considered apart from the latter, is purely enabling, so far as it goes, giving permission to get stone for certain purposes, even out of quarries not open at the testator's death; whereas, without such clause, the tenants for life would only have been entitled to take stone out of open quarries within a certain limit. But the latter passage shews that the former was intended to be restrictive as well as enabling; so that, whilst it enables the tenants for life to open quarries for the purposes specified, it prohibits them from taking stone, even from open quarries, for any other purposes than those. Ferrand v. Wilson, 15 Law J. 41-V. C. W.

TRUST.

Acknowledgment of a Trust the Origin of which is unknown.]-If a person acknowledged that a sum of money deposited by him with another was held by him in trust for a third person, and, on the insolvency of the depositee, and on account of the loss occasioned thereby, the depositor gives to such third person a promissory note for that amount "for value received," and pays interest thereon up to the time of his decease, such third person will be entitled to that amount out of the personal estate of the depositor, the maker of the note, although the origin of the trust is unknown, provided there is no evidence to rebut the presumption of a trust; because the circumstances above mentioned make a prima facie case of trust, and this not being displaced or met, the proper conclusion is, to treat the note as given under a correct and well-founded belief, on the part of the maker thereof, that he had become liable in equity to make good the sum deposited and lost, and, therefore, as a note given for value. Burkitt v. Ransom, 10 Jur. 193-V. C. B.

TRUSTEE.

he is liable for the loss occasioned by the fraud of the brokers, if they sell the Exchequer bills, and appropriate the proceeds to their own use, and afterwards fail; for he ought either to have kept the bills in his own hands, or distinctly to have separated them from the other property in the possession of the brokers. Mathew v. Brise, 15 Law J. 39-L. C.

UNCERTAINTY-See "Legacies."

VENDOR AND PURCHASER.

Reserved Bid.]-Where the particulars of sale do not state either that the sale is to be without reserve, or that the vendors intend to employ a person to bid on their behalf, and they privately instruct a person to bid up to a certain amount, and he does so accordingly, but one of the bidders bids considerably more than that amount, and becomes the purchaser, and it does not appear that, in so doing, he was misled by any confidence he placed in the other person's judgment, he will be obliged to complete the purchase. Woodward v. Miller, 15 Law J. 6-V. C. B. In this case, the defendant, in his answer, alleged that the auctioneer had stated in the auction-room that the premises were to be sold without reserve. But the person employed to bid for the vendors stated, in his evidence, that the auctioneer only said that the sale was to be a bonâ fide one, and that, if there were any puffers in the room, he should hate himself. And hence the allegation of the defendant wasnot held to form any additional ground of defence.

Necessity of producing and proving the Ownership of a surrendered Lease, on a Sale of Leaseholds for Lives.] -Where leaseholds for lives are contracted to be sold, and the lease under which they are held states that it was granted in consideration of the surrender of a Right to a general Release on transferring the Trust former lease, the vendor, in the absence of any express Fund to the Cestui que Trust.]-Where a trustee pays stipulation upon the point, is bound not only to proor transfers a trust fund to his cestui que trust, the duce such former lease, but also to shew, that, at the cestui que trust is not bound to execute a general re-time of the surrender, it belonged absolutely, as well lease by deed; but he is bound either to give the in equity as at law, to the person who surrendered it trustee a receipt not merely for the amount of the and took the new lease, although it be necessary for fund transferred or paid to him, but a receipt in that purpose to carry back the title more than sixty full of all demands against the trustee in respect of years; for the new Statute of Limitations does not the trust, or else to ask to have the accounts taken: shorten the period for which titles are to be deduced. and, therefore, if the cestui que trust refuses to give Hodgkinson v. Cooper, 10 Jur. 39-M. R. In this case, anything more than a receipt for the particular amount the subsisting lease was granted in 1815, and the former offered to be transferred or paid to him, and files a bill lease in 1769. to have it so transferred or paid, the court will direct a general account to be taken, though no account be prayed, and no open unsettled account be suggested by the answer, unless the cestui que trust will receive the particular amount offered in full of all demands against the trustee in respect of the trust. Chadwick v. Heatley, 2 Coll. 137.

