the chose in action; he has only the right to reduce it into possession, if it be in a state capable of being so reduced. Reduction into possession is a necessary and indispensable preliminary to the husband's having any right of property in himself, or to his being able to convey any right of property to another." (1 Russ. 66). "The current of authorities shewing that the court will not receive the wife's consent to part with her reversionary property, bears strongly on the question. If the assignment of the husband passes the interest to the assignee, and destroys her legal right by survivorship, all that could remain to her would be an equity to have a settlement; and there can be no reason why she should not be permitted to extinguish, by her consent, that equity, as completely as if it were an equity attaching upon property in possession. The court, however, will not take her consent while the fund remains in reversion; and the reason which it has assigned for this refusal is, that it will not prejudice the future right which the wife may have by survivorship.' (1 Russ. 28). the rest followed of course. But was the entire interest, even the life interest assigned by M. G. Edgar, reducible into possession? In the first place, merger is, as the Vice-Chancellor admits, out of the question. Merger is a technical consequence of certain legal incidents of tenure, and is wholly inapplicable to choses in action, or even to equitable interests in land. If land is limited at law to A. for life, remainder to B. for life, and A. conveys his life estate to B., his executors, administrators, and assigns, the estate so conveyed is merged, and B.'s executors or assigns have no title after his death, though A. be living. But if an equitable interest in land or in personal property be so limited and dealt with, there is no merger, and no destruction of the first life interest. There is no such thing as the merger of one equitable interest in another. If trustees are directed to apply the income of a fund for the maintenance of A. until he attains the age of twenty-five, and on his attaining that age, and not before, to transfer the fund to him; A., as soon as he is of age, can compel a transfer of the fund. Why? Not because such a The judgment in Purdew v. Jackson has always transfer would be in accordance with the terms of the been considered to have settled the law on this subject trust, but because the trust gives him a vested interest upon its true grounds. It appears, then, that the pro- in the fund and in its produce; and an adult man cantection of the reversionary choses in action of a married not be restrained from dealing as he likes with his woman from the acts of her husband and herself, is vested interests. He obtains the fund at twenty-one, merely a consequence of the general rule, both of law because he is then under no disability, and in defiance of and of equity, that her choses in action remain in her the special terms of the trust. If a trustee is directed until they are reduced into possession by her husband. to pay the dividends of a fund to A. for life, and after A legal chose in action is reducible into possession his death to transfer the fund to B., and A. assigns his when it may be recovered in an action; an equitable interest to B., the trustee may go on paying the divichose in action is reducible into possession when the dends to B., or, at B.'s request, he may transfer the fund trustee is bound to pay it. The husband may recover to him; but in the latter case he will not be obeying his wife's legal chose in action as soon as it is due, the terms of his trust, but he will be obeying the diwithout her concurrence. He may recover her equit-rection of a person on whom the trust and subsequent able chose in action, when it is due, without her concurrence, but subject to her right to insist on having a settlement out of it. If he can arrange with the trustee out of