IV. Of the Jurisdiction to enforce the Performance of a Unless, therefore, there were circumstances in the case of Todd v. Wilson which do not appear in the report of that case in the public journals, we conceive that it must be considered as in direct conflict with, and overruling, Stanes v. Parker. And, until the doctrine of the latter case, a doctrine which certainly goes much further than any preceding case in support of the claim of trustees to be allowed remuneration, is confirmed by distinct judicial recognition, we apprehend the doctrine must be taken, on this subject, to be restored to its pristine rigidity; and that, in the absence of express agreement, no implied acqui-porary easement, to erect poles and other temporary escence on the part of a cestui que trust will bind him to submit to the charge of a trustee for professional business done in his character of trustee. We believe, that, before Stanes v. Parker, the doctrine was understood to be, that nothing short of a deliberate and distinct direction in the instrument creating a trust that the trustee, if a solicitor, might charge for his services, or, if there was no such direction in the instrument of trust, a deliberate and positive agreement to pay for such services by the cestui que trust, not resting upon mere inference, but referrible to actual contract, would have the effect of protecting the trustee against the reopening of his account. Stanes v. Parker, therefore, to some extent introduced an element of laxity into the doctrine of the court; and the recent case of Todd v. Wilson restores it to its original state, of which it may be said, that, however rigid and apparently harsh it may be, it is probably founded on reasons of sound policy, and that, at any rate, it is clear and intelligible, and affords, therefore, a safe ground for the conduct of trustees. In The Great North of England, Clarence, and Hartlepool Junction Railway Company v. The Clarence Railway Company, (1 Coll. 507), the principal question beof Parliament, under which the plaintiffs claimed to tween the parties was upon the construction of the act act, whether, assuming that the plaintiffs had a right to make a bridge, pursuant to a certain plan, over the defendants' railway, no part of the permanent supports of such bridge being intended to rest upon the defendants' land, the plaintiffs had a right, by way of temconstructions upon land adjacent to the defendants' railway, and to pass and repass across such railway, doing no vexatious acts, compensating for all damage, and not interfering with the regular traffic of the defendants' railway. The defendants, in order to prevent the plaintiffs from so temporarily using their land, plaintiffs from carrying on their works; and the bill had built up a wall, which effectually prevented the prayed an injunction to restrain the defendants from continuing to maintain such wall, and from preventing the defendants from making their bridge &c. In effect, defendants to remove their wall. The court refused to therefore, the bill sought for an order to compel the grant the injunction until satisfied, by the opinion of a court of law, that the plaintiffs had a legal right to build the bridge, and also a legal right to use the defendants' lands by way of temporary easement. But, the Court of Exchequer having certified that the plaintiffs had the view of Knight Bruce, V. C., that it was no objecboth such legal rights, the Lord Chancellor, supporting tion to the injunction that it was in effect of a mandatory character, made the order nearly in the terms of the prayer of the bill. To the same effect is Lord Mexborough v. Bower, (7 Beav. 127), in which an injunc tion was granted to restrain the defendant (who had cut certain channels from one coal field into another, in derogation of an agreement with the plaintiff) from POINTS ON THE LAW AND PRACTICE OF permitting the communication to continue open. INJUNCTIONS. (Continued from p. 230). III. Doctrine of Acquiescence. And here may also be mentioned two cases of Whittaker v. Howe (3 Beav. 383) and Tayler v. Davis, (1 Beav. 388, n.) In the former a motion was made to restrain the defendant, a solicitor, who had sold his buAn important distinction exists between the effect of session of books belonging to such business, from desiness to the plaintiff, and, notwithstanding, kept posacquiescence as a ground of demurrer to a bill for an injunction, and as a ground for resisting merely the in-chambers of the plaintiff, and from permitting the same to taining and keeping possession of the books, &c. from the junction. In the first instance, the acquiescence must remain away from the office of the plaintiff." Lord be such as wholly to disentitle the plaintiff to any relief; Langdale at first made no order upon the motion as to in the