Indemnity against Liability before Loss.]-A trustee who is threatened with an action, and is primâ facie liable as legal owner, is not obliged to wait until such liability is actually enforced against him, before he can file a bill against his cestui que trust for an indemnity. Phene v. Gillon, 15 Law J. 65—V. C. W.

Negligence in allowing Exchequer Bills to remain in a Broker's Possession, undistinguished from other Property.]-Where a trustee, who is directed by the instrument creating the trust to invest trust monies in the stocks or on real security, instructs his brokers, who also act to some extent as bankers, and had the confidence of the author of the trust, to invest the trust monies to a considerable amount in Exchequer bills, and, for more than a year, during the interval which elapses before a mortgage security is found and approved of, he allows the Exchequer bills to remain in the possession and under the control of the brokers, undistinguished from other property in their possession;

Action for Use and Occupation, where a good Title cannot be made.]-Where a person contracts for the purchase of land, and agrees to pay interest in case of his default in payment of the purchase-money on a certain day, and is let into possession and treated as purchaser by the vendor, but is prevented from completing the purchase from the want of a good title, he is not liable at law to the payment of any rent in respect of the use and occupation of the land; because, after treating him as purchaser, the vendor cannot convert him into an occupier, liable to pay for his occupation, by his (the vendor's) own wrongful default in not making a good title. Winterbottom v. Ingham, 10 Jur. 4-Q. B.

Sale of a reversionary Interest at an Under-value.]— A sale of a reversionary interest in real and personal property, by a young man in straitened circumstances, to a trustee of part of the property, at a material under-value, will be set aside, although the purchase was made at the instance of the vendor, and against the inclination of the purchaser. And if 19007. is the actual value, 1700/. is to be considered a material under-value. Edwards v. Browne, 2 Coll. 100.

Agreement to accept a Title "without Dispute."]— Where a person agrees to purchase an estate, and to accept the vendor's title "without dispute," but it is also agreed that an abstract of title shall be furnished,

and the purchaser discovers from the abstract that there is an outstanding legal estate, he is precluded from taking the objection, notwithstanding the delivery of the abstract by the vendor, and his entering into a correspondence on the subject of the objection. Duke v. Barnett, 10 Jur. 87-V. C. B.

VESTED INTEREST.

every

which he had only a Life Interest-Election.]-Where a
testator is entitled in fee to some messuages and lands
in a parish, and entitled for life to other messuages and
lands in the same parish, and he devises all his mes-
suages and lands in that parish, subject to a charge of
legacies on a part of the particular hereditaments in
which he had only a life estate; it is not to be inferred,
from his dealing with that part as his own, that he
meant to include in the devise the other part of the
same hereditaments, so as to raise a case of election
against a person claiming such other part of those here-
ditaments as a remainder-man, and also claiming under
the will as to property of which the testator was seised
in fee. Parker v. Carter, 4 Hare, 400.
See "Devise."

Direction to pay and divide six months after the death of a prior taker.]-Where a testator bequeaths the residue of his personal estate upon trust for his wife, for her life, if she shall so long continue his widow; and, after her decease or marriage, upon trust to pay and divide the whole unto and equally amongst all and his nephews and nieces, share and share alike, within six months after they shall have become entitled thereto; the property vests in them on the testator's decease; the possession alone being postponed for the sake of the prior taker and the convenience of the estate; so that if one of them dies in the lifetime of the widow, his or TABLE OF CASES IN THIS PART OF THE her share passes to his or her personal representatives. Packham v. Gregory, 4 Hare, 396.

Limitation to the Testator's right Heirs of his own Name.]-Where a testator, after devising particular estates, makes an ultimate devise to his own right heirs of his own name, and his, her, and their heirs; and there is nothing in the will which clearly shews that the word "heir" is used in any other than its technical sense, or that the ultimate devise was intended to create a contingent remainder in favour of the person who should answer the given description on the expiration of the particular estates; in such case the ultimate devise creates a vested interest in favour of the person who, at the time of the testator's decease, is his heir-at-law, and bears his name; because it is a rule of law that an interest shall be construed to vest as early as possible; and because the word "heir," unexplained, means the person on whom the law casts the inheritance on the ancestor's decease. Wrightson v. Macaulay, 14 Mee. &

W. 214.

66

See "Legacy."

WILL.

