word 66 paper" substitute "papers."

some.'

Note p, line 3, erase the word "the" and substitute": Page 186, at the end of note j, add "see further, In re McKinnon and

Caledonia, 33 U. C. Q. B. 502."

Page 194, note 1, for "resolutions," used in the third and fifth lines, substitute "restrictions."

Page 242, note e, at the end, add "nor to prevent a County Magistrate taking a recognizance in an election case. In re Hamilton, 10 Can. L. J. N. S. 170."

Page 278, note d, at the end, add "A public officer suffering loss through the failure of the Municipal Council to provide him proper office accommodation, has an action against the Municipal Corporation. Lees v. Carleton, 33 U. C. Q. B. 409."

Page 288, note, line 16, after "Orford v. Bailey, 12 Grant, 276," add “see further, Brown v. McNab, 20 Grant, 179."

Page 319, note w, line 13, after the word "footing," add see Buchanan v. Young, 23 C. P. 101; Gillson v. North Grey R. Co., 33 U. C. Q. B. 128."

Page 343, note b, at the end, for "6 H. & W. 667,” substitute “6 H. & N 667."

Note c, line 6, after "17 N. Y. 449," add
Cambridge, L. R. 6 H. L. C. 303."

66

Attorney-General v.