second, acquiescence falling short of that degree the retention of papers, not, it would seem, from any may be a sufficient defence. (Gordon v. The Cheltenham doubt of the jurisdiction, but because the defendant's Railway Company, 5 Beav. 229). have rendered the injunction unnecessary; but he afcounsel made an offer, which, if acted upon, would terwards made the order. (See note, p. 395). having, contrary to a covenant in the partnership deed, Tayler v. Davis was a case in which, one partner abstracted a partnership book from the counting-house of the firm, an injunction was granted, and continued at the hearing of the cause, restraining him from continuing to violate the covenant. V. Of extending the Common Injunction. The case referred to turned upon two points: first, whether certain buildings erected and used by a company for the purpose only of housing and repairing their engines and carriages, and not as a station, in the ordinary sense of the word, constituted public buildings, &c. within the meaning of the act under which the company acted; and, secondly, whether the acquiescence of the plaintiff had been such as to preclude him from obtaining an injunction. It appeared that he had continually objected to the proceedings of the company, though he had taken no proceedings so long as he was In Ashby v. Jackson (6 Beav. 336) the case of Thorpe led by them to believe that such proceedings were merely temporary; but, on their asserting a right to acquiesced in by the court. It is to be presumed, howv. Hughes (3 My. & C. 732) was cited, and its doctrine do the acts objected to, the plaintiff filed his bill with-ever, from what is stated in the report of Ashby v. Jackout any further delay. On both points Lord Langdale, M. R., thought the plaintiff entitled to an injunction: afterwards an appeal motion was heard by the Lord Chancellor, who directed the opinion of a court of law to be taken on the construction of the act. The report does not state whether his Lordship continued the injunction in the meantime. son, that that case fell more properly under the rule in White v. Steinwacks*, (19 Ves. 83), as it would seem, that, in Ashby v. Jackson, the fact, that the discovery would be of no use to the plaintiff in his defence at law, appeared upon the pleadings, if at all. * See these cases distinguished, Drewry on Injunctions, 378. Since the cases of Mellor v. Cresswell and Howard v. Cliffe, (3 Jur. 817), it has been held by Lord Langdale, M. R., in a case (Archer v. Hudson, 6 Beav. 474) where there was a common injunction obtained upon the answer being found insufficient; then an order to amend the bill, without prejudice to the injunction; and then amendment of the bill accordingly; that an order to extend the common injunction to stay trial might be granted. The motion was made on the 3rd July, and the commission-day was appointed for the 12th. His Lordship appears to have considered the case as distinguishable from Howard v. Cliffe, as he observed, that, if the authority of that case applied, he should refuse the motion. The report of Archer v. Hudson does not, however, state the grounds on which the court distinguished it from Howard v. Cliffe. The rule, that, in support of a motion to extend, the affidavit of materiality will not do if made only by the plaintiff's solicitor, unless good reason is shewn why the plaintiff did not make it, has been supported in a recent case. (Scotson v. Gaury, 1 Hare, 99). refused on the 2nd June (the day on which cause was to be shewn) to allow the plaintiff any further time, although the answer was of great length; so that it was manifestly out of all question that the two days could have been sufficient for the plaintiff to look into the answer to see whether exceptions should be taken to it. (Stanley v. Bond, 5 Beav. 175). 2. Of dissolving Special Injunctions. Where a plaintiff obtains an injunction upon affidavits, the defendant, although he might try the question by demurrer, is not under any obligation to do so, if he thinks, that, by moving to dissolve upon affidavits, he can place his case better before the court. (Barnesley Canal Company v. Twibill, 7 Beav. 19). It has been doubted, whether, where a special injunction has been granted against several defendants, one of them can move to dissolve without bringing the others before the court. The ground of the doubt is, that, if the defendant moving should succeed, he materially changes the position of the other defendants. The court however, doubted, at the same time, whether, if present, the defendants not moving to dissolve could oppose the motion. (Harrison v. Harrison, 5 Beav. 131). LAW APPOINTMENTS. C. S. D. In the same case, the plaintiff did not move to extend till the 2nd December, the trial being fixed for the sittings commencing on the 6th. It appeared that