Effect of an Attestation Clause-Evidence of signing and publishing.]-Where an attestation is not expressly required, the mere circumstance that there is a memorandum or an attestation clause stating that certain things have been done, does not exclude evidence that other things were done besides those which are expressed to have been done. So that if a will of a married woman, made by virtue of a power, is required to be signed and published" in the presence of witnesses, and, after the signatures of the witnesses to such will, there is a memorandum or attestation clause, only stating that the will was "signed and sealed" in their presence, evidence may be adduced to shew that it was also published in their presence. And the evidence of two witnesses, that it was declared by the testatrix to be her "will," although according to the evidence of the third it was declared by her to be her "act," is sufficient evidence that it was published. And so the evidence of two witnesses that it was signed in their presence is sufficient evidence of that fact, although the third witness believes it to have been signed before they entered the room. Warren v. Postlethwaite, 2 Coll. 108.

Pencil Erasure.]-A pencil erasure of an annuity given by will may be either deliberative or final, according to circumstances; but primâ facie it is only deliberative, indicating that the testator contemplated making an alteration in his will, and not final and amounting to a positive revocation. Francis v. Grover,

15 Law J. 99-V. C. W.

Inference that a Testator meant to devise Property in

WORDS

-See "Construction," "Legacy," "Power," "Remoteness."

REPOSITORY.

Allen v. Anderson, 10 Jur. 196, V. C. W. [p. 188].

Baggett v. Meux, 1 Coll. 138; 10 Jur. 213. [p. 197].
Beaufort (Duke) v. Neeld, 12 Cl. & Fin. 248. [p. 198].
Belcher . Vardon, 2 Coll. 162. [p. 185].
[p. 186].
Bessey v. Windham, 6 Adol. & Ell. 166.
Burkitt v. Ransom, 10 Jur. 193, V. C. B. [p. 213].
Pegg, 6 Adol. & Ell. 1. [p. 212].
Butler v. Powis, 2 Coll. 156. [p. 212].

Brown v.

[p. 196].

[p. 198].
[p. 187].
[p. 196]
41. [p. 198, 213].
[p. 212, 214].

Chadwick v. Heatley, 2 Coll. 137. [p. 213].
Cheese v. Cheese, 15 Law J. 28, V. C. E. [p. 212].
Clark v. Burgh, 2 Coll. 221. [p. 195].
Clough v. French, 15 Law J. 24, V. C. E. [p. 185].
Cockshott v. Cockshott, 10 Jur. 41, V. C. B. [p. 195].
Compton v. Bloxham, 2 Coll. 201. [p. 188].
Cornfield v. Wyndham, 2 Coll. 184. [p. 196].
Doe d. Egremont v. Burrough, 6 Adol. & Ell. 229. [p. 211].
v. Stephens, 6 Adol. & Ell. 208. [p. 211].
d. Sams v. Garlick, 15 Law J. 54, Exch. [p. 187].
Donovan v. Needham, 10 Jur. 150, M. R. [p. 196].
Duke v. Barnett, 10 Jur. 87, V. C. B. [p. 214].
Dykes v. Farr, 15 Law J. 89, V. C. W. [p. 198].
Early v. Benbow, 10 Jur. 169, V. C. B.
Eaton v. Barker, 2 Coll. 124. [p. 197].
Edwards v. Browne, 2 Coll. 100. [p. 213].
Farquarson v. Carr, 10 Jur. 63, V. C. B.
Farr v. Sheriffe, 15 Law J. 89, V. C. W.
Faulkner v. Wynford (Lord), 15 Law J. 8.
Ferrand v. Wilson, 4 Hare, 344; 15 Law J.
Francis v. Grover, 15 Law J. 99, V. C. W.
Frith v. Rotherham, 10 Jur. 208, Exch. [p. 212].
Gale v. Burnell, 10 Jur. 198, Q. B. [p. 186].
Glasse v. Marshall, 15 Law J. 25, V. C. E. [p. 195].
Haigh . Jaggar, 2 Coll. 231. [p. 195].
Hatfield v. Pryme, 2 Coll. 204. [p. 197].
Hine v. Lart, 10 Jur. 106, V. C. E. [p. 188].
Henson v. Blackwell, 4 Hare, 434 [p. 195].
Hodgkinson v. Cooper, 10 Jur. 39, M. R. [p. 213].
Holt v. Dewell, 4 Hare, 446; 15 Law J. 14. [p. 198].
Jacques v. Chambers, 10 Jur. 151, V. C. B. [p. 211].
Jodrell v. Jodrell, 15 Law J. 17, M. R. [p. 195].
Lidgett v. Williams, 4 Hare, 456. [p. 211].
Macgregor v. Macgregor, 2 Coll. 192. [p. 197].
Mathew v. Brise, 15 Law J. 39, L. C. [p. 213].
Minton v. Cave, 10 Jur. 86, V. C. E. [p. 196].
Moneypenny v. Mascal, 2 Coll. 213. [p. 186].
Moore v. Jervis, 2 Coll. 60. [p. 187].
Morse v. Tucker, 10 Jur. 173, V. C. W. [p. 187].