court, the wife, in order to enforce her right to a settlement, must move; if he is obliged to go to the court, the court will not interfere until the wife's settlement is provided for, or waived by her consent in court. This is the only case in which the wife's consent in court is taken, or can have any operation: the specific and only object of that ceremony is to waive her right to a settlement. A married woman can, by an appropriate assurance, deal with her interests in real property; she can deal with her separate property as if she were unmarried; she can waive her equity to a settlement out of her equitable choses in action; she can exercise a power expressly given to her; these are the only cases in which a married woman has any power to do, or consent to, any act affecting her property. Accordingly, in Purdew v. Jackson, Honner v. Morton, (3 Russ. 65), and the other cases where the husband and wife joined in attempting to assign her reversionary choses in action, the court took no notice of the wife's part in the transaction, but treated it as the act of the husband alone. events have conferred the right of dominion over every part of the property. Where the cestui que trust is a married woman, the case is entirely different; the trustee must literally perform the terms of the trust, because the cestui que trust is incapable of authorising him to deviate from those terms in the minutest particular. If the trust were, to pay the dividends to Mrs. H. until she should attain the age of twenty-five, and then to transfer the fund to her, could it be contended that the court would allow the fund to be transferred before she attained that age? Would it not be tantamount to a restriction on alienation until twenty-five? Yet the whole interest would be in her. Would not the case be the same if the direction were to pay the dividends to the wife until the death of A., and then to transfer them to her? Would it not be even stronger if the trust were to pay the dividends to her during her husband's life, and after his death to transfer the fund to her? Again, if the dividends were given to the husband himself for life, and the fund to the wife after his death, would the husband's appointment to a trustee for his wife of that which would be his after the appointment quite as much as it was be fore, be allowed to affect her reversion, or the duty of So far there is no dispute as to the law. Let us the trustees? Can it make any difference, that the life see how it applies to the case of Hall v. Hugonin. interest is given to a stranger, who afterwards assigns it There trustees were directed to pay the dividends of to the wife? Would not, in each of these cases, the a sum of stock to M. G. Edgar and his assigns during trustee be justified in following the terms of the trusthis life, and after his decease to transfer one moiety paying the dividends only until the arrival of the time of the fund to Mrs. Hall. M. G. Edgar having as-appointed for transferring the fund? Can there be an signed his life interest to Mrs. Hall, the court held option in the trustee to choose between two courses so that the entire interest in the trust-fund became im- materially different in their consequences to his cestui mediately reducible into possession by Mr. Hall, sub- que trust? If not, can the husband have such an opject to his wife's equity to a settlement, which she tion? That the wife can interfere is not pretended. waived in court. It is not," said the Vice-Chan- When a trustee is directed to transfer a fund to a particellor, "a question of merger, but whether a married cular person at a certain period, the authority of that woman has not, at the time of petitioning, both inter-person alone can justify the transfer at a different ests, as representing the life interest of some one else, period; and here she is not in a capacity to give any and also her own interest in reversion." such authority. If the