the action was brought on the 11th August; that the plaintiff, from the circumstances, must have known what was the cause of action, and nevertheless he did not file his bill till the 8th November: and even after that, he knew that proceedings were going on at law, and In our statement last week of the new Law Appointmight have got the common injunction on the 17th No-ments, we committed two or three errors, which we vember; instead of which he never moved for it till the now endeavour to rectify by inserting the changes in 24th. Under these circumstances, it was held, that his their correct form. delay would preclude him from obtaining an order to extend so near the time of trial, unless the answer was insufficient; and, the answer having been excepted to and found insufficient, the Vice-Chancellor looked into it to see whether the defendant had misconducted himself, by evasion in his answer, in which case his Honor thought he might, perhaps, set off such misconduct against the dilatoriness of the plaintiff. The answer was substantially sufficient, though technically insufcient, and, therefore, the motion was refused. VI. Of dissolving Injunctions. 1. Of dissolving the Common Injunction. The case of Sharpley v. Perring (8 Sim. 603) was referred to in Bordinave v. Wadeson, (1 Coll. 432), in support of a special motion to dissolve at once the common injunction. The court refused the motion, with expressions of want of confidence in the accuracy of the report of the case of Sharpley v. Perring, which his Honor observed was stated to be ex relatione, with out stating by whom it was reported. It is to be regretted, that the special circumstances in Sharpley v. Perring are not stated in the report. In Bordinave v. Wadeson, there were no very special circumstances, and, therefore, Sharpley v. Perring was clearly no authority for departing in that case from the usual practice of first obtaining an order nisi. The observations of the court in Bordinave v. Wadeson must be taken, however, to throw much doubt on the authority of Sharpley v. Perring, for even the limited doctrine, that in any case (except cases of the class of Lacy v. Horneby, 2 Ves. & B. 291) the order nisi can be dispensed with in proceeding to dissolve the common injunction. The terms of the order nisi to dissolve the common injunction are, that the injunction is to be dissolved unless the plaintiff, his solicitor having notice, shall, on a day (named in the order), shew to the court cause to the contrary; and these terms are considered to be inconsistent with the allowance of any further time to the plaintiff to shew cause. Therefore, where the answer was filed on the 30th May, and the same day the defendant obtained and served an order nisi, the court Mr. Serjeant Talfourd and Mr. Serjeant Manning were appointed Queen's Serjeants. Mr. Serjeant Murphy and Mr. Serjeant Byles received Patents of Precedence. James Humphry, Esq., J. Bacon, Esq., S. H. Walpole, Esq., and J. Rolt, Esq. were appointed Queen's Counsel in the order here put down. Emperial Parliament. HOUSE OF COMMONS. Mr. Hume moved the second reading of the Charitable Trusts Bill. As serious objections had been taken to this measure, he thought he should best fulfil the object in view by merely retaining those clauses which secured the accountability of those who had charge of public money. It was the duty of this House, after the expense which had been incurred in inquiries, to have some accounts available, that would shew how the revenues of each trust had been expended. It was not his intention to include the Bible Society, and other relithese only where the individuals were dead. The principle of gious trusts or charities where the founders were alive, but the bill was to secure the accountability of persons entrusted with public monies. Sir G. Grey should not offer any opposition to the second reading of this bill; but the House must not suppose that this was a substitute for another bill, which had been thrown out in the other House, or for a more general measure. Mr. Bernal recommended the honourable member to leave legislating upon the subject, which would be better done by the comprehensive measure referred to by the hon. Baronet. Mr. S. O'Brien agreed with the hon. member who spoke last, that this measure might interfere with the comprehensive measure referred to by the Secretary of State, which, as Government. He moved that the bill be read a second time he (Mr. O'Brien) understood, was in the contemplation of the that day six months. Mr. T. Egerton said, the great bodies who were the trustees of those charities either considered themselves unaccountable, or acted as if they thought so, and applied the monies to their own private purposes. He knew of charities that were so managed. When the House came to consider the great and