Wells (Dean and Chapter) v. Doddington, 2 Coll. 73. [p. 212]. | Essex, at Colchester, Tuesday, Oct. 20.
Williames v. Edwards, 2 Coll. 176 [p. 197].
Williams v. Tartt, 2 Coll. 85 [p. 212].

Kingston-upon-Hull, (Town and County), Tuesday, Oct. 27. Bedfordshire, at Bedford, Wednesday, Dec. 2.

|

EDWARD HARWOOD BRACE and JAMES ALLEN,
Mitre-court, Milk-street, Cheapside, London, warehouse-
men and copartners, (trading under the style or firm of E.
H. Brace & Company), June 3 at half-past 1, and July 7
at 11, Court of Bankruptcy, London: Off. Ass. Pennell;
Sols. Sale & Co., Manchester; Reed & Langford, Friday-
street, London.-Fiat dated May 18.
WILLIAM COOPER, Bury St. Edmund's, Suffolk, hard-
wareman and haberdasher, dealer and chapman, June 4 at
12, and July 11 at 11, Court of Bankruptcy, London: Off.
Ass. Green; Sol. Goddard, King-st., Cheapside. - Fiat
dated May 14.
JOSEPH AVERY, Manchester-street, Manchester-square,
Middlesex, dealer in plate and jewellery, June 5 at 11, and
July 11 at 12, Court of Bankruptcy, London: Off. Ass.
Follett; Sol. Stafford, 13, Buckingham-street, Strand.-past 11, Court of Bankruptcy, London, aud. ac.-J. Thomp-
Fiat dated May 22,

JOHN BEATON, Upper-street, Islington, Middlesex, tailor,
dealer and chapman, June 4 at 2, and July 9 at 11, Court
of Bankruptcy, London: Off. Ass. Bell; Sol. Rae, War-
wick-court, Holborn.-Fiat dated May 22.
JOSEPH DAVIS, Pall-mall, Middlesex, and Ludgate-street,
London, dentist, June 9 at half-past 2, and July 3 at 1,
Court of Bankruptcy, London: Off. Ass. Edwards; Sol.
Beart, Bouverie-street, Fleet-street.-Fiat dated May 18.
ARTHUR BURTON, Ranelagh-wharf, Pimlico, Middle-
sex, coal merchant, dealer and chapman, June 10 at half-
past and July 3 at 12, Court of Bankruptcy, London:
Off. Ass. Groom; Sol. Fitch, Bridge-street, Blackfriars.-
-Fiat dated May 21.