entire interest was reducible into possession, If it is said, that, in the case of a prior life. interest, the transfer of the fund postponed merely for the sake of securing such life interest, and that the moment that obstacle is removed the fund may be transferred, how are those cases answered in which the tenant for life has removed the difficulty by concurring in the application, and yet the court has refused to sanction the transfer,-cases which the Vice-Chancellor expressly recognises: as in Seaman v. Duill and Richards v. Chambers, (10 Ves. 580), and Fraser v. Baillie, (1 Bro. C. C. 518), where the life interest was originally limited to the husband, and the application was for a transfer to him; and in Pickard v. Roberts, (3 Madd. 384), where the husband acquired the life interest by assignment, and applied for a transfer to himself; and Box v. Box, (2 Con. & Laws. 605; 1 Drury, 42), where the tenant for life was a stranger, and the application was for a transfer to him. In none of these cases was there any obstacle to the immediate transfer of the fund, save only the fact, that the time appointed for such transfer by the trust had not arrived. Even if there were no force in the above observations, we are at a loss to see how the objection can be answered, that the wife is at liberty when she becomes discoverte to disavow the whole transaction, and disclaim the insidious gift which was made to her. Her consent in court, it is admitted, cannot bind her, except to waive that equity which is the creature of the court-her equity to a settlement. out the interference of the court. For, the principle of that case is, that an assignment of the prior interest or interests to the feme renders the fund immediately transferable, and the trustees are not bound to regard the wife's equity, but may transfer to the husband, if she does not apply to the court to stop them. G.S. COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH. sittings in banc after term, said: The court will, on Nov. 25.-Lord Denman, C. J., with reference to the Monday the 30th, take the case in the Crown Paper which has been partly heard; and then go into the New Trial Paper, taking first the case of Bainbridge. Bourne, which has been partly heard. On the other days, the court will proceed with the Special Paper, and on one of them will take the case of Reg. v. Arnaud. COURT OF EXCHEQUER. MICHAELMAS TERM.-10 VICTORIÆ.-Nov. 25. This Court will, at the Sittings already appointed to be held on Saturday, the 12th day of December next, proceed to give Judgment in all motions now standing for Judgment, and also in all causes now standing for Judgment in the New Trial Paper. Read in open Court.-E. BENNETT. GRAY'S INN. BY THE COURT. There is another way of putting the objection to the decision in Hall v. Hugonin, which we conceive to be unanswerable. It is settled, that when a life interest in a chose in action not merely commensurate with the coverture belongs to a married woman, the husband has no power to dispose of it beyond the coverture. Being a mere periodical payment, it is not reducible into possession at all by anticipation; the husband, being under no At a Pension held the 24th day of November, 1846, disability, may dispose of it by anticipation to the extent of his interest, (i. e. during the coverture), but not beThe Masters of the Bench of Gray's Inn have reyond. (Fraser v. Baillie, I Bro. C. C. 518; Stiffe v. Eve- solved to establish a Lectureship of Real Property and ritt, 1 My. & C. 41; Lee v. Young, 2 You. & C. C. C. Conveyancing Devises and Bequests; and have ordered, 535*. See Whitmarsh v. Robertson, 1 You. & C. C. C.715; that the sum of 3007. per annum, for three years, be Box v. Box, 1 Drury, 66; Scarborough v. Borman, 4 My. paid by the Society, by way of endowment, to such & C. 383). It is, indeed, self-evident, that a life inter-person as the Bench shall elect to deliver the Lectures, est, standing