com prehensive measure, let them come to the consideration of it with all the accounts before them. Mr. Spooner thought that the House ought to be clearly informed how far it was intended to go; they ought to be informed whether or not they were to have all the different foundations brought within the scope of the bill; for example, were they to have King Edward's foundations comprehended within its operation? The House, he hoped, would bear in mind that all the larger charities were subject to the Court of Chancery. He would not say that the House did not possess the right to interfere, because Parliament could do anything; but he did think that a bill of that importance ought to be introduced into the House of Commons upon the responsibility of the Queen's Government. Sir D. L. Evans could not help remarking, that it might be all very well to say that the Court of Chancery possessed the authority necessary for taking cognizance of these matters; but it should be remembered that proceedings in the Court of Chancery were inordinately expensive. To him it appeared that the objections to the present bill were by no means well | founded it was merely a bill to enable the Government, the Legislature, and the country, to obtain clear and exact information upon subjects of great public importance. Every one acknowledged that great abuses were committed, and the bill then before the House was merely a preliminary step, the purport of which was to clear the way for a more comprehensive measure. Sir J. Graham referred to the bill brought in by Lord Lyndhurst. That bill, he said, required that trustees should furnish annual accounts, but it made certain exceptions, and he thought that similar exceptions ought to be contained in any bill introduced upon the subject. That bill, unhappily, as he thought, was defeated in the other House of Parliament; and thereupon the hon. member for Montrose inquired of him (Sir J. Graham) if he would consent to a single enactment requiring trustees of charities to present to Parliament a statement annually of their accounts. He told the hon. member that which he then repeated, namely, that he very much regretted the loss of the larger measure, adding at the same time, that a single enactment, requiring the annual production of accounts would, in his opinion, prove a salutary check upon the conduct of trustees in the administration of charities. The right hon. member proceeded to say, that, if it were found that the trustees of certain charities had proceeded in a manner the effect of which was to defraud those whom the donors intended should have the benefit of those charities, then, surely, it would not be an undue assumption of power if a statute were enacted compelling the annual preparation and publication of accounts, setting forth the funds which the trustees received, and the mode of their application. Such was the object of the measure then before the House, and so far, at least, it must be admitted that the bill was not too comprehensive. After a few observations from several other hon. members, the House divided GEORGE SWAINE WHITECHURCH, Fleet-street, London, hosier and glover, dealer and chapman, July 21 at 2, and Aug. 28 at half-past 11, Court of Bankruptcy, London: Off. Ass. Alsager; Sols. Lawrance & Reed.-Fiat dated July 6. ADAM GILFILLAN, Pomeroy-street, Old Kent-road, Sur. rey, draper and tea dealer, dealer and chapman, July 20 at 1, and Aug. 26 at 11, Court of Bankruptcy, London: Off. Ass. Pennell; Sols. Surr & Gribble, Lombard-street.-Fiat dated July 7. ROBERT SPOONER, Buckingham-street, Strand, Middlesex, licensed victualler, July 21 at 2, and Aug. 26 at 12, Court of Bankruptcy, London: Off. Ass. Pennell; Sol. Bell, 28, Craven-street, Strand.-Fiat dated July 13. FREDERICK CLEMENT GRAY, Melicent-cottages, Forest-row, Dalston, Middlesex, boarding and lodging-house keeper, July 23 at 2, and Aug. 29 at 3, Court of Bankrupt. cy, London: Off. Ass. Follett; Sols. Young & Son, Mark. lane.-Fiat dated July 11. THOMAS WALLIS, College-street, Chelsea, Middlesex, builder, plasterer, dealer and chapman, July 22 at 11, and Aug. 29 at 1, Court of Bankruptcy, London: Off. Ass. Follett; Sol. Taylor, Lincoln's-inn-fields. - Fiat dated July 6. WILLIAM HENRY OSBORN the younger, St. James'sstreet, Piccadilly, Middlesex, silversmith and jeweller, July 23 at 12, and Aug. 25 at half-past 2, Court of Bankruptcy, London: Off. Ass. Green; Sol. Teague, Crown-court, Cheapside.-Fiat dated July 2. GERARD POLDEN and ANTONIO HIPOLITO LAFARGUE, Gould-square, Crutched-friars, London, ship owners and ship agents, dealers and chapmen, July 22 at 11, and Aug. 22 at half-past 2, Court of Bankruptcy, London: Off. Ass. Green; Sols. Phillips & Son, Laurance Pountney-lane.