|

ass.-James Blyth, Chelmsford, Essex, grocer, May 30 at 1, Court of Bankruptcy, London, last ex.-Thomas Metcalfe, Princes-street, Red Lion-square, Middlesex, carpenter and builder, May 30 at 12, Court of Bankruptcy, London, last ex.-John Blundell, Wigan, Lancashire, pawnbroker, June 10 at 12, District Court of Bankruptcy, Manchester, last ex.Wm. Edmond and Thomas Edmond, Liverpool, merchants, June 12 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Manchester, last ex. of William Edmond.-James Harris, Leadenhallmarket, London, butcher, June 16 at 11, Court of Bankrupt. cy, London, aud. ac.-George Moir, John's row, St. Luke's, Middlesex, shoemaker, June 16 at half-past 1, Court of Bankruptcy, London, aud. ac.-Joseph Scholefield, Cheapside, London, cutler, June 17 at 11, Court of Bankruptcy, London, aud. ac.-J. Tebbutt, Cambridge, auctioneer, June 17 at halfson, Norwich, grocer, June 17 at 11, Court of Bankruptcy, London, aud. ac.-George Butler Earp, London, ship broker, June 17 at 11, Court of Bankruptcy, London, aud. ac.-D. J. Kinghorn, Crawford-street, Marylebone, Middlesex, baker, June 17 at 12, Court of Bankruptcy, London, aud. ac.—R. Blacker and Charles Earith the younger, Gresham-street, London, warehousemen, June 18 at 11, Court of Bankruptcy, London, aud. ac.-S. Bucknell, Hendon, Middlesex, carman, June 18 at 11, Court of Bankruptcy, London, aud. ac.-H. D. Watkins and J. Innes, Manchester, lead merchants, June 22 at 12, District Court of Bankruptcy, Manchester, aud. ac. Joseph Mellanby, Hartlepool, Durham, broker, June 18 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, aud. ac.-James Leybourn, Bradford, Yorkshire, provision shopkeeper, June 20 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Leeds, aud. ac.-Robert Pickles, Barnsley, Yorkshire, linen manufacturer, June 20 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Leeds, aud. ac.-James Sykes, Doncaster, Yorkshire, hosier, Jane 20 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Leeds, aud. ac.-E. T. Allen, Castlegate, York, apothecary, June 20 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Leeds, aud. ac.—Francis Ward, Batley, Yorkshire, rag merchant, June 20 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Leeds, aud. ac.-David Broadhead and Augutus John Halcro, Leeds, Yorkshire, stock brokers, June 20 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Leeds, aud. ac.-Benjamin Clark, Leeds, Yorkshire, corn factor, June 20 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Leeds, aud. ac.-John Hepworth and David Hepworth, Raistrick, Halifax, Yorkshire, cotton warp dyers, June 22 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Leeds, aud. ac.-James Cousen and Lucy Cousen, Bankhouse, Bingley, and John Richardby Cousen, Bradford, Yorkshire, wors. ted spinners, June 22 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Leeds, aud. ac.— George Schonswar, Hull, and Henry Schonswar, Sculcoates, Yorkshire, merchants, June 17 at 11, Town-hall, Kingston-upon-Hull, aud. ac. and div.-Joseph Lathbury, Burton-upon-Trent, Staffordshire, mercer, June 19 at 10, District Court of Bankruptcy, Birmingham, aud. ac.Wm. W. Jenkins, Birmingham, brass founder, June 19 at 10, District Court of Bankruptcy, Birmingham, aud. ac.-John Smith, Warwick, wine merchant, June 20 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Birmingham, aud. ac.-Wm. Gilpin, Villiers-street, Strand, Middlesex, army clothier, June 16 at half-past 12, Court of Bankruptcy, London, div.—Tho