alone, cannot be reduced into possession. Even a life interest confined to the period of the coverture is not reducible into possession. The husband may assign it, or release it, or, by purchasing the reversion, entitle himself to a present transfer of the fund; but it is out of his power to reduce the life interest, per se, into possession. Now, in Hall v. Hugonin, Mrs. Hall having become entitled to M. G. Edgar's life interest, which, it is admitted, did not merge, it was necessary that the trustees should retain the fund in order to preserve her contingent interest in the dividends during the remainder of the life of M. G. Edgar, in case Mr. Hall should die first; and if there was a necessity for keeping the fund in the hands of the_trustees, it was not then reducible into possession. But, it is said, the life interest was united to the reversion. Surely, not united more intimately than the two parts of the life interest, which we have seen the courts have recognised as separable, were united. On the whole, it is submitted that the decision in Hall v. Hugonin cannot be sustained without entirely overturning the settled rules of the court with respect to a married woman's choses in action. If Hall v. Hugonin is sustainable, the reversionary equitable choses of married women may be got at with "There is here an interest, neither represented nor capable of being represented, namely, the interest of Mrs. Lee, in the event of her surviving Mr. Lee, in the income of the fund during her life after his decease." Per Sir J. Knight Bruce, V. C., 2 You. & C. C. C. 535. to begin from the day of his appointment. The Benchers therefore invite gentlemen desirous to accept the Office of Lecturer to send in testimonials of their competency and fitness, addressed to the Treasurer, at the Steward's Office, in South-square, Gray'sinn, on or before the last day of Hilary Term next. The Benchers are desirous, that, in addition to the Lectures, some further means should be adopted to secure the attention, and to ascertain the proficiency of the Students. The discussion of some appointed subjects, in which the Students should be invited to join, subject to proper regulations, opportunities afforded to Students of stating and of obtaining from the Lecturer the solution of difficulties, and examinations in the subjects of the previous Lectures and discussions, suggest themselves as means by the judicious application of which the end in view may be attained. The Benchers express, however, no opinion as to the best course to be adopted; but they suggest these matters to explain distinctly their object in establishing this Lectureship, and more particularly to induce each Candidate to send in such a plan of the course of instruc tion he proposes to adopt as may enable the Benchers to form a judgment of its probable efficiency. THOMAS GRIFFITH, Steward. MASTER IN CHANCERY.-The Lord Chancellor has appointed Christopher Carter Foottit, of Newark-uponTrent, in the county of Nottingham, Gent., to be s Master Extraordinary in the high Court of Chancery. GENTLEMEN CALLED TO THE BAR. The following Gentlemen have been admitted to the degree of Barrister at Law: LINCOLN'S INN, Nov. 19.-Arthur Currey, Esq.; John L. Griffith P. Lewis, Esq.; John Walter, jun., Esq.; Robert Jones, Esq.; Charles Gifford, Esq.; George Druce, Esq.; Peter Robert Hammond, Esq. Nov. 24. -Robert Eyre Todd, Esq.; Francis Edward Guise, Esq., M.A.; George Chance, Esq., M.A.; Thomas Englesby Rogers, Esq., M.A.; Paul Augustine Kingdon, Esq., M.A.; Alfred Martineau, Esq., M.A.; Hon. George Denman, Esq., M.A.; Charles Turner Simpson, Esq., M.A. Wednesday .... Dec. 1 Motions. ........ Friday At the Judicial Committee. 2 3 4 5 At the Rolls. Monday........ 7 Motions. MIDDLE TEMPLE, Nov. 6.-Dr. Augustus Frederic INNER TEMPLE, Nov. 20.-George Hibbert Deffell, GRAY'S INN, Nov. 18.-Timms Augustine Sargood, Esq.; Robert Rouiere Pearce, Esq. Tuesday ....... Saturday. Tuesday At the Judicial Committee. 