- Fiat dated July 11. WILLIAM HENRY PEASE, JOHN ROBERT PEASE, and WILLIAM HENRY THOMPSON, Ingram-court, Fenchurch-street, and Lime-street, London, wine mer. chants, (trading under the style or firm of W. H. Pease & Co.), July 24 at 11, and Aug. 29 at 2, Court of Bankruptcy, London: Off. Ass. Green; Sol. Bird, Lincoln's-inn. fields.-Fiat dated July 6. WILLIAM groves, Huntingdon, grocer and tea dealer, July 28 at 1, and Aug. 29 at half-past 2, Court of Bank. ruptcy, London: Off. Ass. Green; Sols. Hunnybun, Huntingdon; Fox & Britten, 1, Basinghall-street.-Fiat dated July 10. DONALD MACLEAN, Upper Brook-street, Grosvenor. square, Middlesex, and of Witton Castle, and of Woodhouse-close Colliery, near Bishop Auckland, Durham, brick maker and coke manufacturer, dealer and chapman, July 24 at 12, and Sept. 3 at 11, Court of Bankruptcy, London: Off. Ass. Bell; Sol. Innes, Billiter-street.-Fiat dated June 30. JOSHUA GARSED the elder and JOSHUA GARSED the younger, Leeds, Yorkshire, flax manufacturers, (carrying on business at Leeds, under the style or firm of Joshua Garsed & Co.), July 27 and Aug. 14 at 11, District Court of Bank. ruptcy, Leeds: Off. Ass. Hope; Sols. Lee, Leeds; Sudlow & Co.. Chancery-lane, London.-Fiat dated July 10. THOMAS READ, Manchester, cigar dealer, dealer and chap. man, July 24 and Aug. 27 at 12. District Court of Bankruptcy, Manchester: Off. Ass. Hobson; Sols. Atkinson & Co., Manchester; Abbott, 10, Charlotte-street, Bedfordsquare, London.-Fiat dated July 6. JAMES SMITH WALTERS, Bakewell, Derbyshire, surgeon and apothecary, July 28 and Aug. 25 at 12, District Court of Bankruptcy, Manchester: Off. Ass. Fraser; Sols. Hacker, Leek; Oliver, Manchester; Falcon, 4, Elm-court, Temple, London.-Fiat dated July 8. EDWIN COX NICHOLLS, Bristol, broker, dealer and chapman, July 28 at 12, and Aug. 25 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Bristol: Off. Ass. Hutton; Sols. Savery & Co., Bristol.-Fiat dated July 2. MEETINGS. FREDERICK BELLONI, Shaftesbury, Dorsetshire, clock Michael Emanuel and Henry Emanuel, Hanover-square, and watch maker, silversmith, dealer and chapman, July 23 Middlesex, goldsmiths, July 24 at 11, Court of Bankruptcy, at half-past 1, and Aug. 28 at 12, Court of Bankruptcy, London, pr. d.-Steph. Hey, Colne, Lancashire, worsted maLondon: Off. Ass. Whitmore; Sols. Chitty, Shaftesbury; nufacturer, July 28 at 12, District Court of Bankruptcy, Gilbert & Co., Philpot-lane.-Fiat dated July 11. Manchester, ch. ass. and last ex.-Chas. Collins, Kiddermin WILLIAM BUNDEY, Stamford-cottages, Stamford-bridge, ster, Worcestershire, and King William-street, London, com. Fulham-road, Middlesex, builder, July 21 at half-past 12, mission agent, July 28 at 2, Court of Bankruptcy, London, and Aug. 21 at half-past 1, Court of Bankruptcy, London: last ex.-Geo. Sam. Coxwell and Wm. Croser, NewcastleOff. Ass. Pennell; Sols. Husband & Wyatt, Gray's-inn-upon-Tyne, merchants, July 28 at 12, District Court of Banksquare.-Fiat dated July 10. ruptcy, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, last ex.-Rich. C. Capleton, SCOTCH SEQUESTRATIONS. Wm. Robertson, jun., Glasgow, merchant.-Miss Isabella Renny, Falkirk, deceased.-Wm. Provan & Co., Glasgow, spirit merchants. INSOLVENT DEBTORS Who have filed their Petitions in the Court of Bankruptcy, and have obtained an Interim Order for Protection from Process. Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, tea dealer, Aug. 6 at 12, District Court of Bankruptcy, Bristol, aud. ac.-James F. Cannell, Liverpool, bookseller, Aug. 5 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Liverpool, aud. ac.; Aug. 6 at 11, div.-Wm. Bull, Leeds, Yorkshire, and Addle-street, London, cloth merchant, Aug. 7 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Leeds, aud. ac.; Aug. 11 at 11, div.-Wm. Hand, Endon, Leek, Staffordshire, tanner, Aug. 7 at 10, District Court of Bankruptcy, Birmingham, aud. ac.-H. Kendall, E. Kendall, and J. Kendall, Aston, near Birmingham, perfumers, Aug. 13 at 12, District Court Andrew Anderson, Baker's-row, Whitechapel-road, Midof Bankruptcy, Birmingham, aud. ac.; Aug. 15 at 12, fin. dlesex, dealer in bread, July 27 at half-past 1, Court of Bankdiv.-Thos. Nash the younger, Stourbridge, Worcestershire, ruptcy, London.-T. Driver, Morley, Yorkshire, cloth maker, builder, Aug. 5 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Birming- July 22 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Leeds.-J. Garthham, aud. ac.; Aug. 6 at 11, div.-Wm. Hardisty, Wakefield, waite, Low Fold-band, Yorkshire, mechanic, July 23 at Yorkshire, whitesmith, Aug. 8 at 11, District Court of Bank- 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Leeds.-Geo. Strickland, ruptcy, Leeds, aud. ac.; Aug. 11 at 11, div.-Thos. Tatham, Scarborough, Yorkshire, out of business, July 24 at 11, DisThornton in Lonsdale, Yorkshire, lime burner, Aug. 8 at 11, trict Court of Bankruptcy, Leeds.