WILLIAM DANSON, Birkenhead, Cheshire, builder, June 9 and 29 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Liverpool: Off. Ass. Bird; Sols. Pemberton, Liverpool; Cornthwaite & Co., Old Jewry-chambers.-Fiat dated May 23. STEPHEN HEY, Colne, Lancashire, worsted and cotton manufacturer, dealer and chapman, June 9 and July 3 at 12, District Court of Bankruptcy, Manchester: Off. Ass. Hobson; Sols. Parry, Manchester; Wells, Bradford; Hawkins & Co., 2, Boswell-court, Lincoln's Inn Fields, London. -Fiat dated May 21. JAMES WILKINSON, Manchester, grocer, dealer and chapman, June 16 and 30 at 12, District Court of Bankruptcy, Manchester: Off. Ass. Pott; Sols. E. and R. W. Bennett, Manchester; Hammond, 16, Furnival's Inn, London.-Fiat dated May 22. WILLIAM MALLET, Chorlton-upon-Medlock, Manchester, milliner, dealer and chapman, June 9 and July 2 at 12, District Court of Bankruptcy, Manchester: Off. Ass. Hobson; Sols. Brookes, Manchester; Sibley, 5, Whartonstreet, Pentonville, Middlesex.-Fiat dated May 22. JOSEPH GOLDTHORP, Manchester, grocer and provision dealer, dealer and chapman, June 12 and July 2 at 12, Dis. trict Court of Bankruptcy, Manchester: Off. Ass. Hobson; Sols. Heath, Manchester; Jaques & Edwards, Ely-place, Holborn, London.-Fiat dated May 18. JOHN TEMPEST and WILLIAM HOLDER TEMPEST, Leeds, Yorkshire, share brokers, share dealers, and dealers and chapmen, June 8 and July 2 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Leeds: Off. Ass. Hope; Sols. Middleton, Leeds; Sudlow & Co., Chancery-lane, London.-mas Tubb, Palace-row, New-road, Middlesex, cowkeeper, Fiat dated May 18. THOMAS BOINTON, Pickering, Yorkshire, money scrivener, dealer and chapman, June 8 and July 2 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Leeds: Off. Ass. Hope; Sols. Kendall, Pickering; Dunning & Stawman, Leeds; Hawkins & Co., New Boswell-court, London.-Fiat dated May 22. RICHARD CARLILE CAPLETON, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, tea dealer, grocer, dealer and chapman, June 12 and July 7 at 12, District Court of Bankruptcy, Bristol: Off. Ass. Miller; Sols. Roberts, Keynsham, Somersetshire; Paterson, Bouverie-street.-Fiat dated May 18. WILLIAM WATTS, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, builder, carpenter, dealer and chapman, June 9 and July 7 at halfpast 12, District Court of Bankruptcy, Bristol: Off. Ass. Hutton; Sols. Packwood, Cheltenham; Sabine, Bristol.Fiat dated May 21.

MEETINGS.

June 16 at half-past 11, Court of Bankruptcy, London, div.-
Rich. Ensoll, Broad-street, Bloomsbury, Middlesex, draper,
June 16 at half-past 11, Court of Bankruptcy, London, div.-
Robert Starbuck, Gravesend, Kent, shipwright, June 18 at 11,
Court of Bankruptcy, London, div.-Edw. Burnett, Riches
court, Lime-street, London, merchant, June 16 at 2, Court of
Bankruptcy, London, div.-Hugh D. Watkins and J. Innes,
Manchester, lead merchants, June 23 at 12, District Court
of Bankruptcy, Manchester, fin. div.-T. Armytage Phillips,
Huddersfield, Yorkshire, oil merchant, June 22 at 11, District
Court of Bankruptcy, Leeds, first and fin. div.-J. Lathbury,
Burton-upon-Trent, Staffordshire, mercer, June 19 at 10,
District Court of Bankruptcy, Birmingham, div.-J. Smith,
Warwick, wine merchant, June 22 at 11, District Court of
Bankruptcy, Birmingham, fin. div.
CERTIFICATES.

before the Day of Meeting.

Robert Briggs, Ulverstone, Lancashire, cotton manufac. To be allowed, unless Cause be shewn to the contrary on or turer, June 8 at 12, District Court of Bankruptcy, Manchester, pr. d.-James Buttrey, Manchester, commission agent, June 10 at 12, District Court of Bankruptcy, Manchester, ch.

John Tuddenham, Pickering-place, Bayswater, Middlesex, builder, June 16 at 11, Court of Bankruptcy, London.-Ann