15 ....... 16 At the Rolls. 177 ...... ......... 18 Thursday Pleas, Demurrers, Causes, Further Di- ........ .... Saturday the 12th and Saturday the 19th December, at the sitting of the court. Notice.-Consent Petitions must be presented, and copies left with the Secretary, on or before the Thursday preceding the Saturday on which it is intended they should be heard. Vice-Chancellors' Courts. Before the VICE-CHANCELLOR OF ENGLAND, at .... Tuesday Dec. 1 First Seal.-Motions. .... 21 Pleas, Demurrers, Exceptions, Causes, 3) and Further Directions. 4(Petition-day). - Unopposed Short Causes, and Causes. first, Pleas, Demurrers, Exceptions, Causes, and Further Directions. 7 Second Seal.-Motions. Pleas, Demurrers, Exceptions, Causes, and Further Directions. 11 {(Petition-day). - Unopposed Thursday 10 Friday Wednesday Friday. ..... ....... ......... " 4 { (Petition-day).—Unopposed only and Appeals. {Second Seal.-Appeal Motions and Monday.... 11(Petition-day).-Unopposed only and Monday........ 14{Third Seal.-Appeal Motions and Ap- Monday... Friday Saturday ....... 12 Appeals. peals. ...... Tuesday. .... first, Before VICE-CHancellor KNiGHT BRUCE, at Lincoln's Inn. Wednesday .... Warwickshire, at Birmingham, Thursday, April 8. 3{ Pleas, Demurrers, Exceptions, Causes, Leicestershire, at Leicester, Tuesday, April 13. Further Directions. 4 (Petition-day).-Petitions and Ditto. 7 Second Seal.-Motions. 8 [Pleas; DemurreD; Ectieptions, Causes, and Further 9 Bankrupt Petitions and Ditto. Thursday........ 10 Pleas, Demurrers, Exceptions, Causes, Wednesday Directions. 11 (Petition-day).-Petitions and Ditto. {Pleas, Demers, Ectiontions, Causes, 15 ........ Tuesday.... Wednesday .... 16 Thursday... 17 ....... and Further Bankrupt Petitions and Ditto. and Directions. 18 (Petition-day).-Petitions and Ditto. Brecknockshire, at Brecon, Wednesday, March 3. Cardiganshire, at Cardigan, Monday, March 8. Pembrokeshire, at Haverfordwest, (Town and County), Wed. nesday, March 10. Glamorganshire, at Swansea, Friday, March 12. Glamorganshire, at Cardiff, Monday, March 15. Monmouthshire, at Monmouth, Wednesday, March 17. Gloucestershire, at Gloucester, (City and County), Friday, Somersetshire, at Bath, Monday, March 22. Cause Petitions, (unopposed first), Cornwall, at Bodmin, Tuesday, March 30. Short Causes, and Causes. 7 Second Seal.-Motions and Causes. 8 9Pleas, Demurrers, Exceptions, Causes, 10 11 12 2{ 14 15 and Further Directions. Cause Petitions, (unopposed first), Short Causes, and Causes. Wednesday 16 Pleas, Demurrers, Exceptions, Causes, ......... Thursday. Monday.. ....... 17 and Further Directions. Devonshire, at Exeter Castle, (City and County), Thursday, Southampton, (Town and County), Thursday, April 8. HOME CIRCUIT. WILLIAM JOHN LAW, Esq., Commissioner. Kent, at Maidstone, Saturday, March 6. Cause Petitions, (unopposed first), Canterbury, (City and County), Tuesday, March 9. 19Short Causes, and Causes. 21 Fourth Seal.-Motions and Causes. Suffolk, at Ipswich, Thursday, March 11. Norfolk, at Castle of Norwich, (City and County), Monday, Norfolk, at Lynn, Wednesday, March 17. Suffolk, at Bury St. Edmund's, Thursday, March 18. March 26. Nottinghamshire, (Town and County), Monday, March 29. Kent, at Dover, Wednesday, March 10, NORTHERN CIRCUIT. CHARLES PHILLIPS, Esq., Commissioner. Yorkshire, at Sheffield, Thursday, Feb. 11. Kingston-upon-Hull, (Town and County), Thursday, Feb. 18. Yorkshire, at Richmond, Tuesday, Feb. 23. Cumberland, at Carlisle, Monday, March 1. Cheshire, at Castle of Chester, (City and County), Thursday, London Gazettes. TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 24. BANKRUPTS. HENRY NEWTON, Northumberland-street, Strand, Mid- MEETINGS. Neville Smith, Thos. L. Holt, and John Neale, Fleet-st., London, printers, Dec. 4 at 1, Court of Bankruptcy, London, last ex. Hen. Charles, Manchester, commission agent, Dec. 5 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Manchester, last ex.Fred. Markby, Peterborough, Northamptonshire, common brewer, Dec. 14 at 11, Court of Bankruptcy, London, aud. ac.