TABLE OF CASES REPORTED. Cases of which only an abstract has been given appear in italics. (Cal.). 125 Borgman v. Omaha & St. L. R. Co., 615 193 395 Allen, Colorado Cent. R. Co. v., Anderson, Philadelphia, Wilming- ton & Baltimore R. Co. v., (Md.) 345 Arkansas Midland R. Co. v. Can- Ash v. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co., Brazzil, International & Great Northern R. Co. v., (Tex.)..... 437 Brown, Omaha & Republican Val- 676 Burrell v. Gowen, (Pa.). Atlantic & North Carolina R. Co., 402 Babcock v. Old Colony R. Co., (Mass.) 563 Badgerow v. Grand Trunk R. Co., Baker v. Manhattan R. Co., (N. Y.) 378 273 ..... 465 .148, 166 610 Canadian Pacific R. Co., LeMay Central R. of Georgia v. Ryals, (Ga.) 647 ..504, 505 Cherokee Nation v. Southern Kan- sas R. Co., (U. S.)................... Cheshire Lines Committee, Wins- ford Local Board v., (Eng.).... 274 City R. Co., Cory v., (Mo.).... Chicago City R. Co. v. Pelletier, (Ill.) Chicago, K. & N. R. Co. v. Cook, 179 v. Palmer, (Kan.),.. 182 Cincinnati, N. O. & T. R. Co. v. Colorado Cent. R. Co. v. Allen, 193 618 Colorado Eastern R. Co. v. Union Commonwealth v. Louisville Bridge Compton, Gulf, Colorado & Santa Hudson River R. Co. (N. Y.)... Kansas City R. Co., (Mo.)...... 183 Cottchett v. Savannah & T. R. Co., Council Grove, O. C. & O. R. Co. v. 378 Everts, Stewart v., (Wis.). . 313 Fort Worth & N. O. R. Co. v. 179 595 Irelson v. Southern Pacific R. Co., 319 Hagins v. Cape Fear & Y. V. R. Hall, Gainesville, H. & W. R. Co. Hanford v. St. Paul & Duluth R. Harper v. Newport News & M. V. R. Co., (Ky.).. Karshner, Armstrong v., (Ohio.). 238 Northern R. Co. v., (Tex.).... 607 205 Kentucky Central R. Co. v. Mc- 653 Kentucky & Indiana Bridge Co. v. Harrison v. Fink, (C. C.)......416, 417 (Wash.) Kohler v. Pennsylvania R. Co., |