-Robert Elsworth, MountDistrict Court of Bankruptcy, Leeds, aud. ac.; Aug. 11 at Pellon, Halifax, Yorkshire, butcher, July 23 at 11, Commer11, div.-Hodgson Stelling, Well, Yorkshire, woolcomber, cial-buildings, Leeds.-Jos. Walker, Holbeck, Leeds, YorkAug. 8 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Leeds, aud. ac.— shire, bookkeeper, July 23 at 11, District Court of BankruptSam. Rhodes, Bradford, Yorkshire, worsted spinner, Aug. 8 cy, Leeds.— Benj. Butterworth, Sutton-in-Ashfield, Notat 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Leeds, aud. ac.; Aug. 11 tingham, assistant to a grocer, July 17 at 11, Cutlers'-hall, at 11, div.-Hen. A. Rodgers, Sheffield, Yorkshire, newsman, Sheffield.-Joshua Booth, New Mill, near Holmfirth, YorkAug. 7 at 10, Cutlers'-hall, Sheffield, aud. ac.-Joseph Owen shire, innkeeper, July 24 at 11, Commercial-buildings, Leeds. and Sarah Owen, Sheffield, Yorkshire, merchants, Aug. 7 at-Jas. Henry Clarke, St. Andrew-road, Newington, Surrey, 10, Cutlers'-hall, Sheffield, aud. ac.; at 11, div.-Jacob New-hatter, July 18 at half-past 1, Court of Bankruptcy, London. ton, John W. Newton, and Francis J. Newton, Rotherham, Yorkshire, spirit merchants, Aug. 7 at 10, Cutlers'-hall, Sheffield, aud. ac.; at 11, div.-John A. M. Boden, Sheffield, Yorkshire, razor manufacturer, Aug. 7 at 10, District Court of Bankruptcy, Sheffield, aud. ac.; at 11, div.-Thomas Feaver, Ludgate-hill, London, mercer, Aug. 6 at 1, Court of Bankruptcy, London, fin. div.-John Frost, Grafton-street, Soho, Middlesex, goldsmith, Aug. 6 at 1, Court of Bankruptcy, London, fin. div.-Wm. Cooper, Bury St. Edmunds, Suffolk, hardwareman, Aug. 5 at 12, Court of Bankruptcy, London, div.-Edward Arnatt, Oxford, baker, Aug. 6 at half-past 1, Court of Bankruptcy, London, fin. div.-John Bulmer, Hartlepool, Durham, merchant, Aug. 7 at 1, District Court of Bankruptcy, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, fin. div.-Thos. B. Daft, Birmingham, button maker, Aug. 5 at 12, District Court of Bankruptcy, Birmingham, div.-Benj. Spencer, Nottingham, baker, Aug. 7 at 10, District Court of Bankruptcy, Birmingham, div.-John Clarke, Rich. Mitchell, Jos. Philips, and Thos. Smith, Leicester, bankers, Aug. 7 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Birmingham, div. CERTIFICATES. To be allowed, unless Cause be shewn to the contrary on or before the Day of Meeting. Wm. Cooper, Bury St. Edmund's, Suffolk, hardwareman, Aug. 5 at 12, Court of Bankruptcy, London.-Jos. Avery, Manchester-street, Manchester-square, Middlesex, dealer in plate, Aug. 5 at 12, Court of Bankruptcy, London.-John Geo. Ufford, Holloway, Middlesex, common brewer, Aug. 5 at 1, Court of Bankruptcy, London.-Richard Carlile Capleton, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, tea dealer, Aug. 6 at 12, Dstrict Court of Bankruptcy, Bristol.-Edmondson Cooban, Liverpool, common brewer, Aug. 4 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Liverpool. Wm. Kelly, Chester, common brewer, Aug. 6 at 12, District Court of Bankruptcy, Liverpool.-Wm. Edmond, Bombay, East Indies, and Thos. Edmond, Liverpool, merchants, Aug. 6 at 12, District Court of Bankruptcy, Manchester. To be allowed by the Court of Review in Bankruptcy, unless Cause be shewn to the contrary on or before Aug. 4. John Harlow, Leicester-square, Middlesex, tobacconist. Sam. Mosley Wade, Liverpool, cotton dealer.-Wm. Thompcn, Cooper's-row, Crutched-friars, and Fowke's-buildings, Great Tower-st., London, wine merchant.-John Barwise, St. Martin's-lane, Middlesex, watch maker.- Henry Fowkes, Manchester, share broker.-Jas. Knox, Bond-st., Middlesex, carpenter.-Edwin Robert Hall, Colchester, Essex, ironfounder.-Jos. Timmins, Caynham, near Ludlow, Shropshire, brickmaker.-Wm. Stearman, Princes-st., Cadogan-street, Chelsea, Middlesex, carpenter.—John Davies, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, mercer.-Chas. John Bond, Tranquil-vale, Blackheath, Kent, tailor.-Abraham Crossfield, Whitechapel-road, Middlesex, and Highland's-farm, Comp, Leybourne, Kent, hop planter. Sam. Gregory, Altrincham, Cheshire, artist, July 21 at 12, District Court of Bankruptcy, Manchester.-Cornelius Bartlett the younger, Wells, Somersetshire, labourer, Aug. 3 at 1, District Court of Bankruptcy, Bristol. Moses Webster, Derby, artist, Aug. 1 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Birmingham.-James Woolaston Butler, Walton-on-the-Hill, Lancashire, out of business, July 21 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Liverpool.