...is exerted exclusively for the benefit of the individual. In fact, our author says, plainly : — " Natural Selection will never produce in a being anything...Selection acts solely by and for the good of each." — p. 179. Yet, on the same page he says, — " But Natural Selection can and does often produce structures...

...exerted exclusively for the benefit of the individual. In fact, our author says, plainly : — . " Natural Selection will never produce in a being anything...Selection acts solely by and for the good of each." — p. 179. Yet, on the same page he says, — " But Natural Selection can and does often produce structures...

...produce in a being any structure more injurious than beneficial to that bring, for natural Hection rets solely by and for the good of each. No organ will be formed, as Palcy has remarked, for the purpose of causing pain or for doing an injury to its possessor. If a fair...

...selection will never produce in a being any structure more injurious than beneficial to that being, for natural selection acts solely by and for the good of each." The distinguished geologist, Professor Shaler, of Harvard University, has receded from the position...

...selection will never produce in a being any structure more injurious than beneficial to that being, for natural selection acts solely by and for the good of each." The distinguished geologist, Professor Shaler, of Harvard University, has receded from the position...

...evidences and interprets a theory of anaphylaxis in the light of organic evolution. He quotes Darwin, "Natural selection will never produce in a being anything injurious to itself." This principle is here ratified when \ve note that the injurious substances are alien proteids. We...

...selection will never produce in a being any structure more injurious than beneficial to that being, for natural selection acts solely by and for the good of each." Would a drone go along with that? Who or what assigned the drone his lethal role? If not unique in...

...evidence of the permanence of species and their separate divine creation. Since Darwin was arguing that "natural selection will never produce in a being anything...selection acts solely by and for the good of each" (Origin, p. 229), he needed to account for infertility in some other way. He begins by making distinctions:...

...[should be] ... useful to the possessor'; natural selection 'will never produce anything in a being injurious to itself, for natural selection acts solely by and for the good of each' (Darwin 1859, pp. 485-6, p. 201; see also eg pp. 84, 86, 95, 199, 233, 459, 485-6). This rules out...

...he said, "will never produce in a being any structure more injurious than beneficial to that being, for natural selection acts solely by and for the good of each." For the word "being" we would now substitute "the genes of a being." But the concept of genes was not...