— →Stephen Unwin the elder, Fisher Unwin, and Stephen Unwin the younger, Coggeshall, Essex, woolstaplers, Dec. 16 at 2, Court of Bankruptcy, London, aud. ac.-Th. Marsden the younger, Northallerton, Yorkshire, mercer, Dec. 17 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Leeds, aud. ac.-Jos. E. West and Hen. Tennant, Leeds, Yorkshire, stockbrokers, Dec. 17 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Leeds, aud. ac.-Robert Oxtoby, Wansford, and William C. Oxtoby, Great Driffield, Yorkshire, millers, Dec. 16 at 10, Town-hall, Kingston-upon-. JOSEPH GASS, Colchester, Essex, draper, dealer and Hull, aud. ac.; Dec. 23 at 10, div.—Jas. Evans, Bristol, and chapman, Dec. 4 at 11, and Jan. 16 at 12, Court of Bank-Weston-super-Mare, Somersetshire, silk mercer, Dec. 28 at ruptcy, London: Off. Ass. Follett; Sols. Jenkins & Co., 12, District Court of Bankruptcy, Bristol, aud. ac.; Dec. 29 29, Lombard-street.-Fiat dated Nov. 3. at 11, div.-P. Protheroe and M. D. Protheroe, Bristol, merSAMUEL GARROD, Church-street, Hackney, Middlesex, chants, Dec. 22 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Bristol, surgeon and apothecary, Dec. 2 and Jan. 16 at 11, Court aud. ac.; Dec. 24 at 11, div. joint and sep. est.-J. Coombe, of Bankruptcy, London: Off. Ass. Green; Sol. Wilkins, Walcot, Bath, currier, Dec. 15 at 11, District Court of Bank. Gracechurch-street.-Fiat dated Nov. 18. ruptcy, Bristol, aud. ac.-Jas. Jay Eva, Redruth, Cornwall, DAVID WORTHINGTON, Silver-street, Stepney, Middle- baker, Dec. 16 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Exeter, sex, out of business, Dec. 11 and Jan. 15 at 12, Court of aud. ac.; Dec. 17 at 11, div.-Wm. Brown, Atherstone, Bankruptcy, London: Off. Ass. Groom; Sol. Smith, 6, Warwickshire, ironmonger, Dec. 17 at 12, District Court of Finsbury-terrace, City-road.-Fiat dated Nov. 19. Bankruptcy, Birmingham, pr. d.—Thos. Wright, Edinburgh, JAMES SMITH, Edmonton, Middlesex, brewer, Dec. 9 at and Rich. Burgess and Ralph Taylor, Tunstall, Staffordshire, half-past 11, and Jan. 15 at 11, Court of Bankruptcy, Lon- earthenware manufacturers, Dec. 17 at 11, District Court of don: Off. Ass. Edwards; Sol. Burbidge, 88, Hatton-garden. Bankruptcy, Birmingham, aud. ac.-Wm. Timmis, Longton, -Fiat dated Nov. 18. Staffordshire, draper, Dec. 17 at 12, District Court of BankJOHN GREEN, Park-terrace, Maize-hill, Greenwich, Kent, ruptcy, Birmingham, aud. ac.-John Acton, St. Chad, Lichlodging-house keeper, dealer and chapman, Dec. 8 at half- field, farmer, Jan. 12 at 10, District Court of Bankruptcy, past 1, and Jan. 15 at half-past 11, Court of Bankruptcy, Birmingham, aud. ac.-Henry Deverill, Stoke-upon-Trent, London: Off. Ass. Edwards; Sol. Sadgrove, Mark-lane. Staffordshire, and Congleton, Cheshire, corn factor, Dec. 15 Fiat dated Nov. 20. at 10, District Court of Bankruptcy, Birmingham, aud. ac.➡ JOSEPH COLES, Strand, Middlesex, tobacconist, dealer Wm. Boulton the younger, and Wm. F. Palmer, Stafford, and chapman, Dec. 9 at half-past 2, and Jan. 12 at half- Staffordshire, builders, Jan. 12 at 10, District Court of Bankpast 1, Court of Bankruptcy, London: Off. Ass. Groom; ruptcy, Birmingham, aud. ac.-Jas. Ward, Manchester, iron Sol. Lane, Falcon-square, Aldersgate-street.-Fiat dated founder, Dec. 17 at 12, District Court of Bankruptcy, ManNov. 13. chester, aud. ac.; Dec. 18 at 12, fin. div.-Charles Harwar, HENRY FLOWER, North-buildings, Finsbury-circus, Lon- Serle's-place, Carey-street, Lincoln's-inn, Middlesex, paper don, publisher, bookseller, dealer and chapman, Dec. 2 at merchant, Dec. 17 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Manhalf-past 12, and Dec. 30 at 1, Court of Bankruptcy, Lon-chester, aud. ac.; Dec. 18 at 12, div.-Geo. Edw. Schultz don: Off. Ass. Bell; Sol. Shaw, Furnival's-inn.