-George Barlow, Manchester, baker, July 24 at 12, District Court of Bankruptcy, Manchester.Jas. Wood, Shaw, near Oldham, Lancashire, bookkeeper, July 24 at 12, District Court of Bankruptcy, Manchester.Henry Allsworth, Denton, Manchester, provision dealer, July 21 at 12, District Court of Bankruptcy, Manchester.Adelle Dumas, Stockport-moor, near Stockport, Cheshire, keeper of a lodging-house, July 21 at 12, District Court of Bankruptcy, Manchester. Saturday, July 11. Lin The following Assignees have been appointed. Further Par- Saturday, July 11. Orders have been made, vesting in the Provisional Assignee the Estates and Effects of the following Persons:— (On their own Petitions). William Ward, Tottenham-street, Tottenham-court-road, Middlesex, smith: in the Debtors Prison for London and Middlesex.-George Harrod, Turnham-green, Middlesex, cheesemonger in the Debtors Prison for London and Middlesex.John Lawrence the younger, Queen-street, Edgeware-road, and Cork-street-mews, Bond-street, Middlesex, writing desk manufacturer: in the Debtors Prison for London and Middlesex.-Robt. Hall, Little York-place, Gloucester-place, Portman-square, Middlesex, out of business: in the Debtors Prison for London and Middlesex.-Edward Evans, Curtain-road, Shoreditch, Middlesex, colourman: in the Debtors Prison for London and Middlesex.-Wm. Sires, Little Britain, Hillingdon, near Uxbridge, Middlesex, brick maker: in the Debtors Prison for London and Middlesex.-George Ede, Great Suffolk-street, Borough, Southwark, Surrey, out of business: in the Queen's Prison.-T. Shortland Norton, Park-st., Camdentown, Middlesex, carpenter: in the Debtors Prison for London and Middlesex.-James Scott, Tabernacle-walk, Finsbury, Middlesex, commission agent: in the Debtors Prison for London and Middlesex.-Thos. Lindray, Thibberton-square, Islington, Middlesex, out of business: in the Debtors Prison for London and Middlesex.-Sam. Wilson, Coal-yard, Drurylane, Middlesex, wheelwright: in the Debtors Prison for London and Middlesex.-Jacob Frankenstein, Dowling-pl., Harleyford-road, Vauxhall, Surrey, and Fish-street-hill, London, shipping agent: in the Queen's Prison.-Strickland Muggeridge, Paradise-terrace, Liverpool-road, Islington, Middlesex, wire drawer: in the Debtors Prison for London and Middlesex.-Isabella Steer, Sheffield, Yorkshire, provision agent: in York Castle.-H. Doman Hitchcock, Leicester, stainer: in the Gaol of Leicester.-Harold Youngman, Leamington Priors, Warwickshire, out of business: in the Gaol of Warwick. The following Prisoners are ordered to be brought up before the Court, in Portugal-st., on Tuesday, July 28, at 9. Philemon Price Ward, Penton-place, Walworth, Surrey, clerk.-John Tunbridge, Salmon's-lane, Limehouse, Middlesex, baker.-Stephen Reynolds, Clerkenwell-close, Middlesex, grocer.-Joseph Hale, Bethnal-green-road, Middlesex, cheesemonger.-John Brown, Farmer-street, High-street, Shadwell, Middlesex, rigger.-Arthur Beeston, Bushy-heath, Herts, vocalist.-G. Langridge Williams the elder, New West-end, Hampstead, Middlesex, builder. July 29, at the same hour and place. John Smith, College-hill, London, out of business.-Thos. Thorne, Johnson-street, Somers'-town, Middlesex, porter at the London and Birmingham Railway Station, Euston-sq.H. Wilmot Fownes, Old Paradise-row, Islington-green, Middlesex, coal dealer.-J. Drummond Baring, Rupert-st., Haymarket, Middlesex, gentleman.-J. Daly, Starr-court, Newton-street, Holborn, Middlesex, boot maker.-Jas. Augustus Lamb, Tavistock-street, Covent-garden, Middlesex, commission agent for the sale of wine.-Wm. Bestow, Vernon-place, Bagnigge-wells-road, Clerkenwell, Middlesex, milliner. Court-house, STAFFORD, (County), July 29 at 10. Henry Detheridge, Brierley-hill, Kingswinford, joiner.— Zachariah Davis the elder, Goldthorn-hill, near Wolverhampton, miner.-Thos. Timmins, Walsall, saddle tree maker. MEETING. Charles Palmer, Erdington, Birmingham, lieutenant in the Warwickshire regiment of militia, on half-pay, July 29 at 11, Reece's, Birmingham, sp. aff. FRIDAY, JULY 17. BANKRUPTS. DAVID KEMPTON, Bermondsey-street, Surrey, bed and mattrass manufacturer, dealer and chapman, July 28 at 2, and Aug. 28 at 1, Court of Bankruptcy, London: Off. Ass. Alsager; Sol. Wright, London-street, Fenchurch-street.Fiat dated July 15. ROBERT HAYES EASUM, Commercial-road East, Stepney, Middlesex, rope maker, dealer and chapman, July 24 at 2, and Aug. 28 at half-past 1, Court of Bankruptcy, London: Off. Ass. Whitmore; Sol. Church, Spital-square. -Fiat dated July 9. JOHN BENSTEAD, Fleet-street, London, hosier, dealer and chapman, (trading under the firm or style of Robert Johns & Co.), July 28 at half-past 1, and Aug. 28 at half-past 12, Court of Bankruptcy, London: Off. Ass. Alsager; Sols. Reed & Langford, Friday-street.-Fiat dated July 10. EDWARD HODGES, Circus-street, New-road, St. Maryle-bone, Middlesex, wine and brandy merchant, victualler, dealer and chapman, July 22 at 1, and Aug. 26 at 2, Court of Bankruptcy, London: Off. Ass. Belcher; Sol. Harpur, Kennington-cross, Surrey.