Martin, Sturminster Newton, Dorsetshire, widow, June 16 at Gaol of Surrey.-Wm. Hen. Thomas, Cornhill, London, out 11, Court of Bankruptcy, London.-William Howe, Boxford, of employ: in the Queen's Prison.-Mary Morris, widow, Suffolk, bricklayer, June 16 at 12, Court of Bankruptcy, Lon- Stafford-street, Bond-street, Middlesex: in the Debtors Prison don.-Abraham Duffield and Mark Duffield, Buckingham, for London and Middlesex.-Jas. Turpin, Hindon-st., Pimbraziers, June 17 at 12, Court of Bankruptcy, London.-Jos. lico, Middlesex, greengrocer in the Debtors Prison for LonThompson, Norwich, grocer, June 17 at 11, Court of Bank- don and Middlesex.-John W. Wood, Cursitor-st., Chanruptcy, London.--John James Clark, Hounslow, Middlesex, cery-lane, Holborn, out of employment: in the Queen's Pribuilder, June 17 at 12, Court of Bankruptcy, London.-Johnson.-Alex. Norton, York-buildings, New-road, Middlesex, Dalton, Wandsworth, Surrey, grocer, June 18 at 12, Court of out of business: in the Debtors Prison for London and MidBankruptcy, London.-James Freeman, Cheltenham, Glou- dlesex.-Stephen Reynolds, Clerkenwell-close, Clerkenwell, cestershire, doctor of medicine, June 19 at 11, District Court Middlesex, cheesemonger: in the Debtors Prison for London of Bankruptcy, Bristol.-John Arkell, Donnington, Stowe- and Middlesex.-John Garner, Leicester, hosier: in the Gaol on-the-Wold, Gloucestershire, miller, June 12 at 12, District of Leicester.-Sam. Sharp, Clayton-heights, near Bradford, Court of Bankruptcy, Bristol.-Joseph Mellanby, Hartlepool, Yorkshire, stuff manufacturer: in the Gaol of York.-Frances Durham, broker, June 18 at half-past 11, District Court of Wilson, Salford, Lancashire, engineer: in the Gaol of LanBankruptcy, Newcastle-upon-Tyne.-Henry Rawson Morley, caster.-Jas. Stones, York, out of business: in the Gaol of Kingston-upon-Hull, merchant, June 17 at 11, District Court York.-Rob. Temple, Manchester, commission agent in the of Bankruptcy, Kingston-upon-Hull.-Benj. Clark, Leeds, Gaol of Lancaster.-Wm. Langman, Exeter, slate merchant: Yorkshire, corn factor, June 18 at 11, District Court of Bank- in the Gaol of Exeter.-Richard Shepherd, Clayton-heights, ruptcy, Leeds.-James Corrall, Boston, Lincolnshire, ship near Bradford, Yorkshire, stuff manufacturer: in the Gaol of owner, June 26 at 10, District Court of Bankruptcy, Bir- York. mingham.

To be allowed by the Court of Review in Bankruptcy, unless
Cause be shewn to the contrary on or before June 16.
Charles Poile, Rye, Sussex, merchant.- Wm. Edw. Filbey,
Norwich, wine merchant.-Joseph Metford, Lyncombe and
Widcombe, Somersetshire, wine merchant.-Thos. Harding,
Lichfield, schoolmaster.- Thomas Williams, Bristol, licensed
victualler.-J. Johnson, Nantwich, Cheshire, druggist.—W.
Lendon the elder, Exeter, currier.- Sam. Lawrence, Bedford-
street, Covent-garden, Middlesex, dealer in watches.-Samuel
Massey Cross, Greenwich, Kent, corn merchant.-J. Riddall
Wood, Failsworth, Manchester, varnish maker.

PARTNERSHIP DISSOLVED.

The following Prisoners are ordered to be brought up before
the Court, in Portugal-st., on Tuesday, June 9, at 9.
Edw. Edwards the elder, Mansel-street, Goodman's-fields,
Middlesex, bricklayer.-Jesse Howard, White Horse-street,
Cornwall-road, New-cut, Lambeth, Surrey, scale-board cutter.
Wm. Geo. Smith, Kirby-street, East India-road, Poplar,
Middlesex, out of business.

Court-house, SHEFFIELD, Yorkshire, June 9 at 10.
Robert Hall, Sheffield, out of business.

Court-house, WAKEFIELD, Yorkshire, June 11 at 10. Jas. Sutcliffe, Huddersfield, painter.-Jas. Sewell, Paddick, near Huddersfield, painter.-Thos. Collister, Stocks-hill, near

John King and Davis Porter King, Buckingham, attornies Leeds, butcher.-Thomas Waite, Guiseley, near Leeds, cloth and solicitors.

manufacturer.-John Bateman, Leeds, woollen cloth printer. -Wm. Brownbill, Wakefield, shopman to a watch maker.— Jos. Lister, Bowling, near Bradford, stone mason.-John Lumley, Aldborough, farm bailiff.-Rich. Ellison, Huddersfield, labourer.-George Pickard, Flockton, near Wakefield, coal agent.-Joseph Moody, Hopton, near Dewsbury, wood dealer. Rich. Astwick, Fleckton, near Wakfield, carpenter. -Thos. Bentley, Leeds, out of business.-John Sharp, Horton, near Bradford, machine maker.-Jos. Thornton, Culverley, near Leeds, out of business.-John Bateson, Kirkburton, near Huddersfield, joiner.—Barn. Topham, Boroughbridge, wheelwright.-John Moody, Nether-ends, Denley, near Pennistone, wood dealer.