- Fiat and Hen. W. Carr, Liverpool, sharebrokers, Dec. 15 at 12, dated Nov. 23. District Court of Bankruptcy, Liverpool, aud. ac.; Dec. 18 WILLIAM CLAY and JAMES CLAY, Sowerby-bridge, at 12, div. of H. W. Carr.-James M. Gardner, Liverpool, Halifax, Yorkshire, woollen manufacturers, Dec. 7 and 28 wine merchant, Dec. 16 at 12, District Court of Bankruptcy, at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Leeds: Off. Ass. Liverpool, aud. ac.-Jos. Froste and Isaah Ashlin, Liverpool, Freeman; Sols. Holroyd, Halifax; Courtenay, Leeds; merchants, Dec. 16 at half-past 11, District Court of BankJacques & Co., Ely-place, London.-Fiat dated Nov. 17. ruptcy, Liverpool, aud. ac. joint est. and sep. est. of Joseph JAMES MAY, Redruth, Cornwall, stationer, printer, dealer Froste.-Hen. Cooke, Liverpool, painter, Dec. 16 at 12, Disand chapman, Dec. 8 and 28 at 11, District Court of Bank-trict Court of Bankruptcy, Liverpool, aud. ac.-Sam. Highruptcy, Exeter: Off. Ass. Hernaman; Sols. Coode & Co., St. Austle; Stogdon, Exeter.-Fiat dated Nov. 16. JAMES WALTON, Leeds, Yorkshire, tailor and draper, dealer and chapman, Dec. 7 and Jan. 1 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Leeds: Off. Ass. Hope; Sols. Tempest, Leeds; Cariss, Leeds; Williamson & Co., Gray's-inn, London.-Fiat dated Nov. 20. field, Birkenhead, Cheshire, merchant, Dec. 16 at 12, District Court of Bankruptcy, Liverpool, aud. ac.-Robert Jones, Liverpool, boot maker, Dec. 16 at 12, District Court of Bankruptcy, Liverpool, aud. ac.-Richard Allerton, Bootle-cumLinacre, Lancashire, wheelwright, Dec. 16 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Liverpool, aud. ac.-John Casson, Liverpool, corn merchant, Dec. 16 at half-past 11, District RICHARD CRIPPS LHOYDS, Liverpool, painter, plumber, Court of Bankruptcy, Liverpool, aud. ac.-John Barf, Liand glazier, dealer and chapman, Dec. 3 and 31 at 11, Dis-verpool, merchant, Dec. 16 at 11, District Court of Banktrict Court of Bankruptcy, Liverpool: Off. Ass. Morgan; ruptcy, Liverpool, aud. ac.—Rev. Roger Clough, BathafamSols. Curry & Co., Liverpool; Vincent, King's-bench- park, Llanrhydd, Rich. B. Clough, Glanywern, Llandyrnog, walk, Temple, London.-Fiat dated Nov. 18. Dav. Mason, Astraducha, Llanrhaiadr Cunmuch, and Rev. JAMES FORD, Birmingham, hosier, dealer and chapman, J. L. Jones, Plas Madoc, Llandoget, Denbighshire, bankers, Dec. 5 and Jan. 12 at half-past 10, District Court of Bank- Dec. 16 at 11, aud. ac.-John Pestell, Beeston, Sandy, Bedruptcy, Birmingham: Off. Ass. Christie; Sols. Hodgson, fordshire, corn factor, Dec. 16 at 12, Court of Bankruptcy, Birmingham; Sherwood, London.-Fiat dated Nov. 16. London, fin. div.-Jos. Plowman, Oxford, ironmonger, Dec. JOSEPH NICHOLLS, Edgbaston, Warwickshire, stone 16 at 12, Court of Bankruptcy, London, fin. div.-Mary mason, builder, dealer and chapman, Dec. 5 and Jan. 12 Anne Abercrombie and Wm. H. Abercrombie, Goodge-st., at 10, District Court of Bankruptcy, Birmingham: Off. Tottenham-court-road, Middlesex, brass founders, Dec. 15 at Ass. Valpy; Sol. W. H. Reece, Birmingham.—Fiat dated 12, Court of Bankruptcy, 'London, fin. div.—Thos. Howell, Nov. 18. Queen's-head-passage, Newgate-st., London, tavern keeper, THOMAS LOWIS, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, laceman and Dec. 15 at 1, Court of Bankruptcy, London, fin. div.-Ben. hosier, (trading under the firm of T. Lowis & Co.), Dec. 4 B. King, Fish-street-hill, London, stationer, Dec. 15 at halfat 12, and Jan. 8 at 1, District Court of Bankruptcy, New- past 1, Court of Bankruptcy, London. fin. div.-G. Gandell castle-upon-Tyne: Off. Ass. Wakley; Sols. Griffith & and Jas. B. Higgs, Charlotte-row, Mansion-house, London, Crighton, Newcastle-upon-Tyne; Reed & Langford, Friday- bill brokers, Dec. 15 at half-past 12, Court of Bankruptcy, street, Cheapside, London.-Fiat dated Nov. 18. London, fin. div.-Melchor Lopez, Crutched-friars, London, |