-Fiat dated July 14. WILLIAM HUNT, High-street, Mary-le-bone, Middlesex, printer, stationer, dealer and chapman, July 24 and Sep. 1 at 11, Court of Bankruptcy, London: Off. Ass. Follett; Sols. Lawrence & Plews, Bucklersbury.-Fiat dated July CHARLES WILLIAM GRAHAM, King's Arms-yard, Coleman-street, London, merchant, (trading under the firm of Charles Graham & Co.), July 28 at 11, and Aug. 29 at 3, Court of Bankruptcy, London: Off. Ass. Green; Sol. Borradaile, King's Arms-yard.-Fiat dated July 14. 15. EDWARD BOULT, Isleworth, Middlesex, grocer and cheesemonger, July 29 and Aug. 26 at 1, Court of Bankruptcy, London: Off. Ass. Belcher; Sol. Dods, 102, St. Martin's-lane.-Fiat dated July 10. WILLIAM HENRY BROAD, Stourport, Worcestershire, maltster, July 31 and Aug. 25 at 10, District Court of Bankruptcy, Birmingham: Off. Ass. Valpy; Sols. Watson, Stourport; Hodgson, Birmingham.-Fiat dated July 14. ROBERT COOK, Gainsborough, Lincolnshire, surgeon and apothecary, Aug. 12 and 26 at 10, Town-hall, Kingstonupon-Hull: Off. Ass. Kynaston; Sols. Galloway, Hull; Bell, Bedford-row, London.-Fiat dated July 11. RICHARD HODSON, Everton, Nottinghamshire, ironmonger, horse dealer, farmer, dealer and chapman, July 31 and Aug. 21 at 11, Cutler's-hall, Sheffield: Off. Ass. Freeman; Sols. Plaskitt, Gainsborough ; Scott & Co., Lincoln'sinn-fields, London.-Fiat dated July 6. EDWARD HANKS, Briggate, Leeds, Yorkshire, grocer and tea dealer, dealer and chapman, July 30 and Aug. 20 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Leeds: Off. Ass. Young; Sols. Upton & Clapham, Leeds; Wiglesworth & Co., Gray's Inn, London.-Fiat dated July 3, JOHN SEATON, Wink-house, Frickley - cum - Clayton, Yorkshire, farmer, horse dealer, and dealer and chapman, July 30 and Aug. 20 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Leeds: Off. Ass. Young; Sols. Sheardown, Doncaster, Yorkshire; Cariss, Leeds; Mitten, Southampton-buildings, London.-Fiat dated July 11. ROBERT PRIESTLEY, Manchester and Ardwick, Lancashire, grocer, flour dealer, and retailer of beer, dealer and chapman, July 28 and Aug. 18 at 12, District Court of Bankruptcy, Manchester: Off. Ass. Pott; Sols. Law, Manchester; Gregory & Co., Bedford-row, London.-Fiat dated July 2. JOSEPH LAWRENCE BUTLER, Liverpool, coal merchant, dealer and chapman, July 27 and Aug. 18 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Liverpool: Off. Ass. Bird; Sols. Matthews, Liverpool; Keightley & Co., Chancerylane, London.-Fiat dated June 27. MEETINGS. Edw. S. Harley, Birmingham, grocer, Aug. 18 at 10, District Court of Bankruptcy, Birmingham, last ex.-Dan. Antrobus, Audley, Staffordshire, apothecary, Aug. 4 at 10, District Court of Bankruptcy, Birmingham, last ex.-Samuel Dethick and Thos. R. Kay, Newton-heath, near Manchester, common brewers, July 28 at 12, District Court of Bankruptcy, Manchester, last ex.-Randle Bower, Heyrod and Black Rockmills, near Stalybridge, Lancashire, cotton spinner, July 29 at 12, District Court of Bankruptcy, Manchester, last ex.-Edu. H. Brace and Jas. Allen, Mitre-court, Milk-st., Cheapside, London, warehousemen, July 31 at 11, Court of Bankruptcy, London, aud. ac.-Jas. Meek and Geo. Gill, Liverpool, merchants, Aug. 7 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Liverpool, aud. ac.-Hen. Delamain, Liverpool, merchant, Aug. 7 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Liverpool, aud. ac.—Ben. Thomas, Liverpool, merchant, Aug. 7 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Liverpool, aud. ac.-Thomas I. Hellawell, James Nortcliffe, and John B. Hellawell, Thornhill Briggs, Halifax, Yorkshire, dyers, Aug. 7 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Leeds, aud. ac. and div.-Jos. Woodhead and John Woodhead, Bradford, Yorkshire, worsted stuff manufac turers, Aug. 8 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Leeds, aud. ac.; Aug. 11 at 11, div.-Wm. Chaloner, Lincoln, tailor, Aug. 12 at 10, Town-hall, Kingston-upon-Hull, aud. ac.Henry West, Burgh, Lincolnshire, grocer, Aug. 12 at 10, Town-hall, Kingston-upon-Hull, aud. ac. and div.-Thomas Bousfield, Lincoln, ironmonger, Aug. 12 at 10, Town-hall, Kingston-upon-hull, aud. ac. and div.-Rich. Lees, Wolverhampton, Staffordshire, wholesale ironmonger, Aug. 11 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Birmingham, aud. ac.-Wm. Perry, Wolverhampton, Staffordshire, iron founder, Aug. 15 at 12, District Court of Bankruptcy, Birmingham, aud. ac.; Aug. 20 at 12, div.-Jos. Marriage the younger, Moulsham, Chelmsford, Essex, miller, Aug. 10 at 1, Court of Bankruptcy, London, div.-Chas. John Bond, Tranquil-vale, Blackheath, Kent, tailor, Aug. 7 at half-past 1, Court of Bankruptcy, London, div.-Thos. L. Evill and Thos. Dowglass, Vigo-st., Middlesex, cloth manufacturers, Aug. 10 at 12, Court of Bankruptcy, London, div.-John Reay and John R. Reay, Mark-lane, London, wine merchants, Aug. 8 at 2, Court of |