INSOLVENT DEBTORS' DIVIDENDS.

George Marshall the elder, Hornsey, Middlesex, carpenter, May 30 at 11, Court of Bankruptcy, London.-Andrew Patterson, Montpelier-row, Blackheath, Kent, professor of music, May 30 at 11, Court of Bankruptcy, London.-J. Backhouse, John Ginman, Twickenham-common, Middlesex, painter: St. Mary at the Elms, Ipswich, journeyman carpenter, June 38. 24d. in the pound.-Chas. Slade, Walker's-court, Ber11 at 1, Court of Bankruptcy, London.-Jos. Smith, Boling-wick-st., Soho, Middlesex, china dealer: 84d. in the pound.broke-road, Battersea, Surrey, carman, June 11 at 1, Court of Thos. H. Jones Webb, Curtain-road, Shoreditch, Middlesex, Bankruptcy, London.—Jas. Oliver Sandiford, Hulme, Man- printer: 74d. in the pound.—Thos. Plaw, Green-street, Padchester, lodging-house keeper, June 8 at 12, District Court of dington, Middlesex, retailer of beer: 84d. in the pound.Bankruptcy, Manchester. - Edwin Stott, Liverpool, butcher, Sam. Vousden, King-street, Southwark, Surrey, licensed vicJune 2 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Liverpool.-E. tualler: 10d. in the pound.-Thos. Busbridge, St. Peter's, Smith, Walsall, Staffordshire, shoemaker, June 4 at 12, Dis- Isle of Thanet, Kent, general shopkeeper: 9d. in the pound. trict Court of Bankruptcy, Birmingham.-John Hamling the |—Joshua Stephenson, Walcot, Bath, Somersetshire, glass younger, Plymouth, Devonshire, out of business, June 3 at 11, stainer: 18. in the pound.-John Green, Nottingham, baker : District Court of Bankruptcy, Exeter. 48. 3d. in the pound.

Saturday, May 23.

Apply at the Provisional Assignee's Office, Portugal-street,
Lincoln's-inn-fields, between the hours of 10 and 1.
MEETING.

The following Assignee has been appointed. Further Particulars may be learned at the Office, in Portugal-st., Lincoln's-inn-fields, on giving the Number of the Case. Geo. Hopkinson, Bedford-street, Bedford-sq., Bloomsbury, John Jas. Fuller, Norwich, unemployed, No. 28,296 C.; Middlesex, attorney at law, June 11 at 3, Maypole Inn, NotThos. M. Keith, assignee. tingham, sp. aff.

Saturday, May 23.

Orders have been made, vesting in the Provisional Assignee the Estates and Effects of the following Persons:

(On their own Petitions).

Thos. Yolland the younger, Cromer-st., Brunswick-square, Middlesex, plumber: in the Debtors Prison for London and Middlesex. Robert Thos. C. Gray, Stanley-st., New Northroad, Hoxton, Middlesex, out of business: in the Queen's Prison.-Rob. E. Gaye, Prospect-place, Maida-hill, Middlesex, surgeon: in the Queen's Prison.-Fred. F. Cooper, 17, Walcot-place East, Lambeth, Surrey, dramatic author: in the I

FRIDAY, MAY 29.

BANKRUPTS.

FRANCIS ROLFE, Great Marlborough-st., Middlesex, tailor, June 6 at 1, and July 10 at 11, Court of Bankruptcy, London: Off. Ass. Alsager; Sols. A'Beckett, Goldensquare.-Fiat dated May 23.

WILLIAM DARNBROUGH, Richmond, Surrey, tailor and draper, June 5 at half-past 10, and July 3 at 12, Court of Bankuptcy, London: Off. Ass. Belcher; Sols. Kinder & Sorrell, Jewry-st., Aldgate.-Fiat dated May 25.